Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Killed by Cops: Police Shootings Run Rampant

By Jessica Hoffmann, ColorLines. Posted December 21, 2007.


The Phoenix metropolitan area is the most dangerous in the nation for Latinos.
Advertisement

This article is part of a series from ColorLines and The Chicago Reporter. In a joint national investigation, the publications found that Blacks are overrepresented and Latinos are a rising number of those fatally shot by police.

It was hot and quiet in Mesa, Arizona, as a crowd gathered outside the headquarters of the police department on Aug. 25, 2007. On this day in 2003, the parents of 15-year-old Mario Madrigal Jr. called the police in a panic because their oldest son was threatening to kill himself with a kitchen knife. Within hours, they found themselves watching helplessly as Mario Jr. was shot and killed by police officers, who say he had threatened them with the knife.

Four years later, about 100 people, most of them wearing black T-shirts, joined the family in insisting that Mario was a threat to no one but himself that night and that he was killed by a police force ill-equipped to engage with mental-health crises and Mesa's growing Latino community. "We need changes in how officers approach us Hispanics," Mario Madrigal Sr. said. "They should be much more educated [in] knowing our culture...and understand that we are human beings."

No one from the Mesa Police Department emerged to face the crowd. The crowd was literally speaking to a brick wall as they chanted "justice for Mario" and cheered Mario Sr.'s insistent statement, "The case is not closed." Although the Mesa PD's internal investigation cleared the officers who shot Mario Jr. of any wrongdoing, the family is involved in an independent investigation, and a federal district court judge has set a date in September 2008 for the Madrigals' civil case to be brought before a jury. The family hopes they will be more responsive than local authorities have been.

The Madrigals are hardly the only family in the greater Phoenix metropolitan area that feels like they're talking to a brick wall as they seek justice in the police killing of a loved one.

In March 2006, Malissia Clinton's younger brother, James Deon Lennox, 35, was shot by a police officer outside his apartment in Mesa. According to the story Clinton and her mother have pieced together from witnesses' accounts, Lennox and his girlfriend had returned home late after a night out and began arguing about where to park the car. Within minutes, a police officer arrived. Then two more officers appeared. For reasons none of the witnesses can be sure of, Lennox and one of the officers got into a physical fight. Then, Officer David Kohler shot Lennox twice -- once in the shoulder, once in the chest -- and James Deon Lennox died.

Mesa police spokesmen say Kohler felt his life was threatened -- that Lennox had already hit him with a lawn chair and that he fired his gun when Lennox picked up another one. Neighbors say the chairs in question were cheap, flimsy ones-not life-threatening -- and the autopsy report by the county medical examiner says that both shots came from a distance. The city of Mesa denied a claim of wrongdoing filed by Lennox's family, and the county attorney's office has not filed criminal charges against Kohler. An internal police investigation into the shooting is still under way.

According to Lennox's family, two witnesses have said that one of the officers called him a "nigger" the night he was killed. Malissia Clinton, an attorney in California, thinks her brother was "just tired of playing by rules that are unfair." He'd been arguing with his girlfriend, he'd had a little bit to drink, it was late and suddenly there were police officers on the scene.

"As a Black man," Clinton said, "you know what you are supposed to do and what you're not supposed to do with the police. There are rules that are kinda unspoken, but everybody understands that you could lose your life, so you need to really be careful. That's a given -- my husband knows it, Barack Obama knows it...everybody knows that." So what happened that night? "I just think that he was tired, he decided that this guy was not gonna put his hands on him -- if he wanted to talk to him like a man, that was fine, but if he wanted to play physical at all, he was just not gonna stand for it. And so, he decided to take a stand, and I think that that's why he lost his life."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: police brutality

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Police top Al Queda in murdering Americans
Posted by: Mycos on Dec 21, 2007 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With those few numbers cited from obnly a few cities, It's certain that national numbers reflecting LEO "excessive force" murders, would exceed the dead killed by the religious conservative group Al Queda. Imention conservatives as it is also overwhelmingly high numbers of conservatives present where death and destruction have become commonplace policy. THe neoconservatives used Isreals religious conservatives to act in an Aliiance wuith American religious conservatives to invent the case for war on Isreals protagonists, a move whuich refilled the coffers of the arms-aerospace industry through the Pentagon and it's well known cligue of arch-conservative war-profiteers and Napoleonic delusionaries.
However, low IQ conservatives, although they have the samevneed to dominate through force anyone or thing they view as untraditional (it seems to scare them for some reason!). As such, they now find their services in great demend filling the prison industries cells with newly convicted pot smokers (Pot busts went up 800% over the last 2 decades despite a general admission of neglible risk to ones health from it). The rise of conservatives in government has reduced any oversight on their violent tendencies at precisly the time they are most needed. As such, Americam LEOs now behave independantly of the legal system, making arrests neccesary to keep paychecks coming, but in fact now act as an autonomous military entity witthin the US borders. An army within the country that has no civilian oversight is an illegal entity by federal laws against insurgency threats. If the Bush government and other conservative Americans don't act soon, they'll find themselves at war with the very people they once looked up to, in much the same way they were lied to by the Bush adminiustration and are now fighting to get out from underneasth his iron fisted policies at destruction of the Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing new here
Posted by: DigitalAztec on Dec 21, 2007 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I appreciate the article but this has been going on since the Anglo invasion of the so called "So. West." That's 160 years give or take.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's white privilege not to know "the rules"
Posted by: Davidco on Dec 21, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you routinely view a traffic stop as a life threatening experience? Some have to live with "the rules" day in day out.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6VzsEkfSAdQ

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Latino
Posted by: mincemeat on Dec 21, 2007 9:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How about a discussion on the murders committed by Latino gangs? The gangs are thriving due to illegal immigration. We have no idea who these people are, and they roam our streets with no respect for our laws.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Latino bashing Posted by: Mycos
» Troll Alert Posted by: Jbuuty
» Tard Alert! Posted by: rhinojos
Colonel, ret.
Posted by: Spock on Dec 21, 2007 10:12 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll take essays like this seriously when the author also argues the other side of the issue. Let us hear how he or she would deal with an angry man wielding (holding, if you prefer) a knife or gun. Once a cop, and retired at a PI and bodyguard, a sixth degree black belt in judo who teaches and trains cops, flight deck officers, and special forces troopers, I have a certain perspective (years ago, a police captain back home marvelled at the number of times I disarmed a gun or knife wielding assailant; not that fast or skilled anymore, I would have to rely upon the sidearm I now carry everywhere). Tell us, for instance, how many times a man standing fifteen feet away can slash you with a knife before you can draw your weapon (taser, or what have you). Tell us, too, how many times you have been slashed or shot. The author here may be right - but no reasonable person can so determine. As I said here elsewhere a minute ago, "responsibility, again." Or are we just getting our catharsis, by raging against authority?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Colonel, ret. Posted by: guitrr
» idiots on the force - a compound problem Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» RE: Colonel, ret. Posted by: Mycos
» RE: Colonel, ret. Posted by: drmeow
me999
Posted by: two on Dec 21, 2007 12:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeap, fascism the German kind is on going today. In southern Austria, there was damage to a cemetery for WWII victims. Shame the Fascist are on a role.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the core problem...
Posted by: lexicon on Dec 21, 2007 1:34 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...is the police notion that they have to "engage the confrontation" in situations where there is really no need for confrontation.

Let's not dissemble here, and try to confuse the issue with those situations where police were REALLY left with no choice than to shoot.

What we're talking about here, is situations where a cop comes on a scene, whips that scene into a frenzy, then starts shooting.

I mean, we're talking about situations here, where someone is walking down the damn street, is approached by a cop, and ends up being shot for failing to comply with the cop's demands.

We're not talking about situations where there is an underlying crime or criminal activity ongoing.

We're not talking about the bankrobbers who were shot by the cops. We're talking about the jaywalkers who were shot by the cops.

For a cop to allow a jaywalking episode to escalate into a citizen death, indicates a profound disconnect from reality.

Here's an example: Several years ago, I was on the scene where cops killed a guy. He was walking down the middle of the street, high. Instead of blocking off traffic while they let the situation go benign, they forced the issue, and got into a scuffle with the poor bastard. Pepper sprayed him like crazy, several of them. Guy couldn't breathe, goes into cardiac arrest.

Now, where is it written that he had to be taken down NOW NOW NOW? So, a few of us drivers have to wait a bit....SO WHAT? Aren't we talking about a human life here?

Somehow, the idea that you are empowered to wield deadly force at your own discretion, should be coupled with a deeply ingrained respect for the sanctity of life. Somehow, there's a percentage of our peace officers who don't seem to have received that memo.

I imagine that I could sleep soundly at night, if I knew deep in my heart, that a citizen I killed was going to kill me or someone else, if I didn't act.

I cannot imagine how I'd sleep at night, if I killed someone who simply told me to fuck off, or took a swing at me.

Can that cop that shot the suicidal kid, REALLY look at himself in the mirror, and say..."yeah, that was the right thing to do. I handled that situation correctly".

lexicon

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: the core problem... Posted by: sofla100
» RE: the core problem... Posted by: Jbuuty
seems to be a trend...
Posted by: particle61 on Dec 21, 2007 5:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
redstateupdate.net covered the recently released Justice Department’s
Bureau of Justice Statistics report that found that "over 2000 criminal suspects died in
US police custody over a three-year period between 2002 and 2005."
see story-Suspects Die Daily in US Copper Custody, issue 124

redstateupdate.net covers local po'leece and federal stazi as they clam down on John Q Public in these the United States of Emergency--see 'crowd control' - 'one nation, under surveillance' and 'interpreting the constitution' archives

www.redstateupdate.net
funny, frightening, free since 2005

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only Solution: America Needs to Follow the European Lead and Outlaw Guns
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 21, 2007 8:43 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It start with an amnesty, everyone can turn in the guns they own for a couple of weeks. After that, you go to jail for 5 years if you have one. As for criminals still having them, they will for awhile. But, that will soon dwindle down and America will be like Europe. A couple dozen homicides a year (versus thousands) and then America will be a much more civilized society. As for cops shooting people, what do you expect? When just about everyone owns a gun, they would be stupid not to shoot first and ask questions later. Unless they want to just be blown away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Troll Alert Posted by: Jbuuty
» our guns are registered too Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» hahahaha Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» sofla100 Posted by: meetmeineleusis
» if you want gun control Posted by: meetmeineleusis
The State of Tyranny
Posted by: talkville on Dec 21, 2007 11:28 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A good consolidated summary and compendium of the Status Quo here in the USA can be found at CounterPunch, a great article titled "Police State America" by Stephen Lendman.

The pieces and parts are already largely in place; all that's needed is an Executive to flip the switch to "On".

We are experiencing the 2nd Wave of Fascism, suitably 'improved' to match conditions on the ground; there's an illusive and eerie calm these days, kind of like being in the Eye of the Storm.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The State of Tyranny Posted by: A. Servant
coming from somewhere else
Posted by: Racumin on Dec 22, 2007 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
People defend police by saying that these dangerous people are attacking them. The county I live in doesn't have these problems of people getting shot by police. Why? There are criminals here, like everywhere else. Maybe it's because the average person here doesn't feel terrorized by a police state. The U.S. is a police state. The police have no accountability. People, like some here, defend them. I interact with police and military here almost on a daily basis. They are nice a respectful here. They don't get off on some authoritarian trip. The way this came about was from government making the focus of police and military into community integration. Here they are part of the community, not watchdogs waiting to punish. When I lived in the U.S. I was afraid of police. I've been stopped by them and treated like dirt, for no reason, many, many times, and I have light skin. They never respected my rights or me. Isn't it "innocent, until proven guilty?" I was never treated like an innocent person.
Even if a person is guilty of a crime, they are human beings and should be treated with respect. The court will give them their punishment and they will serve it. That should be it. Just because someone broke the law, doesn't make them any less of a person. They may have serious problems, but what's the point of making them worse by mistreating them? I see no point.

You shouldn't be afraid of the people who protect you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: coming from somewhere else Posted by: Richard House
» RE: coming from somewhere else Posted by: harryf200
as a general rule
Posted by: xtiml on Dec 24, 2007 4:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
police are the last thing to count on.they are especially useless if not dangerous in the mental sickness category. all pet teamsd(psych eval teams) have been shut down.and the only way to 51-50 somebody is to call the police and they are not what i would call usefull.anyways, mental health or shall i say schizophrenia the most common and debilitating is not given much attention and it is the biggest problem, not all the other chicken poo ones that get publicity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Blind Veteran Jailed for pot in Mesa
Posted by: chronic420 on Dec 27, 2007 1:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
my friend suggested this web page http://www.geocities.com/chronicreform/index.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]