Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Buy Some Stuff, Enslave Somebody

By Josh Rosenblatt, Texas Observer. Posted December 27, 2007.


Why are we so disconnected from the slave labor that produces so many of our products?
nobodiescover
llklk

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Josh Rosenblatt

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Years from now, when the story of our corporate age is told with the clarity of hindsight, I'm guessing one of the phrases scholars will keep coming back to is "plausible deniability." The tale will capture our era's wide disparities in wealth, and its almost universal indifference to the rampant mistreatment of workers from countries less fortunate than our own.

After all, when we buy a product -- a piece of fruit, a new suit, an iPod -- how many of us really comprehend what was required to bring that product to our tables, our backs, or our pockets? The expanding global economy demands that corporations seek out the cheapest possible labor to maximize profit, and stimulate growth and innovation. With free trade has come an explosion of global inequality that has left more than 2.8 billion people living on less than $2 a day. We in the wealthy West, living and dining off the fruits of their labor, can honestly say we are unaware of the devil's bargain we bought into. Or that if we do know, the problem is simply too great to comprehend and beyond our means to do anything about, save changing our lifestyles entirely. Best, in other words, not to think about it.

This kind of willful indifference, you might remember, is the line of defense Michael Jordan used to justify his sponsorship deal with Nike Inc. during the 1990s, when that corporation was coming under heavy fire from labor-rights groups for its use of underage, sweatshop labor in Indonesia. It's not my business, he argued; I just wear the shoes. Or take the case of fashion designer Isaac Mizrahi, who agreed to create a line of affordable clothing for Target Corp. stores. Asked if he knew where his clothes were being manufactured, and by whom under what conditions, he responded, "I don't know. And I don't want to know."

So it will probably come as no surprise that when Jonathan Blum, vice president for public relations of Yum! Brands Inc. (parent of Taco Bell, Kentucky Fried Chicken, and Pizza Hut, among others), learned his company had been doing business for years with a farming subcontractor in Florida that grossly underpaid its largely illegal work force, he said, "My gosh, I'm sorry, but I don't think it has anything to do with us." The subcontractor's workers picked tomatoes in what one observer termed "sweatshop-like conditions," without the right to organize, without access to basic rights, protections, or benefits. If celebrities like Jordan and Mizrahi can stand in front of a camera and claim reasonable unaccountability, why shouldn't a corporate mouthpiece like Blum do the same?

This is the world John Bowe stumbled into in 2001. Bowe, a regular contributor to The New Yorker, The New York Times Magazine, and National Public Radio's "This American Life", was in North Carolina working on a book called Gig: Americans Talk About Their Jobs when he heard about a community group in South Florida that had uncovered a slavery ring in local orange groves. Fascinated, Bowe headed to the small town of Lake Placid, where rumors were spreading of a labor contractor in the orange-picking business named Ramiro Ramos. Nicknamed "El Diablo," Ramos had worked for some of the biggest names in the food-service industry, including Pepsico Inc.'s Tropicana, Coca-Cola Co.'s Minute Maid, McDonald's Corp., Wendy's International Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores Inc. He had become notorious for illegally hiring migrant workers from Mexico and using manipulation, financial coercion, deportation threats, and even violence (up to and including murder) to maintain a work force of essentially unpaid and terrified slave labor that had little or no recourse to the American legal system.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: nobodies, john bowe

Josh Rosenblatt is a writer living in Austin.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Simple Solution
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Dec 27, 2007 12:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This could be solved if the G8, US and EU or some similar alliance agreed to prohibit imports from sources that cannot guarantee that a suitable minimum wage, adjusted for the country of origin, was paid to workers, that child labor was not used, and that basic standards of workplace health and safety were met. Sure, consumer goods would cost a bit more, but not as much as you might think because the labor is actually a small part of the price.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Simple Solution Posted by: schetikos
» RE: A Simple Solution Posted by: schetikos
» A Simple Solution but not so simple. Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: A Simple Solution Posted by: undrgrndgirl
Root Cause is How People, Especially Poor People Think About Stuff
Posted by: schetikos on Dec 27, 2007 2:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually AlexLawyer, this doesn't get to the core, the root cause of how people think. Here's how the cycle goes. Marketers get into the heads of people to make them think they need more or new stuff to make them feel better.

So, the demand is created and to keep up with demand and maximize profits, large corporations must find new and cheaper ways to produce the stuff. Then we throw away the stuff, fill the landfills, destroy more natural resources in developing countries to make room in order to make more stuff. Visit

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sounds like a good book, but the other side of the coin is also important
Posted by: Suzon on Dec 27, 2007 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look no further than the Corporation of the City of London (est. 1067) and its 103 Worshipful Companies which "support" the monarchy on both sides of the Atlantic.

Most of the people in the "Square Mile" will never have had to fill out a job application or compete with others to obtain a place at Oxford or Cambridge. They trip merrily from feast to banquet, are given free helicopter rides by the military and tour the world in complacent and self-satisfied company. They store and display plates and goblets of gold and silver, design themselves luxurious robes trimmed with fur, and probably find it strange to be in a room without a chandelier.

Their stately (inherited) homes are not to be found in the land registry. Instead of being taxed, they are given subsidies for not farming on their estates. Download some of their newsletters and you will find them modestly boasting about their charity work!

This is the power base of the people who use law for criminal purposes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what happens if
Posted by: richholland on Dec 27, 2007 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we buy second hand stuff....
if we boycot pizzahut, mcdonald, starbucks etc.
if we enjoy holidays, travel around???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what happens if Posted by: Lauren
» Who is "we"? Posted by: pdxstudent
» RE: Who is "we"? Posted by: blitzmesser
We can't track a million products,
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 27, 2007 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to see which are slave-made (apparently most of them if you count sweatshops), so our first choice is a government that will track them.

Our second choice has to be a store that won't sell slave-made products. We need a Costco-type or cooperative store where consumers pay an annual fee and get individual products at reasonable rates. If average people judge between an honest store's non-slave individual products and Wanker-mart's cheap plastic carcinogenic garbage, they'll grab the cheaper stuff every time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Out of sight, out of mind?
Posted by: hagwind on Dec 27, 2007 4:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is not new. Really. And if it's not "out of mind" enough, the solution is to push it further out of sight. I'm currently reading a book that deals with slavery in the U.S. South. There were laws about what black people, enslaved and free, could wear: they weren't allowed to dress like respectable white folks, because if they did, the respectable white folks (or at least the visitors from Europe and the North) had a harder time justifying buying and selling them. In earlier centuries there were similar laws enforcing class distinctions in England. These days I guess we'd call it cognitive dissonance: get out of my sight, you're spoiling my appetite. And of course if anyone makes an iron-clad indisputable case about what's really going on, we'll bite their head off. (Which is why I think the kid in the "Emperor's New Clothes" story wound up in Gitmo or the local equivalent.)

Even relative innocuous "outsourcing" -- the kind that doesn't involve slave labor -- has consequences. When producers of a good never meet its consumers, it becomes less important to even consider the possibility that the product may be shoddy, or dangerous. Freelancers and pieceworkers have little input into what we produce; whatever we learn on the job goes to waste.

And so on. Blaming it all on "human nature" makes as much sense as blaming it all on God. (Pretty much the same thing in my book.) Instead let's look at the economic incentives. It's cost-effective, at least in the short term, to do things this way -- not just for the big executives and stockholders, but for you and me and every consumer on the planet. Laws against littering didn't clean up the roadsides in my state; a 5-cent deposit on beverage cans and bottles, OTOH, did a pretty good job. Change the incentives and we have half a chance of affecting the output.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Doesn't Change a Thing Posted by: pdxstudent
» RE: Doesn't Change a Thing Posted by: hagwind
otto
Posted by: otto on Dec 27, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Excellent article!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First of all, there is NO free trade/market to begin with. It's all RIGGED !
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 27, 2007 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read the sham deals carefully and you'll realize that not only are there no rules stopping SLAVE labor but in fact businesses that do it are "rewarded" whereas businesses that treat their workers with respect face the risk of getting punished. By the way, Ron Paul is correct to call those shams foreign bribery even though he is rife with contradictions such as support for sweatshop labor if I'm not mistaken. Sadly, most of the so-called "Libertarians" are too busy kissing Wall Street's ASS in their blind support of FALSE "free" trade/market while at the same time turning a blind eye to people's privacy rights and freedoms even as Congress and the White House continue to undermine them day after day !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The new royalty.
Posted by: heid on Dec 27, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aren't those at the tops of the corporations who are currently enslaving people - albeit indirectly, thus avoiding personal accountability, at least for now - aren't those people simply setting themselves up as the next royalty? What's the difference between current royalty and the children of current corporate power players?

As an expat American, UK citizen, I say take it all away from all of them - the royals, the corporate CEOs, CFOs, and so forth, along with whatever their families are holding - and give it to the people. Then, limit how much anyone can earn. After all, how can anyone possibly earn more than a million dollars/pounds/euros a year? Those aren't earnings - they're graft, taken from a system that hasn't the wit to stop them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The new royalty. Posted by: Lauren
Heeeeeeeeeeeere's CAPITALISM!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Dec 27, 2007 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's capitalism, and that's just the nature of the beast!

What CEO would turn down the opportunity to add a few percentage points to the quarterly profit report, by refusing to move that factory to China or to sub sub-contract that IT work? Not if he didn't want to lose his job--hell! the Board of Directors made it clear to him when they hired him: "Make us MONEY, dude!"

Capitalism and the corporate-government morality is based on the moral precept:

"IF IT MAKES MONEY, YOU DON'T MAKE APOLOGIES"

No amount of "reform" or legislation will change this. Hand-wringing articles like this one are only an annoyance to the Beast.

The only thing that will is a true socialist democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and here is one possible answer Posted by: zooeyhall
The top 1% increased there wealth by 42% under bush and
Posted by: Missing Piece on Dec 27, 2007 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the bottom 20% increased there wealth 1%. I think trickle down economics has proven its name correct. Hillary Clinton has said she would work to phase out the death tax and many candidates are campaigning on a flat tax. Energy will soon be too expensive for the masses, and that means more desperate people turning to religious extremism for answers. We are about to enter a new paradigm of decreasing energy and that means we go green and vote or we go back to the dark ages.

Has mankind really advanced enough to keep us from committing false flags to start resource wars and take away our most basic rites like habeus corpus? What about burning up our remaining tops soil for biofuels to sustain a way of life that got us here in the first place.

If you have been a thinker and not a believer then you know what road were on and you know what needs to be done. If you are still a believer then you need to stop being optimistic and look at what happen to cuba in the early 90's.

Good Luck, only 4 years left to get ready for peak oil.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: DEATH TAX?? Posted by: carcinoid112
» I Thought Posted by: pdxstudent
Thank You
Posted by: argyle on Dec 27, 2007 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must provide a comment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Manufactured Landscapes
Posted by: pdxstudent on Dec 27, 2007 8:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is a really great documentary that is more or less a photo/video essay. There's plenty of background information pumping through to get you oriented, but the point of the hour-long film is to get people looking at the kind of places (mostly in East and South Asia) most of the stuff the West consumes is coming from.

None of it is overtly gruesome or anything, but I think that if everyone in the United States saw it they'd be a little less inclined to buy anything that came from China. There is something subtly grotesque in the monstrous grandeur of thousands of people working on the same menial task, or the acres upon acres upon acres devoted to industrial parks that also house their workers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

vote with your dollars
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Dec 27, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
vote with your dollars and don't buy the stuff made with slave labor. the problem is not going to go away. the problem is only going to get WORSE with increasing population and a decline in eco-friendly resources.

this slave labor issue is an ethics problem but it will only be stopped by us not buying the garbage. corporations are not going to stop. slave immigrants will not stop coming and begging for the work.

i'm much more concerned with ecological issues that are destroying life systems for all species. we need a bigger vision that revolves around healing the planet, not getting cheaper "goods" (oh, i mean landfill).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: vote with your dollars Posted by: wildeyes
» i wish i could afford to Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: vote with your dollars Posted by: richholland
Surprised?
Posted by: K.D. on Dec 27, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
History shows us that all major world powers generated their power from slavery...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Except Posted by: pdxstudent
» RE: xcept Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» Of Course Posted by: pdxstudent
do you want them to come kill you?
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Dec 27, 2007 1:21 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bloodletting is the only thing that will stop corporations from doing these things that they do. no consequences,no fear

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

look in the mirror
Posted by: grkjr on Dec 27, 2007 3:04 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As nomal, we continue to blame everyone but ourselves.. they are doing it to us may be creditable in a society that was aveage a few hundred years ago.. but in our democracy, in our time, it is not. We truly have the means to end all of these wrongs.. IF WE HAD THE WILL. In our democracy, as under attack as it is with the current administration,... it is still sufficient to right these wrongs. But, we continue to be more entralled with our own specific needs and wants. Just like Jordan etc., we are not so concerned in the "now", as we continue shopping at walmart or targer etc., because we rationalize that we specifically are not making enough maney to pay more.. it is the other "guy" making more money who should stand up to these injustices.. "iam a victim here" mentality. Just as we continue to vote for a local representative (it is the other representatives who are not doing their job) without looking at their voting record and either voting them out of office or recalling them. No IT IS US, the one in the mirror and it will not EVER EVER change until we get that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Children's toys
Posted by: Phenix on Dec 27, 2007 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a nephew named Tyler, he is 18 months old. I have not purchased him a single gift since he was born. I've babysat a few times. He left me a surprise every time. I am actually the first family baby sitter to have been left a stinky present.

I often bring up that all his toys and now presents are made by slaves, kids, or sweat shop workers. I'm not the most popular guy during Christmas but I've told them that I won't buy him a present until he is 4 or 5. I do not see the point in buying him anything anyway. The kid is perfectly happy taking my DvDs and throwing them on the ground then handing them one by one back to me. If he doesn't do that he's fine being chased around the house or just picking up something thats non-breakable. I don't get the point of buying him a present yet.

O and I am a pretty big dork so my first gift to him will be a chess and checkers set. I play chess all the time and maybe I can bring him up to speed fast. His damn head is in the top 1% of kids his age so who knows maybe he is the next Kasparov.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Slaves Anonymous - Creating Emancipation
Posted by: A. Servant on Dec 27, 2007 7:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't wait for a "centralized solution" to arise. Historically, what you will receive won't be in your best interest. AlterNet and the mainstream "alternative" news sources are strongly biased toward publishing articles that offer no solutions or advocate centralized solutions that can be distorted to harm all but a few at the top. Solutions for the common person have been and will be grassroots ones that emerge organically from you and your communities.

Slavery in America today is subtle and directly affects almost all persons irrespective of background. A person in the middle-class is not likely to acknowledge how manipulated, coerced and threatened he or she really is because such a person rarely meets an undeniable, personal "El Diablo". So rather than learning the tortuous truth, a state of "metanoia", the opposite of "paranoia", brings some fleeting comfort like sand over a mythologized ostrich's head.

Our reality is that most of us are being kept as slaves in a matrix of control; and we are acting in ways that maintain this system of slavery. Our voices are ignored by the powerful, and our true needs are overlooked. And as slaves, we are being dominated and imprisoned or threatened with imprisonment when we are bad producers or bad consumers. We are being sickened by limited access to healthy water, nutritious foods, dietary supplementation, vital health information and health cures--not just treatment. And when our usefulness is over, we will be left to die or be killed. The lack of caring that we experience and too often fail to offer to others is not accidental--our indoctrination has been intentionally planned and executed by the slave masters.

Do you think that the proxies of the slave masters will be kinder and gentler to us if we tell them how their behavior leads to mistreatment of their workers? Do you hope they will stop claiming "plausible deniability"? If you know that this will not happen and you're tired of being enslaved and seeing others threatened with more enslavement, join us in Slaves Anonymous to start making grassroots changes that will improve the security of you and your family. You and your neighbors have the autonomy, creativity, diversity, passion and transcendence to become self-owners and create the conditions necessary for emancipation of your local community from the global tyranny of slavery or serfdom or corporatism or government or fascism or empire or debt-based money or psychopathy or whatever-you-want-to-call-it. You can create ways that lead to less bondage and more humane treatment for yourselves and your neighbors.

Let's work together: You stop it in your community; I'll stop it in mine.

Step 8: Made a list of all persons being harmed, and became willing to stop this from happening.

Step 9: Stopped the harm to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others more gravely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nobody cares as long as they have a flat screen TV
Posted by: Reader11722 on Dec 28, 2007 3:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans do not care about other countries (we always will bomb the crap out of them). The US gov't only cares about the tax receipts they receive from corporations. After all, corporations and gov't are merely quid-pro-quo whorehouses sold to the highest bidder. When the gov't needs illegal wire-taps, Verizon and Sprint allow them secret rooms to listen in on calls. When Haliburton (and KBR) need more revenue, the gov't hands out no-bid contracts. When the gov't dislikes literature, Amazon and Wikipedia ban America Deceived (book). We The People had our gov't sold out from beneath us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

coco for cocoa puffs
Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line on Dec 28, 2007 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You know what would really be the best thing to do besides bitching and moaning....? Start making clothes and toys to sell... you know, start up a business. Whining gets you nowhere... action gets you everywhere. There has to be someone out there that wants to do this and has the money to do this right?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Dec 28, 2007 7:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The capitalist system has greed as its root. Thus, slavery of this kind is no surprise but of course it is a moral failure(and this result we get from the "values" voters!!). Excuse me, where are the values again? I haven't seen any values since the progressives lost the elections.

The fact is Americans don't need all of this underpriced stuff. It is a CRIME that we have junk haulers here. No one should be able to buy so much stuff to waste it like that when there are people who are mistreated, hungry, and downtrodden.

The solution - which this plutocratic, mercenary government resists at all costs, is a sensible minimum wage - not the travesty we have now which is a poverty wage (even though it's been raised recently). We don't need to buy so much stuff and that would stop a lot of it - how? - by making the prices more real world - the higher prices would reflect higher wages rightfully being paid to workers. And we would think sensibly about buying things. Instead we now have mindless consumerism as cheap and amoral entertainment. It's ridiculous and it has supplanted family time and and values altogether.

The real answer here is one that rabid capitalists cannot stand - treating people humanely and paying them living wages means LESS money goes to the financiers on Wall Street. Well I say, in this age of $30 million payouts for someone WALKING OFF a job (and of course that doesn't happen to the maintenance man who walks off his job - or doesn't do his job well - he just goes broke)...the thing to do is definitely rein in that overpaying by raising wages to humanly decent levels. We can stop the runaway train by enacting federal legislation to tie the minimum wage to increases in CEO pay - somehow stopgaps could be enacted - IF ONLY WE HAD SOMEONE BRAVE ENOUGH. Maybe in another year. John Edwards is the only candidate who is really taking this travesty on. I hope he wins even though I like the other candidates also as I feel any one of them has the working man's interest at heart far more than anyone in the current mercenary regime.

We citizens DO NOT NEED all of this manufactured garbage out there. We would help our environment too by having less things and paying more for them (like in the great 1950's and 1960's) - because we would then be doing something really important and moral - enabling others to live at a decent level with dignity and hope. That is so much more moral than senseless tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy. I say raise the minimum wage to $15 and tax the hell out of CEO compensation so we can make things sensible again. BTW, this is somewhat similar to the sensible policies of the Great Society era. Let's hope we can create another one for all of mankind, not just for the hallowed few. But yes, Virginia, this means less for all of us. I for one would be perfectly happy with that. Would I rather have 30 underpriced CDs or know that someone could afford a decent life because I don't have them? I would rather have others have a decent and hopeful life. That is what is called having "values". Let's get back to that so we don't enslave others any more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

invisible empires
Posted by: traintalk on Jan 2, 2008 12:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had an opportunity to work for a startup that outsourced work to a Central Asian country. I found I had more in common with those far away doing the actual work than with the local managers profiting from it. Irregardless of relative pay and local currency value, the feeling, as Marilyn Manson said, when discussing the future of music, is that empowerment at someone else's expense leads to a devaluing of the person "empowered".

Cheap manpower - wherever utilized - cheapened the cost of the entire gamut of work and effort and is devaluing the Western World. Many believe cheap work empowers them but in the end it empowers those who did the work. Many think this will take time, but it has already happened.

Empire, you made a shell of the world and then it came back and robbed your soul.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]