COMMENTS: 47
Hillary Clinton Joins Joe Lieberman to Resurrect the Culture Wars
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
I guess this must be one for those of us who spent the 90s wanting to throw large objects through the television set as we watched that sanctimonious, finger wagging, judgmental scold Joe Lieberman on the floor of the Senate joining with the Republicans to derail the constitution over Bill Clinton's zipper:
Senators Joe Lieberman (ID-CT), Sam Brownback (R-KS), Evan Bayh (D-IN), and Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY) called for a thorough review of the video game ratings process in the wake of "Manhunt 2" receiving a "Mature" rating. In a letter to the Entertainment Software Ratings Board (ESRB), the Senators detailed how the change in rating opened the door to widespread release of the game, which depicts acts of horrific violence.
Well that is just peachy. Do we suppose Hillary sat down and actually played Manhunt 2 on the campaign trail in order to arrive at this conclusion, or did she just take Joe's word for it, much like she did when she voted for the Kyl-Lieberman amendment that others have quite rightly pilloried her for? Because Joe, you'll recall, was a useful idiot for the Bushies when they discovered Iran had no nuclear weapons program and they had to find another reason to bomb them into the stone age -- something they neglected to tell the public about. And despite the fact that Clinton's excuse for voting for the AUMF was that she had "bad information" from the Bush Administration on the Iraq weapons program, she decided to trust them -- and Lieberman -- and amp up the Iran war rhetoric.
One wonders at what point she will stop following Lieberman over the cliff.
Wired magazine:
I agree that the current ratings system and all its consequences needs to be seriously re-evaluated, but not in the sense that Clinton et al apparently do, which is that Manhunt 2 never should have been released.
The uncharitable amongst us might conclude that this is simply a cynical ploy on Clinton's part to pander to old people, upon whom her Iowa chances depend. I'm sure that's not the case. Which is why I'd like to resurrect a suggestion from last year that Clinton find her voice and condemn the violent religious intolerance expressed in the Left Behind video game.
Jon Hutson describes the game:
Imagine: you are a foot soldier in a paramilitary group whose purpose is to remake America as a Christian theocracy, and establish its worldly vision of the dominion of Christ over all aspects of life. You are issued high-tech military weaponry, and instructed to engage the infidel on the streets of New York City. You are on a mission - both a religious mission and a military mission -- to convert or kill Catholics, Jews, Muslims, Buddhists, gays, and anyone who advocates the separation of church and state - especially moderate, mainstream Christians. Your mission is "to conduct physical and spiritual warfare"; all who resist must be taken out with extreme prejudice. You have never felt so powerful, so driven by a purpose: you are 13 years old. You are playing a real-time strategy video game whose creators are linked to the empire of mega-church pastor Rick Warren, best selling author of The Purpose Driven Life.
Christian, Muslim and Jewish groups denounced it at the time of its release, but out of Clinton and Lieberman, who have made themselves the scolding nags of video game morality, why -- not a peep.
Some might find this potentially much more dangerous than Manhunt II, given the fact that people who act out on suggestions made by video games are relatively few, but people are dying in the Middle East at an alarming rate because politicians like Joe Lieberman have decided they will manufacture reasons to wage war there if none exist, and amping up religious bigotry among young people sets an excellent stage.
Since Mitt Romney has said that there will be no Muslim members of his cabinet (though the New York Times hasn't quite tripped to that fact yet), I think it's an excellent time to show that Senator Clinton's views regarding religious tolerance are deeply felt and not just some Sunday morning prayer group she attends to further her political ambitions. If she's in the video game denouncement business, she needs to denounce this one, too.
And if she's really a political leader capable of leading the country she can demonstrate it by getting ol' bipartisan Joe to join her. May make him a bit uncomfortable showing up at the next Christian-Zionist convention and confronting all those tough questions from the Rapture crowd, but hey, Joe has made a career out of telling the right lie at the right time.
I'm sure he'll have no trouble.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Dec 18, 2007 12:24 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 18, 2007 3:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mauimom on Dec 18, 2007 5:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xtiml on Dec 18, 2007 5:33 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: xtiml
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JonA on Dec 18, 2007 6:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hillary.... No Vote
Posted by: underledge
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 18, 2007 6:54 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Focusing on a virtual war--a form of artful expression, however silly--while a real one wages and people are dieing is the most useless waste of legislators time and my money since the baseball thing they "worked" on previously.
Shame on Congresscritters who do so.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chaoslegs on Dec 18, 2007 7:02 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I spent 5 hours last night with my friend, skipping the Monday Night football game he had tickets to, to play Halo 3 and we killed each other a combined 600 times. Lots of fun.
Never fired or owned a gun. Fought some in school, but usually bullying involved. Video game violence can just be fun, it doesn't have to corrupt my soul, although as an atheist I am sure Joe thinks it already has.
And where the heck are the parents. Most new games cost $50-$60, young kids can't afford to buy them on their own. If you wait, they may drop to the $20 amount and sometimes lower, but the good popular games take a long time to get there.
Oh and in Halo 3, the battle me the human Master Chief has is against alien fundamentalists.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: DaBear
» You WASTEDtickets to the Metrodome to see the Vikings win on Home Turf?
Posted by: Prairie Waif
» They were free tickets that were my friends
Posted by: chaoslegs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Flora Gael on Dec 18, 2007 7:10 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nah. It was rock and roll that made our society rotten.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Nah. It was rock and roll that made our society rotten.
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» One of the things I like about living in a free and liberal country...
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Thanks, Knot_Rich.
Posted by: Flora Gael
» RE: Thanks, Knot_Rich.
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Thanks, Knot_Rich.
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Then why don't you move to a nation that bans things from adults because they "pollute the mind"
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: however...
Posted by: bigremo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ben Sen on Dec 18, 2007 7:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Dec 18, 2007 10:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: W SLaan on Dec 18, 2007 10:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Video Game Rating system works better than any other entertainment rating system, such as the R-rating for movies, etc. The full study information is available on the bottom of that page.
2.
I have played video games since Doom (I was 6)on my family's first computer. There is absolutely nothing wrong with me. In fact, I am generally smarter, more literate, read more, etc than most of my age group. I go to one of the nations best Masters level schools (Elon).
ANYONE who is "messed up" by video games is already messed up. Look not at the entertainment but at the parents and culture they live in. If someone is hell bent on killing others, a video game where you kill zombies is not going to add or detract to it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I am messed up because almost all of my lifetime we have been at war.
Posted by: Sojourner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Knot_Rich on Dec 18, 2007 11:55 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm all against censorship, give any government entity a hand and they'll eventually take the arm, and there's isn't a lot the government can get involved in that they don't screw up anyway. In fact, in some ways putting some of this stuff out there helps clean up the gene pool. After all, if some teenager or young man doesn't have the smarts to determine that lying in the middle of a busy street to see if cars will swerve around him is just plain stupid, we don't really want him spreading his genes around anyway. I don't know what can be done to not censure this stuff but still keep it away from the kids too young to handle it, maybe a stronger rating system will help. It's not the job of the government to take over parental responsibility, unless of course you're part of Hillary's village, but something has to be done to get parents to step back up to the plate and assume their role. Until that happens, we're going to keep cranking out more and more kids who run off to schools, malls and churches using killing as their prefered method of expression. Where did they see such stupid stuff? Oh, wait...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'd like to see a post from a real parent
Posted by: wishninja
» RE: I'd like to see a post from a real parent
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: I'm a real parent
Posted by: bigremo
» RE: I'm a real parent
Posted by: Knot_Rich
Comments are closed-
Posted by: riotoustanpdx on Dec 18, 2007 3:39 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There may be a back room in the Pentagon with a special mission, and the mission may come directly from Dick Cheney's Office: To create as much and as horrific violent programming as is conceivable for television, movies, cable "news" channels and video "games" in order to instill in young people from the earliest ages that deep, inquisitive desire to know just what it feels like in real life to torture, maim, violently and explosively destroy a human being, and get to see it "close up and personal." That way, everyone benefits by having a "volunteer military service" without the need for a draft.
After all, we need people who are primed to kill, and to be serial killers, and who "love their work" because we can't seem to keep up with the demand for the good soldiers needed to maintain the level of violence that we have created around the globe. Without violent programming early in life, in all media, we just can't do the job of spreading our wonderful culture to every corner of the Earth.
So, yes, absolutely, we need to castigate every one who opposes the spread of horrific media violence, and if we have to discredit people based on ad-hominem arguments such as those above, then we must.
Lieberman is wrong for being a whore to the death industry, otherwise known as the military-industrial community of mega-corporations, which makes him a hypocrite for opposing the violence depicted in the media. He is trying to have it both ways, or he is engaging in a cover-up of his own marriage to the death and destruction industry.
The problem with the Lieberman, et al, attempt to limit media violence is the hypocrisy of it, and that anyone sincerely trying to place the limits that are needed would be demanding far greater controls than have ever been proposed thus far. Of course, Hillary is in the same camp as Lieberman and the others, not willing to stand up the the death industry in order to protect the young people of today from media violence and propaganda for the thrill of killing.
As far as "the separation of church and state" is concerned, since "We the People" are in fact "The State" forged into a politic union called a democratic republic, the only true "separation" is the establishment of Atheism as the sole religion of the State, and we have passed that momentous event decades ago.
By the way, there is not one shard of the teachings of Christ in the Left Behind series, just as there is none in the presidential campaigns of McCain, Obama, Huckabee, Clinton, Romney or Rudy. Atheists have nothing to fear from any of them; they will each kiss the feet of the death industry, or wash its feet with tears of gratitude for the campaign contributions, until they retire from public office.
As far a there ever being a "culture war," see my book (January 2008) titled "Placebo Politics and Empty Elections." Thomas A Nagy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Idiot's View of Violence
Posted by: Flora Gael
» RE: The Idiot's View of Violence
Posted by: Knot_Rich
Comments are closed-
Posted by: herbal on Dec 19, 2007 1:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Hillary and Joe Club version of Skull and Bones is a staunch advocate for the morality of our children. The virtual blood that is, or isn’t, splattered by young Christian Zionists all over the virtual landscape is a noble electoral cause. Virtue is alive and well in the Hillary/Joe video room.
There are real Sunni/American plasma and corpuscles seeping into the sand of Iran in the war that voyeurs, Hill and Joe, have been cheerleading. But, alas, the effort falls short of orgasm. Yes, there is insufficient lubricant for their current lust de guerre. Peeping voters are implored to take heart. Hillary and Joe have been boosting a grander scale of snuff porn; preemptive nuclear attack of Iran. Iran is the home of enough Corporatist lubricant to invoke the fireworks of nuclear potency.
The embarrassment of Lyndon Johnson’s Viet body bags has been sanitized out of Iran by D. Rumsfeld. Surely, Hillary can arrange to extend the media white curtain to cover the first strike of Iran. No voter left behind will fail to appreciate the protection of the impressionable young from the visage of radiation burned flesh dripping from the limbs of our Persian collaterals. We are willed to adulate the human sacrifice on the Temple mount, the blood flowing through the gates. Jewish Zion, Christian Zion, Mormon Zion; it is God’s to discern and to judge who will be left behind, those who were not purpose driven defilers of the flesh.
Hillary met the Ruling Class when in the White House. She wishes to join their ranks.
Hillary is a cinch for Fuhrer more appropriately than President.
REFERENCES
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/200
70811_kucinich_throws_down_the_gauntlet/P0/
(Eliminate the space between the 0 and 7 because of the 60 character limit)
Google: ‘Hillary Clinton AIPAC’ to see her famous “No options left off the table” Speech.
Google: ‘Rev. Hagee AIPAC’ to see almost identical rhetoric from the star
Christian Zionism cultist.
Clue: Christian Zionist’s goal is to tear down the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem so they can rebuild the Jewish Temple and thereby conjure Jesus’ Second Coming down to Earth to bring on Armageddon and the End Times.
The Tim LaHaye “Left Behind” novels are premillenial fantasies. Google up Margaret McDonald, Irving 1830 to understand premillennial “Rapture” and enter the theological territory of Jerry Falwell that influences Hillary. The word, Rapture, is not biblical.
http://www.idust.net/Tutorial/DBish002.htm for the war crime of U-238
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Perverted Gospel of Hillary and Joe
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: The Perverted Gospel of Hillary and Joe
Posted by: herbal
» RE: The Perverted Gospel of Hillary and Joe
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Agreed but in addition
Posted by: herbal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TerryS on Dec 19, 2007 1:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, the subtitle of this piece
says "Hillary wants to censor video game
violence".
Just to be clear, Hillary is NOT calling
for censorship of what games *adults* can
buy, she (and 3 other senators) sent a
letter to the Entertainment Software Ratings
Board (ESRB) asking that they reconsider
giving Manhunt 2 a Mature rating (for those
17 and older) instead of an Adults Only
rating (those 18 years and older).
Even if the ESRB took their advice and
changed the rating to Adult Only, it would
still be perfectly legal for the publisher
of Manhunt 2 to sell this game to adults
AND to children. The ESRB rating system
is completely voluntary.
So why all the wailing and gnashing of
teeth over the ESRB? Because most retailers
want to stay on the good side of parents,
and thus will only sell games that have
a ESRB rating. Plus, a lot of retailers
won't carry Adult Only games. Plus Nintendo
and Sony won't allow Adult Only games
on their platforms.
This is the free market in action, NOT
censorship !!
Rockstar Games (the publisher of Manhunt 2)
and other publishers of violent video games
are upset, not because of any love of free
speech, but because they know a lower ESRB
rating means less *profits* for them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TerryS on Dec 19, 2007 2:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the big arguments in defense of
violent video games is that they are
designed and played by adults.
Well you can't have it both ways,
you can't insist that violent video
games are designed for and played
almost exclusively by adults, and
then turn around and complain when
retailers who cater to families don't
want to carry the games.
If you want to experience violence
porn, then fine. But I don't see
the sex porn industry whining because
Walmart or Target refuse to stock their
videos. If these violent video games
(violence porn) are purely meant for
adults, then why not market and sell
them the same as regular porn.
Adults have the money and freedom to
support a vibrant porn industry.
There is no reason that *adults*
can't support a vibrant violence porn
industry. There's no reason to demand
that violence porn be sold by every
game retailer.
For those interested in violence porn,
here is the wikipedia description of
the orginal Manhunt:
"Aside from the sensitive subject matter of
Manhunt (snuff films), the controversy surrounding
the game stems from the extremely graphic manner
in which the player kills enemies. The game has
three 'levels' of executions: hasty, violent, and
gruesome. Hasty kills are quick and the least
bloody of the three, while violent kills are
considerably more gory, and gruesome kills are
over-the-top executions. Furthermore, the game
encourages players to execute enemies as brutally
as possible, and awards players who do so with
higher scores. Cash's violent killings in the
game are also extremely graphic, both visually
and audibly (e.g. a victim will gag when he's
being choked, muffle and vomit blood while he's
being suffocated etc., in a lifelike manner).
Some examples of Cash's executions include
decapitation, suffocation with a plastic bag,
and jamming a crowbar into a victim's head."
Note, in the case of the original Manhunt
Rockstar Games courageously held onto their
artistic integrity and kept their Adult Only
rating. This allowed violence porn afficianos
everywhere to vicariously enjoy gruesome and
torturous killings. There is nothing stopping
them from doing the exact same thing with
Manhunt 2.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Stoney 12+1 on Dec 20, 2007 9:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He hasn't grown up to be a mass murderer, child molester, or social deviant! He has turned out to be an extremely fine young man, who I'm proud to call my son!
Why? SIMPLE! I taught him to take responsibility for his own actions! I actually took the time to get involved in my son's life! I actually spent time with my son, and asked him what was going on in his life! How he felt about certain things that were going on in this country at the time!
And those "violent" video games? I PLAYED THEM WITH HIM!!!! I got my ass smoked once or twice, but I got REAL good on the "Twisted Metal" series! Finally, we quit playing against each other, and formed an alliance to smoke the bad guys! We ROCKED!!!! And I told him we rocked!
You see, what I'm trying to say is simple! Too many parents use the television, and video game console like a baby sitter to keep the kids quiet while Mommy and Daddy stare blankly at "American Idol" or the "drama de jour" emanating form their own television. Then, Junior comes home in a Police Car, and they want to blame everything, and everybody except the true culprits! THEMSELVES!!!!!
What video games did Nero play? How about Hitler? How about Stalin? Face it! Some people are just fucked up! It's nobody's fault! Others had no chance from the beginning! And that's the fault of those that raised them!
Want your kids' respect? Simple! EARN IT!!!!! Let them know that you love them! I STILL give my son a hug and a kiss when he comes home from school! What? You say that's wrong? You say, (as a Baptist minister told me once), that it's "unseemly" for a father to tell his son that he loves him? Well! That's 99.9% of your problem right there!
And finally, QUIT TRYING TO LIVE OUT YOUR DREAMS THROUGH YOUR KIDS!!!! You want to be a concert pianist? Fine! Go do that! DO NOT force your kid into piano lessons he or she my not even want!
You've been given the job of preparing a young life to live in a fucked up world! No more, no less! Earn your children's respect! Help them achieve what it is that they want to achieve, not what you want them to achieve! Believe in them, and yourself, and let them know you do! Support them, and help them to have a healthy opinion of themselves! And for God's sake LOVE THEM!!!! Tell them you love them, and foster that love to be shown to others!
Do these things, and you can't go wrong! Or you can let McDonald's, Corporate America, and The Media do it for you! The choice is yours. And you have nobody to blame but yourself!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Want a "Real" Parent? I Can Do That!
Posted by: Clockwise Cat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Dec 21, 2007 6:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did not hear a peep out of either when the latest mass killings in a mall and church were done by automatic weapons. In fact, to my knowledge and brief check, neither has commented at all about the murders one way or another.
Guess fake violence is more fun to fight for the modern Don Quixote's of the world.
These people would be a joke if they did not do so much harm to this country with their hypocrisy and bad positions.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Dec 18, 2007 12:24 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sofla100 on Dec 18, 2007 3:16 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Mauimom on Dec 18, 2007 5:03 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: xtiml on Dec 18, 2007 5:33 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: xtiml
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JonA on Dec 18, 2007 6:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Hillary.... No Vote
Posted by: underledge
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 18, 2007 6:54 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Focusing on a virtual war--a form of artful expression, however silly--while a real one wages and people are dieing is the most useless waste of legislators time and my money since the baseball thing they "worked" on previously.
Shame on Congresscritters who do so.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chaoslegs on Dec 18, 2007 7:02 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I spent 5 hours last night with my friend, skipping the Monday Night football game he had tickets to, to play Halo 3 and we killed each other a combined 600 times. Lots of fun.
Never fired or owned a gun. Fought some in school, but usually bullying involved. Video game violence can just be fun, it doesn't have to corrupt my soul, although as an atheist I am sure Joe thinks it already has.
And where the heck are the parents. Most new games cost $50-$60, young kids can't afford to buy them on their own. If you wait, they may drop to the $20 amount and sometimes lower, but the good popular games take a long time to get there.
Oh and in Halo 3, the battle me the human Master Chief has is against alien fundamentalists.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: DaBear
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: Xynyx
» RE: But think of the children
Posted by: DaBear
» You WASTEDtickets to the Metrodome to see the Vikings win on Home Turf?
Posted by: Prairie Waif
» They were free tickets that were my friends
Posted by: chaoslegs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Flora Gael on Dec 18, 2007 7:10 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Nah. It was rock and roll that made our society rotten.
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» RE: Nah. It was rock and roll that made our society rotten.
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» One of the things I like about living in a free and liberal country...
Posted by: ABetterFuture
» Thanks, Knot_Rich.
Posted by: Flora Gael
» RE: Thanks, Knot_Rich.
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Thanks, Knot_Rich.
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Then why don't you move to a nation that bans things from adults because they "pollute the mind"
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: however...
Posted by: bigremo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Ben Sen on Dec 18, 2007 7:29 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willymack on Dec 18, 2007 10:38 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: W SLaan on Dec 18, 2007 10:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Video Game Rating system works better than any other entertainment rating system, such as the R-rating for movies, etc. The full study information is available on the bottom of that page.
2.
I have played video games since Doom (I was 6)on my family's first computer. There is absolutely nothing wrong with me. In fact, I am generally smarter, more literate, read more, etc than most of my age group. I go to one of the nations best Masters level schools (Elon).
ANYONE who is "messed up" by video games is already messed up. Look not at the entertainment but at the parents and culture they live in. If someone is hell bent on killing others, a video game where you kill zombies is not going to add or detract to it.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I am messed up because almost all of my lifetime we have been at war.
Posted by: Sojourner
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Knot_Rich on Dec 18, 2007 11:55 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm all against censorship, give any government entity a hand and they'll eventually take the arm, and there's isn't a lot the government can get involved in that they don't screw up anyway. In fact, in some ways putting some of this stuff out there helps clean up the gene pool. After all, if some teenager or young man doesn't have the smarts to determine that lying in the middle of a busy street to see if cars will swerve around him is just plain stupid, we don't really want him spreading his genes around anyway. I don't know what can be done to not censure this stuff but still keep it away from the kids too young to handle it, maybe a stronger rating system will help. It's not the job of the government to take over parental responsibility, unless of course you're part of Hillary's village, but something has to be done to get parents to step back up to the plate and assume their role. Until that happens, we're going to keep cranking out more and more kids who run off to schools, malls and churches using killing as their prefered method of expression. Where did they see such stupid stuff? Oh, wait...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'd like to see a post from a real parent
Posted by: wishninja
» RE: I'd like to see a post from a real parent
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: I'm a real parent
Posted by: bigremo
» RE: I'm a real parent
Posted by: Knot_Rich
Comments are closed-
Posted by: riotoustanpdx on Dec 18, 2007 3:39 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There may be a back room in the Pentagon with a special mission, and the mission may come directly from Dick Cheney's Office: To create as much and as horrific violent programming as is conceivable for television, movies, cable "news" channels and video "games" in order to instill in young people from the earliest ages that deep, inquisitive desire to know just what it feels like in real life to torture, maim, violently and explosively destroy a human being, and get to see it "close up and personal." That way, everyone benefits by having a "volunteer military service" without the need for a draft.
After all, we need people who are primed to kill, and to be serial killers, and who "love their work" because we can't seem to keep up with the demand for the good soldiers needed to maintain the level of violence that we have created around the globe. Without violent programming early in life, in all media, we just can't do the job of spreading our wonderful culture to every corner of the Earth.
So, yes, absolutely, we need to castigate every one who opposes the spread of horrific media violence, and if we have to discredit people based on ad-hominem arguments such as those above, then we must.
Lieberman is wrong for being a whore to the death industry, otherwise known as the military-industrial community of mega-corporations, which makes him a hypocrite for opposing the violence depicted in the media. He is trying to have it both ways, or he is engaging in a cover-up of his own marriage to the death and destruction industry.
The problem with the Lieberman, et al, attempt to limit media violence is the hypocrisy of it, and that anyone sincerely trying to place the limits that are needed would be demanding far greater controls than have ever been proposed thus far. Of course, Hillary is in the same camp as Lieberman and the others, not willing to stand up the the death industry in order to protect the young people of today from media violence and propaganda for the thrill of killing.
As far as "the separation of church and state" is concerned, since "We the People" are in fact "The State" forged into a politic union called a democratic republic, the only true "separation" is the establishment of Atheism as the sole religion of the State, and we have passed that momentous event decades ago.
By the way, there is not one shard of the teachings of Christ in the Left Behind series, just as there is none in the presidential campaigns of McCain, Obama, Huckabee, Clinton, Romney or Rudy. Atheists have nothing to fear from any of them; they will each kiss the feet of the death industry, or wash its feet with tears of gratitude for the campaign contributions, until they retire from public office.
As far a there ever being a "culture war," see my book (January 2008) titled "Placebo Politics and Empty Elections." Thomas A Nagy
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Idiot's View of Violence
Posted by: Flora Gael
» RE: The Idiot's View of Violence
Posted by: Knot_Rich
Comments are closed-
Posted by: herbal on Dec 19, 2007 1:05 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Hillary and Joe Club version of Skull and Bones is a staunch advocate for the morality of our children. The virtual blood that is, or isn’t, splattered by young Christian Zionists all over the virtual landscape is a noble electoral cause. Virtue is alive and well in the Hillary/Joe video room.
There are real Sunni/American plasma and corpuscles seeping into the sand of Iran in the war that voyeurs, Hill and Joe, have been cheerleading. But, alas, the effort falls short of orgasm. Yes, there is insufficient lubricant for their current lust de guerre. Peeping voters are implored to take heart. Hillary and Joe have been boosting a grander scale of snuff porn; preemptive nuclear attack of Iran. Iran is the home of enough Corporatist lubricant to invoke the fireworks of nuclear potency.
The embarrassment of Lyndon Johnson’s Viet body bags has been sanitized out of Iran by D. Rumsfeld. Surely, Hillary can arrange to extend the media white curtain to cover the first strike of Iran. No voter left behind will fail to appreciate the protection of the impressionable young from the visage of radiation burned flesh dripping from the limbs of our Persian collaterals. We are willed to adulate the human sacrifice on the Temple mount, the blood flowing through the gates. Jewish Zion, Christian Zion, Mormon Zion; it is God’s to discern and to judge who will be left behind, those who were not purpose driven defilers of the flesh.
Hillary met the Ruling Class when in the White House. She wishes to join their ranks.
Hillary is a cinch for Fuhrer more appropriately than President.
REFERENCES
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/200
70811_kucinich_throws_down_the_gauntlet/P0/
(Eliminate the space between the 0 and 7 because of the 60 character limit)
Google: ‘Hillary Clinton AIPAC’ to see her famous “No options left off the table” Speech.
Google: ‘Rev. Hagee AIPAC’ to see almost identical rhetoric from the star
Christian Zionism cultist.
Clue: Christian Zionist’s goal is to tear down the Dome of the Rock and Al Aqsa Mosque on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem so they can rebuild the Jewish Temple and thereby conjure Jesus’ Second Coming down to Earth to bring on Armageddon and the End Times.
The Tim LaHaye “Left Behind” novels are premillenial fantasies. Google up Margaret McDonald, Irving 1830 to understand premillennial “Rapture” and enter the theological territory of Jerry Falwell that influences Hillary. The word, Rapture, is not biblical.
http://www.idust.net/Tutorial/DBish002.htm for the war crime of U-238
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Perverted Gospel of Hillary and Joe
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: The Perverted Gospel of Hillary and Joe
Posted by: herbal
» RE: The Perverted Gospel of Hillary and Joe
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Agreed but in addition
Posted by: herbal
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TerryS on Dec 19, 2007 1:17 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, the subtitle of this piece
says "Hillary wants to censor video game
violence".
Just to be clear, Hillary is NOT calling
for censorship of what games *adults* can
buy, she (and 3 other senators) sent a
letter to the Entertainment Software Ratings
Board (ESRB) asking that they reconsider
giving Manhunt 2 a Mature rating (for those
17 and older) instead of an Adults Only
rating (those 18 years and older).
Even if the ESRB took their advice and
changed the rating to Adult Only, it would
still be perfectly legal for the publisher
of Manhunt 2 to sell this game to adults
AND to children. The ESRB rating system
is completely voluntary.
So why all the wailing and gnashing of
teeth over the ESRB? Because most retailers
want to stay on the good side of parents,
and thus will only sell games that have
a ESRB rating. Plus, a lot of retailers
won't carry Adult Only games. Plus Nintendo
and Sony won't allow Adult Only games
on their platforms.
This is the free market in action, NOT
censorship !!
Rockstar Games (the publisher of Manhunt 2)
and other publishers of violent video games
are upset, not because of any love of free
speech, but because they know a lower ESRB
rating means less *profits* for them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TerryS on Dec 19, 2007 2:20 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the big arguments in defense of
violent video games is that they are
designed and played by adults.
Well you can't have it both ways,
you can't insist that violent video
games are designed for and played
almost exclusively by adults, and
then turn around and complain when
retailers who cater to families don't
want to carry the games.
If you want to experience violence
porn, then fine. But I don't see
the sex porn industry whining because
Walmart or Target refuse to stock their
videos. If these violent video games
(violence porn) are purely meant for
adults, then why not market and sell
them the same as regular porn.
Adults have the money and freedom to
support a vibrant porn industry.
There is no reason that *adults*
can't support a vibrant violence porn
industry. There's no reason to demand
that violence porn be sold by every
game retailer.
For those interested in violence porn,
here is the wikipedia description of
the orginal Manhunt:
"Aside from the sensitive subject matter of
Manhunt (snuff films), the controversy surrounding
the game stems from the extremely graphic manner
in which the player kills enemies. The game has
three 'levels' of executions: hasty, violent, and
gruesome. Hasty kills are quick and the least
bloody of the three, while violent kills are
considerably more gory, and gruesome kills are
over-the-top executions. Furthermore, the game
encourages players to execute enemies as brutally
as possible, and awards players who do so with
higher scores. Cash's violent killings in the
game are also extremely graphic, both visually
and audibly (e.g. a victim will gag when he's
being choked, muffle and vomit blood while he's
being suffocated etc., in a lifelike manner).
Some examples of Cash's executions include
decapitation, suffocation with a plastic bag,
and jamming a crowbar into a victim's head."
Note, in the case of the original Manhunt
Rockstar Games courageously held onto their
artistic integrity and kept their Adult Only
rating. This allowed violence porn afficianos
everywhere to vicariously enjoy gruesome and
torturous killings. There is nothing stopping
them from doing the exact same thing with
Manhunt 2.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Stoney 12+1 on Dec 20, 2007 9:31 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He hasn't grown up to be a mass murderer, child molester, or social deviant! He has turned out to be an extremely fine young man, who I'm proud to call my son!
Why? SIMPLE! I taught him to take responsibility for his own actions! I actually took the time to get involved in my son's life! I actually spent time with my son, and asked him what was going on in his life! How he felt about certain things that were going on in this country at the time!
And those "violent" video games? I PLAYED THEM WITH HIM!!!! I got my ass smoked once or twice, but I got REAL good on the "Twisted Metal" series! Finally, we quit playing against each other, and formed an alliance to smoke the bad guys! We ROCKED!!!! And I told him we rocked!
You see, what I'm trying to say is simple! Too many parents use the television, and video game console like a baby sitter to keep the kids quiet while Mommy and Daddy stare blankly at "American Idol" or the "drama de jour" emanating form their own television. Then, Junior comes home in a Police Car, and they want to blame everything, and everybody except the true culprits! THEMSELVES!!!!!
What video games did Nero play? How about Hitler? How about Stalin? Face it! Some people are just fucked up! It's nobody's fault! Others had no chance from the beginning! And that's the fault of those that raised them!
Want your kids' respect? Simple! EARN IT!!!!! Let them know that you love them! I STILL give my son a hug and a kiss when he comes home from school! What? You say that's wrong? You say, (as a Baptist minister told me once), that it's "unseemly" for a father to tell his son that he loves him? Well! That's 99.9% of your problem right there!
And finally, QUIT TRYING TO LIVE OUT YOUR DREAMS THROUGH YOUR KIDS!!!! You want to be a concert pianist? Fine! Go do that! DO NOT force your kid into piano lessons he or she my not even want!
You've been given the job of preparing a young life to live in a fucked up world! No more, no less! Earn your children's respect! Help them achieve what it is that they want to achieve, not what you want them to achieve! Believe in them, and yourself, and let them know you do! Support them, and help them to have a healthy opinion of themselves! And for God's sake LOVE THEM!!!! Tell them you love them, and foster that love to be shown to others!
Do these things, and you can't go wrong! Or you can let McDonald's, Corporate America, and The Media do it for you! The choice is yours. And you have nobody to blame but yourself!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Want a "Real" Parent? I Can Do That!
Posted by: Clockwise Cat
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Dec 21, 2007 6:39 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I did not hear a peep out of either when the latest mass killings in a mall and church were done by automatic weapons. In fact, to my knowledge and brief check, neither has commented at all about the murders one way or another.
Guess fake violence is more fun to fight for the modern Don Quixote's of the world.
These people would be a joke if they did not do so much harm to this country with their hypocrisy and bad positions.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
One Company Thinks They've Created Fast Food With a Conscience -- Are They Right?
ACORN Smear Collaborator Claims Persecution to Raise Money for Her Legal Troubles
When Will Obama Stop Trying to Work with Republicans?




