Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Are You Going to Pay for Bush's Wars?

By Jodie Evans, AlterNet. Posted December 15, 2007.


How much of your tax payment this year would you like to allocate for waterboarding in Iraq or an invasion of Iran?
Advertisement

How much of your tax payment this year would you like to allocate for waterboarding in Iraq or an invasion of Iran?

Around the world, people are puzzled as to why the U.S. public allows the Bush administration to wage illegal wars and usurp our power. Why do we tolerate it and continue to pay for it?

Over the past year, millions of U.S. citizens have voted, lobbied, marched and taken direct action to end the war in Iraq. Courageous soldiers, such as members of Iraq Veterans Against the War, have taken the risk to speak out. Yet Congress continues to appropriate billions of dollars for the war.

How do we up the ante of resistance? It is time for taxpayers who oppose this war to join together in nonviolent civil disobedience and show Congress how to cut off the funds for this war and redirect resources to the pressing needs of people.

Chris Hedges wrote in the Nation, "I will not pay my income tax if we go to war with Iran ... I will put the taxes I owe in an escrow account. I will go to court to challenge the legality of the war."

On this anniversary of the Boston Tea Party, a coalition of anti-war activists is calling on individuals to sign a pledge to resist payment of a portion of their taxes. Our pledge states, "When I am joined by 100,000 other U.S. taxpayers, I will join in an act of mass civil disobedience and refuse to the portion of my taxes that pays the U.S. military occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan." We are aiming for April 15.

Former Secretary of State Alexander Haig once said, "Let them march all they want, as long as they pay their taxes." And he was right. We can march all we want, but if we cooperate with the funding of the war, we are culpable. There is a great tradition of war tax resistance in the United States. During the Mexican-American War, which began in 1846, Henry David Thoreau refused payment of war taxes and called on others to join him in resistance. "If a thousand people were not to pay their tax bills this year, that would not be a violent and bloody measure, as it would be to pay them, and enable the state to commit violence and shed innocent blood."

When Ralph Waldo Emerson visited Thoreau in jail, he asked the author of Walden, "Henry, what are doing in there?" Thoreau responded, "Ralph, what are you doing out there?"

Our statement is not against taxation or government. Many of us will continue to pay a portion of our taxes that support the vital functions of government. But we will hold in escrow or redirect the portion of our war taxes to humanitarian aid projects and projects such as those providing relief to survivors of Hurricane Katrina.

Some might suspect that tax resistance is symbolic and futile. But we want to purposely put a cog in the machine of war-tax collection. We believe it will lead to a deepening of opposition as tens of thousands of people say, "I can no longer in good conscience pay for these acts by my government." Mass war-tax resistance, on the scale proposed, has never been done in the United States

The tradition of civil disobedience involves breaking a law in favor of a higher law. It is a statement of noncooperation with illegitimate authority.

There are people for whom this will not be an option or an appropriate expression of resistance. We hope that each of us will consider what additional action and sacrifice we will make to end this war.

As Chris Hedges explained his reasons for tax refusal, "I have friends in Tehran, Gaza, Beirut, Baghdad, Jerusalem and Cairo. They will endure far greater suffering and deprivation. I want to be able, once the slaughter is over, to at least earn the right to ask for their forgiveness."

The world and history will judge us by how vigorously we resist the illegal and immoral war tactics of the Bush administration. One start is to stopping paying for Bush's war. What are you doing out there?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war, bush, taxes

Jodie Evans is co-founder of Code Pink: Women for Peace, which is launching www.dontbuybushswar.org to commemorate the anniversary of the Boston Tea Party.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Money for nothing...
Posted by: rocketman on Dec 15, 2007 2:50 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Around the world, people are puzzled as to why the U.S. public allows the Bush administration to wage illegal wars and usurp our power"" - I doubt the western powers are wondering anything as they have done and are doing the same thing.

As for paying for waterboarding..I'd have to say I detest torture and the thought of the US actually condoning it. I would have always said the US doesn't do that, but then there is reality and many if not all countries have done some form of it..

..but it is tempting to say if it saved the life of a family member say in 9-11, I'd pay alot

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not as easy as the author suggests.
Posted by: wli on Dec 15, 2007 3:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, most people don't pony up their taxes for the year in one big lump sum. Their taxes are withheld from their paychecks on a bi-weekly basis or similar. Putting money in escrow in such a situation does little or nothing.

Second, bank accounts are raided and wages garnished with mere keystrokes. Attempting to avoid paying taxes on income actually earned doesn't really get very far, and not very many people need to be put away to scare the rest into line.

Third, money is not all that crucial. They're little numbers in accounts that tick to say how much of this and that you should get for your typically indirect service to the ruling class. Taxation is mostly shuffling those numbers to redistribute rights to acquire goods according to the whims of whoever's captured the governmental institutions, in this case, the ruling class of plutocrats. One should look to what's called the "real economy" of concrete goods and services instead.

I have no intention of authoring a guidebook to protest or resistance even for the sake of a complete response. However, I will point out that tax resistance has severe shortcomings as a method for such. I'd suggest reviewing the methods of the labor movement in the US and Europe with particular emphasis on developing explanations for their successes and defeats.

This quickly degenerates into a discussion of disputed aspects of military history, in particular espionage, of post-WWII US and Europe, so I'll cut things short here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Petrodollar
Posted by: tonyf69 on Dec 15, 2007 3:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't think a 'Tax Strike' would be very effective in halting the finance of the Iraq conflict because it is not American taxes that are entirely paying for it.

The massive American Military is financed by the Petrodollar and the Military in return secures an environment in which the Petrodollar can flurish.

Non payment of taxes would likely scare the Government, but they would simply discredit and imprison the offenders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Petrodollar Posted by: dezertlady71 dezertlady71
» RE: Petrodollar Posted by: MyLeftFoot
Yes.
Posted by: talkville on Dec 15, 2007 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the USA, each of us will pay for the actions of other individuals, elected or not, and their policies. Make no mistake; we are the Soil which gives life to those who have sprinkled and spread all sorts of artificial rhetorics in order to remain the "flower of civilization".

And our entire culture is based upon the expropriation of snippets and useful tid-bits of all others. Now, it's time to pay up or, more to the point, pay down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Revenue is irrelevant to this government.
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 15, 2007 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nobody runs on a budget in DC Land. With only a few exceptions, all of Congress and the whole of the Bush administration are angry, foolish children with Asian credit cards.

And lots of hardware.

We haven't had a meaningful spending policy since "Clinton v. Gingrich".

On the other hand, I agree with the author in the more general sense: if the government is going to waste our money, we shouldn't be paying so much in taxes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great Idea, But It Doesn't Work That Way
Posted by: dezertlady71 dezertlady71 on Dec 15, 2007 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For most people who have regular jobs, trying to withold taxes would not work. Your local HR wouldn't allow it.
Second, if the IRS had something to say about you not paying taxes, you would be fined, levied, liened, and harassed. In most cases there would be no being taken to court to plead your case.
So I would call this a "pipe dream".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ignore this tax suggestion, but do something else
Posted by: Knowmad on Dec 15, 2007 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As Wli describes above, tax evasion or withholding is not a practical suggestion in your country, as it is deemed illegal. It sure doesn't seem to take much to be arrested there, and who knows what might happen to you after that. I'm sure Ms. Evans is trying to help, but perhaps she should consult with those who can envision the potenial negative aspects of an idea before blurting it out on world-side media. This seems to be merely a superficial solution for the sake of offering a solution, and more desperate than helpful - not to mention potentially dangerous to those who might try it.

Your current administration and its followers are not the least bit interested in your opinions or welfare, only their own. This is obvious to virtually everyone with a tad of awareness or intelligence, except maybe many of you Americans, who are so bludgeoned with lies at every turn that you're often blinded and can't see, or believe, what's happening.

You are now in a full-blown neocorp ruled society. The only good thing about that is, by its very description, it suggests a way to fight back. And you won't be risking anything because you're breaking no laws - unless it's now illegal there not to spend money. To hit them where it hurts and really get their attention you should boycott, yes...not taxes, but spending. When the immoral, foolish politicians you have put allowed to take over are brought to task by their corporate masters - the real power - they'll do whatever they're told, as cowards and bullies always do when confronted.

So, Ms. Evans, and those like her who want to help save your country, should devote their energies to promoting actions which at least have a chance of making a difference. Maybe things like a 'no Walmart month', or a 'no driving week/month' (walk or bike to wherever you need to go; you might even like it, and the environment will thank you as well). The possibilities are endless, from not purchasing anything made with petrolem, to going to a local organic market for food rather than BigAgroChem (and, bonus, it also tastes like food). The possibilities are only limited by your imagination, participation and, of course, willingness to get involved.

When those in charge of the parasitical corporations ruining your lives see their bottom line turn red, or even tend that way, they'll certainly do something - they'll have no choice, as without making money for the corporate entity they have no real life.

Just a few more suggestions from a concerned Canadian. (One, by the way, who is totally disgusted by our bushlicking Prime Minister harper's shameful support of your administration's ridiculous stand in Bali. We're rallying and petitioning all over the country to stop this, and little harper will soon pay with his career, guaranteed).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fellow Canadian agrees Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
We are Borg, resistance is Futile
Posted by: Rod on Dec 15, 2007 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This how the government operates.

However, a peaceful protests, like multi millions marching in every city, get noticed. I do not advocate huge march in Washington, because of the HUGE amount of petroleum needed to transport. But if everyone were to pick a day, and protest ,except police, fire, hospitals, nursing facilities etc and march in their home towns all over the country, that would get attention.

When it reaches the point that 1 out of ever 3 or 4 is marching they will know that they no longer have our permission to rule and things will change. So why not get all the alternet type internet forces together and start this.

Pick a day with decent temperatures on a weekend with some significance and see if we can organize peaceful energy neutral protests nationwide. If this does not happen then John Q Public is not yet ready. Rest assured, when John Q. Public finally awakens the government will have to change. We can only hope it is not too late.

Rod

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Withholding taxes
Posted by: smadaj on Dec 15, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I do not want my tax dollars used to fund illegal and immoral military actions, I believe that the incredibly destructive laws that have been passed over the last seven years - in the name of national security - would make this form of rebellion a higher risk action than in previous years. The administration can now declare that anyone is an "enemy combatant" without having to show any evidence whatsoever to anyone. Any citizen of this country can now legally be removed from their home without a warrant or any explanation, can be stripped of the their citizenship, can be taken to any location on the planet (including NSA-run secret prisons within the U.S.), can be tortured and then killed. They can be denied a lawyer, a trial, and any information about why they are being held. All of the laws to allow the government to take these actions are in place now. Friends of the Administration in the House and Senate are continually working toward taking away our right to free speech and the right to organize and demonstrate. I think the safest way to protest is by being visible, but the risks are going to become greater. Possibly quite suddenly. I hope I'm wrong but things look awfully grim to me...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Income tax!
Posted by: Frenchie! on Dec 15, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regarding the income tax I suggest viewing the following video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l5Of8M1MZJQ

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

petrodollars must be cut, instead of taxes
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Dec 15, 2007 9:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As above correctly commented, petrodollars are the real financers.
It raises a curious question.
If the dollar is falling everyday, and Euro strenghtens everyday, why do most opec members still sell its oil in dollars ?
It is interesting to raise the question in order to discover who is really funding the war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paying with your life savings
Posted by: PaulK on Dec 15, 2007 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Indochina conflict was paid for in part through stagflation.

The scheme is simple. If you spent nine trillion dollars that you don't have and you've already put one trillion dollars in circulation, print nine trillion more dollars and make the dollar worth a dime. You've kept your promise of no new taxes!

The people who suffer are people with their life savings in banks, bondholders, and foreign investors in the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

People who are afraid to risk anything should stay in bed
Posted by: meltedpriest on Dec 15, 2007 2:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, folks: if you expect that BushCo is just going to leave you all alone and roll over for you if you play nice...then I have some New Orleans real estate to sell...cheap!

The reality is that if you hurt the Administration War Machine in any way: they're going to come after you. If you protest and block traffic: you'll get arrested. If you engage in sit-in's in Congressmen's offices: you're going to get arrested, possibly tasered, or (in the case of one friend of mine) have pepper-spray dabbed into your eyes.

If you withhold taxes, expect to get audited, garnished, or anything else that they can think of that's presently legal (altho I truly DOUBT that BushCo would start labelling tax-resistors as enemy-combatants. Things aren't THAT bad...yet). What would you expect?? Tyrants and autocrats NEVER go down without a fight.

So, you have to decide how much you can sacrifice to stand up for your beliefs. We ALL know the price of apathy (or, you wouldn't be reading this). Sacrifice is often hard and sometimes yields little noticeable result but is necessary to get ourselves out of the steadily sinking quagmire.

Just remember Gandhi's statement on fighting the Powers That Be: "First they laugh at you. Next, they fight you. Then, you win."

All life entails risk. The important thing is not to let the fear of loss blunt the edge of your convictions. Otherwise, why get out of bed at all??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For Legal Residents It May Not Be A Viable Option
Posted by: cocozane on Dec 15, 2007 4:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I may be wrong, but I understood that if legal residents do not pay taxes, that may be grounds for expulsion (and seizure of assets). Is that so?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

don't pay your loans, either...
Posted by: undrgrndgirl on Dec 15, 2007 10:17 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i would also suggest that, in response to predatory lending practices, we stop paying our mortgages, student loan and credit card payments, too...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

going for the throat....
Posted by: eosrk on Dec 16, 2007 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..only buy stuff you need, and not wants, for it's funded by the consumer anyway, and if the consumer spending slows down or stops.....then they will have to stop rolling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Taxation Without Representation
Posted by: wilty on Dec 16, 2007 9:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The gist of this post is an intriguing one; imagine 20 or so million antiwar citizens, civilly disobeying Howdy Doody and Darth by
not paying their war and torture taxes.

I love romancing the idea, but reality suggests
that while there currently isn't enough prison nor gulag space to confine these people, it's a darn tootin' certainty that it would be built in one big hurry.

Another downside is that, these Neocon Nazi criminals would just take another loan out from the Chinese if their was a shortfall in the
military and CIA budgets, and any general cash flow crisis would be dealt with, by shutting down the entire Federal Government, period.

Afterall, isn't that what the Royal House of Bush wants to eventually do, anyway?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Only...
Posted by: apophenia_monkey on Dec 16, 2007 11:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
i find meself a coward on this subject. the idea is one i embrace, but w/o the numbers of other citizens to do the same, i'm afraid the IRS taking everything i my family and sinking us deeper to indentured servitude is not an option i like.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The war is not being paid for by current taxes
Posted by: Intellect on Dec 16, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The war is not being paid for by current taxes.
What good is a tax revolt when the government has an unlimited credit card and uses it?

We have a 9 trillion dollar deficit. That's what has paid for this war (and Bush's enabling the corporate and religious organization raid on our treasury), not our current taxes which aren't even sufficient to maintain our infrastructure. Eventually the humongous deficit will have to be paid by our children and grandchildren - talk about immorality! Bush and his Repugnican rubber stamp Congress have no sense of morality!

If you withhold taxes, the IRS will levy your assets starting with your bank account. It will take some time for that to happen, but it most definitely will. The IRS levy will destroy your credit rating when it occurs, because you will no longer to be able to guarantee that you will be able to pay your bills when your account is frozen, and the lien will show on your credit report.
In other words, a tax revolt in today's times is a bad idea.

If you want to change what happens in Washington, get as politically active as you possibly can. Give of your time and efforts to elect candidates who will represent you, not positions you abhor.
At election time, pester everyone you know to vote. Join local efforts to drive people to the polls. Write letters to your local newspapers, and monitor your representatives votes in Congress. Write to your representatives and senators regarding their positions on particular bills, especially those you oppose. Call them by phone. Join Move-on and other progressive organizations that will inform you about what you can do to help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They can't arrest ALL OF US
Posted by: soulrebeljc on Dec 16, 2007 3:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have taken a stand on my tax liability to this war. http://www.call4democracy.org/ARTICLE.ASP?AID=815

Peace
Jason Call
www.Call4Democracy.org
Candidate, US Congress, New Mexico CD 1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

V for Vendetta
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Dec 16, 2007 4:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when it becomes too dangerous to be a greedy,scumbag head of a corrupt corporation that steals our public money and subverts the truth by propaganda spewed by their media networks. things will change. death has a way of equalizing things

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: V for Vendetta Posted by: UndergroundPirate
» RE: V for Vendetta Posted by: Turiye
» RE: V for Vendetta Posted by: soulrebeljc
how to end the war
Posted by: mr.E on Dec 17, 2007 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if everyone in this country that is against the war (not sure about the exact numbers but i'm guessing a good percentage) were to not pay their taxes today, the war would be over tomorrow. i read a lot of comments about reasons not to resist taxes, but they all amount to excuses. you say the system is too powerful already, i beg to differ. you just underestimate the power of the masses. you say i might get thrown in jail, well i'd rather be in jail then financially supporting murder, rape and whatever other war crimes are going on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hooray for War Tax Resistors!
Posted by: James W. Harris on Dec 17, 2007 12:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I salute the War Tax Resistors.

The worst tax dollars are those that go to war and killing innocents.

Actually, all taxes are “death taxes.”

They are collected by threat of death. If you refuse to pay, eventually the State comes to seize your property at gunpoint. If you further refuse, the guns are drawn. If you further resist, you will be killed.

Most of what the State does would be considered a crime if done by ordinary people. Taxation = robbery and slavery. IRS collection methods = violation of fundamental Bill of Rights freedoms. Wars = murder on a mass scale. Government schools = kidnapping and brainwashing. The draft and compulsory national “service” are kidnapping. Military “recruiting” is based on fraud and lies. Prisons are vile cesspools that torture human beings and create more criminals. The enforcement of “victimless crime laws” against pot smokers and sex workers is neo-Prohibitionist tyranny.

The very existence of the IRS and tax forms makes all Americans fearful of their government, afraid to protest for fear that their lives will destroyed by the IRS.

The State is a gigantic criminal gang. It has bamboozled society into thinking it is necessary, and that its worst crimes are actual “services” that we should be grateful for. Surely this is the hoax of the ages.

To stop the State’s crimes, cut off its life blood, high taxes. Especially the income tax.

RON PAUL has introduced legislation to do this – to repeal the income tax outright, and replace the lost revenues by slashing government spending, beginning with the warfare state.

NO SINGLE MOVE would do more to reign in the bloody activity of the State than this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

President Bush approach and reasoning image of Taliban
Posted by: alanmirsa on Dec 18, 2007 9:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"If the Russians are willing to do that, which I support - then the Iranians does not need to learn how to enrich," President George W. Bush said yesterday
Taliban: Women should not learn to write as they might write to their lovers and act adultery and sin!
“If the Iranians accept that uranium for a civilian nuclear power plant, then there’s no need for them to learn how to enrich.”
Having the peaceful nuclear energy hence having the knowledge of building the bomb takes away the importance of possession and helps the destruction of such weapons
One should realize Iranians are very logical, what can one or two bomb do when countries have hundreds of new generation bombs? Clever as they are they won't ravage the effort for waste; instead they are building their future with peaceful atomic energy, as should other nations do!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]