Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Yankee Pitcher Roger Clemens as Guilty as Bonds

By Dave Zirin, AlterNet. Posted December 14, 2007.


MLB honchos not knowing about steroid use is like Bush not "reading" the National Intelligence Estimate while saber-rattling against Iran.
Advertisement

Ever had someone spit in your face and tell you it's raining? That's how it felt watching former Sen. George Mitchell's press conference on steroid use in major league baseball. The former Senate majority leader unleashed his "investigative findings" speaking with the somber, deliberate tones of an exhausted undertaker. Mitchell strained to convey scorn upon both baseball owners and the union for being "slow to act." Yet beneath the surface, his report is ugly, sanctimonious fraud meant to absolve those at the top and pin blame on a motley crew of retired players, trainers and clubhouse attendants. This is truly the old saw of the magical fishing net that captures minnows but lets the whales swim free.

Sanctioned by Commissioner Bud Selig's office, the Mitchell Report was seen by some as an unprecedented act in sports: a $20 million internal investigation aimed at rooting out "performance enhancing drugs and human growth hormones" in the game.

The Mitchell Report certainly contains a great deal of sexy sizzle. First and foremost, it names names: including MVPs Mo Vaughn, Miguel Tejada and Barry Bonds, as well as former all-stars like Eric Gagne and Lenny Dykstra. It also names a man being called the Moby Dick to Mitchell's Ahab: seven-time Cy Young Award winner Roger Clemens. For some time, people in the game have whispered about Clemens being on the juice. And for some time, the 45-year-old Clemens denied all charges as a compliant media lapped it up. As Yahoo Sports' Dan Wetzel wrote, "Year after year he peddled the same garbage. Roger Clemens was so dominant for so long because he simply outworked everyone. It played to the nation's Puritan roots, made Clemens out to be this everyman maximizing his skills through singular focus, dedication and a commitment to drinking carrot juice, or something. It's all gone now, the legend of Rocket Roger dead on arrival of the Mitchell Report; one of the greatest pitchers of all time, his seven Cy Youngs and 354 career victories lost to history under a pile of lies and syringes."

The Mitchell Report confirms not only suspicions about Clemens, but also the existence of an outrageous media bias and double standard. While seven time MVP Barry Bonds was raked over the conjecture coals for years, Clemens got a pass. Two players, both dominant into their 40s, one black and one white, with two entirely different ways of being treated. It doesn't take Al Sharpton to do the cultural calculus.

And yet, flaying Clemens shouldn't excuse the gross whitewash at work.

There are three fundamental problems with the Mitchell Report:

1. Mitchell himself. George Mitchell, the former Senate majority leader best known before today for helping negotiate the peace deal in Northern Ireland, has had a massive conflict of interest when it comes to baseball. The man is on the boards of both the Boston Red Sox and also the Walt Disney Co. The Disney Co. owns ESPN, baseball's No. 1 broadcast partner. Joe Morgan has spoken out about how in the 1990s, ESPN execs encouraged him not to state his suspicions about steroid use on the air. As Morgan said, "I would be broadcasting a game, and there would be players hitting balls in a way that they had no business hitting them."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: steroids, roger clemens, barry bonds, mlb, baseball, mitchell report

Dave Zirin is the author of What's My Name Fool? Sports and Resistance in the United States. Read more of his work at Edgeofsports.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Who gives a fuck?
Posted by: bigremo on Dec 14, 2007 5:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who gives a shit if professional baseball players take steroids? Why are my tax dollars being spent on this nonsense? I don't care if the baseball players inject themselves with performance enhancing drugs that kill them at the end of the day! It's just a distraction and absolutely unimportant to the world at large. What real news is this crap covering?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: Timba
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: JSquercia
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: johnclark
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: wavydavy
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: ProgressiveRedStateResident
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: johnclark
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: Joe
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: wavydavy
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: K.D.
» RE: Who gives a fuck? Posted by: wavydavy
» I give a fuck. Posted by: cjohnson44
» RE: I give a fuck. Posted by: tmwright
Bush is involved in the scandal, too
Posted by: johnclark on Dec 14, 2007 6:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a link from Alternet

It's true that every scandal in Baseball's history points back to the owners. John Sayles "Eight Men Out" showed us that it was Charles Comiskey's greed that caused the Blacksox scandal.

This Baseball monopoly has existed since the 1922 Baltimore Terps vs the National League decision; it still effects how the game is run. It why the small market Rockies didn't stand a chance against the big market Red Sox. It's why the Yankees can buy (and juice) much of the talent. It's why the sport remained segregated for so long. And it's why the books are closed from public viewing.

The Court has said time and time again that it's up to Congress to break the monopoly. Every time that the political will rises up to do something, the owners do nothing that looks like something and legislation dies.

As a fan, I knew how Mitchell would play today. He always plays better away. He's never any good at home. And we're all booing him in the stands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TNH
Posted by: DetachedObserver on Dec 14, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was waiting to hear Zirin's take on this. And he didn't disappoint. Contrast that with your average local sports columnist across the land, who's peddling the precise narrative that Zirin is so rightly contemptuous of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Owners and the Owned
Posted by: jim_altman on Dec 14, 2007 7:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They may be paid the wages of kings, we may pen legends about them, and sing songs of their exploits, but they must never forget they are the owned; the jesters, the jugglers, the gladiators of true royalty. One can almost hear echoes of the Duke of Clarence saying, "Fetch my n***," in no bluer a blue-blood than George Mitchell summoning the "owned" of professional baseball to remind them of their true places in the arena of sport. And, will a single owner face jail time for encouraging and supplying the juice to their gladiators? Perhaps, a few of their house servants will face the public lash. Is it not punishment enough that performance enhancing drugs are also life-shortening; that the injuries played though for glory will be crippling in future anonymity? Who dreams of spending many years signing autographs and opening supermarkets? Slavery is still slavery even when you pay the slaves if the freedom to make and live with personal choices does not exist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» come on now Posted by: reevolve
» RE: come on now Posted by: jim_altman
» seriously? Posted by: reevolve
This is what our legislators do in D.C. land?
Posted by: ABetterFuture on Dec 14, 2007 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Checks and balances on a national passtime, when there's a war on going?

These "athletes" want to live fast and die young with shriveled up naughty bits? Then I say to our useless Congresscritters to back off and let them self-destruct. Fewer CO2 emissions that way, and an overall reduction in global warming in the absence of so much hot air.

This is why Congress is more loathed than Bush. They spend their time and my money goofing off while our nation teeters on the brink, or over it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lawsuits 'R' Us
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Dec 14, 2007 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some in this post said quite pointly, "who cares" and I am one of those compared to more important events happening.
But don't be surprised if anyone of these players file a lawsuit for defamation of character.I wonder if someone will.
Great article by Zirin.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

well said who gives a fuck!
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Dec 14, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
impeach bush and cheney
end the war in iraq
end the war in afghanistan
health care
voter fraud
the list goes on and these fucking clowns in dc just don't get it.
we don't give a fuck what baseball players do,we care about our sons and daughters dying in illegal wars,taking our children to a doctor when they are sick,labor relations,oil dependency
wake the fuck up!!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh, please -- not the race card again
Posted by: wavydavy on Dec 14, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The steroid situation in MLB (and surely other sports) is without a doubt an embarassment (at least) for all concerned. But let's drop the bullshit "poor innocent black player" vs. "guilty but excused white player" storyline. Especially if it involves Barry Bonds, who is an unmitigated prick who has offended just about everyone he has come in contact with and who was being trashed for his attitude long before his head expanded from all the steroids.

Maybe the reason Bonds has received more press than Clemens is because, oh, I don't know...

-- He has been mentioned in this scandal since the first BALCO stories in 2003, FOUR YEARS AGO. Clemens was not.

-- He was one of many athletes, lots of them white, who was listed as a customer of BALCO. Clemens was not.

-- A prize-winning, best-selling book, Game of Shadows, was written about Bonds' involvement with steroids. No books have been written about Clemens' usage (yet).

And, let us not forget that Bonds was not forced to testify to the Mitchell Commission. The only player who was forced to testify is white (Jason Giambi). The only player whose house was raided during the BALCO investigation was Jason Grimsley, who is white.

Look, I hold no brief for Clemens; I think he is a whiny, not-very-clutch, egomaniacal asshole, who has clearly been juiced for a while (do you think maybe throwing a broken bat at Mike Piazza in the 2000 WS was a result of 'roid rage?).

But the idea that one asshole who happens to be black (Bonds) got more press in the last 4 years than an asshole who happens to be white (Clemens) BECAUSE Bonds is black and Clemens is white is just plain stupid, and obviously the result of the author's preconceived notions rather than any actual facts.

See here for more on Bonds' asshole-ishness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The race card whites started...again Posted by: dangerouslysane
Christmas Comes Early: A Gift To Both Parties
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Dec 14, 2007 2:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally there's something that the Bush Administration and Congress can agree on; that this will be a great opportunity to distract everybody from their mutual, absolute failure to do anything else constructive.

I sense some congressional committees, ceaseless media coverage and endless pontification about fair play from the wind bags in congress that have done little else encouraging for a nation in need of leaders with actual integrity and fortitude.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Sports Controversy??? Really....
Posted by: indieandie on Dec 14, 2007 2:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am too busy to pay attention to this mind numbing sport's distraction. My time is spent looking for fulfilled promises and watching our last newly elected Congress circle the wagons. The smoke screen is gagging me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting Blog
Posted by: coyasun on Dec 14, 2007 3:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I found this blog post about some creative solutions for what this report could potentially do to the MLB: http://nowinchicago.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bond's isn't guilty.
Posted by: cjohnson44 on Dec 14, 2007 4:01 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Only Whitie can be guilty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the use of the apostrophy Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Excuse Me?!?
Posted by: paddymick on Dec 14, 2007 4:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MLB honchos not knowing about steroid use is like Bush not "reading" the National Intelligence Estimate while saber-rattling against Iran...

You have got to be f*cking kidding. You are comparing corporate sports owners, whose decisions involve nothing more than money management and the tender egos of idiot sports fans with the President of the United States when he threatens to invade YET ANOTHER COUNTRY? As if compromising a baseball game is equivalent to the proposed slaughter of countless innocents...

You should be ashamed of yourself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

...Until Proven Guilty
Posted by: dumdumboy on Dec 14, 2007 4:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While there is evidence that Roger Clemens used steroids, I don't think he has actually been proven guilty. This report isn't a court of law, after all. If it were, then it'd be all prosecution, with no defense.

I'm not a fan of Roger Clemens, but something about steroids contributing to his longevity strikes me as being implausible. Doesn't steroid abuse lead to an effect of burning the candle at both ends, allowing the athlete to enjoy a few years of excessive prowess, after which they crash? Wasn't this the case with Mark McGuire? I know Hulk Hogan admitted that this was the case with his abuse.

In any event, I'm really not that concerned about this issue. They're not harming anyone else, and "Better living through chemistry," as Freewheelin' Franklin used to say.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

To the Clemens apologists
Posted by: Kym525 on Dec 14, 2007 5:08 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brian McNamee admitted that he injected Roger "I'm Juiced" Clemens in the ass (that just sounds totally homoerotic--not that I have a problem with that--hunky, sweaty guys doing the wild thing is a turn-on) with steroids four times over a several week period in 1998, when Clemens was playing for the Toronto Blue Jays.

Oh really *raises eyebrow*. Didn't he win the Cy Young award that year?

Also, according to McNamee, he injected Clemens during the 2000 and 2001 seasons when he played for the Yankees and guess what? Another Cy Young.

Amazing, ain't it?

In contrast: Giants owner Peter Magowan asked Bonds back in 2004 if he took steroids. Bonds told him that when he took the whatever it was he'd been given for his arthritis and sleeping problems, he did not KNOW they were steroids. It was later that he learned they were. Also, Bonds said that he used both the topical cream and the drops in full view of his teammates and others. Don't most steroid users do this stuff out of sight or with a trusted friend?

Bonds also told Magowan that he stopped using the stuff because they didn't help. From what I've heard, that's pretty much the same story he told the grand jury.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legalize the use of steroids
Posted by: Sociallibertarian on Dec 14, 2007 5:39 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If people wants to destroy themselves let them do it. If they want to enhance there performance let them do it but make it obligatory to tell if you use steroids so that "clean" athletes get the attention they should have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The author is an Idiot
Posted by: dismayed on Dec 14, 2007 5:52 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
first he states....

the report "confirms not only suspicions about Clemens"

and then....

and "Reputations have been ruined -- and the essential "truth" of the report is still based on hearsay."

what a jerk.

ultimately, as previously stated "WHO CARES".. not me. Whatever, blow yourself up on steriods- The blackwater guys love it afterall. The U.S. is the proud flagwaving (if over leveraged) owner of a morally corrupt society.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just one side
Posted by: sweet_byrd on Dec 14, 2007 5:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What this article fails to report, or to take into account, is the lack of cooperation from the Players' Association. The reason for the near total lack of interviews is that nobody would talk to Mitchell.

There are a number of things to critique in the report -- particularly Mitchell's ties to the Red Sox, but failing to report the stonewalling Mitchell faced, then finding fault with the report for not involving more players is sloppy, asinine and borders on untruthfulness -- traits I associate more with Fox News than Alternet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STEROIDS
Posted by: gellero on Dec 14, 2007 11:24 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All Pro athletes should be able to use steroids if they want. Who cares?? They're there for our amusement. If bigger and better amuses us more, we should support steroid use without hesitation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Distractions
Posted by: frank69 on Dec 15, 2007 12:02 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ball players' use of steroids ranks right up with wild fires, hurricanes, floods, earthquakes, tsunamis, and other "big stories."
All DISTRACTIONS from the Bush regime's criminality!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Distractions Posted by: dockboy
bcb in FL.
Posted by: redsox07 on Dec 15, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Makes me think back to his bat throwing incident with Piazza. An irrational act, but the recent news explains it. I like Clemons but now I gotta wonder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

steroids...a beauty treatment
Posted by: davidg on Dec 15, 2007 5:33 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
some men I now like their guys on steroids. It's about that important. And for a few million bucks a year...rich and pretty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who's REALLY responsible for this?? How about Conglomerates!
Posted by: realmuzik on Dec 16, 2007 2:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sure ... I'd like to not give a fuck about this, too. But the reality is that there are kids who look up to athletes and once they learn that their favorite athlete is using steroids, guess what? They want to use them, too! It's a no-brainer.

Another reality: There is pressure among these athletes to be in the best shape possible, so they can win, win, win and land lucrative billion$$ endorsement deals by the likes of Nike, Reebok, Budweiser... and, yes, Wal-Mart! Another no-brainer. Once these impressionable young athletes put 2+2 together, all they want are their own McMansions, luxury cars and the "bling" that they see paraded in front of them on any given segment of the MTV show "Cribs." Their favorite athlete has this?? They want it, too.

Don't think their families care? Think again. Why do you think there are parental brawls at little league events? These greedy "wanna be/never-be" parents want pieces of their kids' future pies, too.

I hope this report is a clarion call to the Athletic "industry" (which includes schools of all levels) that they need to put their sports teams and their human players above and beyond the conglomerate demands for pimping-out their star-property athletes in the name of profiteering. Sports was never, ever to have been about "greed is good." Today it is, and too many human lives have been damaged, let alone ended. Whatever happened to win or lose, what matters is playing the game at all??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» personal choice and integrity Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
Dubya was an owner..
Posted by: don't jolive my olive. on Dec 16, 2007 8:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why hasn't anyone checked out juicing during Dubya's reign over the Rangers.... just think of that now!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]