Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Texas Preacher Pushes the Gospel of Mercy for Death Row Inmates

By Michelle García, Amnesty International Magazine. Posted December 17, 2007.


Years of ministering to prisoners on death row turned Rev. Carroll Pickett into a passionate leader to end the death penalty.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Immigrants and Health-Care: What Part of LEGAL Doesn't Washington Understand?
Marielena Hincapié

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Michelle García

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The great Texas sun is rising on a cool summer morning as the Rev. Carroll Pickett, a minister who once ushered condemned men into the execution chamber and watched them die, speaks of redemption. His Sunday school students, middle-aged and elderly couples from a gated community just north of Houston, contemplate the message of repentance given by the former prison chaplain of Texas' most notorious penitentiary, a prison whose name is synonymous with hard time: Huntsville.

Pickett, a Presbyterian minister, wears a mint-green suit and a tie dotted with gold crosses. Tucked under his arm is a hand-tooled leather case containing a Bible, a gift from the inmates who once sought his counsel and lent their voices to his prison choirs. During the course of his career, this soft-spoken man with a good-ole-boy twang has witnessed prison officials pump poison into the veins of 95 men.

Pickett reads aloud the warning delivered by an angel in the final book of the Bible, Revelation: "I know your works, that you are neither cold nor hot ... So, because you are lukewarm, and neither hot nor cold, I will vomit you out of my mouth."

"In other words, get off the fence," Pickett tells his class. "Every Christian has got to get off the fence."

It took decades -- nearly a lifetime -- but Pickett made that jump himself. After his retirement in 1995, he spoke out against the death penalty. Since then, his unique insider's perspective and "Texas gentleman" manner has made him a potent force within the movement to abolish the death penalty. Few men can claim to have witnessed the first execution by lethal injection in the world, as he did 25 years ago. Even fewer have sat in prayer, listened to the confessions and final requests of men on the last day of their lives, heard their final words and their last gasp.

In Pickett's 2002 book, Within These Walls: Memoirs of a Death House Chaplain, he described in poignant detail his personal journey from death penalty supporter to ardent abolitionist. A documentary film about the possibly wrongful execution of Carlos De Luna and Pickett's final moments with him, At the Death House Door, is slated to air on the Independent Film Channel in the spring. Pickett has testified before Texas lawmakers, taken his abolitionist message to Rotary clubs and to big-city and small-town congregations alike. On an issue that imposes absolute and final judgment, he injects nuance.

"I was for [the death penalty] because I saw the injustice," explained Pickett after Sunday school. "I began to change because the system was so bad. I saw 17-year-old killers and the mentally retarded [executed], and the fact that nobody had any education."

In 2002, six years after Pickett's retirement from the Huntsville Prison, the Supreme Court ruled against executing the mentally retarded; in 2005, the Court exempted juvenile offenders from capital punishment. In September, as Texas carried out its 400th execution, the Supreme Court agreed to consider whether the mixture administered in lethal injections amounts to "cruel and unusual punishment," thus violating the Constitution. The case will be argued in February 2008.

Steve Hall, director of the Stand-Down Texas Project, an anti-death-penalty group, says Pickett's indisputable credibility and authenticity is compelling in a state that leads the nation in executions.

"People understand it's not gloss, it's not some sales job, it's not some distillation, it's not something he has picked up from the AI Web site," he said. "When you hear him, you really get a vision of what he went through and the questions, the doubt and that gradual transformation that changed him, and that now really drives his activity." Pickett grew up in Victoria, Texas, a small town east of San Antonio. "My daddy was a [death penalty] supporter, and his office was next to the jail," Pickett says, over a breakfast of homemade biscuits at an old-fashioned restaurant in Montgomery, birthplace of the "Lone Star" Texas flag. "My father believed that anyone who was arrested was guilty, and I was raised that way."

In Texas, the death penalty, like pickup trucks and high school football, is part of a culture steeped in the lore of frontier justice. Here, attitudes toward the death penalty are rife with emotion, shaped by religious beliefs and deeply personal. On a highway leading to Huntsville, a billboard boasts of the town's treasures: Big Sam (Sam Houston University); Ol' Sparky, the state's retired electric chair; and war heroes from various conflicts. Another billboard invites tourists to the Texas Prison Museum, its sign decorated with a ball and chain.

Pickett first entered "the Walls," a foreboding brick-red behemoth set in the middle of a residential neighborhood of ranch-style homes and big yards, in 1974. A newcomer to the town of Huntsville, he found himself in the midst of crisis. Three inmates had barricaded themselves and a number of staff inside the prison library, in what would become one of the longest prison hostage sieges in U.S. history. Jim Estelle, director of the Texas prison system and a parishioner, called on Pickett, then 40, to minister to the families of the hostages.

After 11 days of waiting, Pickett spoke by telephone with two hostages who had volunteered as human shields for the prison break, Judy Standley, a prison librarian, and Yvonne Beseda, a teacher. They called the chaplain to convey their final goodbyes to family as their captors prepared their escape.

Fred Gomez Carrasco and his men had constructed a makeshift shield, a Trojan horse of sorts, concealing the convicts and their hostages, the two women and a priest, as they shuffled from the library to a waiting van. Prison officials planned to blast them with high-pressure water hoses and rescue the hostages, but the hoses failed. Carrasco and one of his men shot the women, and Carrasco then turned the barrel of the gun on himself.

"It was difficult to talk to them in the afternoon ... and six hours later they were murdered," Pickett said. "It was traumatic."

Three years later, after the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment, the Presbyterian Church considered taking a position, and Pickett, emotionally scarred from the siege, delivered a presentation. "I took the position we got to do something in favor of the victims," he said. The church adopted an anti-deathpenalty position, and Pickett accepted the decision, with reservations. In 1980, Pickett returned to the Walls to take the job of chaplain to the 2,200-strong general prison population. He organized prison choirs, visited dying inmates and helped lower the dead from their homemade nooses. And, said Roy Villanueva, who served time at Huntsville for hiring an undercover cop to kill his wife, Pickett became known among prisoners for being a stickler for strictly Christian music. "He was concerned about what messages got to us and keeping us focused," said Villanueva, now a Southern Baptist minister in Geronimo, Texas. "He was redirecting our minds."

In 1982, Texas resumed executions. The state did away with Ol' Sparky and introduced lethal injection, the method now used by all but one of the 38 states that still have the death penalty. Pickett's job expanded to include counseling the condemned, and he found his Christian mission: the ministry of presence. "I made a commitment: nobody dies alone. Anyone that I can be a friend to I would," said Pickett. He remained by the side of Charlie Brooks, the first to die by lethal injection, until the end of the seven minutes it took Texas to end his life.

When prisoners arrived from death row, Pickett was there waiting for them in the "death house." He offered spiritual counsel, facilitated phone calls and familial visits, and in the final hours before execution explained the series of events that would end their lives. "My responsibility," he said, "was to prepare them to die. His task, the warden told him, was "to seduce [the prisoner's] emotions so he will not fight coming out of the cell, and he will not fight getting up on the gurney and being strapped down."

Eight small steps separate the holding cell, where the condemned pass their final day, from the execution chamber. The death chamber, as Pickett refers to it, is much smaller than one imagines from television. A sickly blue paint covers the brick walls, and until the state recently installed a glass partition, witnesses stood only a few feet away from the gurney.

Seen from the outside, Pickett's role in the execution process appears ambiguous. He and the warden were the only witnesses to the "tie-down team" who strapped in the prisoner and inserted the needles to administer the lethal doses that cost the state $86.06 per inmate: potassium chloride, pancuronium bromide, and sodium pentathol. He searched the inmate's body for viable veins. He wrote a manual called The Team Approach to Execution in the State of Texas that outlined the role of each participant -- excluding his own.

But Pickett is clear on the part he played: "I was visiting him as his last friend. I never strapped him down. It was the law and I couldn't do anything about that. I was not part of the execution team. I was part of the ministry to the man."

In 1989, Johnny Paul Penry, a white man with narrow eyes and a tight jaw, entered the death chamber toting crayons and coloring books. Pickett remembers the mentally retarded Penry, enthralled by his comic book characters and oblivious to his impending death. He was probably just as unaware when an 11th-hour Supreme Court ruling saved him on the grounds that Texas law had wrongly prevented jurors from fully weighing his mental disability as a mitigating factor.

Later that year, Carlos De Luna walked into the death house with big round brown eyes and asked if he could call Pickett "daddy." De Luna had been sentenced to die for robbery and the murder of Wanda Jean Lopez, a service station clerk in South Texas. "He never had a daddy of his own," recalled Pickett. After the experience, he concluded with no uncertainty: "I knew he was innocent when I watched him die."

In 2006, an investigation by the Chicago Tribune strongly supported his belief. The three-part report revealed that the prosecution's only eyewitness could not positively identify De Luna as the killer, and no physical evidence linked him to Lopez. The newspaper also uncovered an important finding that could have saved De Lunas' life: the gas-station robbery -- which elevated the murder to a capital offense -- may not have occurred at all.

Nonetheless, just as Pickett had done with the others -- with the resigned, the angry, and the clearly innocent -- he placed his hand on De Luna's ankle and waited as the lethal mix of drugs shot through the man's arms. But De Luna didn't die on cue as most did. He was able to move after the first injection, a powerful anesthesia, and after the second, a paralytic. Even after the third and final injection, which stops the heart, he showed signs of life before finally expiring.

It was not fast, it was not easy, and Pickett doubts it was painless.

At the end of the Bible lesson comes the phrase, "And then here we come with the word -- repent." "What does it mean?" asks Pickett. "Do a 180," he answers.

Pickett witnessed some 60 executions after Carlos De Luna. But De Luna's execution hastened the transformation that was to come, three years later, when the death penalty came full circle into Pickett's personal life. Ignacio Cuevas, one of the three inmates who had orchestrated the 1974 prison siege that took the lives of Pickett's two parishioners, showed up to die.

As Pickett recalls that pivotal moment, he flips through a yellowed scrapbook filled with newspaper clippings and photographs of the siege. In one, soon after the botched escape, a young, darkhaired Pickett embraces Jim Estelle, the prison director.

Seventeen years after those photographs were taken, Cuevas died on the gurney, with little fanfare. There was none of the hoped-for closure, no making peace. It brought nothing. In the hours after Cuevas died, Pickett recalled Judy Standley's final words to him, "It isn't how you die, but rather, how you live." Pickett closes the scrapbook and reflects on both the prison siege and Cuevas' execution. "I can see how hard it can be to understand, for just one event to change me, and then to change again," he says. But at the heart of Pickett's journey is a reflection on life. The death penalty is not about dying, he says. It's about how a society chooses to live."

Pickett later brought his perspective to Texas legislators as they considered a moratorium on the death penalty. He mused how in life men as different as Carlos de Luna, most likely an innocent man, and an unrepentant Ignacio Cuevas shared little more than the absoluteness of their ending.

"All 95 met the same fate," he said in testimony before Texas lawmakers in 2000. "The repentant died with the unrepentant, the mentally competent died with the mentally incompetent and the innocent died with the guilty." It has been more than a decade since Pickett left the Walls. The message of repentance he once shared with the imprisoned and those condemned to die is now heard by the living and the free.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: death penalty, carroll pickett

Michelle Garcia, a native Texan, recently completed a Knight fellowship in El Salvador with the International Center for Journalists. She is based in New York.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Abolish it
Posted by: talkville on Dec 17, 2007 12:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imposition of death by the State, by whatever method, makes the people complicit in a murder and in justice as Vengeance and Retribution, and has never been convincingly shown (given the long history of its imposition) to in any way correct the aberrations and distortions in social relations.

Abolish it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Abolish it Posted by: Jbuuty
» RE: Abolish it Posted by: smithbr
prayer song
Posted by: Lauren on Dec 17, 2007 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
prayer song

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AAiGsSKtqlI&NR=1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: That was beuatiful, Lauren! Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: prayer song Posted by: Basenjis
What Have We Here????
Posted by: Tom Degan on Dec 17, 2007 5:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, a Christian preacher from Texas who lives the words Jesus spoke in the Sermon on the Mount! I knew there had to be one of them down there!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
IT'S TORTURE I, I TELL YA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What Have We Here???? Posted by: carcinoid112
theological views (part 1)
Posted by: vasumurti on Dec 17, 2007 6:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Using the Bible to advocate vegetarianism and compassion towards animals is comparable to using the Bible to advocate the emancipation of women or the abolition of human slavery: the secular arguments are stronger.

A vegetarian interpretation of the Bible IS possible, as St. Jerome, Thomas Tryon, William Metcalfe, John Wesley, Ellen White, and other distinguished figures in the Christian tradition have demonstrated, but arguments can be made on both sides of the coin. Christian activists often cite the Bible with regards to other contemporary moral issues.

In his book Death as a Penalty, Howard Zehr makes a Christian case for the abolition of capital punishment. He notes that retaliation in the Old Testament was not as much of a requirement as it was a limitation on vengeance. In early Hebrew history, vengeance had to be controlled. "An eye for an eye" was a rule to make retaliation proportionate to the offense.

Hebrew society thus moved from unlimited to limited retaliation. "An eye for an eye" was not a command to seek vengeance, but a limitation on retribution. According to Zehr, "Retribution, like divorce, reflected a concession, not God's highest intent." (Deuteronomy 24; Matthew 19:8)

Zehr points out that the Old Testament death penalty included many offenses that our society does not consider capital. "To be consistent with the Old Testament," Zehr argues, "we would need to apply the death penalty much more broadly than we do today, including for accidental manslaughter and rebellious teenagers without regard to intent or mitigating circumstances. (Exodus 21)"

Moreover, the old Testament and later rabbinic tradition placed many restrictions on the application of capital punishment. An "eye for an eye" was one such limitation. Mosaic law and the later rabbinic tradition established a strict set of judicial procedures for cases involving capital punishment. The standard of proof required to convict someone went beyond our own standard of "beyond reasonable doubt" and required almost absolute certainty.

A conviction required at least two eyewitnesses, and witnesses who lied were subject to the same penalty as the accused. (Deuteronomy 17, 19) Hebrew law regarding capital punishment was much more restrictive than our own. Further restrictions were added, and by the 2nd century, the sanction was rarely carried out.

According to Zehr, a frequent theme in the Old Testament is that of mercy for the offender: "The first murder recorded was followed by an act of God protecting the murderer (Genesis 4). Cities of refuge were to be provided where the guilty could avoid revenge by the victim’s family (Numbers 35; Deuteronomy 4, 19; Joshua 20). These sanctuaries allowed time for tempers to cool and a solution to be worked out.

"The themes of Deuteronomy 32:35--‘To Me belong vengeance and recompense’--and of Leviticus 19:18--‘You shall not take vengeance... but shall love your neighbor as yourself’--recur frequently in the Old Testament."

Zehr says taking a life for a life in the Old Testament was more of a sacrificial and ceremonial action, rather than a legal one: "A killing was a religious evil that demanded compensation through a religious ceremony. (Genesis 9, Exodus 21, Deuteronomy 19)" Executions, Zehr insists, were not as much a device for maintaining social order as they were a way of righting a moral imbalance. "The death penalty had a sacrificial and ceremonial more than a legal function," observes Zehr, "and to draw parallels to modern use of capital punishment is fallacious."

Zehr concludes, "The Old Testament allowed capital punishment, but as a concession. Retribution was possible, but as a limitation, not as a command. Mercy was preferred. The death penalty served a primarily ceremonial function and was hedged with serious restrictions and reservations."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

theological views (part 2)
Posted by: vasumurti on Dec 17, 2007 7:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the New Testament, Jesus refers to capital punishment in one of his parables. (Luke 19:27) However, Jesus’ response to capital punishment undermined the penalty by his demand that both judges and executioners be sinless.

"On one occasion," Zehr writes, "Christ was asked to rule on a death penalty case (John 8). His response: ‘Let one without sin cast the first stone.’ And this was consistent with Christ’s other teachings. He reminds his listeners to beware of condemning others because God’s judgements do not necessarily coincide with our own (e.g. Matthew 25, Luke 6). If our judgements are so fallible, how can we make the decision to take a life?"

According to Zehr, the sacrificial aspect of taking a life was fulfilled by the sacrifice of Christ:

"Christ's death on the cross, itself an application of capital punishment, wiped away the Old Testament ceremonial and moral basis for the death penalty (e.g. Hebrews 10). No more blood needs to be shed to testify to the sacredness of life. Christ died that others may live. By trading places with the guilty and the enemy, by dying in place of the murderer Barabbas, Christ closed off the Old Testament reason for the death penalty.

"Christ did not simply eliminate the rationale for the death penalty. He constantly reiterated our responsibility to see Christ in our needy neighbor, even in our enemies."

A theme repeated throughout the New Testament is that of love and forgiveness towards one's enemies and persecutors:

"When Christ himself was executed," observes Zehr, "he gave a model response to his enemies in his dying words: ‘Father, forgive them.’ Jesus teaches that we are to love those who harm us and he sees no way to love a person without caring for life.

"If we love God, Jesus says we are obligated to show that love in our actions toward others. Christ moves us from the Old Testament perspective of limited retaliation to nonretaliation and active love (e.g. Romans 12, I John 4, Luke 6:27-36).

"In Jesus’ teaching," Zehr concludes, "life belongs to God. It is not ours to take. We also have to repudiate capital punishment because it is incompatible with the basic focus of the Gospel--reconciliation and redemption."

Attacking capital punishment, the early church father Cyprian, Bishop of Carthage, wrote: "Christians are not allowed to kill, it is not permitted for the guiltless to put even the guilty to death.

Zehr asks, "When the state takes a life, is it performing a function that belongs to God?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Randy Halprin- Innocent man on Texas Death Row
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Dec 17, 2007 7:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Randy Halprin- Innocent man on Texas Death Row.

Convicted and sentenced to death as part of the "Texas Seven." Seven guys escaped. One guy shot a cop. Randy was not a shooter but he is on Death Row.

See www.randyhalprin.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» google "Texas Seven" Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» evil Posted by: openhouse
California Death Row Inmate- INNOCENT- Jarvis Jay Masters
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Dec 17, 2007 7:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
California Death Row Inmate- INNOCENT- Jarvis Jay Masters


see www.freejarvis.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Paul Cardwell
Posted by: Paul Cardwell on Dec 17, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Michelle Garcia omitted a chilling fact from the Carrasco escape story. Guards also opened fire on the escapees and when asked about the risk to the hostages, a prison official, I think Estelle himself, glibly replied, "We consider all hostages already dead."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» dead men Posted by: openhouse
RON PAUL and the death penalty
Posted by: James W. Harris on Dec 17, 2007 10:22 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ron Paul has served 9 terms as a Texas Republican Congressman in a conservative district.

Yet Paul opposes the federal death penalty, and for the right reasons.

This position has no doubt cost him votes. Indeed, it's hard to imagine a GOPer saying what he says about it.

In the All-American Forum debate at Morgan State in September 2007, Paul stated:

"Over the years I've held pretty rigid to all my beliefs, but I've changed my opinion of the death penalty. For federal purposes I no longer believe in the death penalty. I believe it has been issued unjustly. If you're rich, you get away with it; if you're poor and you're from the inner city you're more likely to be prosecuted and convicted, and today, with the DNA evidence, there've been too many mistakes, and I am now opposed to the federal death penalty."

Paul's principled opposition to the death penalty is for all the right progressive and spiritual reasons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our Justice System
Posted by: dayenta on Dec 17, 2007 12:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more I lerarned anbout the inequalities of our "justice" system, the more I realized that I could not support the death penalty and consider myself a moral person. It is barbaric to continue the death penalty in this country. Frontier justice was never justice in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» barbaric Posted by: openhouse
The Celebrated Chessman Case
Posted by: Basenjis on Dec 19, 2007 7:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a young person, I had never questioned the death sentence until after writing a college research paper on the sensational Caryl Chessman case. I found the Chessman story so engrossing and compelling that I ended up reading everything I could find on the case and have been a confirmed opponent of the death sentence ever since.

Chessman was a confessed rapist and murderer who spent 12 years in a prison cell awaiting execution. The crime took place in California back in 1948. Chessman never denied that he had committed crimes, but after a forcibly coerced confession he recanted many times saying he had been a bandit, but never a rapist or a murderer.

From his prison cell, Chessman spent his time buried in legal books and was eventually recognized as an expert on American law. He wrote 3 remarkable memoirs and a novel, plus numerous other writings, drawing the attention of the Pope, Albert Sweitzer, Marlin Brando, Steve Allen, William F. Buckley and other influential people of the times. Journalists travelled from other countries to interview him and to write compelling stories of his innocence. His case inspired popular songs, including one titled, "Let Him Live, Let Him Live." In spite of several stays of execution and other legal delays, Chessman was finally executed in California's gas chamber. As one biographer noted, the state of California, in a final act of vindictiveness, destroyed all his unpublished writings.

Not only do I object to the death sentence because we know innocent people have lost their lives due to mistakes, inept or careless defences or other reasons, I also do not believe a state that believes the act of murder is a great crime should retaliate in kind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Never Understood
Posted by: xennonette on Dec 20, 2007 5:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... How killing someone for the crime of killing another is considered justice. Murder is a crime, but not if it's done by the state I guess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Death Penalty
Posted by: Landbaron on Dec 23, 2007 2:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another case for Universal Healthcare. Poor people usually don't have the insurance or money to go to a psychologist or psychiatrist for depression or similar ailments which would prevent a lot of these senseless crimes. They could be prescribed the right medication and then, they "want to live" and live accordingly......But why can't I be like a Republican (lose my conscience); "Screw you Jack, I'm alright, pull yourself up by your own bootstraps, get a job, Death Penalty all the way, only the strong survive,,, brother? I have a brother in Ohio..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement