Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ecuador to Evict U.S., Offer Air Base to China

By April Howard, AlterNet. Posted December 13, 2007.


When the U.S. Air Force Southern Command's 10-year usage rights for Ecuador's Manta air base expire in 2009, it can expect to be evicted.
Advertisement

An earlier version of this article appeared on UpsideDownWorld.

When the U.S. Air Force Southern Command's 10-year usage rights for Ecuador's Manta air base expire in 2009, it can expect to be evicted in favor of China.

President Jamil Mahuad signed a 10-year lease agreement with the U.S. military in 1999. The Manta base is not geopolitically important for U.S. national security, but the Southern Command (South Com) currently uses it to combat illegal cocaine trade in the "source zone" of Colombia, Peru and Bolivia. The air base shares a common runway with Quito's Eloy Alfaro International Airport terminal, but the air base has a separate office for cargo, while the airport handles passengers. About 475 U.S. military personnel are stationed at the air base under a 10-year agreement signed with Quito in November 1999, which is due to expire in 24 months.

Acording to Latin Americanist Marc Becker, the agreement with the U.S. military "has proved to be unpopular and, some argue, unconstitutional. The purported purpose of the FOL was to help interdict drug shipments from neighboring Colombia, but opponents contend that the U.S. government has ... move[d] well beyond that mandate into counterinsurgency and anti-immigrant activities." There are also complaints that the base was consolidated by expropriating land from indigenous groups and small farmers, and that it is being used by Colombian pilots and as a center of anti-guerilla intelligence as a part of Plan Colombia, and for the targeting of alleged terrorist groups. From March 5 to 9, 2007, more than 400 activists gathered in Manta for the first International Conference for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases. They chose Manta due to the new government's stance against continued U.S. presence.

When Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was campaigning in 2006, he promised to make the contract renewal with the U.S. contingent on a reciprocal agreement allowing Ecuador to build or station military on an air base in Miami, Fla. The United States rejected this idea, and Correa offered the base to the Terminales del Ecuador, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based Hutchison Port Holdings [HPH] during to Beijing on Nov. 21. China would most likely use the base for cargo transit in trade rather than for security purposes. Strategic Forecasting (STRATFOR) predicts that Correa's offer is "aimed partly at maintaining domestic support, partly at extracting preferential trade access to U.S. markets (something Washington probably will cave in to and deliver), and partly at securing Chinese capital for fulfilling Manta's future role as the largest Sino-Latin American trade trans-shipment hub on the South American west coast."

Correa's presidential campaign also focused on the need to improve regional transport and trade in order to compete with ports in Peru, Colombia and Chile, and to link to industry in Brazil. Some of the roads planned between the Andean countries would also connect waterways linking Ecuador and Brazil. The agreement will create profits for Brazil as well as Ecuador, as the two countries recently signed an agreement to link Manta to the city of Manaus by railway or highway corridor. According to the government, the details of this project have already been discussed with other interested Chinese investment firms. This corridor project is a key part of IIRSA, the South American regional infrastructure integration initiative.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: latin america, correa, pax americana

April Howard is an editor at UpsideDownWorld, a website on activism and politics in Latin America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When you see the use of foreign US airports...
Posted by: chomsky on Dec 13, 2007 12:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you see the use of foreign US airports...
- Transfer suspects (including innocent people)to be illegaly tortured abroad.
- Transfer illegal drug/cash.
- Organise local special ops for US (business) benefits.
- Spying.
- Etc...
Ecuador is right to evict the US.
You just cannot trust them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That's a Pity
Posted by: Scott Griffith on Dec 13, 2007 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's a pity: there won't be an Ecuadorian military base in Florida after all. I was looking forward to the help Ecuadorian soldiers could offer the state in the correct conduct of elections there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Dec 13, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
50 years or so of the US fighting communism/socialism/marxism throughout the world... usually by destroying local government, supporting dictators, killing millions, and generally undermining autonomy throughout the globe... paired with the support of exploitive corporate interests and leaders, often dictatorial or tyranical ones, who will be friendly to those interests that often take the natural resources of a nation while giving little to nothing to the citizens of the nation for all that is being taken from them... and often putting large numbers of them into wage slavery.

Taking all of this into consideration, is it any wonder that there is a shift in many of these areas.. south america, for a very good example, are rejecting Americanism and its influence for other forms of government whether more religious forms such as Sharia or for more socialist forms of government. Perhaps not the best form of government, but when the most powerful nation in the world sets such a bad example, other alternatives start to look good in comparison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well...Josh Posted by: donl51
» Well. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
A harbinger?
Posted by: Sojourner on Dec 13, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You mean a South American state gets to actually bargain with the US? Banana Republics don't get to do that.

The media parrots in the US tell us that our tenant farmers south of the border should feel lucky that we send our troops to protect them along with our work to them to do at slave wages. Take it or leave it.

Negotiate? Maybe times have begun to change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Great China war
Posted by: rocketman on Dec 13, 2007 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
China with an airbase in South America?.. Funny but one of the dem's in the debate today (I don't remember which one) rightfully stated that the US has to deal with China much stronger than it is now.

China's toxic toys, unfair trade policies, currency manipulation, lack of trade right protection,stealing military and other sensitive information, shooting down satellites etc..etc..etc highlights the dangerous course China and the US are headed on.

Not to mention China's need for oil conflicting with our own. China is more of a threat to US security than Iran, N Korea or any other nation today.

The US has to ensure that China is dealt with, in a non military way but effectively. We are losing this economic "war" with them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Great China war Posted by: Don Garb
» RE: The Great China war Posted by: rocketman
» RE: The Great China war Posted by: laoma
» RE: The Great China war Posted by: rocketman
halrivers
Posted by: halrivers on Dec 13, 2007 4:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well,
The base in Manta was never just about drugs. It put the squeeze, as many Ecuadorians believed, on Ecuador’s peace, sovereignty and environment, and furthered neoliberal goals and U.S. security interests, especially oil. I wrote about this in an article I published in NACLA, "In the Grip of the Anaconda" (July August 2001). The irony of Chinese developers moving in is doubly delicious. The question remains, however, just how much Chinese "market socialism" will act like the neoliberals from el norte. Phillip Bannowsky, author of The Mother Earth Inn (http://phillipbannowsky.com/Motherearth.htm)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In a rare fit of Right trumping Might. . .
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Dec 14, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Quite simply, I say hurray for Ecuador! I wish the rest of the US military Empire would follow suit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US has always taken it for granted
Posted by: FedUp on Dec 14, 2007 5:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that the nations of the world were required to allow it to establish military bases on their soil - Guantanamo makes no sense; it's equally easy to torture people in Florida!
I'm sure that the Ecuadorean government made the request to point out the absurdity. Perhaps other countries like Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Azerbaijan will follow suit. Hmm; wait a minute, they already have bases in Crawford, Texas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Win/win situation
Posted by: Doubtom on Dec 15, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally something in the news where everyone benefits. Ecuador benefits from getting the bullying northern gringos off its ass and we taxpayers get to save a bit of our hard-earned money, instead of invading other countries under the guise of spreading democracy.

There's just the remote possibility that the nations of the world are getting sick and tired of the United States. Gee, I wonder why??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Base geography
Posted by: cellardiva on Dec 16, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting article, but you may want to check your geography a bit. Manta is located on the coast of Ecuador while Quito is in the Andes at 10,000 feet. At this distance it would be hard to share a runway. There is a base at Quito, but it is not a US base.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]