Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Ecuador to Evict U.S., Offer Air Base to China

By April Howard, AlterNet. Posted December 13, 2007.


When the U.S. Air Force Southern Command's 10-year usage rights for Ecuador's Manta air base expire in 2009, it can expect to be evicted.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by April Howard

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

An earlier version of this article appeared on UpsideDownWorld.

When the U.S. Air Force Southern Command's 10-year usage rights for Ecuador's Manta air base expire in 2009, it can expect to be evicted in favor of China.

President Jamil Mahuad signed a 10-year lease agreement with the U.S. military in 1999. The Manta base is not geopolitically important for U.S. national security, but the Southern Command (South Com) currently uses it to combat illegal cocaine trade in the "source zone" of Colombia, Peru and Bolivia. The air base shares a common runway with Quito's Eloy Alfaro International Airport terminal, but the air base has a separate office for cargo, while the airport handles passengers. About 475 U.S. military personnel are stationed at the air base under a 10-year agreement signed with Quito in November 1999, which is due to expire in 24 months.

Acording to Latin Americanist Marc Becker, the agreement with the U.S. military "has proved to be unpopular and, some argue, unconstitutional. The purported purpose of the FOL was to help interdict drug shipments from neighboring Colombia, but opponents contend that the U.S. government has ... move[d] well beyond that mandate into counterinsurgency and anti-immigrant activities." There are also complaints that the base was consolidated by expropriating land from indigenous groups and small farmers, and that it is being used by Colombian pilots and as a center of anti-guerilla intelligence as a part of Plan Colombia, and for the targeting of alleged terrorist groups. From March 5 to 9, 2007, more than 400 activists gathered in Manta for the first International Conference for the Abolition of Foreign Military Bases. They chose Manta due to the new government's stance against continued U.S. presence.

When Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa was campaigning in 2006, he promised to make the contract renewal with the U.S. contingent on a reciprocal agreement allowing Ecuador to build or station military on an air base in Miami, Fla. The United States rejected this idea, and Correa offered the base to the Terminales del Ecuador, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-based Hutchison Port Holdings [HPH] during to Beijing on Nov. 21. China would most likely use the base for cargo transit in trade rather than for security purposes. Strategic Forecasting (STRATFOR) predicts that Correa's offer is "aimed partly at maintaining domestic support, partly at extracting preferential trade access to U.S. markets (something Washington probably will cave in to and deliver), and partly at securing Chinese capital for fulfilling Manta's future role as the largest Sino-Latin American trade trans-shipment hub on the South American west coast."

Correa's presidential campaign also focused on the need to improve regional transport and trade in order to compete with ports in Peru, Colombia and Chile, and to link to industry in Brazil. Some of the roads planned between the Andean countries would also connect waterways linking Ecuador and Brazil. The agreement will create profits for Brazil as well as Ecuador, as the two countries recently signed an agreement to link Manta to the city of Manaus by railway or highway corridor. According to the government, the details of this project have already been discussed with other interested Chinese investment firms. This corridor project is a key part of IIRSA, the South American regional infrastructure integration initiative.

Since before his election, Correa has also emphasized the necessity of attracting Asian investment in order to upgrade infrastructure and therefore expand regional and international trade. In offering the Manta base to HPH, he said that he was offering Chinese investors a "geopolitical window" that would make Ecuador a bridge for accessing markets in South America.

Chinese investment and U.S. relations

Chinese investment in Manta began when Chinese, Chilean, Singaporean, Japanese and U.S. port companies expressed interest in the Manta port (not the air base). In October, HPH gave a $1 million bond to the MPA . In November 2006, HPH was the only final bidder and the Manta Port Authority (MPA) gave HPH operating concessions in exchange for $486 million (added to $55 million promised by the MPA) to upgrade facilities over the next 30 years.

According to Business News Americas, Hutchinson Port Holdings (HPH) is the port-operating subsidiary of Hong Kong's Hutchison-Whampoa. The company focuses "on trans-Pacific/Atlantic corridor cargo trade" and has a portfolio of ports in Latin America. "In 2001 it bought out Philippines-based port operator ICTSI, which had various Latin American interests in Argentina, Mexico and the Bahamas. In Panama, HPH's Panama Port Co. operates the ports of Cristobal and Balboa. Manta is the closest port to Asia on South America's west coast." Manta is a desirable port for HPH as it is the closest port to Asia on Latin America's west coast. The Manta deal could also help smooth out a disagreement between Ecuador and China's major state energy players over the October increase of Ecuador's windfall oil tax. The next steps would involve HPH accepting the post-2009 concession for Manta's air base (it already controls the sea port), and another Chinese investment firm's participation in financing the road-rail network between Manta and Manaus, Brazil.

According to STRATFOR, "While this is not the first time China has been made such an offer by a Latin American nation, it is the first time U.S. geopolitical interests in the region have been so closely brushed up against." They forecast that "from a security perspective, a Chinese military presence in the Western Hemisphere would be viewed by the United States as a hostile move and would almost inevitably invite the Pentagon's ire." However, they predict that Beijing, and especially the People's Liberation Army, will try to maintain good relations with the United States to prevent remunerative trade policies such as tariffs.

There is a historical irony to this turn of events, though neither governments nor corporations are likely to see it as such. Sanho Tree of the Institute for Policy Studies notes, "It's ironic that it is China, and not a European power, that would challenge the Monroe Doctrine. The irony is doubled as China turns the original U.S. Open Door Policy of 1900 (designed to allow U.S. access to Chinese markets) back on the United States to get better access to Latin American markets."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: latin america, correa, pax americana

April Howard is an editor at UpsideDownWorld, a website on activism and politics in Latin America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
When you see the use of foreign US airports...
Posted by: chomsky on Dec 13, 2007 12:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When you see the use of foreign US airports...
- Transfer suspects (including innocent people)to be illegaly tortured abroad.
- Transfer illegal drug/cash.
- Organise local special ops for US (business) benefits.
- Spying.
- Etc...
Ecuador is right to evict the US.
You just cannot trust them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That's a Pity
Posted by: Scott Griffith on Dec 13, 2007 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's a pity: there won't be an Ecuadorian military base in Florida after all. I was looking forward to the help Ecuadorian soldiers could offer the state in the correct conduct of elections there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Dec 13, 2007 6:30 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
50 years or so of the US fighting communism/socialism/marxism throughout the world... usually by destroying local government, supporting dictators, killing millions, and generally undermining autonomy throughout the globe... paired with the support of exploitive corporate interests and leaders, often dictatorial or tyranical ones, who will be friendly to those interests that often take the natural resources of a nation while giving little to nothing to the citizens of the nation for all that is being taken from them... and often putting large numbers of them into wage slavery.

Taking all of this into consideration, is it any wonder that there is a shift in many of these areas.. south america, for a very good example, are rejecting Americanism and its influence for other forms of government whether more religious forms such as Sharia or for more socialist forms of government. Perhaps not the best form of government, but when the most powerful nation in the world sets such a bad example, other alternatives start to look good in comparison.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well...Josh Posted by: donl51
» Well. Posted by: JoshuaLudd
A harbinger?
Posted by: Sojourner on Dec 13, 2007 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You mean a South American state gets to actually bargain with the US? Banana Republics don't get to do that.

The media parrots in the US tell us that our tenant farmers south of the border should feel lucky that we send our troops to protect them along with our work to them to do at slave wages. Take it or leave it.

Negotiate? Maybe times have begun to change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Great China war
Posted by: rocketman on Dec 13, 2007 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
China with an airbase in South America?.. Funny but one of the dem's in the debate today (I don't remember which one) rightfully stated that the US has to deal with China much stronger than it is now.

China's toxic toys, unfair trade policies, currency manipulation, lack of trade right protection,stealing military and other sensitive information, shooting down satellites etc..etc..etc highlights the dangerous course China and the US are headed on.

Not to mention China's need for oil conflicting with our own. China is more of a threat to US security than Iran, N Korea or any other nation today.

The US has to ensure that China is dealt with, in a non military way but effectively. We are losing this economic "war" with them!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Great China war Posted by: Don Garb
» RE: The Great China war Posted by: rocketman
» RE: The Great China war Posted by: laoma
» RE: The Great China war Posted by: rocketman
halrivers
Posted by: halrivers on Dec 13, 2007 4:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well,
The base in Manta was never just about drugs. It put the squeeze, as many Ecuadorians believed, on Ecuador’s peace, sovereignty and environment, and furthered neoliberal goals and U.S. security interests, especially oil. I wrote about this in an article I published in NACLA, "In the Grip of the Anaconda" (July August 2001). The irony of Chinese developers moving in is doubly delicious. The question remains, however, just how much Chinese "market socialism" will act like the neoliberals from el norte. Phillip Bannowsky, author of The Mother Earth Inn (http://phillipbannowsky.com/Motherearth.htm)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In a rare fit of Right trumping Might. . .
Posted by: Ellen Remore on Dec 14, 2007 12:40 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Quite simply, I say hurray for Ecuador! I wish the rest of the US military Empire would follow suit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US has always taken it for granted
Posted by: FedUp on Dec 14, 2007 5:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that the nations of the world were required to allow it to establish military bases on their soil - Guantanamo makes no sense; it's equally easy to torture people in Florida!
I'm sure that the Ecuadorean government made the request to point out the absurdity. Perhaps other countries like Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and Azerbaijan will follow suit. Hmm; wait a minute, they already have bases in Crawford, Texas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Win/win situation
Posted by: Doubtom on Dec 15, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally something in the news where everyone benefits. Ecuador benefits from getting the bullying northern gringos off its ass and we taxpayers get to save a bit of our hard-earned money, instead of invading other countries under the guise of spreading democracy.

There's just the remote possibility that the nations of the world are getting sick and tired of the United States. Gee, I wonder why??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Base geography
Posted by: cellardiva on Dec 16, 2007 1:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting article, but you may want to check your geography a bit. Manta is located on the coast of Ecuador while Quito is in the Andes at 10,000 feet. At this distance it would be hard to share a runway. There is a base at Quito, but it is not a US base.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement