Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Bloated OPEC States Pick Through Scraps of American Economy

By Nicholas von Hoffman, The Nation. Posted December 10, 2007.


As the US economy sickens, foreign governments are on a shopping spree, scooping up bargains paid for by sovereign wealth funds.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Immigrants and Health-Care: What Part of LEGAL Doesn't Washington Understand?
Marielena HincapiƩ

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Nicholas von Hoffman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Every day a new thrill and every day a new spill in the not-so-little world of real estate, subprime mortgages, hedge funds and supposedly unshakable financial institutions. Who got gored today? Who will be bleeding tomorrow? Who will get saved? How? When? And who got hurt when who got saved? It's a good story, but you might want to run for cover while reading it.

Since having announced that it has lost billions in the subprime mortgage business, Citigroup has sold a chunk of its stock to the Arabs. In this case Abu Dhabi came running with $7.5 billion to invest in an institution that seems to be reeling from losses of around $11 billion. But in fact we do not know what the situation is inside Citigroup, and there is reason to fear that the people running Citigroup don't either.

There has been discussion about whether the Abu Dhabi input was a good deal or a desperate lunge for safety by Citigroup, which has fired CEO Charles Prince for doing an outstandingly lousy job. The Investment Authority will receive equity units that pay an 11 percent annual yield--a high price for Citigroup, whose customary dividend yield is 7.3 percent. Citigroup must have had great and hurtful needs for this money, to pay so much.

Some are less worried about what Citigroup is having to put out to save itself than about creeping foreign ownership of American companies in general. The Abu Dhabi purchase was made by that country's sovereign wealth fund, not by an individual sheik or princeling. A sovereign wealth fund is a bunch of money set aside by a government that is so far in the black that it has extra money to invest. The United States--does one need to say?--has not such moneys.

In the past nations with excess cash often used it to buy US government bonds because they were safe and steady and the interest rate on them was pretty good. Today the rate on them is deemed highly sucky, and the value of the dollar is getting smaller almost by the hour. So governments are going out and investing in private US companies--which, like Citigroup, may pay handsome dividends and appreciate in value.

The Abu Dhabi sovereign-wealth-fund investment in Citigroup has some people worried about a foreign takeover of this quintessential Wall Street institution. The Abu Dhabians are welcome to it. Citigroup is so big, so floppy, so just everything profoundly fouled up, that it appears nobody knows how to run it. Good for you, Abu Dhabi, if you can make it work.

Sovereign wealth funds are nothing to sneeze at. About twenty countries have them, and it is guessed that they are worth somewhere between $2 trillion and $3 trillion, which is big money any way you count it. A lot of that money comes from debts piled up by American consumers. This does not stop other Americans from throwing a fit when a wealth fund tries--and fails--to buy into an American corporation like Unocal, as the Chinese did last year. The company was deemed too strategic, too important to let the Chinese capitalist-communists become significant stockholders of it.

There is a limit to how well we can protect ourselves from sovereign-wealth-fund investment--unless we want to go back to making our own toys and clothes and furniture (to say nothing of producing our own oil supply). Beggars cannot be choosers, and thanks to Mr. Clinton and Mr. Bush, we have done our best to beggar ourselves over these past twenty years.

There are also those who fear that foreigners will use their American investments to cause an economic panic, which would melt down our entire financial system, taking all our 401(k)s with it. They might be able to do something like that by dumping vast amounts of American stocks and bonds on the market at the same time. Of course, they would be destroying the value of their own investments, too. That would be the economic equivalent of a suicide bomber, but rich people do not generally kill themselves, least of all when there is no money in it for them.

If there be any economic suiciding to be feared, it is our doing another job on ourselves.





Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: trade deficit, citibank, fdi

Nicholas Von Hoffman is a columnist for the New York Observer and is the author, most recently, of "Hoax" (Nation Books, 2004).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Where is the beef?
Posted by: chagrilama on Dec 10, 2007 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The stance taken by the article makes little sense.

What exactly is wrong with the rich investors buying chunks of US companies that seem to be faltering?

If they are dumb enough to buy failing businesses, well caveat emptor applies to them as well as anyone else.

I do not believe they are dumb at all, certainly not enough to throw money away, and so it must be that these economic assets they are buying are worthy of the money being spent.

In that case, the article's title implying that these asset sales are "garbage dump" sales is definitely misleading.

And if the investors are buying good economic assets, that is good for the economy in this country and abroad. The company gets to use the money in this country, presumably to buy local services and augment the wealth of local people. The profits, if any, are shared with the shareholders - what's wrong with this, exactly? (I am sure the writer owns shares in some companies and receives dividends and possibly sometimes makes money on stocksales when the share prices go up!) What's wrong with investors (ok, Arab investors) making money?

Oh, yeah, the xenophobic "the Arabs will take over 'our' economy and destroy us" argument. That is a ludicrous argument. Can you just see the impeccable logic here: The wealthy investor plunks a few billion dollars to buy a chunk of a US company, then proceeds to destroy that company "to hurt us"! The investor becomes, somewhat, part of "us" when buying the asset. The investor now shares the risks with the American investors who own that company. Why would that investor shoot him/her-self in the foot? To spite someone? Who? I find this argument thoughtless and unreasoned.

Chagri Lama

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As good as you get
Posted by: MattUK on Dec 11, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its not so funny now the shoe is on the other foot.

US busniess has been raping and pilliging its way through most of the developing world for the last 150 years, with the help of the US government (be it through its military or its influence in the IMF, World Bank or WTO). However, when former victims get a bit of money and start to invest it....the xenophobia comes out.

Its called karma, and its long over due.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As good as you get Posted by: magistre
wjfaust
Posted by: wjfaust on Dec 14, 2007 3:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting article but equally interesting title. Why bloated? Why not prudent? Seems that accruing a surplus of "sovereign" funds is a lot more prudent than driving your nation deeper and deeper into debt as we are wont to do with our feckless wars, over-consumption and obeisance to soulless corporate interests.

Of course, they could have liquidation in mind. Maybe they have been studying the history of KK&R. If we had some kind of obesity measure for corporations just as we do for individuals, corporations like Citi Group, GM, Ford and others might look a lot less attractive if that is possible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement