Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Left-Leaning Male Pundits Heart Huckabee

By Katha Pollitt, TheNation.com. Posted December 11, 2007.


Have you noticed how liberal white male reporters get crushes on right-wing male candidates?
Advertisement

Have you noticed how liberal white male reporters get crushes on right-wing male candidates? For years John McCain had Democratic and even left men swooning at his feet -- a straight talker! A war hero! He's cool and macho, and he'll invite you over for barbecue! Never mind that McCain was basically a militaristic reactionary with occasional twinges of sanity. Even at The Nation, McCain was a popular guy with the guys. in 2004, one of my Nation colleagues argued in an edit meeting that the magazine should endorse him.

This time round, the so-called-liberal-media men's Republican sweetheart is Mike Huckabee. He plays the bass guitar! He cares! He's not a total maniac like the other evangelical Christians even though he doesn't believe in evolution and probably thinks you're going to Hell! Ari Berman declares him " humble, decent, and funny." In The New Yorker, Rick Hertzberg is surprised to find himself charmed: Huckabee is "funny," "reassuringly ordinary" in appearance and demeanor, "curiously unthreatening" in affect; he speaks "calmly" and declines to serve up "red meat" on abortion, immigration, the Clintons, and other issues dear to rightwingers' hearts.

Marc Cooper, who can't throw enough rotten tomatoes at Democrats and "progressives," or as he likes to call them "pwogwessives," writes in his blog that Huckabee " radiates a core decency." Newsweek's Jonathan Alter: He "speaks American." (oh lord, where's Mencken when you need him?) "Even on faith and politics, Mike is easy to like." Really? It's easy to like a man who tells Bill Maher that "we really don't know" whether the earth is six thousand or six billion years old? Who doesn't think human beings are primates? Who wants to outlaw almost all abortion because "life begins at conception"? Gail Collins-- yes, yes, not all Huckabee fans are men -- thinks indeed, it is.

Hertzberg ruminates so pleasantly on Huckabee's sympathy for the poor, his attacks on the Club for Growth, his lack of the spit-flecked viciousness that has characterized so many religious wingnuts, that you almost forget Huckabee is a religious wingnut himself. Only in his second to last paragraph does Hertzberg get around to acknowledging that "None of this is to say that Huckabee's policy positions are much better than those of his Republican rivals; in some cases, they're worse. He wants to replace the federal tax code with a gigantic, horribly regressive sales tax; he cannot name a single time he has ever disagreed with the National Rifle Association; he wants to amend the Constitution to ban gay marriage and abortion." But not to worry: "In practice, however, the sales tax and the amendments would go nowhere, and he couldn't do much about abortion except appoint Scalia-like Justices to the Supreme Court--which his rivals have promised to do, too."

Just so you know: One of Huckabee's first acts as governor of Arkansas was to bar state Medicaid from paying for an abortion for a retarded teenager raped by her stepfather, despite federal regulations requiring such payments. Is that your idea of a nice, decent, "curiously unthreatening guy ? As Todd Gitlin writes at TPMcafe, the media relentless scrutinizes the health-care plans of the Democratic candidates, but when Republicans say they want to ban abortion and declare that life "begins at conception,"--anti-choice code for banning most methods of contraception -- they get a free pass, including from the so-called liberal media.

Is there some weird masochism operating here, whereby left-leaning men, weary of failure and scorn, roll over for rightwingers who smile and throw them a bone? Does the issue of abortion-- which is a marker for a whole range of women's issues--just not matter to them the way it does to women with the same politics? Are they so desperate for a candidate who uses the language of "economic populism," -- when he isn't pushing regressive taxation -- that they'll overlook everything else? Which is more likely: a Republican president who limits women's access to abortion, or a Republican president who limits laissez-faire capitalism? The question answers itself. I just wish more liberal male pundits were asking it.

UPDATE: Marc Cooper e mailed me to say he felt I quoted him out of context and am a good example of the "pwogwessives" he despises. He also called my attention to this staggering breaking news story from Murray Waas on the Huffington Post, a story Marc helped edit and has linked to on his blog. Be sure to check it out -- it's truly horrific.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: media, republicans, mike huckabee

Katha Pollitt is a columnist for The Nation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
profiling
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Dec 11, 2007 12:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I dont object to an admonitory article about the dangers of beign lured by charismatic figures ¿why does gender becomes the key aspect? ¿What is the author implying about males?

I think a similar profiling piece depicting any "common" trait of female pundits with such a thick brush would irate most people (including me), but for some reason its ok to say anything one wish of men as a genre.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: profiling Posted by: seenaymah
» Not observational, trivial. Posted by: Tatarize
» RE: profiling Posted by: anonymous black writer
Interesting theory
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Dec 11, 2007 3:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Some guys--including me--identify with libertarian candidates like Ron Paul, but only on certain days and on certain issues. I think it's their contrarian, rebellious, glitz-free, anti-BS attitude that catches our ear once in a while.

I think a lot of guys who are otherwise progressive and liberal get tired of all the political correctness, feminism, special interests, whinyness, and intellectual fluff that have cluttered up the left. So they may sometimes look for relief in straight-talkin' candidates with an alternative to the touchy-feely, hippie-dippy rhetoric of the progressive establishment.

Sometimes we just want to go fishing or camping, with no women to complain about the weather or lack of amenities, and no government trying to babysit us, make us better people, or play nice with others. And I think some of those ultra-right libertarian types feed off of that.

As for Huckabee, I can't stand him, and don't see why any guy would want to have a beer with him. He'd probably try to convert you or something.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Interesting theory Posted by: Mycos
» RE: Interesting theory Posted by: LeeAnnG
What's right with liking the right
Posted by: robchapman on Dec 11, 2007 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Would a great many Dems or left leaning men have defected and voted for McCain over Gore in 2000? I think it was unlikely that this would have happened.

Had McCain won the the election in 2000, the US response to 9/11 might well have had something to do with combatting terrorism.

McCain certainly would have avoided the errors of policy Bush committed.

In 2008, Huckabee is the only one among the GOP contenders who understands the importance of negotiation and compromise in politics.

These are skills that the Democrats will do well to cultivate in the lead up to 08.

Even if Barak Obama is elected President with huge majorities in both chambers of Congress, the GOP will still be there.

Unless we are able to negotiate with them, to at least win acquiesence from them for the Progressive agenda, it will always be imperilled and our politics will always be distorted by partisanship and polarization.

The Conservative movement learned to negotiate their differences among themselves, and grew to parity with the Progressives.

But Conservative unity was impossible without demonization of left, hence the nasty and truculent nature of so much of our politics.

A major part of the Progressive/left victory MUST be to eschew demonization of opponents and maintain the possibility of advocating all honorable positions and willingness to accomodate all legitimate aspirations.

Hence, the importance of discussing and understanding the Conservatives' goals and aspirations.

Candidates like Huckabee who are not continuously demonizing us, offer that opportunity.

Through this process of respectful attention and accomodation, we will eventually change the temper of our politics and continue to expand the Progressive base.

If our victory in 08 is merely taking power from the Right and then acting the way that they do with it, we will have greatly soiled and diminished ourselves and our Progressive/left ideals.

Robert Chapman
Lansing, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pollitt is too polite
Posted by: Democritus on Dec 11, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Katha Pollitt wonders why "left-leaning men" are so enamored of antediluvian curiousities such as Mike Huckabee. She mentions Rick Hertzberg and Marc Cooper among that star-struck
crowd.

What Pollitt is too polite to mention is that by terming these fellows "left-leaning men," she is really saying that they are too fey to be considered to be down-to-earth progressives. They are too fainthearted to be more than "left leaning," and they are too much in awe of the maverick quality of guys like Huckabee and McCain to be any more than adolescents, rather than adult males. They're sort of like the water boys who dutifully carry towels for the star athletes.

So Pollitt shouldn't worry too much about these fawning pimpsters. There are a lot of red-blooded progressives who know that Mike the Huckster belongs on a funny farm, and who don't pay any attention to drones like Hertzberg and Cooper.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have you noticed how liberal white male reporters get crushes on right-wing male candidates?
Posted by: Q30 on Dec 11, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, but I've noticed how Katha just loves to bash white males of any political stripe.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Left-Leaning?
Posted by: aberdeen on Dec 11, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, reminds me of the same "left-leaning" folks who support someone like Hillary, who is about as human rights oriented as Pat Robertson and the pope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Interesting
Posted by: reevolve on Dec 11, 2007 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just today, there is a column on one of the conservative opinion sites asking this same question -- why are the media giving Huckabee a free pass? The are actually more than a few conservatives with serious reservations about Huckabee.

It is also interesting that the author brings up the left-leaning media's fondness for John McCain, since McCain is widely disliked on the right. Yet both McCain and Huckabee are in many ways more conservative than their republican counterparts.

I'm not sure what the common thread here is. Maybe someone else has some ideas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» another twist Posted by: reevolve
» RE: another twist Posted by: Turiye
» Pharma Loves Him Posted by: Gravitas
Add to the list... the 2004 Dem nominee himself
Posted by: defrag on Dec 11, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was widely reported at the time that Kerry asked McCain to be his running mate. Neither have ever denied it. If you disagree you might want to change McCain's Wikipedia entry!

Electoral calculations aren't always the same as a "man crush." In 2000 there was some hope that the lesser of two Republican evils would manage to get that nomination. We'd all be better off, no doubt, if Bush had lost in the primaries.

Now some see Huckabee as the least evil of that bunch. I agree with the author that they may be wrong this time! But the urge to figure out who's least bad is understandable.

We're always reading in the progressive press about Republicans who actually donate money to Hillary's campaign, calculating that she is the one most easily defeated if she gets the nomination. There are probably at least a few wealthy "left-leaning" types doing the same thing on the other side, but we don't read about that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Glad she updated
Posted by: Phenix on Dec 11, 2007 9:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So its nice to see that Katha updated her story and essentially apologized to Marc Cooper. I'm sure it has nothing to do with the fact that Marc is or was an editor of the Nation. I do not know how she created Marc's man crush for Mike H. Cooper recently posted a link that leads to Mike H's release of a serial rapist. If he had a man crush then he would have surely downplayed that event.

Anyway, Cooper might trash the Democrats but if Katha thinks that Hillary or Obama are progressive then she needs to turn in her laptop and stop writing now. O and it'd help if she didn't want to write about white men for the sake of writing about white men. At least have a story that can't be blown to bits in more than 5 minutes of reading that actual source material. Or maybe she just read one blog and figured they all loved Mike H.

O and one more thing, people love to talk about Ghandi but he was also anti-abortion and I would not be surprised if he was also a creationist. Would it still be wrong for me to write that he exudes an aura of decency>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dirt on Ghandi... Posted by: Q30
Anyone actually reading lefty blogs knows this is nonsense.
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Dec 11, 2007 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huckabee is getting all the scrutiny and mockery he deserves at daily kos and everywhere else in the left blogosphere. Some have noted that the Huckster strikes a more populist tone, after all he was the only Repub candidate to court unions in Iowa. Hmm... reporting such must make them heart him... not. There's nothing to like about the wingnut Huckster, his creepy hypocritical and unreality based ideas and his dysfunctional family, a treasure trove of scandal. No, the one thing to like about Mike H. is he's the one candidate the Dems could own in a landslide. So KP's little temper tantrum is doubly ridiculous. She ought to promote him mercilessly.

But that doesn't fit with the narrative of whining that KP feels like today, oppressed and all in the blogosphere... right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I imagine ... Posted by: Joshua Holland
Also the fact that KP was shocked to find out that the Huckster has a rapist releasing scandal
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Dec 11, 2007 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
shows she has really not been keeping up. That one's been known in the blogosphere for quite some time, long time, but been given full exposure in the past couple weeks.

If she wants more dirt on the Huckster, there's plenty, and who's digging it up? Leftist bloggers, male {gasp} and female, that's who.

KP, catch up on your reading and then get back to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

White Like Me
Posted by: 7 Levels on Dec 11, 2007 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't want to bash every person on the opposite side of the fence just to do it. I'd rather influence their side to some degree just in case we end up with one of them as prez again. ANY of the them would be better than GWB.

And the writer is really quite silly. Howabout an article that begins, "Ever notice how black guys....?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: White Like Me Posted by: drmflorida
Have You Noticed How The Entire CorpGov Media Gives Right Wing Candidates A Free Ride
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Dec 11, 2007 12:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's not just a few fake progressives doing this. Every candidate on the Repug slate is a criminal, a liar or a nutjob, and even Olbermann is too nice to them. These fools should be subject to vicious verbal and legal attacks until they are driven off the public stage entirely, but most news outlets treat them as respectable legitimate candidates. Bizarre.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks, Katha
Posted by: dumdumboy on Dec 11, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for having the balls to tell the truth.

I made my once-a-year purchase of Rolling Stone magazine recently, and the political hack in there - obviously a white male - also gushed over Mike Huckabee. He pardoned Keith Richards!

To every white male who was irked by this article; you have my sympathy. I know how the truth hurts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thanks, Katha--right on! Posted by: asilsfable
huckabee slightly better than republican pack
Posted by: whealeydj on Dec 11, 2007 2:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huck sometimes seems to be a real Christian compassionate conservative-- notably his comment on immigration recognizing that we need to treat the undocumented with compassion since they are seeking a better life. this makes him better than the Tancredo and the rest that demonize immigrants. If we get him to talk more about how the Bible calls for treating the poor well rather than on evolution he would be better than others.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huck's charm
Posted by: Gerald on Dec 12, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Huck's charm is pure Southern; it lasts just so long as the conversation stays on safe subjects and doesn't step on certain sore points, by the way there's lots of these sore points.
Race is an issue that hasn't been explored publicly with Huck. I suspect that should his skin be scratched.... but I can't prove it.
Still as a white male receiving Social Security I find Huck "likable" but would never invite him into my home or vote for him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oh please
Posted by: annika on Dec 12, 2007 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men can't take the truth. Liberal ones are the worst-- in the vein of Bill Maher, who himself is a misogynist and racist extraordinaire who somehow thinks he's not.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Don't Understand the Affection for a Lunatic
Posted by: tommy1957 on Dec 12, 2007 9:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the suppose left leaning newsmen like ole Huckabee; one needs to wonder if there may be a more sinister plan at hand. Should ole Huckabee become the nominee, it would be very easy to point out all of his short comings; releasing a rapist who went onto murder and raping; anti-gay-abortion-other religions. His stupid fake telephone conversation that god would want a lying, thieving, murders like "W" and Dick to return to the now Grey House. Come on folks; this guy is a start raving Lunatic from the pig state. Why not endorse him through the primaries and then destroy him leading up to the elections. He is the perfect patsy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Clinton Connection
Posted by: angelofdeath on Dec 15, 2007 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE TORRES-VIGNALI CONNECTION is explored in detail in a congressional report that resulted from Pardongate, when revelations surfaced that President Clinton granted clemency for Carlos Vignali Jr. — convicted of drug trafficking and sentenced to 15 years in federal prison in 1995 — along with other convicted criminals and one-time international fugitive Marc Rich. The granting of clemency occurred after payments were made to Clinton’s brother-in-law, Hugh Rodham, the brother of former first lady, New York state senator and 2008 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton.


Released in March 2002 by the congressional Committee on Government Reform, “Justice Undone: Clemency Decisions in the Clinton White House” details Hugh Rodham’s involvement in the Vignali affair, as well as the long business history Vignali once shared with George Torres.

The report takes to task top L.A. elected officials, including county Supervisor Gloria Molina, then–state Senator Richard Polanco, then–state Assemblyman Antonio Villaraigosa and U.S. Representative Xavier Becerra, among others, for lobbying on behalf of Vignali Jr., in light of his drug conviction and the fact that DEA agents long suspected Vignali Sr. to be involved in drug trafficking — along with Torres. While a member of the California state Assembly, Villaraigosa wrote the first letter on Vignali’s behalf on May 24, 1996.


Saying Hillary Rodham Clinton was a leader who offered a new path, Los Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa today formally endorsed the New York senator and former first lady in her race to become president of the United States.

Villaraigosa will also serve as one of the four national chairs of Clinton’s campaign for the Democratic nomination for president, it was announced.

At a televised news conference from the UCLA campus in Westwood, Villaraigosa praised Clinton’s approach to domestic issues, particularly education, and her pledge to help end the war in Iraq. The pair earlier toured the preschool at UCLA’s Krieger Center. — La Times

http://mayorvillaraigosasdemons.blogspot.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HORRIFIC and SHOCKING
Posted by: asilsfable on Dec 16, 2007 10:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just finished reading the Waas piece. I'm still aghast and nauseous.

How can anyone think this man is decent? WTF??? After Bush, any guy who appears like someone you'd have a beer with should be thoroughly scrutinized. Remember, Bush was the down-to-earth one--unlike Gore.

That piece scared the hell out of me. I'm going to check my doors and windows to make sure they're locked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]