Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Ditch Green Industries, Invest in Guns -- a Deadly Market Gospel

By Naomi Klein, The Nation. Posted December 3, 2007.


In the world of venture capitalism, there has been a race going on between greens on the one hand and guns and garrisons on the other -- and the guns are winning.
Advertisement

Anyone tired of lousy news from the markets should talk to Douglas Lloyd, director of Venture Business Research, a company that tracks trends in venture capitalism. "I expect investment activity in this sector to remain buoyant," he said recently. His bouncy mood was inspired by the money gushing into private security and defense companies. He added, "I also see this as a more attractive sector, as many do, than clean energy."

Got that? If you are looking for a sure bet in a new growth market, sell solar, buy surveillance; forget wind, buy weapons.

This observation -- coming from an executive trusted by such clients as Goldman Sachs and Marsh & McLennan -- deserves particular attention in the run-up to the United Nations Climate Change Conference in Bali at the beginning of December. There, world environment ministers are supposed to come up with the global pact that will replace Kyoto.

The Bush Administration, still roadblocking firm caps on emissions, wants to let the market solve the crisis. "We're on the threshold of dramatic technological breakthroughs," Bush assured the world last January, adding, "We'll leave it to the market to decide the mix of fuels that most effectively and efficiently meet this goal."

The idea that capitalism can save us from climate catastrophe has powerful appeal. It gives politicians an excuse to subsidize corporations rather than regulate them, and it neatly avoids a discussion about how the core market logic of endless growth landed us here in the first place.

The market, however, appears to have other ideas about how to meet the challenges of an increasingly disaster-prone world. According to Lloyd, despite all the government incentives, the really big money is turning away from clean energy technologies and banking instead on gadgets promising to seal wealthy countries and individuals into high-tech fortresses. Key growth areas in venture capitalism are private security firms selling surveillance gear and privatized emergency response. Put simply, in the world of venture capitalism, there has been a race going on between greens on the one hand and guns and garrisons on the other -- and the guns are winning.

According to Venture Business Research, in 2006 North American and European companies developing green technology and those focused on "homeland security" and weaponry were neck and neck in the contest for new investment: green tech received $3.5 billion, and so did the guns and garrisons sector. But this year garrisons have suddenly leapt ahead. The greens have received $4.2 billion, while the garrisons have nearly doubled their money, collecting $6 billion in new investment funds. And 2007 isn't over yet.

This trend has nothing to do with real supply and demand, since the demand for clean energy technology could not be higher. With oil reaching $100 a barrel, it is clear that we badly need green alternatives, both as consumers and as a species. The latest report from the Nobel Prize-winning UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change was characterized by Time magazine as "a final warning to humanity," while a new Oxfam report makes it clear that the recent wave of natural disasters is no fluke: over the past two decades, the number of extreme weather events has quadrupled. Conversely, 2007 has seen no major terrorist events in North America or Europe, there are hints of a US troop drawdown in Iraq and, despite the relentless propaganda, there is no imminent threat from Iran.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: terrorism, weapons, renewable energy, guns, green technology

Naomi Klein's latest book is The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Last One Standing
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Dec 3, 2007 1:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sounds like the logic of Last One Standing as explained by Richard Heinberg in his book The Party's Over: Oil, War, and the Fate of Industrial Societies is about to overshadow conservation as the preferred strategy for coping with resource depletion, at least in the initial phases of industrial capitalism's decline.

Last One Standing is a scenario where, upon facing the prospect of energy scarcity, a polity chooses to compete with other polities for the remaining reserves of various non-renewable resources that are needed to keep industrial capitalism alive, rather than facing reality and restructuring itself in such a way that curbs demand for those resources in the first place. The latter option entails the end of mass consumption and of corporatism, which is why it would be opposed by the corporate interests that control the state despite the pointlessness of competing over vanishing resources.

The United States seems to have already embarked on this selfish trajectory, what with the Iraq War; the construction of permanent bases in Iraq and warnings from high officials that the occupation could go on for decades; rhetoric about "resource nationalism" (as though a country does not own the resources that lie within its territory, particularly when those resources happen to be desired by powerful industrial countries); the buildup to military conflict with Iran; the media's smear campaign against Hugo Chavez; the destruction of civil liberties within the United States, which has made it easier to crush political opposition and civil unrest; and the granting of power to the president to declare a state of emergency.

We are in a lot of trouble. What lurks on the horizon may well be fascism and a prolonged cycle of war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing surprising here...
Posted by: Farasien on Dec 3, 2007 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Humanity is focused, at least lately, on the short-term gain. The current model of American economic policy has really been focused on it since the late 70s when the first supply-side repugnican messiah took office. Its not just the death culture that is showing this, its everything you look at in modern culture. Next time you go out, take a good look around you at what passes for Ordinary Life these days and you can see it; from the stupefying pointlessness of youth culture to the locking down of civil rights, from our financial activities to international policies- the message of it all is perfectly clear... Tomorrow doesn't matter. Unfortunately, that causes mega-disasters down the road, but never mind that, we have investor returns to manage for the end of the quarter. Environmental catastrophes, economic meltdowns, jihads, the stripping of basic human rights and liberties? Those are someone else's problems and are like, yaknow, um, so uncool. Its time to wake up. Things have to get moving. We have to stop arguing and start doing something- not next quarter, not next year or in 10 years... The issues we face are OUR problems and unless humanity pulls its head out of its collective asses, and VERY SOON, there won't be anything left to worry about at all.

Get active. Do something, while you still can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nothing surprising here... Posted by: Farasien
» RE: Nice ideas but... Posted by: nightgaunt
» RE: yup to the above Posted by: davidg
Klein's analysis fails to both give the real picture and offer alternatives
Posted by: Bobsays on Dec 3, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is one thing to target the US for being a power-hungry imperialist capitalist state, but it is another to not even bother trying to understand the larger geo-political forces that gave birth to the US. Or how the US has been at many times a great supporter of freedom and economic opportunity (something Chna, Russia and Venezuala are worse at).

Just as Klein mistakenly told us design and logos were the cause of low-wage injustice, she is also mistaking violence and war as the only byproduct of the US' global role. She fails to go after the numerous other countries who have failed to work for global security, or the UN, which has contributed just as much to global lethargy and failure in conflict resolution. When the US had retreated after the Vietnam war, the world had plenty of conflict, large and small, all over the place. And much of it was not just down to cold war proxy wars.

I hope Klein and her followers see that there is a bigger picture here for progressives, and that much of her analysis is at best scratching the surface, or at worst leading down blind alleys that will not bring about real, lasting change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» gross oversimplification Posted by: JoshuaLudd
Green is no longer a color permitted in the US
Posted by: thelostsailor on Dec 3, 2007 1:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With basic rights stripped from Americans and actions to undermine nearly every country in the world, there is reason for people to feel the fear card. Since 9-11 there have been several decks of only fear cards thrown down on America. Since most of the country was already terrified of their neighbor prior to 9-11, it's not hard to imagine weapons sales through the roof (I've long been amazed how much of the country lights up their house like a Christmas tree at night for FEAR of everything).
Yet many are heeding my advice to go hunt a deer in their back yard (and save much more oil and energy) instead of giving in to veggiecentrism! Yes, at a time when we need to come together and dispell our fear and rid D.C. of the culprits, we should be using our guns, but only to put food on the table, lessen consumerism, and use less energy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New Better Weapons !
Posted by: mmckinl on Dec 3, 2007 6:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Taser is going wireless!
http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=7536

In case your insurance doesn't cover your murder conviction.

Yep , personal size tasers in fashion colors ! And for you Mercs , tasers that cover whole areas, coming soon to your local police department!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]