Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Labor Goes to Bali: Unions Ready to Take on Global Warming

By Brendan Smith and Jeremy Brecher and Tim Costello, Global Labor Strategies. Posted November 29, 2007.


The devastating realities of climate change, and the scientific consensus around its cause and cure, are shifting the global political climate.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

This week trade unionists from around the world will travel to Bali for the December 3rd launch of negotiations for a successor to the Kyoto Protocol limiting greenhouse gasses. It will include delegates from such U.S unions as the Electrical Workers (IUE), Mine Workers, Service Employees, Boilermakers, Steelworkers, Communication Workers, Transport Workers (TWU), and UNITE HERE garment and textile workers. It will also include the AFL-CIO Industrial Union Council as well as such labor-oriented groups as the Blue-Green Alliance, the Cornell Global Labor Institute, and the Labor Research Association.

The Kyoto Protocol was signed by 172 countries - not including the U.S. The AFL-CIO, which then represented the great majority of all U.S. unions, opposed the Kyoto protocol. What will be the stance of American labor toward an even stronger version for the future?

The devastating realities of climate change, and the scientific consensus around its cause and cure, are shifting the global political climate. In Australia, Prime Minister John Howard is defeated by the Australian Labor Party partly because of his intransigent opposition to effective action on global warming. Rightwing French Prime Minister Nicolas Sarkozy visits Washington and lectures George Bush on his failure to address the global warming crisis. Rupert Murdoch announces his papers will go green. A major power company cuts back on new plants because they would contribute to global warming. It remains to be seen whether this trend will also change American labor.

The attitude of U.S. unions may be critical to how well the world addresses the crisis of global warming. Despite its waning power, labor retains a critical position in controlling energy legislation in Congress. According to the highly respected Congressional reporting of Congressional Quarterly, lawmakers in Congress view support of the AFL-CIO as "essential" to passing any climate change bill. James Grumet of the nonpartisan National Commission on Energy Policy says, "If you don't have organized labor, you can't get something through" Congress.

The international labor movement has responded valiantly to global warming. It has taken a strong stance in support of international and national limits on greenhouse gas emissions. In a statement prepared for the Bali meeting, the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC, successor to the ICFTU) noted the tangible impacts of climate change for millions of workers' communities and workplaces, including droughts, floods, and diseases. And it put the issue in a broad historic frame:

History will judge us by how we exercise the conscious options that we still have within our reach. Will we truly face up to this monumental challenge? Trade unions want everyone to accept this challenge together, in solidarity and common action.

They add:

As trade unionists, we are confident that Bali will mark the beginning of a new and more ambitious process of social change, where our collective hearts and minds must aspire to save our planet, on the basis of solidarity and mutual respect.
Equally important, the ITUC has strongly backed the greenhouse gas reduction targets established by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), whose scientists recently received the Nobel Peace Prize. The ITUC states, "Securing a new Post-2012 Kyoto Protocol is the most important challenge the world community faces." It urges governments at Bali "to follow the IPCC scenario for keeping the global temperature within 2 degrees C and reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 85% by 2050." And it urged developing countries to use as a benchmark the EU's commitment to a 30% cut below 1990 levels by 2020.

The ITUC recognizes that both global warming and the efforts to combat it will have serious impacts for many groups. In a tone rarely heard from any quarter in the U.S. debate on global warming, it calls on governments and society to show "solidarity with those who are most vulnerable" around the world. According to the ITUC:

Such solidarity first of all means countering global warming and its effects on the most vulnerable. Trade unions consider the best way for developed countries to exercise solidarity with developing countries is by cutting their own emissions in order to limit further suffering and irreversible changes, and by creating the means for other countries to participate in reduction efforts.

In another theme little heard in U.S. discussion, the ITUC says that trade unionists "believe climate justice cannot be achieved without gender justice." Climate change "is not gender neutral. Women are generally more vulnerable, representing the majority of the world's poor and powerless." It points out that the 2004 Asian Tsunami killed four times as many women as men.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: labor, global warming

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Executive Director, AFL-CIO Industrial Union Council
Posted by: bbaugh on Nov 29, 2007 1:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a shame you chose to cherry pick our comments the way you did. We participated in the ITUC discussion and there is much that we support in the document. We have also participated in several stakeholder processes in Congress to design legislation, the Lieberman-Warner bill being the most recent.

Yes, we have a disagreement over the timelines and standards because we are concerned that there is a disconnect between the reduction targets and the actual development and deployment of new technology. However, our testimony also provided a lot of constructive criticism about how these cap and trade system can and should work and how how the resources should be invested. That is how our testimony has been received. I encourage any readers to read it and other recent information form the AFL-CIO Energy task Force at the afl-cio website http://www.aflcio.org/issues/jobseconomy/manufacturing/iuc/

And, about that 35 mpg amendment we criticized. We did so because we want investment in hybrids, advanced diesel and other advanced technoloies that raise the fleet average to the 35 mpg standard. The point is these are investments in efficient technologies. They aren't designed just for a 35 mpg car. That is the approach behind a 35mpg standard for the fleet average ... its across a group of vehicles. The amendment to limit the investment to only 35mpg cars doesn't make sense, kills investment in these advanced technologies and in the end is contrary to the intent of what a CAFE standard seeks to accomplish.

We have been meeting and talking with a variety of industry and environmental organizations about everything from investment policy to market systems. When we worked with the ITUC on the statement we agreed to disagree on the standards and agreed to agree on a whole lot more. We will be in Bali supporting those good ideas. At home our own legislative efforts have paralleled the investment strategies in the statement.

The point is we have been deeply engaged on multiple levels with the climate change issue because the labor movement sees it as an opportunity for a cleaner planet and a revitalized manufacturing sector. Unfortunately, your readers would never know that from reading your column.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Unions Another Evil Force
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Nov 29, 2007 2:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
U.S. labor unions hold an inordinate amount of power in this country and, while not quite as bad as corporations, have consistently advocated policies that are harmful to the environment in order to benefit themselves, such as opposing actions to reduce global warming and advocating oil drilling in the Alaska National Wildlife Refuge. These issues raise a real problem: there is an inherent conflict between those whose priority is economic, regardless of whether left or right, and those whose priority is environmental.

The economy of our society is based on ecological destruction. If you don't believe that, try to find a paying job that doesn't cause, or at least greatly contribute to, some serious environmental or ecological harm. (There is a minuscule percentage of those jobs, but they are rare exceptions and pay very poorly.) Because of this inescapable fact, there is an inherent conflict between the interests of leftists, including labor unions, and those of environmentalists.

I'm glad to see that labor unions in other countries are not as bad as those in the U.S. in demanding jobs at the cost of the environment. But until we greatly both lower our population and simplify our lifestyles, unions will have no choice but to advocate policies that are environmentally harmful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what will be done about cattle and metane gasses?
Posted by: kkmedia1 on Dec 24, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
online casinos USA | leather jackets The essential one-step product for Il migliore Casino Online complete leather care. URAD NEUTRAL buy cigarettes |brings back and revives the original buy diamond earings color and is remarkable buy cigarettes online |leather and fur is always great leathers to casino bonus |mint condition. Also, it offers efficient casino and poker no problems, Casino Online casino and poker no problems. Whether used as a simple shoe polish, as a cleaner for golf shoes or as a online casino gambling Online Casino Games
das beste internet casino best internet casino best online casinos casino spielen | blog for all | conditioner for Best Online Casinos leather and fur is always greatblog for all |car interior, URAD will surpass Das beste casino | any other product as to ease of use, dry time and leather and fur is always great on leather furniture and saddles, and URAD COLOR to bring a Das beste casino | better shine and hide scuff marks play bingo online casino and poker no problems.
online Casino bonus | Livonia transmission repair shop Michigan | Online Casino Gambling leather and fur is always great casino links and casino and poker no problems on we also have online casino links and more like cigarette links exchange always great| tamiflu, viagra, cialis buy tamiflu, viagra, buy cialis | pharmacy links | link directory, free link exchange | Online Casino United States | online casino US players leather and fur is always great judaica, kotel, menora | Casino Bonus Code | free casino bonus

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]