Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Goes Private to Spy on You

By Tim Shorrock, CorpWatch. Posted December 6, 2007.


The Bush administration is launching a new government agency that will rely heavily on private security contractors to conduct surveillance in the U.S.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Tim Shorrock

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

A new intelligence institution to be inaugurated soon by the Bush administration will allow government spying agencies to conduct broad surveillance and reconnaissance inside the United States for the first time. Under a proposal being reviewed by Congress, a National Applications Office (NAO) will be established to coordinate how the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and domestic law enforcement and rescue agencies use imagery and communications intelligence picked up by U.S. spy satellites. If the plan goes forward, the NAO will create the legal mechanism for an unprecedented degree of domestic intelligence gathering that would make the United States one of the world's most closely monitored nations. Until now, domestic use of electronic intelligence from spy satellites was limited to scientific agencies with no responsibility for national security or law enforcement.

The intelligence-sharing system to be managed by the NAO will rely heavily on private contractors, including Boeing, BAE Systems, L-3 Communications and Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC). These companies already provide technology and personnel to U.S. agencies involved in foreign intelligence, and the NAO greatly expands their markets. Indeed, at an intelligence conference in San Antonio, Texas, last month, the titans of the industry were actively lobbying intelligence officials to buy products specifically designed for domestic surveillance.

The NAO was created under a plan tentatively approved in May 2007 by Director of National Intelligence Michael McConnell. Specifically, the NAO will oversee how classified information collected by the National Security Agency (NSA), the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and other key agencies is used within the United States during natural disasters, terrorist attacks and other events affecting national security. The most critical intelligence will be supplied by the NSA and the NGA, which are often referred to by U.S. officials as the "eyes" and "ears" of the intelligence community.

The NSA, through a global network of listening posts, surveillance planes, and satellites, captures signals from phone calls, email and internet traffic, and translates and analyzes them for U.S. military and national intelligence officials.

The National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), which was formally inaugurated in 2003, provides overhead imagery and mapping tools that allow intelligence and military analysts to monitor events from the skies and space. The NSA and the NGA have a close relationship with the supersecret National Reconnaissance Agency (NRO), which builds and maintains the U.S. fleet of spy satellites and operates the ground stations where the NSA's signals and the NGA's imagery are processed and analyzed. By law, their collection efforts are supposed to be confined to foreign countries and battlefields.

The National Applications Office was conceived in 2005 by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI), which Congress created in 2004 to oversee the 16 agencies that make up the U.S. intelligence community. The ODNI, concerned that the legal framework for U.S. intelligence operations had not been updated for the global "war on terror," turned to Booz Allen Hamilton of McLean, Va., one of the largest contractors in the spy business. The company was tasked with studying how intelligence from spy satellites and photoreconnaissance planes could be better used domestically to track potential threats to security within the United States. The Booz Allen study was completed in May of that year and has since become the basis for the NAO oversight plan. In May 2007, McConnell, the former executive vice president of Booz Allen, signed off on the creation of the NAO as the principal body to oversee the merging of foreign and domestic intelligence collection operations.

The NAO is "an idea whose time has arrived," Charles Allen, a top U.S. intelligence official, told the Wall Street Journal in August 2007 after it broke the news of the NAO's creation. Allen, the DHS's chief intelligence officer, will head the new program. The announcement came just days after President George W. Bush signed a new law approved by Congress to expand the ability of the NSA to eavesdrop, without warrants, on telephone calls, email and faxes passing through telecommunications hubs in the United States when the government suspects agents of a foreign power may be involved. "These [intelligence] systems are already used to help us respond to crises," Allen later told the Washington Post. "We anticipate that we can also use them to protect Americans by preventing the entry of dangerous people and goods into the country, and by helping us examine critical infrastructure for vulnerabilities."

Donald Kerr, a former NRO director who is now the No. 2 at ODNI, recently explained to reporters that the intelligence community was no longer discussing whether or not to spy on U.S. citizens: "Our job now is to engage in a productive debate, which focuses on privacy as a component of appropriate levels of security and public safety,'' Kerr said. ''I think all of us have to really take stock of what we already are willing to give up, in terms of anonymity, but [also] what safeguards we want in place to be sure that giving that doesn't empty our bank account or do something equally bad elsewhere.''


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: domestic surveillance, contractors, war profiteering

Tim Shorrock has been writing about U.S. foreign policy and national security for nearly 30 years. His book Spies for Hire: The Secret World of Outsourced Intelligence will be published in May 2008 by Simon & Schuster.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
living in the good oil USA....no thanks
Posted by: Smiggsy on Dec 6, 2007 12:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ha....glad I'm not living in the good oil USA.

If you guys don't get your act together & garner a new revolution soon you will all be more than just the current laughing stock of the 'free' world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The quicker the better? Posted by: Melvin
» CRONY CAPITALISM Posted by: snideelf
Proof positive that time is running backwards in the United States
Posted by: Rune on Dec 6, 2007 1:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
where it is getting closer and closer to 1984 with each passing moment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An honor
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Dec 6, 2007 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope that, by reading your site and making this comment I'll become another (in my case european) citizen watched by your Hi-tech, big brotherly, intelligence agencies of yours.
It would be an honor to be considered as an "enemy of the sate", as Stalin would say, and a prove that I'm in the right tracks against the XXI century evil empire.
Anyway, as an european, I think that we (EU)should unify urgently in a superstate and build, on the double, a satelite killing space sistem.
I think that sistem will play the same role as the RAF in WWII.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: An honor Posted by: cwilsondrum
an honor II
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Dec 6, 2007 3:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry for my rotten english: what I meant was: "a satellite killer sistem"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Life,Liberty,and the Pursuing of Privacy....
Posted by: starvinmarvy on Dec 6, 2007 4:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I`ve said this before and I`ll say it again:all this spy infrastructure is not to protect "we the people" from the boogyman ...it IS intended to to
quell the "will of humanity"!!Infrastructure to
"guarantee" that come hell or high water...no demonstration of civil disobedience will change
the grand plan to keep people in high places that will assure the continuation of that"grand plan".
They MUST keep the masses in check!!!
Leaves one feeling a little defeated huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Waste... Posted by: Cathyc
Our Congress
Posted by: douglashoyt on Dec 6, 2007 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is the people's house (House of Representatives) passing legislationn to spy upon us?

Something is rotten here, methinks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our Congress Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
The Laughs Keep On Coming
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Dec 6, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this technological progress didn't help too many of those poor people left to rot in New Orleans. It doesn't seem to prevent the US from being completely impotent in Iraq either.

It will be helpful for the next 'disaster' read; pretext, when they hand the intelligence to Blackwater who will use it to protect the public from itself and its tendency to protest against injustice and infringement on rights (ungrateful bastards).

It's like watching a bad Schwarzenegger movie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Off topic, but important...
Posted by: Knowmad on Dec 6, 2007 7:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, but there's nothing on the Bali environmental initiative right now, and this piece from our most widespread national newspaper needs to be out there. There are rallies being planned for this weekend regarding this debacle. Find one and go if you can. Here's the information (the link address was too long):

Go to www.theglobeandmail.com/world/, then scrool down to the "Ottawa gains 'beyond Kyoto' allies" story.

Canadians - and anyone else who cares - should let their MP/Senator/Congressperson know just how disgusted they are with them. Personally, I'm now even more ashamed to have the lowlife bushlicking harper as our Prime Minister (not for long though...the beauty of a minority government).

When will all this blatant corporate corruption end? When everyone but the 'elite' and their toadies are fat, safe and giddy inside their pollution/radiation/weather proof bubbles, after the rest of us have left after succumbing to their immoral psychopathy?

I wonder how short-sighted fools like harper, cheney, bush, and the rest of that lovely neocorp cabal can look themselves in the mirror every morning, and resist the urge to slit their throats for the benefit of humanity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's Looking At You
Posted by: QQOblivion on Dec 6, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Bush administration's supporters say they "have nothing to hide".
(Maybe they should be hiding how absolutely idiotic they are. But I digress.)
We ALL have something to hide, however. I, for one, don't want spy satellites watching me use the bathroom or watching me having sex. (The satellites can look through walls and ceilings into buildings.) I don't want my personal information to be compromised. I don't want to be suspected of being a terrorist just because I view Alternet.
My thoughts and my actions are my own and, especially when I am not breaking any laws, are not the business of security contractors or the government. But ALL of us -- whether we are criminals, terrorists, or just ordinary law-abiding Americans -- can be the targets of the surveillance. We are ALL in danger of having every single personal detail about our lives known to the government.
And to think, the one person who has the most to hide than anyone in America, President Bush, is behind the push to know everything about everybody ELSE. He's just "keeping us safe", I guess.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The only reason Bush is pushing more aggressively than even Nixon is simple.
Posted by: maxpayne on Dec 6, 2007 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He knows that the MOTHERFUCKERS in Congress, and yes members of both parties, are going to kiss his FUCKING ASS and give the "baby" whatever the FUCK he wants !!!! Bush would not have done it had he been confronted with a real Congress in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

25ghostcommander
Posted by: 25ghostcommander on Dec 6, 2007 10:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is just another chapter in the book-"The Largest Robbery" in history of future and taxpayer dollars. The Bush/Cheney Fascist Criminal Enterprise has increased privatization of the departments of government by approximately 25%. The National Debt increased by 57% and still growing. That amount equates to over $30,000 for every man woman, and child in this good ole USA. I heard that one company does not have the employees to fulfill all their contracts and they are not hiring. The Mafia cannot compete with the Bush/Cheney RIP-OFF of America. Stealing from the citizens through privatization and no-bid and over-inflated contracts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

alohaoceanus
Posted by: alohamarilyn on Dec 6, 2007 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is anyone concerned about the knowledge Bush & company are gleaning from spying to further their own political goals? The perspective of our views may be used to serve electing their choice of candidates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's not about the politics Posted by: huricane
UnConstitutional as Hell..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Dec 6, 2007 12:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is clearly UnConstitutional as are so many of the measures this ever more fascist government has enacted the last 6 years..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: UnConstitutional as Hell..! Posted by: InsertNameHere
threat?
Posted by: cwilsondrum on Dec 6, 2007 1:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I only hope that if they(the gov and bushy)are soooo busy watching me,that when we are attcked again ,they will be the first to go. after all they (bush,cheney) are who the terrorists are really after and that maybe security will be so bad from mis-directed,incompetant,corrupted officials that there will be no safety net. one can only hope

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spying - "for the first time" Ha! Ha Ha!
Posted by: Cathyc on Dec 6, 2007 6:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Its not as if the USA government invented spying on its OWN PEOPLE" for the first time (sic)! LOL, SOCIOPATHS, i.e., would-be human beings -- have been doing THAT the world over ever since.... lemme think... since so-called Christianity was invented!!!

Anyone ever read Brindsley Sheridan's THE VALLEY OF THE SQUINTING WINDOWS? Re: 1950's Holy Catholic Ireland...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the manipulation continues
Posted by: caru on Dec 6, 2007 9:33 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hey all ... i am enjoying my life, in spite of living in the most wreckless time on the planet. i wish you all well. please check out this most interesting film series. imho, i think big pharma is drugging all the big pharaohs in dc to be compliant and subservient. just a thought.

_________

A film spanning from the time of the pharaohs all the way up to the New World Order. From pirates to banksters, to the ruling elite, who run the world's finances, the media and cover both side of nearly every war: the world may make more sense after watching this.

About the Producer:
As a child, she had many arguments between her parents over her father's ring, inscribed with "G", a compass and square. At a later age, years of intensive research led her to the identity , history and plans of a power "so organized, so subtle, so watchful, so interlocking, so complete, so pervasive" that even the known 'leaders' of the world are careful not to speak in "condemnation" of it.
_______________________________________
Series: The Secret Rulers of the World

01. That Morning of September
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAcxGD...
___________________________

... and 29 more 10 minute clips at youtube. sorry folks it looks like bush will hit iran in the next couple of weeks and he will create martial law. if only the aliens would save us ... seems like nothing else is working. dont forget they have ELF too .... soze they can smack ya in the brain drum as soon as they get ya in the preview ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I hate to say this....
Posted by: coñoloco on Dec 7, 2007 1:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I mostly laugh at what the bible says,but
how one can't believe Bush isn't the 666
A man that barely makes himself inteligible
has managed to get the smartest dancing his tune.
Probably the only time Chavez was right
was at that podium in UN.remember to who
he was reffering to ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I hate to say this.... Posted by: donl51
» Yes it is true Posted by: snideelf
Milton Friedman's Economic Debacle
Posted by: macdon1 on Dec 7, 2007 1:36 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Get ready people. We are about to reap the bitter harvest of years of our political leaders following the "Shock Doctrine" promoted by Milton Friedman and his Chicago School of economics. (See Naomi Klein's amazing book of the same name) For a preview of what is to come for America, just read up on the histories of Chile and Argentina. Everything is to be privatized and owned by the super-rich elites, including the methods used to subjugate any citizens who oppose the destruction of the middle class and the monopolization of wealth by a small global elite. Too bad Americans are so preoccupied by consumption that they have failed to see their democracy being destroyed from within. Too late now...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Privatize and Classify
Posted by: Southern Gal on Dec 7, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What better way to control the people and inspire fear? You are being monitored by private companies who will never be held accountable for mistakes or deliberate wrong doing because they and their activities are classified.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just a thought!
Posted by: GPH on Dec 7, 2007 6:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is about money and control, which creates a false blanket of comfort in the mind set of the greater population, under the term national security. Today you could walk out your front door be hit by a bus, or equally be caught up in a bombing incident even a shooting. Security in the broader sense of the word is an illusion of comfort and ones safety. We are no more safe then in the days of the stone age cave man.
And what you see in the piece is a sales pitch.

The questions you should be asking, Why do this? What is to be gained from these actions? What is the benefit to the greater good? Apart from the obvious of saving lives, and trying to keep a balance between conflict and peace where it can be achieved and must be done in a balanced manner.

I perceive this as the coming out for want of a better word, of the bringing together of the corporate and governmental, into the public domain as has been going on for years. Your just seeing it at a new stage in it’s development. And in the end folks, big business is going to be pulling the strings and running countries. Regardless of who you vote for. Sleep tight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jean
Posted by: acers on Dec 9, 2007 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Another chink of the Constitution is on its way out. Look at HR 1955. This plan for private contractors surveilling us fits right in. Write your Senator about this bill. The House has passed it 405 (about) to 6. I am sorry to say the Dems supported this to the hilt. The No's were 3 Dems and 3 Reps. Write your Senator!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Watching
Posted by: frank69 on Dec 10, 2007 9:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We're watching you! Your papers, please. Sounds like a bad WWII movie.
Except this is real RepubDemoThuggery. Once again the Money Party has us all by the short hairs!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Passport please...
Posted by: underledge on Dec 10, 2007 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It isn't too far fetched to envision the time when "papers" or passport will be necessary to cross state lines - for security reasons of course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

mzanony
Posted by: miz on Dec 12, 2007 1:37 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ALL OF CONGRESS WAS TREASONOUS WITH PASSAGE OF THE PATRIOT'S ACT, I AND II, (SAVE ONE REP, A BLACK WOMAN,WHO HAD THE BALLS TO SAY NO TO IRAQ AND THAT IDIOT IN THE WHITE HOUSE. EVERY SINGLE OTHER MEMBER OF CONGRESS IS GUILTY OF TREASON. WE MUST PASS LEGISLATION TO CREATE A "STAND-IN" CONGRESS (DULY ELECTED WITH ALL MEANS OF ELECTION BOOTH FRAUD BEING ADDRESSED FIRST) TO FORCE ALL MEMBERS OF CONGRESS TO STAND DOWN THE NEXT TIME THEY BETRAY THE AMERICAN PEOPLE BY COMMITTING TREASON. BUSHBABY HAS WIPED HIS ASS WITH THE CONSTITUTION AND HAS PISSED ON THE BILL OF RIGHTS AND ALL OF CONGRESS (SAVE 1 WOMAN) HELD HIS TOILET PAPER FOR HIM.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No-thing-is-chan-ging!
Posted by: monkeywrench on Dec 12, 2007 8:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What are we to do about this? Congress is reviewing this NAO proposal? SO WHAT? That's a "wall job," a-la your local auto mechanic, where he promises to fix your car but parks it by a wall for a few days and then charges you for the non-repair. Congress, especially the cowardly-lion Democrats, will do nothing but rubber stamp this latest assault on our rights, as they have done with every other Bush assault since 2000. Short of a MASSIVE march on Washington (show me where to get on the bus) or a nation-wide taxpayer revolt, we can do nothing but bend over and spread 'em. Until people get pissed off enough to cut loose, we might as well mix cocktails, sit back, and hope there is still a country left by 2008 – and after.

Apparently, today, words mean nothing, congressional hearings mean nothing, news exposes mean nothing (the few times we have them), court cases mean nothing (except when they're in favor of the administration), atrocities committed by our government mean nothing, the rule of law means nothing. The truth means nothing. The constant, 24-hour-a-day blather of lies and spin pouring forth from dozens of TV and radio channels has worked to turn the affairs of state into a trivial, overcooked, indigestable gruel. The current "powers that be" have found a form of propaganda far more effective than the heavy-handed Pravda/Izvestia B.S. of the Soviet Union: information overload – especially worthless information. This is what we all have to fight; the inertia that sets in when we are being sucker-punched from all sides and do not know where to move. It is, psychologically, death by a thousand cuts.

I hate to be so cynical, but after living through the "duck & cover" nuclear threat, the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Kennedy/Kennedy/King assassinations, the draft, Kent State, the Berkeley riots, the L.A. riots (twice), Vietnam and Watergate (where there was still a judicial branch that believed in the law), I am just slack-jawed incredulous at how far we have sunk and how dead we have become. Thanks to our fear (and I include myself), we are in far, far, more trouble than any of us realize, because we have simply not experienced the death of democracy here before. Is this how it happened to the good people of Germany in the 1930's?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No-thing-is-chan-ging! Posted by: donnee
SPY NATION.....
Posted by: Dagny on Dec 13, 2007 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We, as a nation, have allowed this to happen. It is time for us as individuals and as a nation to "WAKE UP".

The question is "What are we willing to do about this? What are our options, and where do we go from here?".

I believe our voices can still be heard. We do not need to accept this (or any other) administration's efforts to strip us of our rights and continue to destroy our constitution under the veil of "homeland security".

To those that are out there, indignant of what we are witnessing, refusing to accept the continued violations of our individualities, analyze our options as a country, and let's ALL get involved in voicing our discontempt to all those that have the power to change what is happening, and let's do our part in STOPPING what seems to be a fascist movement under the mask of "protection and national security"!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: SPY NATION..... Posted by: madmax427
does anyone remember...
Posted by: formaryjane on Dec 31, 2007 8:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when big brother was just somones imagination?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]