Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

'Beowulf': War Porn Wrapped in a Chippendale Dancer's Body

By Alexander Zaitchik, AlterNet. Posted November 27, 2007.


The new 'Beowulf' flick combines a bizarre mix of homoerotic imagery, locker room machismo and total carnage.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Alexander Zaitchik

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When Zack Snyder's 300 hit theaters in March, critics flagged the eerie timing of the legendary Greeks vs. Persians battle splashing across big screens just as the White House was ratcheting up its war of words against Tehran. Slate magazine's Dana Stevens spoke for many when she called the film "a textbook example of how race-baiting fantasy and nationalist myth can serve as an incitement to war."

The accusation stung the filmmakers and terrified Warner Brothers, which did everything it could to discourage political readings of the film. But could the studios blame anyone for wondering if a comic book-inspired historical fantasy was being employed as part of a coordinated propaganda campaign? Hollywood showed its willingness to participate in post-9/11 myth making with films like Flight 93.

So it's not much of a leap to project current events (and fears) onto screens showing director Robert Zemeckis' adaptation of the Old English epic poem Beowulf. Like 300, Beowulf is an animated gore-fiesta that should have 15-year-olds around the country screaming for a sword and a trip to the nearest Blackwater recruitment office.

Beowulf, played by Ray Winstone, arrives in Denmark not as a king, but as a famed mercenary. Like today's Pentagon-contracted security firms, he claims not to be interested solely in money, yet heartily indulges in the king's munificence. The mercenary-hero proceeds to do battle with three monsters -- a sort of Axis of Medieval.

The three beasts in the film in fact line up pretty well as stand-ins for Iraq, North Korea and Iran. Beowulf slays the first beast (Grendel/Iraq) easy enough, but he loses his soul in the process and becomes prisoner to the battle's legacy. Because of the second beast's potent demon powers, Beowulf decides not to slay it at all (Grendel's mother/North Korea). The third monster is the biggest (Iran/the Dragon), and when Beowulf finally gets around to charging its cave, the battle ends in their mutual death and the destruction of the citadel.

Beowulf's heroic but tragic end, like that of King Leonidas in 300, makes it hard to fit the story into a neat neocon narrative. Both men fail, while the war party in the United States seeks total victory -- "an end to evil," in the words of Richard Perle. The film takes an even sharper turn away from gung-ho militarism when Beowulf turns and sees that his final enemy is not so monstrous at all. Alas, the dragon is just a man in his own image.

Beowulf, Chippendale warrior?

Beowulf is both politically and sexually unsure of itself. Like 300, this CGI-enabled parable drenches its young-male target audience in PG-13 homoerotica. Star Ray Winstone's rippled abs and marble pecs dominate many scenes, and the script is a steamy bathhouse of macho staring contests, ribald jokes and tender but tense moments between friends-to-the-death. The undercurrent of gay sexual tension is so loud and proud that it's hard to see how anyone could deny it. Yet a Gaylinkcontent.com critic writes that the film is not exactly homoerotic because "the shame in the film is not homosexuality, but the low sexual willpower of the male heroes."

But what does shame have to do with anything? Beowulf revels in the beefcake torso of its male star, whose flesh gets more screen time than that of his female co-star, Angelina Jolie. Even Anthony Hopkins' King Hrothgar gets a gratuitous ass shot in the first scene.

In the most bizarre example of the film's obsession with Winstone's computer-enhanced body, Zemeckis has him strip naked to battle Grendel. In the original poem, Beowulf just takes off his armor. But here, in the mead hall before the battle, Beowulf lies naked in a position of amorous waiting, arms behind his head, muscles glistening in the lamplight. In a David-like film study of the male form, Beowulf looks up languidly at his best friend, who grumbles in jealousy that there are "too many untended women here. A warrior's mind must be unblurred."

Then there is the jarring utterance of Queen Wealthow, played by Robin Wright Penn: "There have been many a brave soldier come to taste my husband's mead."

The first hour of Beowulf so bursts with this kind of thing that it can only be a matter of time before gay bars start popping up named "The Mead Hall."

Like the refusal of 300 to acknowledge the sexual reality of its subject -- the script actually has the Spartans mocking the Athenians for being "boy lovers" -- Beowulf is careful to disguise its nude male imagery amid typical examples of adolescent homophobia. When one of Beowulf's soldiers accuses another of being gay with an effeminate gesture, a friendly frolic ensues, much like the ones found in any ass-pinching football locker room or paddle-smacking fraternity -- half jocular wrestle and half dry-hump.

This homoerotic/homophobic tension in the film is doubly striking, given another of the film's notable themes: strident, Nietzschean anti-Christianity.

This theme is unveiled in the film's early minutes, with John Malkovich's character, the venal drunk Unferth, explaining the new Roman religion to a small group in hushed tones, as if he were explaining some new street drug. "This is how it works," he says. "After you die, you wouldn't really be dead -- providing you accepted him as the one and only god."

Later, after Grendel attacks the castle, Unferth asks King Hrothgar, "Should we pray to the Roman god Christ Jesus? Perhaps he can lift our affliction." To which Hrothgar responds: "No, no, no. The gods will do nothing for us we cannot do for ourselves. What we need is a hero."

Enter the mercenary Beowulf. But even heroes are no match for the new god Jesus Christ. After the religion has gained a foothold in the land, an aging Beowulf mutters, "The age of heroes is over. The Christ god has killed it, leaving humanity with nothing but weeping martyrs, fear and shame."

It is lines like this that make you wonder about these new-generation war films. Are they, as the filmmakers maintain, nothing more than cutting-edge comic book remakes of old poems and stories? Or are they in fact slick propaganda with amazing f/x intended to get and keep kids pumped up for our multigenerational fight against the evil-doers?

Beowulf offers a third possible reading. Perhaps it is intended as a post-9/11 parable, but one with a very different message from that found in the "fascist" 300. It is possible to read Beowulf as a not-so-subtle radical critique of greed, bloodlust, the desire to enter the lairs of others and obliterate all enemies. As Angelia Jolie tells Beowulf when he storms her treasure-cave seeking revenge: "Underneath your glamour, you're as much a monster as my son."

Beowulf does not disagree.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: beowulf, homoerotic, anti-christian

Alexander Zaitchik is a writer and editor for the eXile.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Everything is not a metaphor for what's on your mind
Posted by: YogiBear on Nov 27, 2007 12:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The three beasts in the film in fact line up pretty well as stand-ins for Iraq, North Korea, and Iran.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't there three monsters in the original tale? I guess the 11th century author must have somehow been on the Bush family payroll, eh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Static Posted by: YogiBear
ummmm....no.
Posted by: Eat Politicians on Nov 27, 2007 12:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
wtf?

There are so many films with so much patriotic fluff or clearly established homoerotic content, why do you feel the need to stretch the metaphor to the breakpoint for these two movies? Sure both those movies suck, but that is kind of beside the point.

Find a new hobby that isn't writing...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wtf indeed Posted by: Techubus
homework
Posted by: truecascadian on Nov 27, 2007 2:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ok, so maybe it's understandable as the focus of this article is not on the nuts and bolts of film production but "Like 300, Beowulf is a motion-capture animation gore-fiesta"? c'mon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neocon Porn
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Nov 27, 2007 2:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It reminds me of when George Bush strutted around the USS Abraham Lincoln in a flight suit with a heavily padded jock strap designed by Karl Rove. And then there's our Vice President, who is called Dick because he has a head with no brain and no hair, screws everyone he can and is supported by a Bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Neocon Porn Posted by: bomec
Are there editors at Alternet?
Posted by: dmaddox on Nov 27, 2007 3:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Beowulf's heroic but tragic end, like that of King Leonidas in 300, makes it hard to fit the story into a neat neocon narrative."

It may be difficult, but your reviewer is willing to give it the old college try. Every aspect of this review is stretched so far that it becomes ridiculous.

Not only are the supposed political undertones of the movie tenuous at best, the supposition that a monolithic "Hollywood" has been coopted by the Pentagon to help with the war effort is likewise ridiculous. Are we supposed to forget "Redacted" and "Lions for Lambs"? (Actually, most people ARE trying to forget those movies.)

AlterNet usually offers a rational alternative perspective for those of us interested in understanding our political opponents. No one is served by such juvenile tripe as is offered by this review.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Unintentionally Gay Duo Posted by: MThomson
Overexaming
Posted by: masterjc on Nov 27, 2007 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gone amock. There is no political overtones in Beuwolf or 300. I've seen both movies and all it's all simple mindless fun, and thats it. Stop trying to look for metaphors in movies that don't have any. And Beuwolf is based on a tale written hundreds of years ago, and 300 is based on something that supposedly happened thousands of years ago. I don't think any of those people where thinking of Bush when they wrote them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Overexaming Posted by: jroth420
» RE: Overexaming Posted by: Thetorganization
» RE: Overexaming Posted by: JOHN L.
» RE: Overexaming Posted by: summerhill
So goes Hollywood
Posted by: talkville on Nov 27, 2007 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As with Mega Churches and Prosperity Groups, Hollywood too has entertained new players in the production and distribution business.

The Pater Familias is back; the Clan is back; the Warlord is back. The Tribe is back. Fully digital and computer enhanced for the masses. Grand Blanks to fill in for those who are asked: what do you want to be when you grow up? Who are all these grand embody-ments of Masculine or Feminine Power?

Seductive, all these Conans and Xenas and Beowoulfs and such -- Eros Incarnate! Power and Desire in the Flesh. And the Moulds are so perfectly and endlessly fill-able.

"A Working Class Hero is Something to Be" -- J Lennon. Not so much in Hollywood; there the Warlords of Industry are engaged in bloody struggle to 'elevate' and 'entertain' the National and Global Culture into Heroes all. Just what is needed in these Enlightened and Sophisticated times of ours. Just around the corner is that Hero who will Save Us All from the Pulpit of the White House. A Leader of all Leaders: Beowulf or Xena Agonisto!

Besides, the movie will probably do well and be profitable and prosperous at the box office. Who could possibly object to that? It's the American Way, the Tao of USA. Heroes and exemplars of old are so much better now; they can be Produced and Manufactured at Will. All Hail, New and Improved Caesar!! "Mercy, Mercy Mercy" - the Bopper.

Enjoy the Movie. There's Concessions at the Stand too!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So goes Hollywood Posted by: El Hombre Malo
» RE: So goes Hollywood Posted by: talkville
» RE: So goes Hollywood Posted by: screwjack2000
» RE: So goes Hollywood Posted by: talkville
Yeah, I didn't think it to be possible...
Posted by: Scientz on Nov 27, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but this review is actually dumber than the one for 300.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar
Posted by: lepidopteryx on Nov 27, 2007 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe it's just a really bad CGI-enhanced movie version of an epic poem. Maybe that's ALL it is. The really scary part of it is that this is the ONLY exposure some people will ever have to the legend of Beowulf. One can only hope that perhaps some of the folks who have never heard of Beowulf before the movie will actually READ it after seeing it.
I've lost track of the number of times I've commented on a movie by saying that I liked the book better, only to have someone respond, "There's a BOOK?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overassumptions, tainted analogies and bad research...
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Nov 27, 2007 5:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since I mostly agree with the comments left before mine, I will just make some precissions;

-Beowulf is as much a mercenary as The Pied Piper of Hamelin or many other medieval folk heroes. To awnser the plea of someone in distress and upon success receiving a reward, may it be gold, a princess hand or a token of heroicy, does not make you a mercenary but an adventurer.

-The three monsters Beowulf fight are, as someone noted, the classical story ones. But even so, they are less monstruous than simbolic. Obviously the critic wasnt paying much attention to the film since he failed to notice that the "man behind the monster" Beowulf contemplate as he is dying in the beach is actually his own son. It gives a whole different meaning to that scene, and any interpretation that doesnt aknowledges this is crippled.

-What the critic labels as homoeroticism, a less obsessed beholder would call "nude male body". And yes, there are subtext and insinuations flying all over the room, but these are sexual ones, the orientation for the beholder to pick. Beowulf is a braggart, a self enamorated adventurer who disrobes to taunt the Queen (and because vikings were actually very natural about nudity). Obviously the writer felt unconfortable watching a group of pixels resembling a male nude body, sans genitalia.

The Song of Beowulf is a classic in both english literature and in the scandinavian world. The film version is far from perfect but is pretty faithful to the original, and where it is not, it is respectful and coherent. Technically and in terms of production design, I think it would have needed a grittier aproach but thats more a matter of taste.

But where it succeeds is in its depiction of beowulf personality Rather than elaborate on the adventures of the hero it tries to deconstruct its psyche, giving us a "man behind the hero" perspective while also describing how myths are born. That kind of revisitation of folklore is a frequent theme in Neil Gaiman's work.

But hey, maybe I am wrong...

... and Anthony Hopkins drunken digital fat ass is an overt intivation to steamy gay sex.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what is this writer's problem?
Posted by: somegirl on Nov 27, 2007 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the headline made me think that the critique would show the movie as glorifying war for the masses, as i'm always looking for these signs. i was curious about this, because i really can't imagine the fabulous graphic/novelist neil gaiman (who co-wrote the screenplay) would do such a thing, though i don't put it past hollywood to bastardize his work beyone recognition.

what i find instead is almost the exact opposite, and nothing that i find politically offensive. i actually would like to see this movie, as i'm not above some beefcake action, but i'm afraid my poor brain won't be able to take the special effects...i'll wait till it's on cable when i can bear it on the small screen, as i do with most movies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I hear they have it in 3-D!
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Nov 27, 2007 6:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that would be pretty cool. Its too bad that I will become a homosexual Bush supporter after I see it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh puleeeeze!
Posted by: lydia cypher on Nov 27, 2007 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw Beowulf two days ago and my biggest critique of the film is: BORING! I laughed the first time I saw the computer animated transformation of Grendel from a pitiful, misshapen creature to an explosion of vicious fury - sorry, it just seemed so silly! The whole thing was so overblown ridiculous that it just didn't work on me. I literally fell asleep numerous times throughout the film. What's worse for Beowulf was that my boyfriend and I had just watched a truly charming independent film with a very human story, Big Night, at home the night before. Beowulf falls flat because it simply fails to make us care a whit about any of the characters. Man aganst mythical monster is an ancient foil, but it takes more than money and technology to bring a story to life. This reviewer is stretching the political metaphor theory to the breaking point, trying to make something out of nothing. I'd have to say that point of view is akin to looking for Commies under the bed. I didn't buy it as a kid and I ain't buying it now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh puleeeeze! Posted by: When In Doubt
bart simpson bars opening soon.
Posted by: Declan on Nov 27, 2007 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I could think while watching the naked fight scene in the movie was that it was funnily reminiscent of Bart's skate board ride through Springfield. I had no idea that both of these scenes were inserted to excite the gay audience. Will "The Mead Hall" gay franchise open and compete with the "Bart Simpson's Little Bar" franchises that are no doubt about to spring up everywhere? And what about a nude Angelina Jolie? Was she picked to appeal to the lesbians in the audience? If so perhaps she should have emerged from the water wearing a flannel shirt and sensible shoes.
As for the other interpretations, they are even more ridiculous. I'm laughing too hard to even comment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Typical cultural criticism
Posted by: Jbuuty on Nov 27, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I almost enjoying reading the comments more than the article. The article is simply typical cultural criticism: it depends quite a bit on the subjective experience of the critic. It looks for hidden meanings, which are sometimes truly there, and at other times completely absent. It does provide some insight, while often exaggerating the critics major positions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

beowolf was amazing in 3-D
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Nov 27, 2007 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
beowolf was amazing in 3-D. i can imagine it would be boring in 2-D though. but if you get a chance to watch it in 3-D, it's pretty amazing. just focus on the effects and don't worry about the story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anybody else notice that the headline doesn't actually describe what this article is about?
Posted by: Incertus (Bradley) on Nov 27, 2007 6:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't have a problem with anything in this article per se-- although I think anyone entertaining the notion that this movie could possibly be construed as being pro-war is really reaching. At the movie's beginning, Beowulf is a lying braggart looking for adventure. By the movie's end, Beowulf's simple-minded quest for "glory" has cost him his kingdom, his marriage, and his life. In fact, it's stated explicitly that the myth that will come bears no relation to the man being depicted in this narrative-- there's nothing particularly heroic about a guy who goes looking for a fight, then scrambles to survive when the chickens come home to roost.

But the odd thing is, I think this reviewer gets that-- hence the article's conclusion. So please, someone tell me why the editors at AlterNet decided to give this article a headline that suggests that it's arguing the exact opposite of its stated conclusion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Movie goer"
Posted by: Joekanan on Nov 27, 2007 6:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's a movie, an animated film, loosely based on the story of Beowulf.
That's it. Nothing else.
Just because you are intelligent and CAN write doesn't always mean that you should.
Worry not, there are probably no monsters under your bed either.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Movie goer" Posted by: talkville
ray winstones rippled abs?
Posted by: kelt65 on Nov 27, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Are we thinking of the same Ray Winstone? the last film I saw him in he was obese (Sexy Beast) Not exactly what I have in mind when you say homoerotic. Neither is Anthony Hopkins. I think I'll pass on this one ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You know, folks, this "review" could be a satire
Posted by: sausage on Nov 27, 2007 7:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been cudgeling my brains for days to find something I read once, saying in effect that a sure sign of a civilization's impending collapse is the reading public's inability to recognize irony, sarcasm and/or satire.

For some reason I think that Morris Berman penned the line in question but I'm unable to pin it down!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get A Life
Posted by: ilene on Nov 27, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh for god's sake!!! Why are you wasting your time writing this crap. Sometimes a movie is just a shitty movie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get A Life Posted by: summerhill
Now I gotta see it
Posted by: alphakat on Nov 27, 2007 7:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hadn't planned on seeing this movie but now that I know there are rippled abs and gratuitous ass shots I'm all in. Homoerotic or not, women movie-goers get shortchanged on male nudity. :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Ray Winstone gay trivia note--"Scum" (1979)
Posted by: zooeyhall on Nov 27, 2007 7:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just a curious gay trivia note about Ray Winstone: back in 1979 there was a British film called "Scum". It was about a British reformatory and Winstone was the star. In that film, he plays a guy who takes on a gay lover while in the reformatory.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

reading myth
Posted by: wildeyes on Nov 27, 2007 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like others, the reviewer's critique of beowulf seems a bit outlandish. perhaps rather than asking: what can we criticize in the film? where can we find propaganda? we should ask: what can we learn?

beowulf is a myth and it follows a pretty regular mythic pattern. there are lessons to be learned and though the movie modifies the story, it still keeps the mythic sense of things intact.

beowulf arrives to the kingdom, which is plagued by both a monster (grendel) and a corrupt, drunken king. he does battle with grendel and kills it and goes to grendel's mother where he fathers a child for grendel's mother. he returns to the kingdom and learns that grendel was actually the child of the king and the monster-mother. now beowulf has done the same thing and becomes king... and again, a monster comes.

grendel is a manifestation of the first king's shame, and likewise the dragon is a manifestation of beowulf's shameful behavior. this is classic stuff: if the king is corrupt, the kingdom is in peril.

remember the first scene in Oedipus the King. The city is in trouble. There is disease in the plants and cattle, there is trouble for women in childbirth, and people are suffering and dying. As the story continues, Oedipus learns that he has married his mother. It is this incestuous relationship by the king that has tarnished the city.

even at the end of beowulf, there's some sense that maybe beowulf's best friend who is now king will succumb to the same fate as the previous two kings -- a temptation for both gold, glory, and women. through these he will sire destruction for the kingdom.

if every king goes through this fate, we could say: ah-ha. this king business is eternally damned. let's throw off this notion that if we just get the right one as king, then things we'll be ok. we could give an anarchist reading to it pretty quickly...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rorschach
Posted by: screwjack2000 on Nov 27, 2007 7:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Each time I visit this site I am forced to take it less and less seriously. Every legitmiate criticism of the left/liberal/progressive ideology is consistantly on parade here, and it is just plain embarrassing. Articles written by unthinking people not interested truth of any kind, but who only choose to see the world through the filter of their pet obsessions. Talk about becoming what you hate. You guys are getting just as bad as the rightwing nutjobs. I know its trite, but sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The purpose of nudity?
Posted by: justAnEgg on Nov 27, 2007 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's obvious and simple: we must strip ourselves off of every and any burden in order to face our demons successfully. No (homo)sexuality there whatsoever, the whole movie revolves around creating and facing our demons. Americans are obsessed...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Author doesn't even begin to tell the whole story
Posted by: Drclaw on Nov 27, 2007 8:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..so I went and saw this movie, and I surreptiously taped the whole thing on my cam-corder, downloaded it to my computer and went frame by frame. OMG!! There were subliminal messages in all the good good parts (Vote for Mitt! Craig is not gay! Edwards is a fag!) plus all the usual stuff to get me to buy icky popcorn etc. Good thing I had my anti-mind control foil hat on!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ON HOMOEROTICA
Posted by: Ipsi Dixit on Nov 27, 2007 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that the author's apparent obsession with the suppossedly 'homoerotic' aspects of the film (real or imagined) stands more as comment on his (and our own) moral sensibilities than anything else and the Western world's squemishness on the subject.

Ask yourself the rhetorical question: if the script had called for a lot of child nudity would it have been called 'pedoerotic'? And what would this have said about ourselves (if anything)? Could such a film even be made?

It is all in the eyes of the beholder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Could it be Done? Posted by: Setnakt
Beowulf Predates Bush by Several Hundred Years
Posted by: Kym525 on Nov 27, 2007 9:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THIS is the kind of nonsense that make us real and thoughtful liberals look like paranoid idiots. Isn't it totally hypocritical that we deride the far-right wack-jobs over their alarmist reactions to Harry Potter and now The Golden Compass, when right here in black and white, we're doing the same thing. For Goddess sake, man, can't a movie just be a movie without always having to have some sort of 'agenda'?

I read Beowulf in high school (both as an assignment and for fun) and frankly enjoyed the film (as I also enjoyed 300--based on a historical even that also predates Bush by a few thousand years--okay, I liked 300 because of all the beautiful man-flesh in leather speedos too). In both instances I sat enthralled and taken away to a mythical era where the tales and the heroes were larger than life, and for a few hours managed to forget about all the ugliness outside.

Thanks to the ridiculous overanalyzation of some failed film student, the ugliness has returned in spades. What's next to fall prey to your pseudo-liberal hyperbole--Santa Claus Conquers the Martians? Hmm, the Martians can be stand ins for fundamentalist Islamic terrorists...yes indeed, I can see it now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow, I must have been asleep.
Posted by: Razst on Nov 27, 2007 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am 100% gay living in a gay household. I thought the movie was a piss-poor adaptation of the original "Beowold." But neither I nor my friends noticed all the homoerotocism described by the author. In fact we all found it a big turn-off to find out that Ray Winstone was really nothing but an ugly, out-of-shape old fart embedded into a computer-enhanced shell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think this is the message here
Posted by: darkhorse on Nov 27, 2007 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beowulf's heroic but tragic end, like that of King Leonidas in 300, makes it hard to fit the story into a neat neocon narrative. Both men fail, while the war party in the United States seeks total victory --

I think it may be putting out the idea that it's heroic to lose your life even to a losing cause. It's the willingness to sacrifice your life and make yourself indistinguishable in the battlefield mush that will make you heroic in your own mind. Nevermind that everyone else thinks it's a stupid thing to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks for saving me some money...
Posted by: snideelf on Nov 27, 2007 2:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I almost thought about going to see the movie.
I am sure the really big deal about this one is Jolie in 3D.
But I am going by what the writer here says and this movie must be as stupid as "The 300", another movie that was obviously hyped-up and I avoided.
Most of the Hollow Wood stuff coming out these days is pure unadulterated schlock anyway.

Happy movie going to all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This doesn't make sense
Posted by: longboardersurf on Nov 27, 2007 2:48 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes a movie is just a movie. This is one of those times. Beowulf is just a commercial film of an old epic. Someone who can read so much into it has too much time on their hands to forward their own agenda and too little inclination to look with an open mind and eyes. This was the type of article I expected to find on a conjob site.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

SO What??
Posted by: Scott on Nov 27, 2007 3:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well we all know that like football, basketball, baseball, soccer and all those male sports that our boys indulge in, Beowulf is like them, a chance to see some good old ass grabbing and slapping and feel them up disgused as male comradeship...... so IT turns a few more of the str8 guys gay, so what?? The more the merrier I say!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No real parallels here...
Posted by: 4sense on Nov 27, 2007 3:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beowulf's heroic but tragic end, like that of King Leonidas in 300, makes it hard to fit the story into a neat neocon narrative.

...um...maybe that's because it isn't a neocon narrative and this review was just a silly waste time.

Look, it's not all that complex:

Bush contradicts himself by reducing freedom and civil liberties, and disregarding American values (he's supposed to be defending those) as a way of fighting those who purportedly hate American values and would like to take our liberties away.

King Leonidas saw freedom was in jeopardy and was 100% committed to freedom above all, and fought for it within Spartan Law. He didn't try to usurp power or create a new Sparta that wasn't no longer really Spartan (think Bush's continuous self contradictions).

If you don't like the blood and gore, it's fine if you don't want go to the movie. But "neocon narrative"? Please!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sounds good.
Posted by: daniel1982 on Nov 27, 2007 7:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new 'Beowulf' flick combines a bizarre mix of homoerotic imagery, locker room machismo and total carnage.

Ok I'm sold.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Americans love cok and bull
Posted by: Jim_ME_expert on Nov 27, 2007 8:09 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and and unfair fight.

Americans love violence. America is (by far) the most violent society in the world.

Yours is nation having a very dark nature.

"So shall you give, so shall you receive."

Payback is going to come.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Anti-Christianity...?" Puhleeeeze!
Posted by: eyejam on Nov 27, 2007 11:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If one chooses not to accept Jesus Christ, or any religious figure, at face value that does not necessarily make them anti-religion: That person is simply opting out. One can be skeptical without being in the oppostion. That tired "you're either with us or against us" rhetoric is both ignorant and puerile.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intellectual Snobbery
Posted by: CV on Nov 27, 2007 11:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For me, this review is an excellent example of imputing metaphor where it does not exist. Ohmigod - Beowolf took off all his clothes - homoerotic? How about heteroerotic? Naw, I wasn't turned on - but it did make me curious about his "basket." (grin) Really now, if our current government were a sinister force behind the presentation of this movie, wouldn't Beowolf have survived? Instead, he died - the "tragic" (hero brought down by his fatal flaw) consequences of his flaw - the inability to resist temptation. Our government has always had its "propaganda" - WWII movies were full of it - but Beowolf? This is a reviewer almightily impressed with himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Neil Gaiman
Posted by: sliver on Nov 28, 2007 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I understand the script for Beowulf was adapted by Neil Gaiman, a brilliant mythological writer. Check out "American Gods" for a great mythological-themed story.

Gaiman is quite aware of the themes of all his stories, and he is certainly not a conservative, so calling this a neo-con war movie must be a misreading of the movie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Like Sees Like
Posted by: Ansgar on Nov 28, 2007 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is often the case that people who see homo-erotica in things are homosexuals themselves. BTW, 300 was one of the most ridiculous films I've ever seen, or have almost seen. I turned it off 30 mins. into the film. I expect Beowolf to be as ridiculous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Now I HAVE to see this movie
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 28, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I was gonna skip it. The paragraph previous to the one below sold me utterly on it... anytime someone gets to bash Jesus on a huge screen, I'm there with bells on!

It is lines like this that make you wonder about these new-generation war films. Are they, as the filmmakers maintain, nothing more than cutting-edge comic book remakes of old poems and stories? Or are they in fact slick propaganda with amazing f/x intended to get and keep kids pumped up for our multigenerational fight against the evil-doers?

The first question shows Zaitchik's lack of experience with the comic-book medium and his lack of comprehension about film (isn't this the dude who wrote the crit on 300? He doesn't understand graphic novels either apparently).

The second question is just a reach.... with 300 I was buying the argument until I saw the film finally. Then I just realized, bummer, the reviewer was just clueless. It was a fun ride, but not much critical merit to be sure (in re both the film and the "critique"). So I can't wait to see Beowulf now.

When reviewers go all shocky on sex and violence in 'Merkaan films, my gag reflex comes up. Puhleeze, in case we've all missed the memo, 'Merkaans are violent thugs, always have been, always will be (until they get taken down a few pegs.. petrocollapse'll cover that pretty well, what's left of us post-Chimp anyway). They love gore (just not Al unless he's got a powerpoint moovee for us), they love bare breasted hairless males and bare breasted hairless females even more. And they love to feel superior and they think they invented everything from democracy to peace while the world burns. One thing you can count on in 'Merkaan films: all their shit hangs out especially when they can use tech to enhance a mooveee experience... kinda like art is supposed to do, reflect the shit, hold up the mirror.

While this "article" was a total stretch, it sure as hell was fun and it sold this film well. Alex, you should have stock in these studios.... you could at least make a buck off that, eh? And while yer at it, owning stock in the studios that is, make 'em pay writers for releases via iTunes, web and DVD's...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Article
Posted by: easter on Nov 28, 2007 1:20 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I disagree with most of the comments, media is playing a much larger role in propaganda than we dare to give it credit for. I think this could have been communicated more efficiently, but overall this is exactly the type of understanding that we need to come to terms with to understand why we have such a massive disrespect for the idea of life in general. Sure it has been going on for most of human "civilized" history, but if you look outside the sphere of your own personal lives you may see that we are speck in the big scheme and this may be a slippery slope that underlies much, so old in finely woven, we didn't even notice it working. This is what we should have learned since we have become more evolved than most animals ;civilized thinking not material possessions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Article Posted by: Incertus (Bradley)
» RE: Good Article Posted by: easter
» RE: Good Article Posted by: Incertus (Bradley)
» RE: Good Article Posted by: easter
» RE: Good Article Posted by: easter
» RE: Good Article Posted by: YogiBear
Rather paranoid...
Posted by: tsmith101 on Nov 28, 2007 2:45 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The interpretation of the three monsters Beowulf faces as somehow anologous to the Axis of Evil seems to be rather blatant paranoia. While I agree wholeheartedly that Beowulf and its cousin, 300, are textbook fascist art, saying that Grendel, his mother, and the dragon are somehow related to modern events is simply ignoring the source material...as an early commenter said, the 8th century poet must, in this interpretation, somehow have been on the Neocon payroll.

The criticism of Christianity found in the film is also a quite valid interpretation of the original work, which the movie seems to frequently disregard. A sort of forced Christianity is very clear in the text of the epic poem, as any 12th grader with an english teacher worth his salt will tell you. The filmmaker's choice in expressing this tension between archaic Nordic religion and hero worship and Christianity is a quite legitimate exercise in interpreting the poem.

While Beowulf surely has fascistic overtones, it is incredibly paranoid and specious to attribute this to some sort of concerted propaganda campaign. The problem with media is not the Neocons, it's that these 15 year old boys, who are mostly too uninformed and apathetic to know what Blackwater is, are trained to ravenously consume this violence and glorification of the Nordic ubermensch.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How the point of a story usually gets missed
Posted by: Explorer on Nov 28, 2007 9:27 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fascinating. This is a real good example of what
happens when people look at reality through a certain
ideological lens instead of thinking for themselves.
This is why I'm better described as a surrealist than
a liberal. First it was the conservatives griping
about how the Star Wars saga was too much of a
commentary on the Bush Administration even though it
was written in the 1970s and just described the
general process of how a dictatorship can grow out of
a democracy. Then we have these liberals seeing a
several hundred year old story as beating the wardrums
against the new "axis of evil". Either way the
ideological lens is filtering out the original point
of the story. In the movie Enter the Dragon, I think
Bruce Lee warned someone not to "concentrate so hard
on one finger that you miss all the heavenly glory."

And this Alternet commentary also reminds me of the
Daoist philosophy that when any two opposites get
pushed to their most extreme form they tend to
resemble each other, like the bright flash of light
that's just as blinding as pure darkness. It seems
that some people who think of themselves as feminists
are in effect pushing a new Victorian culture of
reinforcing the old traditional roles. This film is
"homoerotic"? Why not just plain erotic, where did
the "homo" part come from? Maybe any display of male
flesh must be there for the homos because of course
the women in the audience wouldn't be looking. That's
just not assumed to be the female role, the looking is
traditionally left to the guys, I guess.

My first reaction to the story was that it was about
each generation's failure to learn from the lessons of
history. Exhibit A is the timing of all the major
wars in US history, about one per generation like
clockwork.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Movies As Metaphors
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Nov 29, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Imagination is what led me to see "300" but not Beowulf. For those who have read the Old English tale, is Beowulf close to being accurate portrayed by the film?
And is it really a metaphor for what the author claims it to be? An allegorical reference to the Bush Administration's "Axis of Evil"? Who knows. We should ask the screenwriter.
I don't know if I'll see Beowulf. And like "The DaVinci Code", I'll stick with the book. The "Code" had a disappointing ending. But to each his own.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's only a movie/legend
Posted by: cpesprit on Nov 29, 2007 8:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow -

I must have seen the OTHER 3D "Beowulf"
I usually love most I see on Alternet.
What makes the mind of the writer even conjure up these wierd political comparisons...???
just to MAKE a story/controversy?

Lighten up.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey, Alternet Editors: Look! Amazing Concensus!
Posted by: Camilla Cracchiolo on Nov 30, 2007 1:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dear Alternet: Can we PLEASE not have any more of this type of drivel article?? PLEASE???? PRETTY PLEASE???

I don't think I've seen such unity among commenters on any topic including the Iraq war. Everybody seems to agree that:

1. This article was complete drivel and the article a total waste of our time.

2. The writer appears to be completely self obsessed with highly imaginary interpretations of a basically irrelevant movie (not to mention gloriously ignorant of the great literature and history of the ancient western world).

AMAZING! ASTOUNDING! Never to be repeated!

So: in the face of such agreement, can we save space for important topics? Even the porn discussion was better than this.

Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It pays to think of what you see
Posted by: riotoustanpdx on Dec 1, 2007 1:17 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The difference between those who watch purely for entertainment and those who "have eyes to see" is both profound and and dangerous for us all. That is, we all complain as we suffer through the Bush administration, it's illegal and horrific war, the suicides of American war vets AND the suicides of farmers in India and Iraq in reaction to the "crime against humanity" of forcing farmers to buy seeds from Monsanto (which upsets the practices of agriculture that are 6,000+ years in place). If more of us would THINK at what is below the surface in these movies, and HEAR those telling lines that are planted, along with the images, into our subconscious minds, then we can begin to extricate ourselves from the present deep morass into which we have descended. Usual, the music is underrated as the accompaniment to the implanting of images and words; it is the musical score that determine how much emotional penetration the scenes and words have on the mind. There are indeed two forces at work in making Hollywood movies, one force does indeed support the status quo, while more independent voices urge us to think. Now consider this: without the level of violence that has INCREASED in the movies made for and viewed rabidly by young people, those who are under the age of eighteen, and even up to twenty five, what chance would volunteer military recruitment have to induce preprogrammed youth to eagerly go and kill? Not very much. This is why the exceedingly violent movies are made; not for the "entertainment value" that they represent, or the "demand of the audiences," but for the continued programming of the young, just as the National Socialists did, to make boys into eager killers when they reach the age of consent. After years of seeing the killing simulated on television and in movies, they are eager and ready to go torture and kill in places like Iraq. So, the making of the Neocon, the mercenary, begins in our living rooms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

arent comic books inherently homoerotic
Posted by: whealeydj on Dec 2, 2007 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does Ray Winstone really have a body like the hero in the movie Beowulf? In comic books heroes and superheros generally have incredibly muscular bodies and the women have unrealistic builds. I saw the movie in 2D and thought the built-in stiletto high heels the mother of Grendel (Angelina Jolie) had was completely ridiculous and obvious playing to teenage male democraphic . Seeing the axis of evil in 3 monsters was a stretch by this reviewer. I thought insights toward the end of article were closer to my own interpretation of the movie. The notion that Hrothgar and Beowulf generated monsters themselves with the female monster was the limitations of macho mentality. I chose not to see 300 because it did make dehumanize Persian making them into orcs rather than human beings.

I never read the book so I wonder if the anti-Christian lines were in the original. I read in How the Romans saw the Christians that they were perceived as ritual cannibals which does have a element of truth about the Eucharist. So the characterization/perception of Christianity by pagans who worshiped warriors who fell in battle would be skeptical.

I think too many Alternet readers take politics too seriously and that this article was interesting and gnerated some interesting responses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement