Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bill Moyers: My Father and FDR

By Bill Moyers, TheNation.com. Posted November 22, 2007.


"When Roosevelt was President, my father knew he had a friend in the White House. We should rekindle that spirit," Moyers says.
Advertisement

Note: Bill Moyers gave the following remarks at the Franklin and Eleanor Roosevelt Institute's twentieth-anniversary Four Freedoms ceremony, where he received the Freedom of Speech award.

Thank you for this recognition and the spirit of the evening. Thanks especially for giving me the chance to sit here awhile thinking about my father. Henry Moyers was an ordinary man who dropped out of the fourth grade because his family needed him to pick cotton to help make ends meet.

The Depression knocked him off the farm and flat on his back. When I was born he was making two dollars a day working on the highway to Oklahoma City. He never made over $100 a week in the whole of his working life, and he made that only when he joined the union on the last job he held. He voted for Franklin Roosevelt in four straight elections, and he would have gone on voting for him until kingdom come if both had lived that long. I once asked him why, and he said, "Because the President's my friend."

Now, my father never met FDR. No politician ever paid him much note, but he was sure he had a friend in the White House during the worst years of his life. When by pure chance I wound up working there many years later, and my parents came for a visit, my father wanted to see the Roosevelt Room. I don't know quite how to explain it, except that my father knew who was on his side and who wasn't, and for twelve years he had no doubt where FDR stood. The first time I remember him with tears in his eyes was when Roosevelt died. He had lost his friend.

We can't revive the man and certainly we wouldn't want to revisit the times, but we can rekindle the spirit. There are 37 million people in this country who are poor; there are 57 million who are near poor, making $20,000 to $40,000 a year -- one divorce, one pink slip, one illness away from a free fall. That's almost one-third of America still living on the edge. They need a friend in the White House. My father, with his fourth-grade education and two fingers with the missing tips from the mix-up at the cotton gin, got it when Roosevelt spoke. "I can't talk like him," he said, "but I sure do think like him." My father might not have had the words for it, but he said amen when FDR talked about economic royalism. Sitting in front of our console radio, he got it when Roosevelt said that private power no less than public power can bring America to ruin in the absence of democratic controls.

Don't think for a moment he didn't get it when Roosevelt said that a government by money was as much to be feared as a government by mob, or when he said that the political equality we once had won was meaningless in the face of economic inequality. My father got it when he heard his friend in the White House talk about how "a small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people's property, other people's money, other people's labor -- other people's lives." My father knew FDR was talking for him when he said life was no longer free, liberty no longer real, men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness -- against economic tyranny such as this. And my father listened raptly when his friend the President said, "The American citizen" -- my father knew the President was speaking of him -- "could appeal only to the organized power of government."

So thank you for reminding us that liberalism is less about ideology and doctrine than about friendship and faith -- the bond between a patrician in the White House and a working man on the Texas-Oklahoma border and their mutual belief in America as a shared project. Thank you for this reminder of how we might yet turn the listing ship of state. My father thanks you, too.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bill moyers

Bill Moyers is a journalist and president of the Schumann Center for Media and Democracy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
FDR's Endangered Legacy
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 22, 2007 3:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bill Moyers: You've done it again....

Twenty-seven years ago, FDR's legacy, the New Deal, came under assault by the reactionary political ideology of the so-called "Reagan Revolution. As a result, today the middle class that he literally braought into being is in danger of total extinction. The privatization of America, begun during the administrations of Reagan and Bush I, passively enabvled during the clinton years - and accelerated under Bush II - has decimated the quality of life in a country which used to be a nice place in which to live. From the early 1940s until well into the 1970s, working men and women in the United States thrived because of the programs put into place by President Roosevelt and the brilliant men - and one woman, Francis Perkins - who comprised his cabinet. Home ownership was at an historical high and the chances for the children of people of modest means to recieve a college education were betetr than they had ever been before and, sadly, might ever be again. During this period, the rich - the plutocracy - had to contribute their equitable share to the nation's tax burden. Corporate America was obliged to pay into the system as the price of doing business in a country with such an abundance of wealth and prosperity. The result of this was a social and economic infrastructure that was the strongest, most envied in the world. All of that has changed - possibly forever.

The voo-doo, trickle-up economics of the last quarter century has had the desired effect: The rich have indeed gotten richer; the pmiddle class has gotten poorer. The poor don't even matter any more.

To read more of my thoughts on FDR, please, when you've finished with AlterNet, click on my blog and scroll down to September 21. Here's a link:

"The Rant" by Tom Degan

Happy Thanksgiving, everybody!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: FDR's Endangered Legacy Posted by: boblecht
Voodoo Economics
Posted by: Intellect on Nov 22, 2007 8:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even Bush 41 called Regan's assault on the poor and middle class "Voodoo" economics.

Yet his son, Bush 43 has not only embraced Reagan's failed concepts but taken them to a far higher degree of greed and selfishness.

We do need another Roosevelt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

FDR lives through Dennis Kucinich
Posted by: blondesprite on Nov 22, 2007 8:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I want a man who reads and leads, who wants to be a hero to our troops and bring them home NOW, who wants to put and end to the rape of our planet through the WTO, IMF and repeal NAFTA. I want a man who wants to put an end to the military industrial complex stanglehold, privitization of the military, and create a department of peace.
I want a man who is humble in manner and in the size of his wallet, and who is on the side of the US Constitution.
I want a man who wants the same health care for all Americans that Hellary, Biden, Richardson, Edwards and Dobbs enjoy.
I want a man who keeps America safe through diplomacy and not hate speech and preemptive war.
I want an end to the strangle hold of wall street robber barons, i.e. Goldman Sachs Merrill Lynch, et al.
I want the return of the fairness doctrine and independent media.
I want to go abroad,hold my head high and be proud to say I am an American. I want to welcome the poor, the down trodden and huddled masses again. Not put up a fence and imprison those who would be proud Americans if given a chance.
I want voter rights restored and electronic voting machines to go the way of the DeLorean.
I want access to public transportation and
investment in green jobs on American soil.
I want Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, Chuck Schumer, Diane Feinstein, Rham Emmanuel, Steny Hoyer and the Blue Dogs drummed out of the Democratic party.
I want Dick Cheney, Bush and the rest of the sniviling, crusading cabal impeached and tried for war crimes.
I want Democracy for America, Habeas Corpus and Posse Comitatas restored, the eaves dropping and wiretapping to stop and those who pervert the Constitution in secret tried for espionage against the Bill of Rights.
I want a just and honorable man, I want Dennis Kucinich for President.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Hope to Believe
Posted by: wilty on Nov 22, 2007 2:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What remarkable men, FDR and Henry Moyers were,
in remarkable times; the Depression and World War II. I never felt that I had a friend in the White House, though I trusted Eisenhower, and
was awed by JFK. The point was, that I trusted them, and believed that my wellbeing and interests, were concerns that were handled well, by these men.

But the worms, the termites of Privitization,
have bored there way through, to nation's very heart.

It appears to me, that privitization is motivated by unabashed and unrestricted greed.
It is an illness, that could very well prove fatal, to the concept of America I grew up with.

Privatizing the government, from Nixon on up, to the current despot, Bush, has indeed, led to the ruination of our government; its goal is really to dismantle it, along with the Constitution, completely. America, as we know her, will fall to an ashen pile of dust and other detritius.

No matter how fine a man, and perhaps the only one on the horizon, Dennis Kucinich is, I am
doubtful that he, or any other single individual as President, could turn things around for us. Our American malady and the challenges it possesses, has metastasized through to all of its cultural organs.

Corporate-evegelical-military-fascist-congressional appeasers-plutocrat complex America is not my friend, and none of those in that government, that no longer represents us,
are CERTAINLY NOT my friends.

I believe it is time for the people, as guided by the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, to stand up, and take our country back, from these
despicable and criminal heads of state, CEO's,
and the whole lot of these Neocon villains.

These are the bad guys, and we are going to have to , SOMEHOW, whup 'em!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

homegrown-s.c.democrat
Posted by: angryfromcross on Nov 22, 2007 5:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Dennis K. may have noble ideas he has zero chances of winning either the Democratic nomination or the Presidency, on the other hand, WE Democrats have an remarkable opportunity to elect a man in the image of a modern day FDR part II, if and only if, WE vote for John Edwards (D-NC) Not only is Edwards the best progressive running in '08, he is absolutley the most electable candidate for the Democratic Party. We have four votes awaiting Edwards in the Jan. 26th SC Democratic Primary and my wife's 91 year old grandpa in KY who voted for FDR twice is also supporting John Edwards. Wake up Democrats, we can not win with candidates that start out with over 50 percent of the voters saying they will NOT vote for them in the General election! We need John Edwards in the White House!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: homegrown-s.c.democrat Posted by: gkentnc
American Heroism.
Posted by: grumble-bum on Nov 22, 2007 7:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was born to far removed from FDR's multiple terms in office to be able to say that I consider him to be an unquestioned paragon of heroic leadership. Most of the accomplishments we laud him for have been thoroughly demolished, compromised or corrupted in my lifetime (the past 30-odd years). For instance, Social Security is little more than a black hole to hard-working people of my generation; We pay into a program that we hope will help our parents, fear will fail us almost completely, & dread will burden our children (should it even exist) to the point of obscenity.

So it is difficult, other than in the abstract, to truly appreciate this man who so many hold so dear as a leader & patriot. I can see the clear benefit of many of his initiatives to the struggling people of this country at the time, I can marvel at his sheer political domination mixed with coalition-building, & I can easily recognize the comparative weakness of more contemporary "leaders".

But what am I to make of internment camps in a time of war? What indeed, of an incredible four terms in office, or attempts to control the leanings of the Supreme Court? What legacy would covet the ushering in of the threat of the complete destruction of the world, a seeming inevitability that has dominated the nightmares of generations?

I wonder how those of us who speak with outrage at the abuses of power of our current Administration should view this man, we who are so righteously opposed to a pResident engaged in manipulations of the Justice System, mass secret internment based primarily on ethnicity, claims of unprecedented "war powers" (including, many of us fear, a last-minute retention of the office for an indefinite time), & nuclear brinkmanship? Did FDR's opponents perhaps view him with the same horror that we do George W. Bush?

I'm not an historian, & I am certain that people will be eager to correct me on the finer points. Nor do I wish to in any way imply a direct similarity between Roosevelt & Bush (obviously, the circumstances, goals & outcomes couldn't be more different), but I simply can't help but see some parallels & wonder if perhaps we should reduce our prescription on our rose-colored glasses. Or perhaps grant our opponents on the conservative side of the fence at least a shred of the "true patriotism" we so loudly claim.

Just a shred, mind you.

PS: Bill Moyers is unquestionably a bulwark of thoughtful & decent thought in these troubled times, & someone I can, without reservation, say that I appreciate for his efforts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: American Heroism. Posted by: rinthy
» "Dude, Where's My Hand?" Posted by: grumble-bum
Bill Moyers woke me up out of a coma
Posted by: Missing Piece on Nov 22, 2007 9:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was an induced coma, brought on by media's american way of life. I was completly out of touch with reality until I saw his show and was immediatly woke up. Everytime I watched his show I thought, why aren't people outraged and taking to the streets, and then I realized that I use to be one of those people. Too lazy to seek out the truth and look behind the stage to see who the puppet masters were. Because of Moyers I have woke up and begun to dig even deeper and that has led me to question Moyers.

Bill, why don't you cover peak oil? Why don't you cover WT7? Why don't you cover the money changers? Now I know that even this is too much for pbs viewers but the time has come, people have a rite to know the truth.

Thank you Bill, for waking me up, you were the first to do it. The way you covered a story was brilliant and it spoke to me on every level, but its time to tell the people what awaits us in less than five years, no energy for the masses.

Good luck

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remembering FDR is crucial. The right is now rewriting depression era history for future generations
Posted by: yellow on Nov 22, 2007 9:47 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Writers like Amity Shlaes and Jim Powell are rewriting history to "show" that the New Deal actually prolonged the great depression and that the problem wasn't lack of regulation but to much government interference. How they manage to finesse this line is beyond me. They both treat the ideas of JM Keynes and a scourge and are trying to deflate the reverence America has for FDR and his New Deal. The destruction of Social Security, the only remaining aspect of the FDR legacy, is a major objective that they have yet to give up on. The destruction of FDR as an icon in US history and his lasting political influence is a far right objective in the US. This will leave supply side economics as the only school of economic thought despite the fact that it has historically been shown to be a collossal fraud.

The early New Deal legislation was, in fact, no radical program but a sound and conservative relief effort put together mostly with the help and approval of big business. FDR's choice for Chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank, Marriner Eccles, a conservative Morman Businessman, elected to go off the gold standard and increase banking reserves. This improved growth without inflation and halved the level of unemployment in a few years. In 1936 an attempt to reverse the policy failed and resulted in a backslide in 1938. Though the Second World War was what really ended the Great Depression, the legacy of Keynes's ideas still live on everywhere and still are quite relevant. We must preserve the FDR legacy. More importantly, we must preserve the relevance and legitimacy of Keynes's tremendous intellectual contribution to our understanding of modern capitalism and its contradictions. It is extremely vital to solving our current problems and resolving our current crisis. It is the only way out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You like Milton Friedman better?
Posted by: Urstrly on Nov 27, 2007 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely there are problems with a mixed, Keynesian economy, but that is not what we have at the moment. We have a chaotic system in which anything goes— government borrowing with no accountability, ineffectual restrictions upon corporations, free-range hedge funds and millions of people in poverty or on the verge of bankruptcy. The evictions from variable rate mortgages alone cast shame on all those office holders who allowed this greed to go unchecked. Let's not blame that on John Maynard Keynes.

Bill Moyers has that rare voice of sanity, conviction and compassion, not unlike his father's friend, Franklin Roosevelt. I remind myself that FDR was not born particularly insightful or courageous; polio and Eleanor that made him that way. I pray that we will find a leader with that kind of potential for greatness, but right now, it's not easy to discern who that might be.

In the meantime, cheers to Bill Moyers and his wife and producer Judith for lighting our path.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

B. Clinton's role
Posted by: Dianka on Dec 12, 2007 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you, Mr. Moyer! Roosevelt thought in terms of "the common good" rather than "for the good of my campaign donors".

One point of disagreement: Bill Clinton was anything but passive when it came to wiping out the New Deal policies that enabled so many millions of Americans to work their way out of poverty. It was Bill Clinton who shredded the social safety net, enacting policies that tore families apart, slammed the doors to essential higher education/skills training, and essentially turned our poor into a Third World workforce, often paid less than the legal minimum wage. This funneled millions of new bottom-wage workers into the labor market at the same time that so many jobs were being moved to foreign nations, playing a powerful role in keeping wages very low, stripping out workers' protections, and breaking unions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]