Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

America's Rich Citizens Can't Escape Our Poor Public Infrastructure

By Barbara Ehrenreich, Barbaraehrenreich.com. Posted November 21, 2007.


Can you spare a tear for the ultra-wealthy?
Advertisement

Can you spare a tear for the ultra-rich? One week after achieving the Guinness World record for the world’s most expensive dessert – a $25,000 “Frrozen Haute Chocolate” containing 5 grams of edible 23-karat gold – the New York restaurant Serendipity 3 was shut down by the health department. It turns out that in addition to truffle shavings and other Haute Chocolate ingredients, the restaurant’s kitchen contained "a live mouse, mouse droppings in multiple areas of the restaurant, fruit flies, house flies, and more than 100 live cockroaches," according to the inspectors.

The Haute Chocolate story is already exciting the usual populist outrage drizzled with references to Marie Antoinette. In the Detroit News, Brian O’Connor notes that for the price of two dozen of these confections all the food banks in his city would be able to meet the Thanksgiving demand instead of facing the holiday with empty shelves. He recommends guillotining the Haute Chocolate eaters, “Then we could treat the needy to a helping of my favorite dessert: ladyfingers.”

But there could be all kinds of reasons for needing a $25,000 Haute Chocolate. What about the chocolate addict who freely chooses to blow his or her life savings on a single dessert? And we mustn’t rule out those who suffer from a rare gold deficiency disorder and have already consumed their fillings and wedding rings. All of these worthy people now face a shuttered Serendipity when they go for their fix.

No, this isn’t just another story about gluttony. It’s a story about the inevitability of cockroaches in a world divided between rich and poor and served by a public sector in a state of bad decay. In this situation, even the rich get ripped off, and should live in fear that those truffle shavings are actually maggots in cross-section. As Robert Frank, the author of Richistan: A Journey Through the American Wealth Boom and the Lives of the New Rich, observed of the cockroach finding: "It goes to show that in today's mass luxury world, just because something is expensive doesn't mean something's good or high-quality."

I discovered this when a recent move put me within striking distance of two high-end food markets, Whole Foods and Balducci’s. Ah, was my thought, no more cooking! For dinners at least, I would eat nothing but their tasty deli offerings. How disillusioning then to discover that the items that look so delightful behind the counter are little better than the take-out at Safeway. Balducci’s fresh mozzarella-topped lamb burgers require a steak knife; their shrimp-and-caper concoction, at $26 a pound, seems to involve a preparatory stage of fossilization. You can do slightly better at Whole Foods, but only if you avoid anything with a sauce, which is likely to be a super-saturated solution of sodium chloride.

Yes, over-salting and over-cooking have a preservative effect, perhaps allowing the same items to be displayed for days at a time. But there could be something else behind the consistently bad prepared food at these upscale sources: Many, if not all, of the people doing the cooking behind the scenes are making foods they are unlikely ever to confront in real life. Ask a Salvadoran immigrant to whip up chicken masala and he or she will no doubt follow directions, but in complete ignorance of the desired taste. One of the women working at the Balduccis I have patronized has only one visible tooth in her mouth, which in addition to speaking ill of the store’s dental benefits, means she can never have bitten into one of the lamb burgers she sells.

And what about the kitchen workers at Serendipity 3? Like most underpaid New Yorkers, they probably went home to vermin-infested apartments, and thought nothing of a cockroach or two.

What this means is that even the very rich cannot escape into their own little bubble of purity and excellence, of “haute” this and “haute” that. Ride around in a limo and you still have to sit in traffic created by ordinary people who can’t afford to live near where they work. Fly in a private jet and you’re still dependent on archaic, underfinanced, systems of air traffic control. Travel first class on the Acela train and you still have to stare out at the rotting environs of Philadelphia and Newark. Oh, and you lobbied against higher taxes and regulations on business? Then think twice before you sink your teeth into that chocolate and gold dessert. The vermin are always with you.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: wealth divide, public infrastructure

Barbara Ehrenreich is the author of thirteen books, including the New York Times bestseller Nickel and Dimed. A frequent contributor to the New York Times, Harpers, and the Progressive, she is a contributing writer to Time magazine. She lives in Florida.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
America not worth saving in present state
Posted by: Richard House on Nov 21, 2007 1:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
". . . the very rich cannot escape into their own little bubble of purity and excellence, of “haute” this and “haute” that."

True, as long as they are in country but most of those rich own second and third homes in Europe and other continents. So they can escape from this dump if they want. America is becoming a workhouse for the masses and with plantation owners as overseers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In disease, shared fates of rich and poor
Posted by: Joe Sixpack, Jr. on Nov 21, 2007 4:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fates of the wealthy and of everyone else are shared
far more than most people imagine. Consider the
emergence of a highly infectious flu, like that which
gripped the world in 1918-1919.

On the subway and in the airline cabin, rich and poor
breathe the same air. The poor get sick and, because of
low pay and no health insurance, continue to work while
sick and contagious. They cough out, and Mr. or Mrs.
Moneybags breathes in. Infections spread.

Ill, Moneybags is helicoptered to a fine hospital for
5 star treatment. But the hospital has lately become
dysfunctional. Janitorial and cafeteria workers are now
so sick that it is physically impossible for them to work.
Germs abound. Shorthanded, the hospital
desperately seeks replacement workers, but most the
still healthy candidates are being deported back to
Mexico and Central America because they lack working
papers.

Dead, Moneybags's corpse lies unburied because the
grave diggers and mortuary workers are
overbooked ... or sick themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am so glad
Posted by: walldodger1969 on Nov 21, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so glad I started reading today..such uplifting stories. No wonder people watch just the sports.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I am so glad Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: I am so glad Posted by: Xynyx
Question?
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 21, 2007 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was asked long ago:
"What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul?"

Selfishness and greed have conquered all. Even the 'Middle' Class and Blue Colar folks have bought in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

adam054
Posted by: TZ on Nov 21, 2007 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
From my youth on, I was taught that hatred was the worst sin for a Christian. I don't know about you but I am convinced that greed is the worst. This story tells so much abut greed.

I hope that one of the latinos or others who are hired and paid low wages with no benefits, when they create these expensive meals, spit or pours urine on them and mix it in. Some rich bastard deserves this.

By the way, if you want to see how money affects people, spend some time watching the MSNBC show on how the wealthy live. One episode was about how a very rich man had a designer plane hanger built to protect his jet. A hanger, built out of marble, exotic wood and the like.

I am reminded of the scripture quote that tells us that it will be easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle (actually a yoke) than for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Maybe some, not all, rich folks should heed this.

Happy Thanksgiving to all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» one of the Seven Deadly Sins Posted by: zooeyhall
» RE: adam054 Posted by: monkeywrench
» hate is greed Posted by: 9wicket
Newark?
Posted by: dover23 on Nov 21, 2007 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Travel first class on the Acela train and you still have to stare out at the rotting environs of Philadelphia and Newark

The urban blight of Newark is the result of low taxes and private business???

Can anyone explain this?

It looks to me like Newark is actually being revitalized somewhat (compared to the 90's at least) by some of the companies opening up large offices there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Newark? Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: Newark? Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Newark? Posted by: bifheart
» RE: Newark? Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: PHILADELPHIA? Posted by: Turiye
Kill the wolves so they don't bother us mentality
Posted by: anothername on Nov 21, 2007 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember a New York Times item from years ago when construction near the then-current trendy residential areas drove rats into upper-end apartments. I remember a person in a small Massachusetts city who wrote a letter to the editor to express displeasure with health officials who tried to blame asthma in lower-income households on cockroaches, as though only the poor have bugs, and not on all the suburban cars that zoomed past every day on the commute to Boston.

Ehrenreich wrote a vitriolic essay. Before ridiculing the dental care of the worker and how that might relate to the taste of food sold, did Ehrenreich ask the worker why there was only one tooth? Was it something recent? Was the worker having dental work done but doing it slowly either for medical or for financial, e.g., co-payments and deductible, reasons? How long had the worker been employed by the store?

Did Ehrenreich ask where the food was made? Several stores do not make their prepared foods on site. How many grocery store chains behave like chain restaurants and have chefs create menus and dishes then have cooks prepare them at the local restaurants? The workers probably have nothing to do with how the food is prepared.

Travel on a train and you do not have to look out the window. Travel on or fly a private jet and use private airfields and except for the flight path, air traffic control doesn’t matter. Hire a chauffeur and spend your time in congestion having fun with the mistress, reading the reports from subsidiaries, and calling your subordinates to check out some useless information because you have nothing else to do while traffic isn’t moving.

When a writer has space to fill, rants such as this essay will be written at some point. That does not mean they are worthy of reprint.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The declining infrastructure is a major problem. Signifies ruling class neglect of the society.
Posted by: yellow on Nov 21, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very little signifies the neglect of American society as much as the crumbling infrastructure. Profession Civil Engineering Associations have declared that over $1.6 trillion will be required to fix this infrastructure over the next ten years. Yet, the durability of American society is of little concern in a society whose elites look at shareholder interests as paramount and whose short term, quarter to quarter focus emphasizes profits and stock prices. Infrastructure gets short shrift.

Now that America's tax system has become regressive, the massive reduction of federal income taxes on the rich and corporations replaced by regressive local taxes on the middle class and poor, infrastructure will not have resources to draw upon and the problems will increasingly be solved by privatization and outsourcing of management which will enrich large transnational corporations at the further expense of local, middle class taxpayers who end up with higher user fees (tolls) and licensing fees constituting another major transfer of wealth and income from the poor to the rich in our epoch of neo-liberal capitalism.

The infrastructure question reflects class inequality as does most social issues. Such inewuality is at the very core of our major problems and must be addressed first.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

potential pitfall
Posted by: deang on Nov 21, 2007 11:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apart from some facilely dismissive, right-wing comments, the responses here to this essay have been pretty good. Some of the responses elsewhere, however, have fallen into the trap of blaming the poor for the problems of the imposed system instead of noting that the structure itself discourages people from thriving and performing well, i.e. "It's those Mexican workers who aren't doing a good job that are the problem." The job performances of the poor are a symptom; they are not the problem. Is it the fault of your Oaxacan lawn worker when he fatally over-prunes a plant, or is it the fault of his employer, who underpays him, requires him to work in unsafe conditions, and doesn't teach him anything about the plants he's responsible for?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New business opportunity: filtering the rich's poop
Posted by: Jasonix on Nov 21, 2007 11:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I see homeless people collecting recyclable cans from time to time. Too bad they couldn't collect the rich's feces. This is the most disgusting example of everything that's wrong with America's ruling class that I've ever read. Some time ago, I read about rich businessmen that ate sushi off of a naked model. Utter debased. Repulsive. The rot in American society seems to permeate every institution and community - the government, business, religion, media, university, everything. It's all doomed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

infrastructure
Posted by: astralman on Nov 21, 2007 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our public infrastructure sucks because our culture has a dismal "public" life. We are so invested in accumulating private wealth and possessions and scowl at others for not being as competitive. Why on earth would I want to spend money to support some vague notion of the public even if we all drive on the same roads or breathe the same air as other forum members stated? Additional taxes placed on our "hard earned" wealth is not going to fly with most people.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Tax the rich instead Posted by: drcyflowers
» RE: infrastructure Posted by: CommonDreamer
Neoconservativism begets neo-feudalism
Posted by: scheherezade on Nov 21, 2007 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...the problems will increasingly be solved by privatization and outsourcing of management which will enrich large transnational corporations at the further expense of local, middle class taxpayers...constituting another major transfer of wealth and income from the poor to the rich

So we begin to see the outlines of modern feudalism take shape: the rich own everything, peasants perform grunt work (and they're grateful to get it!), vassals administer the flow and cheerlead for the Chamber of Commerce, and private armies ensure obedience.

And plenty of corrupt clergy itching to step in and leech their usual cut as arbiters of peasant behavior control.

As tax cuts eliminate what we define as public services (schooling, clean water, roadways, social security); neo-feudalism will re-define such 'entitlements' as 'charity' or perhaps 'alms for the poor,' distributed according to ruling class whimsy.

Under the euphamism of 'privatization,' roads and utilities are hitting the auction block -- and the housing market crunch and property tax hikes are consolidating real property ownership in wealthy hands. Eventually, we'll all be renters.

How all those investors quietly buying up 'discount' properties must be celebrating this most recent windfall!

Next step: look for churches and 'economic development' experts to focus on destroying 'failing' public schools in favor of voucher scams. After all, what do peasants need with a civics education, anyway...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Word to the wise about supermarket take out
Posted by: Livia on Nov 21, 2007 11:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My brother worked in a grocery store for a while. My family is decidedly working class, often at best. He told me that grocery stores take the stuff they'd otherwise have to throw away, food either at or just past its expiration date, food nobody will buy now as groceries, and cook it up to sell as take out. It's a win, win for the store, an added profit center even if they don't sell it all. It never stopped my brother from taking home leftovers the store ok'd for employees after hours, but it gives me pause when I see it. Not that it isn't okay. Not that you aren't possibly getting the same or worse from any restaurant. It's just something to think about if you aren't inclined to cook.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Love You, Barbara
Posted by: oldmaninhisunderwear on Nov 21, 2007 12:08 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you ever need an old man....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Frozen Haute Chocolate ala Kocoaroach
Posted by: eosrk on Nov 21, 2007 12:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yeah, that's the true dessert for the ultra-wealthy, an castle built on a garbage dump

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But of course
Posted by: zeofredo on Nov 21, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can relate to this. I read Ehrenreich's "Nickeled and Dimed" and am already won over to this way of looking at wealth and privilege. I worked as a line cook in posh restaurants in Canada (fortunately never in an unfit kitchen-- I swear!) for many years and probably even made appetizers for Conrad Black's table once at the [now-defunct] Rosewater. I am now gleefully unemployed and will only return to kitchen duties if the divide between the front and back of the house is narrower than usual for much of fine dining. Unfortunately, it's not possible to make a full-on income working most lower-end restaurants.

The conceit of the privileged is such that they are as unaware of public services and infrastructure as many impoverished migrant workers. The roads we use, the services for sanitation and upkeep have always fascinated me as being little miracles of civic functionalism. We usually think of highway repair or waste treatment as nuisances or unsavory concerns, but what would become of us all without these services?

Perhaps things have been running too well for us to notice them. This is the mechanics of a municipality; the biosystem of state-- don't let ignorance blind us to things of necessity!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

5 Grams of gold for $25,000
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Nov 21, 2007 4:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
even at today's gold prices, is really a rip-off for the greedy. I guess the rich just like to pay through the nose cause they can. It saddens me that money can be thrown at such trivial things when so much is needed to improve this country. What priorities? It is just disgusting...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The USA is a third-world country
Posted by: drcyflowers on Nov 21, 2007 4:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the '80s, I read a book about India, called "India, a Wounded Civilization." The author, V.S. Naipaul, describes a common situation there, a plumber who goes home to a hovel with no plumbing. How can he then understand that you need a faucet installed in a way that is functional and efficient? He's never really used one!

At that time, I imagined the United States to be better than that, but I see that we've become a third-world country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Henry Ford Posted by: gellero
» RE: Henry Ford Posted by: bifheart
Regarding Wealth...
Posted by: bifheart on Nov 21, 2007 5:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After some huge flooding, wheat abounds, rapidly reconditioning the soil (for all the other plants). It puts all its energy into seeds, which are like little barrels of oil - high concentrations of solar energy, (a.k.a. wealth). Soon, granaries appear, and a few houses much larger than others...6000 years ago, in Egypt, this enabled a focussing of human resources that successfully applied astronomy to synchronizing agricultural operations with the long-term flooding cycles of the Nile River. Thus they were able to achieve an exceptionally robust temporal continuity. (Just look at those pyramids - clearly they weren't thinking of moving house any time soon!)

Technology, (a.k.a. explicitness), sews the seeds of rapid change in human societies (a.k.a. environments). Throughout the 19th century the Industrial Revolution progressed full-steam ahead with coal and whale oil. For the 20th, it jumped to warp speed, petroleum and electricity providing far higher energy densities. The latter has zapped us into our present communications environment of virtually instantaneous global information exchange - an environment which irresistably imposes the necessity of synchronization, integration, automation, and control, globally.

Rich people are careful always to hide. They hide in enclaves, in crowds - crowds of rich people and their servants, flunkies, henchmen. In such gatherings, protocals, conventions, and agenda ensure that nothing untoward can occur, nothing that might perturb their happy selves, or interrupt their merriment. Nowadays, what with the globe becoming such a tiny village, entire neighbourhoods of rich people are incorporating, so as to seperate their infrastructure and municipal taxes from those of the poor. This is an especially striking feature of our global control system (a.k.a. world).

We should not laugh about rich people eating mouse droppings, for we may have to eat the rich, some day soon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: regarding Wealth... Posted by: driftwolf
wrap your mind around this
Posted by: lrrysgl on Nov 21, 2007 7:19 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now, wrap your mind around this item that was reported in the January/February 1996 issue of dollars and sense magazine:

According to the United Nations Development Program, the last three decades have seen an alarming growth of global economic inequality. Thirty years ago, the richest fifth of the world’s population had an income 30 times greater than the poorest fifth. Now, the income of the richest fifth is 61 times that of the poorest fifth. And 358 super-rich individuals now have a combined wealth equaling the total income of 2.3 billion people, nearly half the world’s population.

Now that was back in 1996. How much more obscene would those number be if they were updated to today?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inequality??
Posted by: gellero on Nov 21, 2007 11:35 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So who claims a sheep herder in Mongolia needs an iPod to be content? What is wealth? Is a hot young Mongolian babe in your yurt at night worth more than a bitchy bejeweled wife in your Park Avenue duplex? I wish AlterNet would stop this guilt-trip BS. They owe us nothing and we owe them nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Inequality?? Posted by: CommonDreamer
"Obscenity - who really cares?" - Bob Dylan
Posted by: bifheart on Nov 22, 2007 12:51 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's even more obscene is how, in the process (of development) the actual wealth is being transformed into shit - a sort of reverse alchemy, gold into lead. I mean people into corpses, farmland into desert, oceans into garbage dumps...But I don't see any guilt to be assigned - unless it be to God, for a criminal mind. To me it's a grotesque nightmare cartoon. We were so very confident, and we had a boldly, clearly defined project, and a strong trajectory, with a lot of momentum, and then a funny thing happened on the way to Utopia: we slipped on a banana peel (oil) and got struck by lightning (electricity) at the same time. Surprise! - Breathtaking acceleration! The hasty conversion of navies to oil precipitated WWI. The human population quickly quadrupled. And suddenly...here we are, and the rich people are running amok - just doing their usual thing, nothing especially creative - although perhaps a little panicky over the end times. Oh yes - the end of liquid fueled growth, which spells the rapid collapse of infrastructure - no more Walmarts. And yet worse: the end of fresh water, the end of fish, the end of productive soil, the end of copper, uranium, tin, the end of functioning ecosystems, the end of familiar (ie, adapted-to) global systems...Under these circumstances, the idea of guilt seems just silly, to me. But then maybe that's what we are, maybe we're silly. Or God exists, and has a criminal mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C.S.I. The Vatican
Posted by: bifheart on Nov 22, 2007 2:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But of course! God would commit the perfect crime - leaving us without a clue!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Think differently for a second.
Posted by: wsx on Nov 22, 2007 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I you can put some gold shavings on some ice cream and get $25k for it, isnt that a more efficient way of redistributing wealth than ammending 10000 pages of tax rules and regs with unknown bueraucracy, redistributions and consequences to the economy. We need more market creativity like this until wealth gets balanced a bit better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive Tax System?
Posted by: clocksmith on Nov 22, 2007 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article doesn't say whether Serendipity 3 actually sold any $25,000 desserts. If so, the consumers who bought these disgustingly decadent desserts are proof that our "progressive tax system" is not progressive enough by far. There is something morally reprehensible about a society in which the rich can afford "Haute Chocolate" while people sleep in the streets at night.

That being said, I believe that the system put in place by the partnership between government/big business/ultra rich (read:fascists) has become seriously out of whack in the past seven years. The practice of giving just enough to us down here in the middle class to keep us going while encouraging us to look down on the poor as lazy and unwashed has been thrown into disarray by the fact that the rich have become bolder and greedier.

If I were a member of that "ruling class" I would be having a hard time sleeping at night due to the fact that when the "little people" become miserable enough they start looking up towards the top of the ladder for someone to blame.
Just ask the Russian czar and ruling elite class circa 1918 what happens when the middle class is decimated and miserable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

look for jobs that don't serve the rich
Posted by: rtdrury on Nov 24, 2007 5:36 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are two types of jobs - those that serve the rich and those that serve everybody else. Which type of job should we seek?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Nov 26, 2007 9:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scheherezde states correctly that monies will be distributed more and more according to whimsy. It is happening now - all glamorous gifts to universities and museums but not much to grass roots concerns and especially to affordable housing. If we don't have affordable dwellings, how will people learn? But the gifts just keep coming to universities as if that alone will solve all inequities, just like this government thinks tax cuts for the wealthy alone will solve everything. The vision is narrow....one cannot ignore the most basic needs (food, housing and decent treatment of workers) and have an effective and educated workforce. Where is the brave person who will give to the unglamorous but much needed basic concerns? We are still waiting for that person - and he or she will be a white knight at this point. We can only hope, since we have not yet been able to alter the perilous path, that someone with great financial power will step up to this challenge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]