Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

How a Community Is Saving Itself and the Environment

By Kevin Danaher and Shannon Biggs and Jason Mark, PoliPoint Press. Posted November 20, 2007.


Our current economic model has created nothing but poverty and pollution for the South Bronx. But the visionary folks there have a different model that will change all that.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The following conversation with Omar Freilla is an excerpt from the new book Building the Green Economy: Success Stories from the Grassroots (PoliPointPress, 2007) by Kevin Danaher, Shannon Biggs, and Jason Mark. You can read more about the book here.

Though only 33 years old, Omar Freilla has already distinguished himself as a leader in the movement to create a sustainable and just economy. As the founder of the Green Worker Co-op in the South Bronx district of New York City, Freilla has laid out an exciting vision of how to balance economic needs with ecological wisdom. That vision rests on the basic principles of environmental justice-ensuring that no one community has to bear a disproportionate burden for society's toxins and wastes. The way to do that, Freilla believes, is by creating worker-owned co-operatives that will have no incentives to pollute. He spoke to us from his office in the Hunts Point neighborhood in the Bronx.

Q: How did you get the idea for the Green Worker Co-op? Was there any "aha" moment that you remember?

Omar Freilla: There have been a couple of "aha" moments. The most recent came when I worked for Sustainable South Bronx. I was involved in a collaborative effort to try to attract green businesses into New York, with the hope and the desire that they would be locating in low-income neighborhoods.

Unfortunately, it didn't go anywhere at the time. I realized that I wasn't really comfortable with the approach that we were taking as a group, which was to try to attract businesses -- traditional, corporate-structured businesses -- into an area from outside. I felt that an approach that produces even more results and maximizes benefits to an even greater extent would actually be building up business from within the community. And creating it as a worker-owned business. So that way the profits would actually stay within the community, and decisions would be made by people from the area.

Q: A key part of the vision is recycling and reusing all the waste produced in New York. How do you plan to turn trash into opportunity?

OF: Well, that's part of the vision. Our vision is to incubate and let fly a number of worker-owned businesses that are able to improve environmental conditions generally. It's not specific to waste. We just happened to latch on to this idea of creating a co-op that could reduce waste. This particular co-op would be salvaging building materials that would otherwise get thrown out and get sent to a landfill, or even worse, to an incinerator. We have latched on to that and really promoted that as an idea.

The next co-op or the third one or the fourth one could be anything. It could be energy efficiency, doing anything related to improving environmental conditions. For us, the big issues in the South Bronx are reducing air pollution, and reducing waste.

Q: Why is it important to you to have a worker-owned co-operative? How does that fit in with your broader philosophy?

OF: There are two reasons. One is economic. It's about being able to maximize the resources within the community. We have an incredible amount of money that just cycles out almost immediately, as soon as it's generated. People don't make a lot of money, and the money we do make winds up going into stores that aren't owned by people in the community. In many cases, especially if you are talking about big chains, the money immediately flows out to some corporate headquarters and distant stock owners in other parts of the country and other parts of the planet. There's really no financial benefit coming back to the person who actually shops there or who works there, other than maybe getting a particular product. We felt that the worker co-op model is a great way to go.

Q: What is the second reason?

OF: Democracy. We live in a country that is counted as a great democracy, but in day-to-day life few of us actually experience it. We go to school and we go to work under conditions where people don't have a say in their day-to-day life; they don't have a say in the things that happen around them. And then people are surprised that there is little participation at the voting booth, or that people don't really take seriously this idea of living in a democracy. So that is a really big part of it, creating an opportunity for people to have ownership of their lives.

Q: We have an industrial economy that's built on extraction. How do you envision a different kind of economy that's more sustainable?


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economic justice, environmental justice, worker co-ops, south bronx, bronx

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
mskatmai
Posted by: Ms.Katmai on Nov 22, 2007 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hooray! This is GOOD news. I love reading about solutions to poverty.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What? I am only the SECOND poster?
Posted by: halg on Nov 23, 2007 10:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am thinking along the same lines as OF, and for very much the same reasons. In fact, about a month or two ago, I had suggested to my Green local group the possibility of creating local, sustainable employment and economics. It started with the notion of a living wage, but quickly evolved into a more general concept of a live-work-learn-play "co-op" type arrangement.

OF really gets it right. The money or work is generated within the community and quickly sails out of the community to someone else's coffers. That money is not reinvested locally, and the person(s) benefitting from remote-controlled slavery do not have anything to lose.

For example, gas prices are about $3.10 right now. At least that's what the sign on the pump says. Exxon-Mobil is still in court defending its innocence in the Exxon Valdez disaster of 20 years ago. How much has that cost taxpayers? If we imputed that very real cost to the price of gas, I am sure $3.10 would seem like a bargain.

So if big money creates a mess while generating its profits, it simply externalizes these costs. That translates to increased taxes on working people while wages stagnate. And that generally means poverty, illness, and injustice to the local community.

OF's co-op approach is the right direction. I am hoping to garner enough support for a similar but much more extensive concept locally here in Mesa, AZ, which has dire economic problems despite the presence of a "middle-class." We do not have bus service on Sundays, and what service we do have is limited. Dial-A-Ride service -- essential for our poor and elderly -- is constantly threatened with cutbacks. Mesa Library Hours have been cut significantly.

Why? Because we have a retail economy. There are no large employers in Mesa paying survivable wages, unless you count Boeing which has a plant here manufacturing helicopters for use primarily in war (no thanks, thank you). There is no money to further tax, and tax referendums are routinely defeated. The poor can not pay additional taxes, and the wealthy elite here are obviously against taxes (except regressive ones like sales tax).

OF's idea is a first step in the right direction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LOVED this article and the work that Omar Freilla is doing.
Posted by: Bev on Nov 25, 2007 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I feel like this is truly the right track. This is what can make for a much happier and healthier society. I wish more people had seen it. It deserves a LOT of attention. That's why I dugg it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]