Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

We Face Worldwide Drought with No Contingency Plan

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted November 25, 2007.


As droughts reach record levels worldwide, no one is asking the tough question: What happens when there is not enough water to go around?
Advertisement

Georgia's on my mind. Atlanta, Georgia. It's a city in trouble in a state in trouble in a region in trouble. Water trouble. Trouble big enough that the state government's moving fast. Just this week, backed up by a choir singing "Amazing Grace," accompanied by three Protestant ministers, and twenty demonstrators from the Atlanta Freethought Society, Sonny Perdue, Georgia's Baptist governor, led a crowd of hundreds in prayers for rain.

"We've come together here," he said, "simply for one reason and one reason only: To very reverently and respectfully pray up a storm." It seems, however, that the Almighty was otherwise occupied and the regional drought continued to threaten Atlanta, a metropolis of 5 million people (and growing fast), with the possibility that it might run out of water in as little as eighty days or as much as a year, if the rains don't come. Here's a little summary of the situation today:

Water rationing has hit the capital. Car washing and lawn watering are prohibited within city limits. Harvests in the region have dropped by 15 to 30 percent. By the end of summer, local reservoirs and dams were holding 5 percent of their capacity.

Oops, that's not Atlanta, or even the Southeastern US. That's Ankara, Turkey, hit by a fierce drought and high temperatures that also have had southern and southwestern Europe in their grip.

Sorry, let's try that again. Imagine this scenario:

Over the last decade, 15 to 20 percent decreases in precipitation have been recorded. These water losses have been accompanied by record temperatures and increasing wildfires in areas where populations have been growing rapidly. A fierce drought has settled in -- of the hundred-year variety. Lawns can be watered but just for a few hours a day (and only by bucket); four-minute showers are the max allowed. Car washes are gone, though you can clean absolutely essential car windows and mirrors by hand.

Sound familiar? As it happens, that's not the American Southeast either; that's a description of what's come to be called "The Big Dry" -- the unprecedented drought that has swept huge parts of Australia, the worst in at least a century on an already notoriously dry continent, but also part of the world's breadbasket, where crops are now failing regularly and farms closing down.

In fact, on my way along the parched path toward Atlanta, Georgia, I found myself taking any number of drought-stricken detours. There's Moldova. (If you're like me, odds are you don't even know where that small, former Soviet republic falls on a map.)

Like much of southern Europe, it experienced baking temperatures this summer, exceptionally low precipitation, sometimes far less than 50 percent of expected rainfall, failing crops and farms, and spreading wildfires. (The same was true, to one degree or another, of Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Macedonia, and -- with its 100-year record scorching of Biblical proportions -- Greece which lost 10 percent of its forest cover in a month-long fiery apocalypse, leaving "large tracts of countryside...at risk of depopulation.")

Or how about Morocco, across the Mediterranean, which experienced 50 percent less rainfall than normal? Or the Canary Islands, those Spanish vacation spots in the Atlantic Ocean known to millions of visitors for their year-around mild climate which, this summer, morphed into 104-degree days, strong winds, and fierce wildfires. Eighty-six thousand acres were burnt to a crisp, engulfing some of the islands in flames and smoke that drove out thousands of tourists?

Or what about Mexico's Tehuacán Valley, where, thousands of years ago, corn was first domesticated as an agricultural crop. Even today, asking for "un Tehuacán" in a restaurant in Mexico still means getting the best bottled mineral water in the country. Unfortunately, the area hasn't had a good rain since 2003, and the ensuing drought conditions have made subsistence farming next to impossible, sending desperate locals northwards and across the border as illegal immigrants -- some into Southern California, itself just swept by monstrous Santa Ana-driven wildfires, fanned by prolonged drought conditions and fed tinder by new communities built deep into the wild lands where the fires gestate.

And Tehuacán is but one disaster zone in a growing Mexican catastrophe. As Mike Davis has written, "Abandoned ranchitos and near-ghost towns throughout Coahuila, Chihuahua and Sonora testify to the relentless succession of dry years -- beginning in the 1980s but assuming truly catastrophic intensity in the late 1990s -- that has pushed hundreds of thousands of poor rural people toward the sweatshops of Ciudad Juarez and the barrios of Los Angeles."

According to the How Dry I Am chart of "livability expert" Bert Sperling, four cities in Southern California, not parched Atlanta, top the national drought ratings: Los Angeles, San Diego, Oxnard, and Riverside. In addition, Pasadena has had the dubious honor, through September, of experiencing its driest year in history.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: water, drought, water scarcity, atlanta drough, australia drought

Tom Engelhardt, editor of Tomdispatch.com, is co-founder of the American Empire Project and author of The End of Victory Culture.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Here in Michigan,
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Nov 25, 2007 12:10 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm gonna take a 25-minute shower.:P

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Here in Michigan, Posted by: lisah
On a related note...
Posted by: Decoy on Nov 25, 2007 12:29 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. I'd like to note, however, that this problem encompasses more than just low rainfall and thus reservoirs: there is a global crisis in pollution and overuse of running freshwaters - rivers and streams - as well. The relationship with desertification should also be stressed, since the consequence of continuing to use (or, more importantly, overuse) these drought-stricken lands for agriculture is that they may be unable to be used again even if the rains start up; the soil is either rendered infertile or simply blows away when dry. Even a brief look at the history of intensively farmed dry areas such as the middle east or mediterranean - or a current look at the situation in places such as northern Africa - should provide a clear warning about the dangers of this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peak oil, peak water, peak people
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Nov 25, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Things are crumbling before our eyes, but the brain dead press wants to cover Paris Hilton and the rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Brain dead media... Posted by: Cathyc
Why should there be a contingency plan?
Posted by: Ian MacLeod on Nov 25, 2007 1:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The rich have demonstrated adequately that they'll always have enough water to fill their swimming pools. Then they can sell their pool and bath water at whatever inflated prices they care to to the dehydrated masses, just like they sell fuel now - without there even being a fuel shortage - to people at whatever inflated prices they choose to set. They're protected no matter what, and they know it. They're inches (read: one National Emergency determined by Bush) from being ab absolute monarchy and aristocracy now. They have nothing to worry about at all.

Hell, even firemen, cops, librarians and your neighbors are going to be spies for them so they'll know when there's trouble brewing in the masses. After all, everybody will need a little something extra just to stay alive, and Stalin showed them the way a long time ago. Nope, they're all set. And so are we.

Ian

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the water issue should be solutions
Posted by: Phr2 on Nov 25, 2007 1:26 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Very good article.
The Bush administration has made up false facts to lure America into Irak and at the same time has hidden true facts to deny action on climate change and related drought. There is an obvious bias here on his part leading to total anihilation, its all that his policies have the world to. Willingfully or not, he's bringing the world down.
But lets think beyond, and think of the world we want, as in Lester Browns words "If we dont have a clear idea of where we want to go , we'll probably never get there".
So relating to drought, what solutions do we have ?
Over the long term, with action to be taken now: reduce developed nations greenhouse gas emissions by 90% for 2030, which leaves best chances of avoiding a runaway climate change scenario. This will have obvious consequences on future droughts.
Over the short term, reduce per capita water consumption. The solutions exist, technical, political and behaviour changes: tax water consumption heavily if they go beyond a yearly per capita allowance; impose debit reduction devices on all fawcets and taps (cheap and effective); impose dry toilets in new buildings and retrofit existing ones (see www.laneta.apc.org/esac/drytoilet.htm); develop existing lawns and plants species adapted to dry climates and requiring no watering, etc.

Yes this requires state intervention, but the state is us.

Greetings from Switzerland where local and federal state are not seen as an enemy but as a purveyor of public good.

Buscheney and their clones will not be around for ever, look at the whaking the conservatives got in Australia, hope is our fuel, we might avoid the worst if we focus on the solutions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

4 birds with one stone: Solar Deserts, Desalinization, Warming and Energy Wars
Posted by: channing on Nov 25, 2007 1:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The future of energy and water are resolved in a still little-known research project that you can review at www.trecers.net

Calculations show that the planet's deserts currently absorb 700 times the amount of energy consumed by humanity from all other sources... This is just the deserts!

By combining Concentrated Solar Arrays which have already passed the 20-year field test, with a High Tension Grid for distribution, solar energy can be produced inside 1/700th of the desert-mass and shipped anywhere in the world, with a key byproduct being Desalinization. It is conceivable that humanity can simultaneously solve Warming, Pollution, Energy Wars, and Clean Water access in one massive international effort.

The above plan does not preclude other sustainable priorities and options like Wind Islands, Wave and Geothermal, but we can't afford to ignore such a profound solution for our future!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks for the link Posted by: Hans B
When it comes to water
Posted by: toppun on Nov 25, 2007 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
even the experts can't think ahead. About 20 years ago I was one of about 50 National water research directors, I suggested it was time for us to come up with a waterless sanitary system. I was the laughing stock of the "futures" meeting. Really I am not too worried. I have found that I can live very well on less than 5% of the average per capita consumption rate of water without adopting any extreme measures. Heck I even wash my car once in a while although I prefer to ride my bicycle. Ba humbug.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When it comes to water
Posted by: toppun on Nov 25, 2007 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
even the experts can't think ahead. About 20 years ago I was one of about 50 National water research directors, I suggested it was time for us to come up with a waterless sanitary system. I was the laughing stock of the "futures" meeting. Really I am not too worried. I have found that I can live very well on less than 5% of the average per capita consumption rate of water without adopting any extreme measures. Heck I even wash my car once in a while although I prefer to ride my bicycle. Ba humbug.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: When it comes to water Posted by: stueysplace ca
The most likely outcome
Posted by: stueysplace ca on Nov 25, 2007 5:51 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As always humans avoid thinking about the obvious. Our leaders will go to great ends to devise all sorts of ingenious methods to deal with the drought in their respective locations. They will continue to allow the population to increase. When it finally hits the fan there is only one solution that will work. Move! Not popular, just inevitable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Where? Posted by: vertical
The cause of the world's current drought is
Posted by: kellysgarden on Nov 25, 2007 9:10 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to be found by watching the following video.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=39520879762623193

It is called Global Dimming, and is largely caused by what many are calling Chemtrails.

This is a desperate attempt at climate manipulation to avert the global warming that is being caused by the release of carbon from human activity.

In short, Big Oil has a vested interest in our continued addiction to oil. If we start to conserve, they make less money. They don't want us to conserve, so they tell us that global warming does not exist, while they, at the same time are spreading aluminum oxide and barium salts into the atmosphere to cool off the warming atmosphere.

This filtration of sunlight from aluminum oxide and barium particles in the upper atmosphere not only cools the planet from warming, but decreases the amount of evaporation back into the upper atmosphere, resulting in far less precipitation.

Please, watch the google video before you just write me off as some crackpot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tom Engelhardt, read Scientific American and Astrobiology
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Nov 25, 2007 11:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Atlanta without water, like Katrina, is the gentlest of warnings.
Reference Book: "The Long Summer, How Climate Changed
Civilization" by Brian Fagan, 2004 Basic Books, ISBN 0-465-
02281-2
Summary: Smaller climate changes than we have caused already,
caused the fall of many civilizations.

The Existential Risk that is virtually certain to
happen is the same as the End Permian mass extinction:
Hydrogen Sulfide. It is possible to avoid it, but the power
of wealth must be overcome. Coal is a $100 Billion [US]
industry in the US alone. To avoid extinction, we have to stop
burning coal.
download from:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00037A5D-
A938-150E-A93883414B7F0000&sc=I100322
from the October 2006 issue of Scientific American
Article: "Impact from the Deep"
"Strangling heat and gases emanating from the earth and
sea, not asteroids, most likely caused several ancient mass
extinctions. Could the same killer-greenhouse conditions
build once again? "
By Peter D. Ward
The last paragraph of the article says:
"The so-called thermal extinction at the end of the
Paleocene began when atmospheric CO2 was just under
1,000 parts per million (ppm). At the end of the Triassic,
CO2 was just above 1,000 ppm. Today with CO2 around
385 ppm, it seems we are still safe. But with atmospheric
carbon climbing at an annual rate of 2 ppm and expected to
accelerate to 3 ppm, levels could approach 900 ppm by the
end of the next century, and conditions that bring about the
beginnings of ocean anoxia may be in place. How soon
after that could there be a new greenhouse extinction? That
is something our society should never find out."
The hydrogen sulfide will finally put an end to the mining of
coal. Nuclear power is the safest available.

http://www.astrobio.net/news/modules.php?op
=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=672

http://www.ornl.gov/ORNLReview/rev26-
34/text/coalmain.html

http://www.geosociety.org/meetings/2003/
prPennStateKump.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's getting hard to care...
Posted by: PJAW on Nov 26, 2007 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps this unsustainable lifestyle that we lead on a planetary scale is just a self-limiting mechanism for our species. (or maybe God is pissed-off at us)

It does get frustrating though, that we have solutions and alternatives to our problems and habits that would make life here on Earth more enjoyable and more sustainable and we (generally) seem so averse to implementing them. I think most people who subscribe to this blog would happily participate in, or even initiate, these solutions, but there is so much resistance that it sometimes becomes difficult to even give a damn. Which leads one to begin focusing on "where is the safest place to be when the shit hits the fan?", instead of taking a more cooperative view of things.

I'm thinking that would be in an approximate wedge of space that is between ten degrees and 45 degrees off direct alignment with the axis of rotation of the fan, and toward the approach angle. And, of course, outside the direct path of fecal approach. In three dimensions, this probably most resembles a cone, or taking wind drift etc into account, a typical mushroom shape with a large hole in the center of the cap. One's time would seemingly best be spent getting an exact fix on the fan itself. And hoping that the spread of the approaching fecal mass does not exceed the diameter of the fan blade assembly. If it does, we're fucked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If it's yellow, let it mellow. If it's brown....
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Nov 26, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it's yellow, let it mellow. If it's brown.... flush it down.

That's the rule in my bathroom.
-----
But in truth, the only thing that will help is small families or no families.

STOP BREEDING and adopt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drought and other effects of global warming - solutions
Posted by: brauerdave on Nov 26, 2007 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is highly possible that global warming is responsible for Atlanta’s water problem. It is also highly possible that burning oil is responsible for global warming. It is also highly possible that oil is the reason George Bush took us to war in Iraq.

I believe that there are two things we can do to help stop (or at least slow) global warming, prepare for the worst case of warming in the US, and eliminate our dependence on Mideast oil.

First, the US government should start building water desalination plants on the west coast (then the east cost). Second, the US government must highly support the change to a hydrogen based transportation system. This includes hydrogen fuel cell cars, a country wide scale of hydrogen fuel development, and hydrogen distribution facilities at the retail level.

The large oil companies are going to resist this by saying it is unrealistic and that global warming is not as bad as we think – SO what? Sooner (rather than later) it will be a problem that destroys them as well as us. If we start now our children may live to see a better life where global warming has a reduced effect (and without war – in Iraq).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please indulge me for a moment
Posted by: zeofredo on Nov 26, 2007 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At the risk of seeming a street corner kook, I would like to draw attention to the skies these day-- their appearance, the cloud formations, the sensation of the atmosphere as you feel it on your body. Pollution and climate change certainly seem to be changing some of the characteristics that would have been 'closer to nature' 30 years ago or more, but have you also noticed the kinds of trails left by some aircraft these last ten years?

I know... this is straying into wingnut territory! I tried to push the observations aside myself when I first noticed the kinds of contrails that jets seemed to be drawing across the sky... but there was a key difference between a traditional trail that dissipates within moments and these creations which sometimes last for hours. And then I also began keeping track of the number of such streaks in the sky, as well as observing the weather conditions closely over days and weeks.

I can't explain it, to be honest. There are theories, many of which are tossed out as being fanciful paranoia. But I will say this much: I have noticed a definite correlation between these spraying 'operations' and the dryness of the atmosphere within the same time frame. I've experienced it in Europe (Czech Republic) as well as in my native Canada (Ontario). It is eerie to see these planes crossing the sky and systematically leaving traces of white vapor (aluminum salts?) which may be drying out the atmosphere or averting precipitation: kind of like the opposite of 'cloud seeding'.

I urge everyone to pay more attention to the sky above and consider the atmosphere which usually goes entirely unnoticed in our midst.

This site has some interesting observations to parse:
http://weatherwars.info/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Please indulge me for a moment Posted by: makeadifference
» zeofredo, you R right... Posted by: kellysgarden
Balled By the Media
Posted by: aberdeen on Nov 26, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What most Americans are being kept in the dark about, is that fresh drinking water is a looming global catastrophe, not only in Africa, India and Southeast Asia, but also here in the United States. Some scientists are predicting that the United States might have a Civil War over water rights within a generation or two.

Enough fresh water for the coming generations is a bigger issue than enough oil, although nobody would know that if all they read is our own mainstream media. It is not only about drinking water. It is also about water for crops and large fires caused by drought (such as recently in S. Calif).

This is a good example of how badly sno-balled modern Americans are by mainstream media, which continues to "debate" global warming instead of centering on the real issue that pollution is extremely harmful to people. We should get rid of pollution, even if the planet is cooling down and Al Gore is entirely wrong, because pollution is harmful to our children and everybody knows it. That is what should be the media focus.

The media is typically out of focus on major issues that matter, including especially healthcare and environmental pollution (which are inter-related). Regarding healthcare, the focus belongs on contagious disease. It is extremely dangerous for the well-insured rich man's children if the poor man's children do not have preventive healthcare. That is where the media focus belongs on healthcare, which no conservatives and few progressives really understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» In Order To Stop All Pollution ... Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
Ever spend time with an addict?
Posted by: Rod on Nov 26, 2007 10:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have a friend that was a crackhead. He knew what it was doing, he has tried to quit, several of us have tried to help. The allure of the crack is too strong, in the end it got him.

The allure of oil, and water is too strong for most of us to ever give up, even though it is killing us.

Such is human nature. Witness the war on drugs.

A "war" on oil, or water or the "right" to have kids is not going to work any better.

Only a better, cleaner drug can avert death. Nuclear, solar, wind, clean coal , de-salination plants, technology of some sort to the rescue.

Rod

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

First, remove the profit motive
Posted by: sophiej on Nov 26, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there are many things we can do to alleviate the increasing water shortage, but so long as corporations can profit from selling water to benefit their investors nothing we do will come near solving the problems.
ownership of water systems must be public and transparent. Yes, it is costly to buy a local water system from a corporation, but it's more costly to let them control it.
There's a lot of good information at
http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/water/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shortage of water?
Posted by: willymack on Nov 26, 2007 12:42 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No, just a shortage of CHEAP water and an overabundance of silly, ignorant, and uncaring PEOPLE. Back to the water; the Earth"s surface is 70% water, so I doubt there'll EVER be a shortage of it. Problem is that it's seawater, and not potable without expensive desalinazation. In the meantime we stupid humans use up and befoul our diminishing fresh water at an ever-increasing rate, while adding to our population as if there will be no adverse consequences. By the way, it's raining in Atlanta. Let's just say it rains the whole 40+ inches it will take to fill the main reservoir. Will the people there take a lesson from the near disaster, caused by global warming and the resultant change in climate patterns? Not likely.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on Nov 26, 2007 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few people have been trying to raise a fuss over the issue. Maude Barlow, who started the "Council of Canadians" grassroots organization 20 years ago - now 100,000 strong - has made water and energy and government sell-outs to corporations key issues for years. About 5 years ago she wrote a book, "Blue Gold" on future water wars rather than for oil...now she has a new book on water again...I forget the title. She and the Council stir up as much trouble as they can at meetings like World Bank and World Trade Organization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Grab your water skis and head to the desert...
Posted by: cstableford on Nov 26, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To top it ALL off (the drought and the hegemony of the wealthy elites), there's an AP article out today about a development project in Mesa, Arizona that will require 100 million gallons of water annually to create and sustain an "ocean park" 15 miles outside of Phoenix. 65% of the voters approved the project because it promises 7,500 jobs. And of course there's the irresistable thrill of sea kayaking in a desert... 100 million gallons of water for a fake beach! This is mass insanity fueled capitalism gone beserk!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

extortion & resource-bearing nations.
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Nov 26, 2007 2:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you know... like Canada... India... Honduras, Boliva, Guatemala...

will soon be suffering the Long Arm of Bushevik corporate extortion...
submit, or end up...
...like Iraq.
the corporate compliance cautionary tale...

can you say Security & Prosperity Partnership of North America?

Now in 2007, at the SPP Summit in Montebello, it was reported in the CBC:

"Quebec provincial police admitted Thursday that three of their officers disguised themselves as demonstrators during the protest at the North American leaders summit in Montebello, Que.

Quebec provincial police admitted Thursday that three of their officers disguised themselves as demonstrators during the protest at the North American leaders summit in Montebello, Que"


NOW PAY ATTENTION: Bush. Paraguay. Water.

do the math. exactly WHERE is that Bush property??


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian.com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why Should There Be A Contingency Plan?
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Nov 26, 2007 8:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What there should be is a strong commitment to lower our population and live a much more natural and simple lifestyle.

By killing the trees thousands of years ago, the people of the middle east turned their forests into deserts. It's quite possible we're doing the same to the rest of the planet, whether by global warming, global dimming, deforestation, or some other human-caused ecological harms. We need to stop the ecological harms that we're doing, not worry about contingency plans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

30 Million Xmas trees 2 B cut this year....Now that's an obvoius cause...
Posted by: common intelligence on Nov 26, 2007 10:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
....Cause for CO2 release that is.

This is kind of a side ways concern from the topic, but the media likes to talk up reducing our carbon footprint. SO eco responsible people should understand those trees that use to collect moisture from the air and CO2 and return oxygen....well they're going to be dead now nad returning all that CO2 back into the atmosphere.

But it's all in the spirit of the season isn't it. Blind and ignorants can always put responsibility off until tomorrow.

The denial continues.......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

what about geoengineering solutions?
Posted by: LLMystic on Nov 26, 2007 10:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While it is clear we need to address overpopulation, pollution, and wastefulness to solve the water shortages (and many other problems), I wonder why no one has mentioned the possibility of using geoengineering solutions for the water shortages? There are places where fresh water is abundant, generally in the north for the northern hemisphere. It is possible to build aquaducts to transport the water to drier, more southerly lands where more people live. It would be expensive, and will not permanently solve the water shortages if we do not also address the overpopulation, pollution, and waste issues for the long term. However, the geoengineering solution offers quicker hope and a stop-gap solution which can be implemented right now, with existing technology and with existing political and economic realities (however horrible these realities may seem to us). We need to look at all the options, not just those we think ideal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You've Got To Be Kidding Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
water is more critical for sustaining life than food, than oil...
Posted by: veggiegrrrl on Nov 27, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
water is more critical for sustaining life than food, than oil... and so few comments on this article... an article about don imus will have 200 comments...
strange.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

turtletime
Posted by: barbs on Nov 27, 2007 10:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
did you hear the one about the developers in Arizona who want to build a 'water park' so the kids can grow up with water fun; AZ gets 8" of rain per year so they're just going to drill deeper...mad people...not paying attention to reality.
These days if you want a taste of reality, you have to watch it on TV!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Law against water lavishness
Posted by: Jimbo33 on Nov 27, 2007 10:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since the situation is so serious the only way to safe water is a law against water lavishness. No golf courses in deserts, farming with less water by adopting new techniques like in Israel, water education in schools for responsible consumption at home and elsewhere.
And if you want to spend a great vacation then you should check in one of those great hotels which acts responsibly towards the environment.
Keyword: Ecotourism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Atlanta's dry year? I think that our rain went elsewhere
Posted by: chief of okeefe on Nov 27, 2007 5:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Texas and southern plains got alot of our rain, as it came in to TX and either stalled, or lifted up over us and went thru Midwest & Northeast.

Before I believe that Atlanta's drought (and it is real, I live here) is part of a "world-wide" drought, I want to see the rainfall stats for TX and the Northern states.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drought, famine, war, disease pandemics, food poisoning, toxic pollutant, failing ecosystems...
Posted by: EDRO on Nov 27, 2007 6:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the most likely future scenario, about 20% the world’s cities with populations of more than 2-3 million could become uninhabitable by 2012. Massive waves of human migration from the affected areas would create domino effect that would cause the collapse of the remaining habitable population centers shortly after. But, we have the option to change that scenario!

http://edro.wordpress.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WWRP do?
Posted by: bmw111 on Nov 28, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How would Ron Paul attack this problem? Read this article to see how Ron Paul and other 08 Candidates look through the Fourth Turning framework. Interesting!

http://truthalert.net/The%20Poison%20Pen.htm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Water Treatment Plants
Posted by: ZekeVanZeke on Dec 2, 2007 12:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of praying, Governor Perdue should start planning for water treatment plants and reservoirs to recapture drain water. And, yes, the tax increase necessary to pay for them. There's no question that Uncle Sam will not pay full cost. Lack of water is definitely no joke. As the article says, you are down to basics. If we were still a predominantly agricultural society, our current topic would be mass migrations from such areas.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will the fall of civilization prevent our extinction?
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Dec 2, 2007 8:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fall of civilization may have the following "benefit": The
burning of fossil fuels will crash along with the crash of
civilization and population. That would at least postpone the
even bigger disaster of human extinction. The bad news: YOU
should expect to be in the 99.99% that dies in a typical civilization
crash.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]