Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Broadway Corporations Like Disney Make Millions as Stagehands Strike to Save Homes, Jobs

By Nancy Van Ness, The Wip. Posted November 20, 2007.


While the commercial media obsess about tourists who can't see the Grinch, striking stagehands struggle to have their voices heard.
Advertisement

I cross 42nd Street and walk up Times Square. It is a cold, windy, rainy day but I had promised to come. I continue past the army recruiting center and the police headquarters; police are out in force. I notice the New York Times building on the east side of the Square at 43rd. The huge Clear Channel signs, some of the most prominent of those that are bright day and night cast a glow that makes the square seem like daytime 24 hours a day while flashing images. Across the way are the Disney buildings and Reuters. I walk over to the Broadway side of the Square, go up to 44th and then to Shubert Alley and over to 45th, giving high fives and thumbs up to striking stage hands as they parade up and down between police barriers in front of the theaters.

I stop briefly to speak with a woman as bundled up as I was against the weather, just to encourage her. Standing in front of the theater's huge sign advertising A Chorus Line, she says they just want to hang on to what they have.

I head to a theater where, ironically, the show is about RCA's theft of the rights to the invention of television from its inventor. It is never comfortable or convenient to man the picket lines and today is really nasty, but I had told the stage hands there I would be back today, so here I am.

I have come to see if I can get a true picture of what is going on. The endless media reports about the family from Seattle or somewhere else who had come to see The Grinch and how disappointed the children were because the stage hands had shut the show down had become intolerable to me.

Where is the story about the children whose parent is a stage hand, who will lose their house if the proposed 38% cut in jobs and pay is forced on the union? Where are our values? How can anyone's vacation and a holiday show be more important than hard working middle class families who risk losing their income and their homes?

We are not going to see or hear that story for the simple reason that the owners of the media are the owners of Broadway, both its shows and the real estate; they just don't want us to know it. Few Americans are aware of some basic facts:

The largest grossing entity on Broadway is Disney, whose three Broadway shows the week of November 4, 2007, the last week before the strike, grossed a total of $2,205,016. Disney owns ABC.

The highest grossing show that week, which has remained at the top, earning over a million dollars a week for many weeks, was Wicked, with $1,335,757. It is produced by Universal Pictures, a subsidiary of the same company that owns NBC.

(Data about the receipts of top shows can be found here.)

The New York Times is an official partner of the League of Theater Owners and Producers, the same entity that is trying to break the stagehands' union. Its final offer would reduce their jobs and pay by 38%. (The cynicism of The Times is so blatant it's ludicrous. On November 15th they declared that the current French transit strike was "provoked" by France's president, whereas they place the blame for the darkening of Broadway on the workers. The Times has no financial interest in French transit; it does in Broadway shows and real estate.)

The Union, Local One of the Theatrical Stage Employees Union, has been negotiating with the League since July and has been working without a contract for some time. They report that the League is actually making further demands, not fewer, as negotiations have lurched forward. They were finally forced to either endorse a contract that would hurt its members badly or go out on strike.

It is not in the interest of the New York Times, ABC, NBC, Reuters, or other corporate media to tell us the facts about this situation. Big corporations own Broadway and the media. They do not want to the public to know the real story and as press, they have the means of keeping people in the dark. Even people who may have known that Disney owns ABC or that the Times is a big investor in the area find it very hard to connect all the dots. And the corporate media wants to keep it that way.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: labor, workplace, broadway

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Disney: Not a League Member
Posted by: jbsibley on Nov 20, 2007 10:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I strongly agree with your sentiments and conclusions, it is worth noting that Disney is NOT a member of the League and is happy with them for forcing a strike that is affecting some of Disney's extremely profitable shows in theatres that Disney does not own or control. Disney is not the bad guy in this particular dispute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

correction
Posted by: jbsibley on Nov 21, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
er, the above should read "is NOT happy with them".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have never worked for a union.
Posted by: wsx on Nov 22, 2007 6:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If I dont like my job, I quit and get another one that is better. No one forces these people to work in these companies and I am sure their are many people who would like to have their jobs on current terms. They should go to work or quit. If everyone quits and they cant find workers at the current set of benefits, then they will need to increase the package. Personally, I'd take minimum wage before I marched around in the streets, in the cold, inflating two story plastic rats hoping for sympathy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enlightened Not!!
Posted by: RobP on Nov 22, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...

I am disappointed to see such an unenlightened
story on the Alternet site....

There are no solid facts presented, and only
talking points from Local 1's handout.

As someone unable to work because of the stagehands
strike, I am supporting their right to strike.

Without knowing all the issues at stake,
and without knowing what goes on behind closed
doors, how can anyone claim to be truly
enlightened about such a situation??

...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dark lights of Broadway
Posted by: MSharp on Nov 22, 2007 8:48 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think the strike is needed so the theatres
on Broadway can be aired out from the putrid
smell steaming from the productions currently there.

Face it, original ideas and new concepts
have taken a backseat to the likes of Momma
Mia (rehashed ABBA 70's bubblegum pop) The
Jersey Boys (rehashed Four Seasons 60's bubble
gum pop) and the umpteenth revival of Grease
(rehashed 50's do wop wannabe).

It seems these days Broadway subsists on
revivals and has never met a movie it didn't
want to musicalize. Legally Blonde for crying
out loud!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The corporations are anti-union
Posted by: outlander55 on Nov 22, 2007 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a member of the IATSE in New Mexico for over eighteen years, and we have been struggling for fair wages and working conditions as long as I can remember. To say that we are greedy is crap. Here in NM, none of us makes a wage that allows us to live extravagant lifestyles. The vast majority of us do not have any kind of health care or retirement benefits. We have lost contracts to companies that pay barely minimum wage and a t-shirt. I SUPPORT MY BROTHERS AND SISTERS OF LOCAL ONE!!!
If the mega corporations are allowed to bust this union, which union will be next? All of you who make great wages and benefits do so due to the creation of unions in the early 20th century. If it weren't for the unions, sweat shops and child labor would still be the norm. Educate yourselves before you speak out against us. The unions fought to make sure all Americans could make fair wages. Do you think you would have your cushy 401k's if the laws we fought for weren't passed? I think not.
The corporations spread mis-information about the unions because they want to pocket obscene profits while you the worker barely gets by. And when the corporations control the media, it makes their propaganda easier to spread because most of you believe the tripe they spread. You believe that if you see it on TV, it must be true. WAKE UP!! or you will be doomed to live life as a drone who would believe anything.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The corporations are anti-union Posted by: acceleratedgrimace
Corporation Bashing
Posted by: maell on Nov 22, 2007 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It comes too easy to many Americans to point out the evil of capitalistic ideals. Most corporations have been formed by individuals that had great ideas and worked hard to achieve their goals. Why should they not profit and which of us who did not achieve their level of success has the right to determine what they do with their money? If we do not wake up our attitude of entitlement will be the demise of this great country. I have yet to see any outcry on any union web site against the money our government steals from us through taxes. Perhaps if these workers did not pay taxes their current wage would better suit their lifestyle. Corporations and workers alike have only one common enemy: A socialistic governance that seeks to steal from each of us and distribute our money as they see fit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: your real god Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: your real god Posted by: maell
» RE: your real god Posted by: chaoslegs
» RE: your real god Posted by: maell
» RE: your real god Posted by: Lector
» Paging Herbert Hoover... Posted by: acceleratedgrimace
» RE: Corporation Bashing Posted by: cwilsondrum
They want to stike and work at the same time, interesting
Posted by: wsx on Nov 23, 2007 6:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
By Christine Kearney and Edith Honan

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York judge on Wednesday ordered a theater owner to reopen "Dr. Seuss' How the Grinch Stole Christmas! The Musical" despite a strike by stagehands that has shut down most of Broadway.

State Court Justice Helen Freedman granted an injunction sought by the musical's producers, who argued their contract was not subject to the strike and who had the backing of the stagehands union, which wanted the show to go on at the St. James Theater.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A grossly under-informed article, this...
Posted by: acceleratedgrimace on Nov 25, 2007 6:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A bit about my perspective: I am rabidly pro-union, and have been my whole life. My great-grandfather was a union organizer who helped obtain the first forty-hour work week for miners. My grandfather was a shop foreman in a typewriter factory. I have been in sympathy with almost every union struggle I can remember. I have also worked in the theater for the past thirty years, and while I've never worked on Broadway, I have been in front of the house and in back of the house as a journalist and colleague for that entire time.

I am not in support of the stagehands on this one.

The basic stagehands' contract was negotiated by theater owners, not theater producers, decades ago; the owners didn't give a damn what kind of a deal they struck. "Featherbedding" is deeply embedded in the stagehand culture, which is part of why they can't see going any other way. When the union leader claims to be insulted by the term, he is telling a textbook example of a BIG LIE. Feigning outrage is the only way to deny the truth of the matter. For decades I've seen stagehands sitting around in basements watching tv or reading the newspaper. Union rules allow a four-hour call to move a piano thirty feet -- and that's for multiple workers. A man sits in the wings with the sole job of raising a curtain at the start of the show and lowering it at the end -- EVEN IF THE SHOW HAS NO CURTAIN. That's featherbedding, and it's permitted under current rules.

EVERYBODy in the theater knows it's true, and if there are union workers who don't believe it, they are in denial. Load-ins of scenery, lights etc. used to take two days; now it can take ten or more. And every single union guy is on the payroll the entire time, even if he/she isnt' working. That's unfair.

The league is offering a 20 percent wage increase over two years. Some union members are making six figures already. Sounds like a good deal to me. The League just wants people to work for their money.

As for Disney making outrageous profits: True. But NINE OUT OF TEN Broadway shows never recoup their investment. Union costs are part of the reason why we get corporate theater on Broadway: Because only the big corporations can manage the risk, and provide the kind of content that interests tourists, which now composes two-thirds of Broadway audiences.

The union should understand changing realities and make a deal that works for everybody, declare victory, and get back to work.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]