Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Does Judith Regan Have the Goods on Rudy Giuliani?

By Frank Rich, The New York Times. Posted November 19, 2007.


Judith Regan knows a lot about Rudy Giuliani, his associate Bernie Kerik, and Rupert Murdoch's media empire -- will she spill the beans?
Advertisement

New Yorkers who remember Rudy Giuliani as the bullying New York mayor, not as the terminally cheerful "America's Mayor" cooing to babies in New Hampshire, have always banked on one certainty: his presidential candidacy was so preposterous it would implode before he got anywhere near the White House.

Surely, we reassured ourselves, the all-powerful Republican values enforcers were so highly principled that they would excommunicate him because of his liberal social views, three wives and estranged children. Or a firewall would be erected by the firefighters who are enraged by his self-aggrandizing rewrite of 9/11 history. Or Judith Giuliani, with her long-hidden first marriage and Louis Vuitton 'tude, would send red-state voters screaming into the night.

Wrong, wrong and wrong. But how quickly and stupidly we forgot about the other Judith in the Rudy orbit. That would be Judith Regan, who disappeared last December after she was unceremoniously fired from Rupert Murdoch's publishing house, HarperCollins. Last week Ms. Regan came roaring back into the fray, a silver bullet aimed squarely at the heart of the Giuliani campaign.

Ms. Regan filed a $100 million lawsuit against her former employer, claiming she was unjustly made a scapegoat for the O. J. Simpson "If I Did It" fiasco that (briefly) embarrassed Mr. Murdoch and his News Corporation. But for those of us not caught up in the Simpson circus, what's most riveting about the suit are two at best tangential sentences in its 70 pages: "In fact, a senior executive in the News Corporation organization told Regan that he believed she had information about Kerik that, if disclosed, would harm Giuliani's presidential campaign. This executive advised Regan to lie to, and to withhold information from, investigators concerning Kerik."

Kerik, of course, is Bernard Kerik, the former Giuliani chauffeur and police commissioner, as well as the candidate he pushed to be President Bush's short-lived nominee to run the Department of Homeland Security. Having pleaded guilty to two misdemeanors last year, Mr. Kerik was indicted on 16 other counts by a federal grand jury 10 days ago, just before Ms. Regan let loose with her lawsuit. Whether Ms. Regan's charge about that unnamed Murdoch "senior executive" is true or not -- her lawyers have yet to reveal the evidence -- her overall message is plain. She knows a lot about Mr. Kerik, Mr. Giuliani and the Murdoch empire. And she could talk.

Boy, could she! As New Yorkers who have crossed her path or followed her in the tabloids know, Ms. Regan has an epic temper. My first encounter with her came more than a decade ago when she left me a record-breaking (in vitriol and decibel level) voice mail message about a column I'd written on one of her authors. It was a relief to encounter a more mellow Regan at a Midtown restaurant some years later. She cordially introduced me to her dinner companion, Mr. Kerik, whose post-9/11 autobiography, The Lost Son: A Life in Pursuit of Justice, was under contract at her HarperCollins imprint, ReganBooks.

What I didn't know then was that this married author and single editor were in pursuit of not just justice, but sex, too. Their love nest, we'd later learn, was an apartment adjacent to ground zero that had been initially set aside for rescue workers. Mr. Kerik believed his lover had every moral right to be there. As he tenderly explained in his acknowledgments in "The Lost Son" -- published before the revelation of their relationship -- there was "one hero who is missing" from his book's tribute to "courage and honor" and "her name is Judith Regan."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: frank rich, judith regan, fox news, rudy giuliani

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Yum!
Posted by: ty111 on Nov 19, 2007 4:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*rubs hands together gleefully*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I dunno
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Nov 19, 2007 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those WSJ writers and editors have to live somewhere, like New York City.

I wouldn't give a fig for anyone's life who disturbs the murky waters of Giuliani and his partners and his henchmen and his capi i consiglieri. A little Mafia-style terror will shut down Regan's sources and Regan herself.

Wasn't a journalist who advocated for stricter gun laws murdered in the Pacific Northwest? And was the media all over it? (Hint: no.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rumor has it...
Posted by: dover23 on Nov 19, 2007 7:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ms. Regan is working on another project; a book titled "If I Knew" which theoretically explores Giuliani's awareness of the NYC terror attacks prior to 9/11/01. It delves into the possibility that Rudy would be rewarded with hero status and a resurrected career with a shot at the US presidency if he played ball and assisted with the coverup.

Of course he "didn't know", the book just explores the theoretical possibility, similar to the OJ book.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rumor has it... Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
Not so strange bedfellows
Posted by: PerryBrass on Nov 19, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, the good thing about the news about Judith and Bernie is that they are of the opposite sex. Suppose the "other woman" in this story had been a man? That would have been truly interesting, and wonderful to see how the Republicans would have doctored that up? The Republicans need a Great White Hope now, and I don't see how they are going to let a mean anything-for-a-buck ex-lackey of Rupert Murdoch get in their way. I think that Rudolph Giuliani has one great trump card in his deck: he did not come from enough money to allow him to sniff at other people's needs for it. He comes off, actually, as a real person, rather than a Mitt-Romney rich-boy doll. So, even if Judith Regan has lots of dirt on him, can show that Bernie grabbed at every buck that came his way, and the tabloid rats chew their mouths off on this one, the truth is that Bloomberg and Romney would never have to stoopI to such shenanigans, because they have SO much money that they can rise above it. But that level of the stratosphere is not where the majority of the American people live. I think the place to attack Giuliani is what he did for working New Yorkers, and how the city became completely, literally unafforable for them—just as the country is becoming unaffordable for so many people here; unaffordable, and with no future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republicans
Posted by: frank69 on Nov 19, 2007 9:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Any working person who votes Republican is a complete and utter fool!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: epublicans Posted by: VZEQICVA
Rudy. . .can we say "sewer rat on steroids?"
Posted by: left-leaning-libertarian on Nov 19, 2007 9:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In one sense I really hope the GOP goes ahead and nominates this sleazebucket as it will take the odiousness out of having to vote for HRC (talk about "lesser of two evils!")

Actually, calling Rudy a "sewer rat on steroids" is an insult to sewer rats, many of whom, I'm sure, are possessed of far more accurate moral compasses.

Giuliani's "character" (I used the term in an ironic sense here) makes Nixon look like Lincoln; his sexual shenanigans make Bill Clinton look like a Buddhist monk and the kind of blatant cronyism he practices makes GWB look like a rank amateur.

If this disgusting crook ever gets himself elected (or more likely steals his way) to the presidency, look for things to become even worse than they already are (just try to imagine how that would even be possible!)

All I can say is "spill it, Judith! Spill it all!"

S'cuse me, I'm going to go vomit now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Framing Posted by: LeaderofMen
» A tyrant waiting to happen Posted by: LeeAnnG
GUILIANI'S SOAP OPERA
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Nov 19, 2007 12:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know how anyone would consider voting for people who are so screwed up. Regan has the goods on alot of people. These people are unable to live anything close to a normal existence, why would anyone think they could run a country. Their decision making ability is flawed.They are too old to be allowed so many bad calls. The prime example is still in the White House. Can't we learn from that. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Imagine President Guiliani
Posted by: littlemanintheboat on Nov 19, 2007 3:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://tinyurl.com/2h63ct

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]