Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fox News Porn: Too Hot for the Internet?

By Robert Greenwald, Brave New Films. Posted November 16, 2007.


The attack dogs at Fox are the subjects of a new exposé of their smut peddling.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert Greenwald

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Editor's Note: Brave New Films' recent release of a video and related website (viewable in the box on the right of this screen) exposing Fox News' smut peddling was originally considered too hot to be linked to on the popular news aggregator Digg and Google-owned YouTube. Brave New Films' Jesse Haff explains that his company has created a new site, FoxNewsPorn.com, which contains images and videos broadcast only from Fox News, "in the hopes people will ask advertisers to stop showing their ads on Fox" for its nearly pornographic content. Haff continues:

Once the site launched, I submitted it to various social bookmarking sites, including Digg. The submission quickly appeared on the Digg's homepage, only to be deleted and our account banned. I emailed Digg, thinking the submission was mistaken for a real porn site, only to be told the site is "adult content," and is against their terms of service, "even though it was broadcast on Fox." See the details with images here.

So Digg bans what Fox News broadcasts. It's hard to believe that's all there is to it, considering there are often sites with content that could be considered "adult" on Digg. As I write this, the submission "The Top 20 'Side Boobs' of All-Time (Kinda Not Safe for Work)," a completely gratuitous website with adult content, is No. 4 on Digg.

Hmm, this couldn't have anything to do with Digg partnering with the Wall Street Journal and looking to be acquired by Rupert Murdoch, could it?

Digg has since reversed its ban on the video after review.

YouTube also banned the video, effectively making the case that "you must be at least 18 to view Fox News." As of Friday, the 16th of November, YouTube still had not lifted its ban.

The email announcement from Brave New Films founder Robert Greenwald on the Fox News Porn project printed below explains more about the campaign against Fox and how individuals can get involved.

***

"Can you quote us so not giving a shit?"

That was Fox's classy response to the half million viewers who saw our Fox Attacks: Decency video.

Looks like we got to Fox this time, and it wasn't a debate about policy in Iran that did it, or a video displaying their racism, or even our coverage of their abject hypocrisy on environmental issues.

No, what got the attack dogs at Fox hungry and looking for flesh was none other than an exposé of their smut peddling! It makes sense in a way, because advertisers tend not to like their products being promoted between segments of soft porn. And a large part of their conservative base hates this as well, which might be why one Christian organization compared the way women were dressed on Fox to the manner in which "hookers" are attired.

So what did we do?

With the Fox News Hounds' help, we found enough Fox lasciviousness for a whole porn site!!

Really, we did. And it wasn't that hard to do. In fact, if you thought Fox Attacks: Decency was a glimpse into the lustful thoughts of your favorite Fox anchor, you ain't seen nothing yet.

Satire and parody aside, we think this is extremely objectionable, misogynistic content. We still don't understand how Fox is allowed to call this "news." So let's make this campaign count and hit Fox where it hurts -- their fair and balanced sheet.

Many of you have been helping to create a massive database of local Fox advertisers. Now it's time to start calling them. Pick one or two to call, and ask them to please not advertise on a channel that shows Girls Gone Wild during prime time, and exploits women 24/7. Let them know in very personal terms why this matters to you.

And please let us know how it goes! When you click on the "call" or "email" advertiser link, you'll get an example script and a form where you can describe what happened. Fill it out so we can all share information on how advertisers are reacting to the campaign. Plus, others will be inspired to act, and we can keep the pressure on these merchants of immorality. Be creative, make it personal and express how you feel.

Click here to find a list of Fox advertisers near you.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: fox news, rupert murdoch, brave new films, robert greenwald, roger ailes

Robert Greenwald is the director-producer of Outfoxed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism, as well as many other films. He is a board member of the Independent Media Institute, AlterNet's parent organization.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Thank you, Robert Greenwald!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 16, 2007 3:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watching FOX News (which I only do occassionally for ten minutes a time and only for laughs, I assure you) is the modern day equivelant of watching the old 1965 film, "Hold On!" starring the desrevedly forgotten British pop band, Herman's Hermits: so mind-fuckingly awful, it's actually fun to watch.

FOX News is pornograpfy. Thgis is something that I've been saying for ten years. Thanks to Robert Greenwald for pointing it out in excruciating detail. If you haven't seen his film, "Out-FOX-ed: Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism", you really ought to. It is essential viewing in order to understand what's happened to the media in this once-great country.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

OTHER FILMS BY ROBERT GREENWALD:
Walmart: The High Cost of Low Cost
Uncovered: The Whole Truth About the Iraq War
IRAQ FOR SALE: The War Profiteers

All of these films are available on DVD and must be seen.

peace....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you, Robert Greenwald! Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
A little overstated
Posted by: drivin98 on Nov 16, 2007 3:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe the videomaker overstates his case when he claims he is "banned" by youtube. Youtube members are the ones who decide if something should have a warning before viewing. And actually, since Greenwald is ALWAYS making the claim he is "banned" by youtube whilst he is spamming other videos comment areas, I wouldn't be surprised if it was Greenwald himself who flagged his own video.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fox News sans frontiers
Posted by: El Hombre Malo on Nov 16, 2007 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Back in 2001 I discovered my operator in Madrid (Spain) had started carrying FoxNews. I had been doing my best to inform myself from international feeds ever since I started catching subtitled Jennings every morning before going to highschool, and was already watching CNN, SkyNews and BBC whenever there was an international story I wanted to follow, so I added Fox to my diet.

Man it was crap... but crap so fun you couldnt stop watching. I kept catching bizarre moments and the weirdest, most sick takes on issues. It had the dim neon-ligh look of a roadside brothel and pretty blonde anchors advocating "kicking doors and taking names" on morning shows, hard to beat that. It was flashy, silly and avobe all, tacky...but then I found him.

My love for Bill O'Reilly was instantaneous and had all the elements of kink. It was a guilty, dirty pleasure, but every morning (in spain) I watched The Factor late night rerun. While I was a student and later, when I worked from home, I was able to watch him daily, delighted in his rudeness and his obnoxious rantings, his out-of-logic conclussions and his sanctimonious, aloof pose. Spanish media and international news services lacked any of that, except for a couple of radio hosts in a Church-owned broadcaster. I didn't knew all my life I had been hoping to find someone I loved to hate so much as Bill O'Reilly.

I now can't watch him because of my schedule, but like a porno junkie browsing for 10 second feeds of smut, I jump at every oportunity to watch a cut from his show here in Alternet or wherever I get him. Its not the same but one does with what one has.

Foxnews does not need smut and sex... Cheap, debasing and degrading journalism has a face and its that of Mr.O'reily...

(I think I got hot writing this...)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fox News sans frontiers Posted by: donl51
OutOutfoxed
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Nov 16, 2007 7:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox News is bad because, like many tv programs, they hit you with patterns of flashing lights designed to tap your subconscious and make you susceptible to brainwashing. Fox is best at this type of attack.

Fox News is bad because they push your buttons, in a primal sense. The same way a piece of tuna pushes a cat's buttons. It's the lowest form of manipulation. It's a direct psychological attack, and in the end it will completely destroy a person's ability to reason, as it did for the 70% of fox viewers who thought Saddam = 9/11.

Fox does all these despicable things, and their viewers love it, even though they are being lied to on a massive scale. Fox News is in fact 10 times worse than Greenwald depicts. Outfoxed isnt even that great of a documentary. Certainly not good enough to make a fox news zealot actually stop watching it. Orwell rolls in his grave is a much better expose on Fox. But when it comes down to it, only people like Jeff Rense or Alex Jones can truly deprogram someone who is addicted to fox news.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: OutOutfoxed Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: OutOutfoxed Posted by: donl51
FOX is Crap, But It's Brainwashing Millions of Americans
Posted by: sofla100 on Nov 16, 2007 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I also watch FOX from time-to-time for entertainment (LOL). The right-wing, sensationalist crap they put out is quite unbelievable. But, what is so terribly bad about them is how many Americans depend on them for news. They significantly shape the American right-wing consensus. The horror of them is that so many, many, Americans believe them. During the run-up to the Iraq war, it was a litany of Saddam's WMD's and Al-Queda in Iraq, none of it true, lie after lie. But, they helped form the support Bush had and his re-election. Now, FOX is on to the next agenda, getting America ready to attack Iran. And, the lies have just started.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Count me out! Outfoxed was great, but this is crap.
Posted by: Rune on Nov 16, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fox is responsible for some terrible lies and misunderstandings, not the least of which is their role in getting George Bush appointed president by calling him the winner of the 2000 election when the exit polls showed that he would lose. I would like to return to the days when fairness and accuracy in news reporting was required and media companies could be held accountable for deliberately trying to manipulate public beliefs to benefit a particular party or candidate (such as Giuliani, today). Something really does need to be done about that.

I give credit to Greenwald for pointing out the hypocrisy of Fox News' pandering to rapid conservatives while feeding them a steady diet of tits and ass. (BTW, when will Fox realize that closeted gay men make up a huge portion of their audience, judging by the number of conservative leaders who seem to be spilling out of said closet with surprising regularity?) However, if he really wanted to be effective, I suppose he would make some effort to aim his hit piece at the Fox viewers instead of the loyal opposition to Fox.

Instead, Greenwald is encouraging liberals and progressives to get behind a movement to effect censorship through lobbying corporate interests and the FCC (that is run by hangers on to the corporate establishment). The object of ire in this case is not the outrageous political slant Fox is promoting as "Fair and Balanced" news, it is a matter of style and personal expression that some find titillating, others offensive--in other words, it is an attack on freedom of expression, not on falsehoods that are a danger to democracy. This is only a step or two away from calling for book burnings. Speaking of hypocrisy.

Sorry, Mr. Greenwald, but you have become a force for the sort of strong arm opposition to freedom of speech that we in the progressive realm have long fought against, even when that bedrock principle partially benefits those with whom we disagree or find offensive. I'll have no part of it. I look forward to further efforts on your behalf that enlighten without trying to stifle the honest, if not universally appreciated, expression of thoughts and experiences some find noteworthy.

If we don't want to be inundated by the T&A on Fox, we need only avoid turning it on. Personally, the only time I see any of it is when it is featured in a video clip online. If others get off on Fox's appeal to cheap sexual fantasy's they are welcome to it, as far as I am concerned. And more power to you, Mr. Greenwald, if you want to ridicule them mercilessly for lapping that stuff up while objecting to the "the homosexual lifestyle," "gratuitous sexuality," "in your face" eroticism, etc. But when it comes to joining the crowd that wants to dictate what others can say or hear, I not only won't go along with it, I will oppose the entire endeavor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank you Posted by: kepstein7777
» Sorry you are confused Posted by: Rune
» RE: Yes thankyou. Posted by: donl51
The More Things Change...
Posted by: dumdumboy on Nov 16, 2007 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Could it be an infringement of the freedom of the press / To have pictures of women in states of undress?" - Billy Bragg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And the hypocrisy just keeps coming!
Posted by: Rune on Nov 16, 2007 2:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tonight, Robert Greenwald will be taking a little time-out from his Fox Porn crusade to be guest speaker at L.A.'s Alt-Film Festival, which describes itself as concerned with "indie films, cult movies, midnight movies, smut, grindhouse, mumblecore, alt-porn, transgressive cinema, underground film... y'know, the kinda stuff Hollywood remakes 20 years later."

Appearing with Mr. Greenwald will be porn princess Joanna Angel, whose sado-smut film Re-Penetrator will be screened as part of tonight's line up.

Fox News fans, get yourself to Westwood, now! You won't want to miss this!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Raul
Posted by: MOTELCALIFORNIA on Nov 16, 2007 4:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get all my news from the Internet now. I grew up watching TV, and now I look at it as some kind of traitor. Ever since they took out the movies and the comedies lost their 'edge,' I got fed up and started recording what I wanted to watch. When everything went to cable, which is usually nothing more than a bunch of repeats, I cut down some more. Now a TV is no more than that thing where I can see what's on my DVDs. Millions of dollars in FCC licensing to show nothing. However, God help you if you want to get them off that channel frequency. They won't give it up and they won't move out of the way. It's amazing that in half a century something designed by the government as an educational tool (TV) is now garbage. TV could have been the place where everyone could have their say about anything, politics, health, education, local situations, you name it. Instead, it's a just one more electronic appliance around the home. If you are not a reader, you'll never know what's going on, let alone what to think. Let's face it folks; as far as information goes, the Internet is all that's left. Most libraries never get enough funding to keep their collections up to date. You'll be seeing books you have read in high school on the shelves for quite some time. You might even read them again once your social security kicks in. I am amazed that, after so many years of goofy computer equipment and software, this has become the window into life that, again, TV was supposed to have brought right into our homes.

Another thing about this topic is that this is proof that soft porn has and will always be okay by most of our culture, at least the youthful and the leering segments of it. I think most men like sex, but I also think quite a few of us don't want a daily report on it. Soft porn is prevalent because it is the safest way for pretty girls to make money without losing their whole reputation in a single swish of the hips. The other porn is still an acting career cemetery; a girl that goes there will never enter the "clean" side. No more Traci Lords. Thanks to our TV programming having turned into nothing but dead air, what we have is airwave squatting. If we turn our attention to sports, we see the same thing. The local team games have always been the majority of the games you can watch. Other teams, boxing, etc., all that stuff went on pay per view. Regardless of what these people say about game tickets, the fact is that EVERYONE WHO WANTS TO WATCH THE GAME CANNOT FIT INTO THAT STADIUM. Therefore, they can designate something like a three-hour drive radius from the stadium as a place to watch the game for free. The truth is, the games are expensive. They don't care about attendance. World Series games are usually full.

Anyways. Even though I don't think the content is so bad, I believe that constantly using it for filler---especially by totally uncool people like Bill O'Reilly (and, no, I am not a teenager---it's awful. I hope the FCC starts to drool over the amount of fines they can use against FOX.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

YouPorn
Posted by: apophenia_monkey on Nov 16, 2007 8:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
if YouTube wouldn't take it, then i'm sure YouPorn would...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]