comments_image -

Senior Intelligence Official Wants Americans to Redefine, Expect Less Privacy

Lindsay Beyerstein: This is the worst argument I've heard in a long time.
November 13, 2007  |  
 
Advertisement
 

This post, written by Lindsay Beyerstein, originally appeared on Majikthise

Via Spencer Ackerman at TPM, we learn that the deputy director of national intelligence says that citizens need to redefine privacy:

Privacy no longer can mean anonymity, says Donald Kerr, the principal deputy director of national intelligence. Instead, it should mean that government and businesses properly safeguard people's private communications and financial information.,/blockquote>
Kerr's comments come as Congress is taking a second look at the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. [AP]
Kerr argues that anonymity is outmoded because some people have chosen to disclose some information to some trusted sources:
Millions of people in this country -- particularly young people -- already have surrendered anonymity to social networking sites such as MySpace and Facebook, and to Internet commerce. These sites reveal to the public, government and corporations what was once closely guarded information, like personal statistics and credit card numbers.
"Those two generations younger than we are have a very different idea of what is essential privacy, what they would wish to protect about their lives and affairs. And so, it's not for us to inflict one size fits all," said Kerr, 68. "Protecting anonymity isn't a fight that can be won. Anyone that's typed in their name on Google understands that." [AP]
That's the worst argument I've heard in a long time.People give their personal information to their associates and business partners, just as they've always done. "Give" is the operative word here.

If I choose to disclose my credit card information to an online retailer, it's because I trust them to safeguard that information. The fact that the government and some (other) criminals might steal that information has no bearing on my right to privacy. Stealing is stealing.

Kerr's argument is analogous to the rapist's assertion his victim was "asking for it" because she was out late in a short skirt, or because she enjoyed an active, consensual sex life.

Lindsay Beyerstein a New York writer blogging at Majikthise.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: civil liberties, privacy, rights and liberties
Alternet Special Coverage - Occupy Wall Street
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Disgusting: Racist Fox Commenters Spit Invective Over Whitney Houston's Passing

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Naomi Klein and Joshua Holland Talk the Keystone Pipeline—Take Action Today

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Dallas School Segregates Kids by Gender on Black History Month Field Trip

By PZ Myers | Pharyngula

 
 
Krugman: How Did Conservatism Turn Out This Bad?

By Julianne Escobedo Shepherd | AlterNet

 
 
Wall Street ‘Likely To Set Records’ For Political Spending Aimed At Defeating Obama In 2012

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Fear of Deportation Kept L.A. School’s Parents From Reporting Sex Abuse

By Jorge Rivas | Colorlines

 
 
Awesome Amendment to "Personhood": the "Spilled Semen" Clause

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Could Santorum Win the GOP Nomination?

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Obama Anchors Budget on Tax Hikes for the Rich

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYTimes: The Anti-Government Republican Base is Totally Dependent On Government

By Dartagnan | DailyKos

 
 
 
Reverend Billy Talen
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]