comments_image -

TV Stations Ignore Local Elections: An Update

An update on the Rocky Mountain Media Watch local newscasts story. Local newscasts from across the country faired poorly in their recent coverage of ballot measures and candidates specific to their viewers, according to Rocky Mountain Media Watch. The group found less than 10 percent of stations covered local election issues on evening broadcasts.
April 26, 2000  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Did the public have to cram for the elections like they were one big exam? Did television newscasts ignore elections until the last minute, leaving voters with one less source of information? Rocky Mountain Media Watch (RMMW), a non-profit organization working to "challenge the news media to inform and educate the citizenry" answers yes on both counts. The group claims local newscasts ignored coverage of such issues as ballot measures, city council elections and other regional election information important to their viewers. Of three surveys of broadcasts conducted in September and October, RMMW found local election issues missing from many. During the most recent survey, conducted Oct. 23, almost half of local stations contained no news of local, state and municipal contests. Instead, 61 percent of 173 stations focused attention on the national elections. A survey conducted Oct. 2, revealed 50 of 72 newscasts contained no news of state, municipal and local elections. What's striking is that the number of election stories dropped 50 percent since the first survey while the number of election ads rose 120 percent. While the limited scope of the survey may not represent a particular station's dedication to election coverage on the whole, it is representative of a growing trend of ignoring the issues until it's too late, said RMMW's Executive Director Paul Klite. "The sample across the country speaks for itself," he said. "It averages out. The exact items covered change from day to day, but a snapshot of (all the) pieces gives you a good idea of what's going on. The stations tend to cram it all in at the end, which leads to short term decision making." The assignment editors assume cause and affect relationships with their viewers: they didn't cover the issues because the viewers didn't want the information. "It's typical of stations to blame the public," said Klite. "Obviously, the stations have got to do better."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
AlterNet Radio: What's At Stake in Wisconsin; Real "Defense" Budget Is $1 Trillion; the Right's Phony Race War

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Fox, Breitbart, and Ricketts Try to Bring Back D'Souza's Pseudo-Birtherism

By Steve M | No More Mister Nice Blog

 
 
Activists Speak Out Against Lack of Access to Bradley Manning

By Agence France Presse

 
 
NYPD Catches Sexual Assailant, Then Lets Him Go Free Because He Didn't Feel Like Being Questioned

By Jill F | Feministe

 
 
Gov. Scott Orders Purging of Florida’s Voter Rolls - Just in Time For Prez Election

By Adele Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Abortion Clinics Across Country Put On Alert In Wake of Georgia Clinic Arson Cases

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Former GOP Congresswoman Blasts New GOP Women’s Caucus: ‘They’re Not Voting In Best Interest Of All Women’

By Josh Israel | ThinkProgress

 
 
Debbie Wasserman Schulz is Wrong on Wisconsin

By LaFeminista | DailyKos

 
 
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]