comments_image -

TV Stations Ignore Local Elections: An Update

An update on the Rocky Mountain Media Watch local newscasts story. Local newscasts from across the country faired poorly in their recent coverage of ballot measures and candidates specific to their viewers, according to Rocky Mountain Media Watch. The group found less than 10 percent of stations covered local election issues on evening broadcasts.
April 26, 2000  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Did the public have to cram for the elections like they were one big exam? Did television newscasts ignore elections until the last minute, leaving voters with one less source of information? Rocky Mountain Media Watch (RMMW), a non-profit organization working to "challenge the news media to inform and educate the citizenry" answers yes on both counts. The group claims local newscasts ignored coverage of such issues as ballot measures, city council elections and other regional election information important to their viewers. Of three surveys of broadcasts conducted in September and October, RMMW found local election issues missing from many. During the most recent survey, conducted Oct. 23, almost half of local stations contained no news of local, state and municipal contests. Instead, 61 percent of 173 stations focused attention on the national elections. A survey conducted Oct. 2, revealed 50 of 72 newscasts contained no news of state, municipal and local elections. What's striking is that the number of election stories dropped 50 percent since the first survey while the number of election ads rose 120 percent. While the limited scope of the survey may not represent a particular station's dedication to election coverage on the whole, it is representative of a growing trend of ignoring the issues until it's too late, said RMMW's Executive Director Paul Klite. "The sample across the country speaks for itself," he said. "It averages out. The exact items covered change from day to day, but a snapshot of (all the) pieces gives you a good idea of what's going on. The stations tend to cram it all in at the end, which leads to short term decision making." The assignment editors assume cause and affect relationships with their viewers: they didn't cover the issues because the viewers didn't want the information. "It's typical of stations to blame the public," said Klite. "Obviously, the stations have got to do better."

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox Blames Obama for Manufactured "Gas Crisis," Even After Prices Fall

By Shauna Theel | Media Matters

 
 
Why Did the Associated Press Make an Anti-Choice 'Correction'?

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Minimum Wage Not Enough for a 2-Bedroom Unit in Any State (Unless You Work Way More Than a 40-Hr Week)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board Will Investigate ALEC for Lobbying Violations

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Obama and Targeted Assassinations: Had Secret Kill List, Calls Killing American-Born Cleric "Easy Decision"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Romney Excuse for Birther Trump Endorsement: I'm Running for Office and I Wanna Win!

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Women's Center In New Orleans Destroyed By Arson, Third Incident in the South

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
US Productivity Up, Wages Stagnant

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Scott Walker's Recall Strategy: Avoid Anyone Who Isn't A Walker Voter Already

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Contaminated by Fukishima Reaches US Shores

By Agence France-Presse

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 2 ]