Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Will Digital Books Replace Ink and Paper?

By Clayton Collins, Christian Science Monitor. Posted November 8, 2007.


Even as companies both large and small digitize print, books exhibit a remarkable resilience to the forces of technology.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Clayton Collins

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Caitlin Lyons labors in the towering stacks as bibliophiles trickle into Boston's Brattle Book Shop. Many are repeat customers, here to browse an eclectic collection -- hundreds of thousands of loosely categorized tomes that spill from these two floors onto outdoor shelves in an empty lot.

It's an avalanche of paper, concedes Ms. Lyons, a recent English major with an ecosensitive streak. She acknowledges that this vast inventory, digitized, could shrink dramatically into an easily managed series of reads on a PC, PDA, or some dedicated device's screen. That, she says, would represent a loss. "Way too many things are becoming technological," she says, cradling a fragile-looking hardback copy of Benjamin Disraeli's "Sybil." "A bookshelf and a study? You can't do that on a disc."

Digital evolution has long since swept the audio and video realms, leaving holdout purists clinging to tubes, vinyl, and film. Holding back the broad digitization of books -- besides the special sensory experience they deliver in their traditional form -- has been a spotty digital inventory and the lack of a dominant device for displaying them.

But as habits change and content inventory nears critical mass (Google, to name one prospective repository, is still wrangling with copyright issues), digital books might finally gain a foothold, observers say -- not as a replacement format, but as an alternative delivery system not unlike the audiobook. Both the publishing industry and the reading public appear to be shaking the notion that for the beloved book, digital equals death.

"Around 2000, I think [publishers] thought there was going to be a brave new world and they were going to have a whole new thing, and I think that's part of what went wrong," says Sara Nelson, editor in chief of Publishers Weekly. What's clearer now, she says, is "there will be plenty of niches and plenty of space for books in digital form, not so much as a direct competitor, [but] as an added format."

In fact, digital loomed very large in the book-publishing world back at the beginning of this decade. No less than Bill Gates was referring to paper as a "reading 'technology'" nearing obsolescence. Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Media Lab was dabbling in "electronic ink." Booths at BookExpo America were crammed with devices from firms of all sizes. Partnerships bubbled.

"There was an enormous outpouring of messianism," says Richard Curtis, president of his eponymous literary agency and founder and president of E-Reads, a publisher of both print and electronic books. "In the next five years there was a backlash as the people involved realized that it was far more complicated than they thought -- technically, in terms of digital-rights management, and culturally." Even big firms such as Warner, with its ipublish, were left with little to show for their investments.

Today, more quietly and with adjusted expectations, the push for digital books has been renewed. Sony is tweaking its 10-month-old Portable Reader tablet. Giant book e-tailer Amazon is plotting its own move into digital sales, with a prototype product in testing.

Year-over-year growth at fictionwise.com, a leading digital-books retailer, moved from a fairly flat 20 percent in 2005 to a projected 28 percent this year, according to Steve Pendergrast, a spokesman. His firm markets its own reader: the eBookwise 1150.

"Sony's marketing grows the entire e-book market and gets people thinking about buying a device," Mr. Pendergrast says. "They shop around, and some percentage of them opt for ours instead of theirs."

Nearly half of his firm's e-book sales are now in romance titles, Pendergrast says, a category that was in low single digits as recently as 2004. Other areas likely to be well served, Ms. Nelson and others say: books with perishable information that are candidates for one-time use -- travel books, for example. The advantages are clear.

"There's portability, flexibility," says Mr. Curtis, who allows that he still likes an old-fashioned book before bed. "Can't read the 10-point type [of an e-book]? Bump it up to 12 points. Load 40 books into a device and carry it to Frankfurt or wherever." Still missing, says Curtis, is that "explosive spark" device that will appeal to a fast-fingered generation.

That means a device ripe for iPod ubiquitousness, industry-watchers say -- perhaps an efficient convergence device served by a content aggregator like audiobook giant Audible.com.

It might involve Apple. Last month, HarperCollins announced a pilot project in which samples of more than a dozen fiction titles could be accessed by users of the iPhone. The publisher said the move would gauge demand for a cellphone format. There are other pockets of promise. E Ink, in Cambridge, Mass., for example, has made recent strides in flexible plastic display screens.

Curtis's small, independent firm has persevered since 1998, he says, kept in the game through sales of print books. "Now the [e-book] industry seems to be established on enough of a basis for us to go on," he says. "We're moving forward aggressively."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: books, digital, print, ebook

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Literary Abstinence
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 8, 2007 2:49 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the symptoms of how far our country has fallen is to look at the sales figures for books. Considering the fact that 300 million +/- live in the US, it should take more than a few hundred thousand books to get on the NYT list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An ebook...
Posted by: adp3d on Nov 8, 2007 4:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...costs as much as a hardbound copy, which I prefer. I know writers and publisher deserve a living, but it seems to me that they are placing a premium on digital copies. If they would just reduce the cost, it would make the electronic readers more appealing to me. After all, I can buy a lot of books for $300. Same as music and my iPod by the way, which was given to me as a gift. You can buy a lot of CD's for the price of a iPod.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Economics of ebooks Posted by: chaoslegs
» Apples and Oranges Posted by: IntlDad
» RE: Apples and Oranges Posted by: willymack
Bad Idea
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 8, 2007 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While a digital book may be a perfectly nifty idea in the short term, in the long term it's a perfectly awful idea. Why? Technology, my friends. Technology.

Everyone assumes that the hi-tech world in which we live is here to stay. Oh, perish the thought, my dears! The fact of the matter is that our entire social and economic infrastructure could (and just very well might collapse at any moment - relagating every single one of us into the new Dark Ages. Of what use would your really neat, digital version of My Life, My Loves by Eddie Fisher do you then? I ask you!

A digital or audio book relies on electricity for it to be any good. All paper and ink needs is a candle or the sun.

These new-fangled, electric books may be fine and dandy convenience for some, but should they ever replace the good, old-fashioned analogue way of reading, that would be a tragedy too horrible to even comprehend. Ouch!

Happy reading, kiddies!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
There's No News Like Fake News

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» even worse than that Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: even worser than that Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Bad Idea Posted by: VZEQICVA
» not to mention Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: even worse Posted by: Sushi
» RE: Bad Idea Posted by: Basenjis
» Great Idea Posted by: PeaceLove
» RE: Great Idea Posted by: Sushi
Alas, what would I do with my bookmarks?!
Posted by: ld7440 on Nov 8, 2007 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the premise that books that are time-limited could be converted to a digital format, making them great for travel. But I don't believe that the print medium will ever disappear - nor should it. Although print books do away with alot of trees (seeing as I don't see best sellers printed with recycled paper), they are solid and comforting. And they're so easy to pass along to someone else! Curling up with a good book can never be replaced by curling up with an electronic device. Not only are they expensive, but don't we have enough devices emitting God-only-knows-what kinds of harmful emissions? I'll take my nice, thick softcover Robin Cook novel any day. Anyone up for a trip to the library?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Digital Rights, what will it mean for sharing
Posted by: chaoslegs on Nov 8, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many of you have read a great book? Hopefully all of you. If you really liked the book, did you become annoying to your friends, telling them about it, offering to let them read your copy.

Well besides the issue of not everyone having a ebook reader (assume everyone does), will you be able to loan your data file to that friend or will some book publishing version of RIAA go nuts on you and sue you for stealing their copyrighted material?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dianna Haught
Posted by: avacyn on Nov 8, 2007 8:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I work as a professional back of book indexer. As you can imagine this is a question that comes up a lot for people in my profession. The article completely ignores the cost factor. At $300 (or even at $100) a portable reader is above the budget of many families. Its a rich kid's toy. While there are many good free ebook downloads avaiable, most readers will be forced to pay the a download cost for the books. (I'm NOT against anyone making a profit from the books, I'm just pointing out that some budgets don't have money for books already.) Compare the costs of buying a reader and downloading books the cost to going to the library, or buying from used book stores or borrowing from a friend or groups like Freecycle and it seems like its a step BACKWARDS for literacy. Are schools to provide portable readers for all their students? Who picks up the cost of this? Who is going to be responsible for replacing all the readers when the kids lose them? Many schools are struggling with not having enough books for the kids to share. At least when they buy a book, it is there for any kid to use.

I'm not for any technology that makes it more instead of less difficult for kids to read. Another problem with ebooks, that isn't stated in the article, is that a significant minority of people have trouble processing text off a computer screen as opposed to paper. They can read the words, but have problems processing the meaning - especially when the text covers the whole page rather than is in short sentences like an email would be. I'm not a neurologist so can't give the explanation for this.

In the end, I think there is a place for both ebooks and paper books and that ebooks have their place. But I think we are a long way from replacing paper with ebooks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

E-books- a bad idea
Posted by: SOWILO on Nov 8, 2007 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is another blow in the long line of assaults on the concept of reading for knowledge and culture. First it was Roland Barthes and the Death of the Author, deevaluing the canon of literature and its importance in the weight of Western culture. Now we are going to have the disappearance of the book itself.

All that will be left is the TV and shitty Hollywood corporate movies.

Why don't we just commit cultural suicide?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Save The Books!
Posted by: Maxwell House on Nov 8, 2007 11:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A life without books to hold, books to read and linger over, pages that I can read over and over again, or even skip if they scare me, books to laugh and cry with, books to keep my mind occupied while I dry my hair (I have a lot of hair; no sense wasting that time), books that I can take anywhere, read anywhere, even by the light of a candle if necessary, that is the true definition of Hell for me.

Well, that and four more years of GDub.

Technology is all great and fine in some ways, but how can you improve the simple book? Answer: You can't. It's perfect as it is, so don't screw with it. As for those "technological advances", my niece's school last year chose to "print" their high school yearbooks on CD's, or DVD's or some sort of D. Imagine your senior year yearbooks on a DISC- no signing your friend's books, passing them around in class while you should be studying, no leafing through them casually on the bus with your friends or swooning over the picture of the cute guy in your history class. A few years down the road, technology will change, the disc will go by way of the 8-track, and chances are you won't have a way to view your yeardisc anymore. But your yearBOOK? You can look fondly at those dorky pictures of you and your friends when you thought you were so cool, forevermore.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» When an e-book Posted by: hurricane hugo
Paper books vs e books, Codex vs scrolls
Posted by: CJC on Nov 8, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In its day, c 1st century AD, the development of the codex (book) was a great advancement over the scroll.

Here's what the American Heritage dictionary has to say
"Codex...was the word (used by the Romans) for a little book made of thin wooden strips coated with wax upon which one wrote....The Christians adopted the codex for scriptures used in their liturgy because a codex is easier to handle than a scroll and because one can write on both sides of the parchment."

A book is printed as a codex. A computer screen works like a scroll. Leaving aside other pros and cons what serious reader really prefers a scroll to a codex?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

unwittingly carrying an ebook reader
Posted by: avagee on Nov 8, 2007 1:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many people are carrying the 'breakout ubiquitous device' with them right now - cell phones. Even relatively 'dumb' older phones can be very capable, ultra convenient, book readers. Check out www.booksinmyphone.com for a selection of free public domain downloads.

Right now an mp3 player has the memory to hold a few thousand novels, apparently within 10 years the same amount of money will be able to buy enough memory to hold the library of congress. No one will be able to afford to fill it, but it seems like everyone having access to that scale of information has to be a 'good thing'.

There is some kind of disconnect between what is technically possible and socially desirable and people wanting to make sure they get paid. I see eBook downloads can cost three times what a paperback costs - whats up with that? Why haven't ebooks taken off? Digital Rights Management and 'strange' pricing - it's almost like publishers don't want to go there ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Digital, with conditons
Posted by: Daniel35 on Nov 8, 2007 2:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd go to digital reading in a minute, under certain condition which I think modern technology could easily meet. Of course we should always have many modes of reading, including books, since we're unlikely to ever have economic conditions where everyone can equally or equitably afford the latest gadgets.

Here I'm looking at the technical possibilites. First we should have standard formats so that any and all viewable electronic information that doesn't require specialized input could be viewed on most choices of gadgets with a screen. Second, possibly we could even avoid being distracted by meaningless ads.

Personally I don't want to be limited to having to sit at a desk or carry around something weighing even a couple of pounds, or squint at a tiny screen, holding it in one hand while maybe typing with one finger on a tiny keyboard. My ideal would be a multi-purpose headset terminal for all electronic communications with people, computers, recorders etc. It would include earphones and microphone. The screen(s) would resemble the latest in virtual reality screens, probably two separate screens for 3-D possiblilites. These days they could probably be built into the earpieces of reflective sunglasses, viewed and magnified by the mirrored inner surface of the glasses. A small flexible keyboard, with more functions than large conventional ones, could be worn around the waste, or across the knees when sitting. It's obvius these days that a significant computer could be worn about wherever we choose. I think that such could be had any time we're ready to ask for them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Red herrings everywhere
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 8, 2007 2:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Books may be easier to read, but a little lightweight PDA is easier to carry. I personally love paper rather than a screen. But it doesn't stop me from using ebooks when I cannot transport a book, or when I don't have the work space to support cumbersome volumes. Nothing beats a paperback when backpacking.... although I've used my PDA and a solar charger a few times. Either one works fine. Neither medium is exclusively superior in all cases.

ebooks vs. print books? Nonsense, they both have their role and place. The 'Merkaan obsession with false binaries, absolutist thought, and extremism is utterly pathetic and indicative of the level of illiteracy to which we have all stooped.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Digital reading
Posted by: vertical on Nov 8, 2007 5:52 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Have you ever tried to read an entire book on a video screen? I have, and I can tell you it is a horrible experience. Digital books will never catch on because reading an entire book on a video screen will give people migrane headaches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Digital reading Posted by: YogiBear
Longing to be rid of books
Posted by: annieb on Nov 8, 2007 6:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't wait to get rid of the stacks and stacks of books that fill my house. Five readers with eclectic tastes, nobody uses the library, house looks like a used bookstore. Dust galore. How I would love to store them all on tiny little chips or disks and breathe freely again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Questions
Posted by: anothername on Nov 9, 2007 3:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A quick note on a few more parts of this discussion:

Not everyone can afford books so they frequent this invention called a library. I have yet to hear a discussion of e-books and public lending.

Where are the artists and graphic designers that create book covers? How many people have bought a book either by the cover or even for the cover? How will they fit into an e-book world?

If printed books disappear, will copy editors be even less likely to be employed? I stopped buying books from one publisher about 10 years ago because the preference for saving money over customer appreciation led this publisher to bypass paying somebody to read a book for continuity, spelling, and other errors. (While the frequency of errors was on average one every other page, the real reason I don’t buy from that publisher is the total disdain it has for customers who complain. I met other readers who had complained to the company without positive results.)

Will authors be less likely to concede to editors’ demand for editing? I read one book that was widely awaited. After it was published, many people in the industry were using it as an example of why computers do not make everybody a better writer and why the power of an author’s prior sales does not mean he should not accept the advise of an editor in the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Questions Posted by: PearlJones
FORTY eBooks
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Nov 9, 2007 7:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To navigate Frankfurt? So bored in Frankfurt you need a selection of forty e-books for distraction? Sheesh. Fifty channels and nothin' on TV.

Methinks it's more about some people wanting to say, "I have forty books on my totally cutting-edge eReader, loser." Much like guys used to show off their spankin' new digital watches (Watch this) some thirty years ago.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DIGITAL WORLD
Posted by: Roverton on Nov 12, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One stroke of a bar-magnet and it's back to square one again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ebook printing
Posted by: werewolfy on Nov 15, 2007 3:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being 45 years old, not that old but old enough that print in many books is a touch small for my eyes to read for long times without strain. I like ebooks that allow printing as I can set the font at a decent 12 point for easy reading. Yes I know some books are available in large print but not all and my eyes are not to that point yet.

Many of the ebooks do not allow printing but those that do are a pleasure to read.

With a laser printer the cost to print is not terrible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement