COMMENTS: 37
Will Digital Books Replace Ink and Paper?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
It's an avalanche of paper, concedes Ms. Lyons, a recent English major with an ecosensitive streak. She acknowledges that this vast inventory, digitized, could shrink dramatically into an easily managed series of reads on a PC, PDA, or some dedicated device's screen. That, she says, would represent a loss. "Way too many things are becoming technological," she says, cradling a fragile-looking hardback copy of Benjamin Disraeli's "Sybil." "A bookshelf and a study? You can't do that on a disc."
Digital evolution has long since swept the audio and video realms, leaving holdout purists clinging to tubes, vinyl, and film. Holding back the broad digitization of books -- besides the special sensory experience they deliver in their traditional form -- has been a spotty digital inventory and the lack of a dominant device for displaying them.
But as habits change and content inventory nears critical mass (Google, to name one prospective repository, is still wrangling with copyright issues), digital books might finally gain a foothold, observers say -- not as a replacement format, but as an alternative delivery system not unlike the audiobook. Both the publishing industry and the reading public appear to be shaking the notion that for the beloved book, digital equals death.
"Around 2000, I think [publishers] thought there was going to be a brave new world and they were going to have a whole new thing, and I think that's part of what went wrong," says Sara Nelson, editor in chief of Publishers Weekly. What's clearer now, she says, is "there will be plenty of niches and plenty of space for books in digital form, not so much as a direct competitor, [but] as an added format."
In fact, digital loomed very large in the book-publishing world back at the beginning of this decade. No less than Bill Gates was referring to paper as a "reading 'technology'" nearing obsolescence. Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Media Lab was dabbling in "electronic ink." Booths at BookExpo America were crammed with devices from firms of all sizes. Partnerships bubbled.
"There was an enormous outpouring of messianism," says Richard Curtis, president of his eponymous literary agency and founder and president of E-Reads, a publisher of both print and electronic books. "In the next five years there was a backlash as the people involved realized that it was far more complicated than they thought -- technically, in terms of digital-rights management, and culturally." Even big firms such as Warner, with its ipublish, were left with little to show for their investments.
Today, more quietly and with adjusted expectations, the push for digital books has been renewed. Sony is tweaking its 10-month-old Portable Reader tablet. Giant book e-tailer Amazon is plotting its own move into digital sales, with a prototype product in testing.
Year-over-year growth at fictionwise.com, a leading digital-books retailer, moved from a fairly flat 20 percent in 2005 to a projected 28 percent this year, according to Steve Pendergrast, a spokesman. His firm markets its own reader: the eBookwise 1150.
"Sony's marketing grows the entire e-book market and gets people thinking about buying a device," Mr. Pendergrast says. "They shop around, and some percentage of them opt for ours instead of theirs."
Nearly half of his firm's e-book sales are now in romance titles, Pendergrast says, a category that was in low single digits as recently as 2004. Other areas likely to be well served, Ms. Nelson and others say: books with perishable information that are candidates for one-time use -- travel books, for example. The advantages are clear.
"There's portability, flexibility," says Mr. Curtis, who allows that he still likes an old-fashioned book before bed. "Can't read the 10-point type [of an e-book]? Bump it up to 12 points. Load 40 books into a device and carry it to Frankfurt or wherever." Still missing, says Curtis, is that "explosive spark" device that will appeal to a fast-fingered generation.
That means a device ripe for iPod ubiquitousness, industry-watchers say -- perhaps an efficient convergence device served by a content aggregator like audiobook giant Audible.com.
It might involve Apple. Last month, HarperCollins announced a pilot project in which samples of more than a dozen fiction titles could be accessed by users of the iPhone. The publisher said the move would gauge demand for a cellphone format. There are other pockets of promise. E Ink, in Cambridge, Mass., for example, has made recent strides in flexible plastic display screens.
Curtis's small, independent firm has persevered since 1998, he says, kept in the game through sales of print books. "Now the [e-book] industry seems to be established on enough of a basis for us to go on," he says. "We're moving forward aggressively."
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 8, 2007 2:49 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Because we all read the same books? And don't go to libraries?
Posted by: chaoslegs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adp3d on Nov 8, 2007 4:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And the production costs for Ebooks...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Economics of ebooks
Posted by: chaoslegs
» Apples and Oranges
Posted by: IntlDad
» RE: Apples and Oranges
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 8, 2007 4:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone assumes that the hi-tech world in which we live is here to stay. Oh, perish the thought, my dears! The fact of the matter is that our entire social and economic infrastructure could (and just very well might collapse at any moment - relagating every single one of us into the new Dark Ages. Of what use would your really neat, digital version of My Life, My Loves by Eddie Fisher do you then? I ask you!
A digital or audio book relies on electricity for it to be any good. All paper and ink needs is a candle or the sun.
These new-fangled, electric books may be fine and dandy convenience for some, but should they ever replace the good, old-fashioned analogue way of reading, that would be a tragedy too horrible to even comprehend. Ouch!
Happy reading, kiddies!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
There's No News Like Fake News
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Then, of course, there is the problem of hardware and software shelf-lives...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» even worse than that
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: even worser than that
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Bad Idea
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» not to mention
Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: even worse
Posted by: Sushi
» RE: Bad Idea
Posted by: Basenjis
» Great Idea
Posted by: PeaceLove
» RE: Great Idea
Posted by: Sushi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ld7440 on Nov 8, 2007 6:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chaoslegs on Nov 8, 2007 7:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well besides the issue of not everyone having a ebook reader (assume everyone does), will you be able to loan your data file to that friend or will some book publishing version of RIAA go nuts on you and sue you for stealing their copyrighted material?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Digital Rights, what will it mean for sharing
Posted by: juanpecan81
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avacyn on Nov 8, 2007 8:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not for any technology that makes it more instead of less difficult for kids to read. Another problem with ebooks, that isn't stated in the article, is that a significant minority of people have trouble processing text off a computer screen as opposed to paper. They can read the words, but have problems processing the meaning - especially when the text covers the whole page rather than is in short sentences like an email would be. I'm not a neurologist so can't give the explanation for this.
In the end, I think there is a place for both ebooks and paper books and that ebooks have their place. But I think we are a long way from replacing paper with ebooks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SOWILO on Nov 8, 2007 10:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All that will be left is the TV and shitty Hollywood corporate movies.
Why don't we just commit cultural suicide?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Maxwell House on Nov 8, 2007 11:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, that and four more years of GDub.
Technology is all great and fine in some ways, but how can you improve the simple book? Answer: You can't. It's perfect as it is, so don't screw with it. As for those "technological advances", my niece's school last year chose to "print" their high school yearbooks on CD's, or DVD's or some sort of D. Imagine your senior year yearbooks on a DISC- no signing your friend's books, passing them around in class while you should be studying, no leafing through them casually on the bus with your friends or swooning over the picture of the cute guy in your history class. A few years down the road, technology will change, the disc will go by way of the 8-track, and chances are you won't have a way to view your yeardisc anymore. But your yearBOOK? You can look fondly at those dorky pictures of you and your friends when you thought you were so cool, forevermore.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» When an e-book
Posted by: hurricane hugo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CJC on Nov 8, 2007 11:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's what the American Heritage dictionary has to say
"Codex...was the word (used by the Romans) for a little book made of thin wooden strips coated with wax upon which one wrote....The Christians adopted the codex for scriptures used in their liturgy because a codex is easier to handle than a scroll and because one can write on both sides of the parchment."
A book is printed as a codex. A computer screen works like a scroll. Leaving aside other pros and cons what serious reader really prefers a scroll to a codex?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avagee on Nov 8, 2007 1:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now an mp3 player has the memory to hold a few thousand novels, apparently within 10 years the same amount of money will be able to buy enough memory to hold the library of congress. No one will be able to afford to fill it, but it seems like everyone having access to that scale of information has to be a 'good thing'.
There is some kind of disconnect between what is technically possible and socially desirable and people wanting to make sure they get paid. I see eBook downloads can cost three times what a paperback costs - whats up with that? Why haven't ebooks taken off? Digital Rights Management and 'strange' pricing - it's almost like publishers don't want to go there ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daniel35 on Nov 8, 2007 2:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here I'm looking at the technical possibilites. First we should have standard formats so that any and all viewable electronic information that doesn't require specialized input could be viewed on most choices of gadgets with a screen. Second, possibly we could even avoid being distracted by meaningless ads.
Personally I don't want to be limited to having to sit at a desk or carry around something weighing even a couple of pounds, or squint at a tiny screen, holding it in one hand while maybe typing with one finger on a tiny keyboard. My ideal would be a multi-purpose headset terminal for all electronic communications with people, computers, recorders etc. It would include earphones and microphone. The screen(s) would resemble the latest in virtual reality screens, probably two separate screens for 3-D possiblilites. These days they could probably be built into the earpieces of reflective sunglasses, viewed and magnified by the mirrored inner surface of the glasses. A small flexible keyboard, with more functions than large conventional ones, could be worn around the waste, or across the knees when sitting. It's obvius these days that a significant computer could be worn about wherever we choose. I think that such could be had any time we're ready to ask for them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 8, 2007 2:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ebooks vs. print books? Nonsense, they both have their role and place. The 'Merkaan obsession with false binaries, absolutist thought, and extremism is utterly pathetic and indicative of the level of illiteracy to which we have all stooped.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ed herrings everywhere
Posted by: EJ
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vertical on Nov 8, 2007 5:52 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Digital reading
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: annieb on Nov 8, 2007 6:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anothername on Nov 9, 2007 3:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not everyone can afford books so they frequent this invention called a library. I have yet to hear a discussion of e-books and public lending.
Where are the artists and graphic designers that create book covers? How many people have bought a book either by the cover or even for the cover? How will they fit into an e-book world?
If printed books disappear, will copy editors be even less likely to be employed? I stopped buying books from one publisher about 10 years ago because the preference for saving money over customer appreciation led this publisher to bypass paying somebody to read a book for continuity, spelling, and other errors. (While the frequency of errors was on average one every other page, the real reason I don’t buy from that publisher is the total disdain it has for customers who complain. I met other readers who had complained to the company without positive results.)
Will authors be less likely to concede to editors’ demand for editing? I read one book that was widely awaited. After it was published, many people in the industry were using it as an example of why computers do not make everybody a better writer and why the power of an author’s prior sales does not mean he should not accept the advise of an editor in the future.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Questions
Posted by: PearlJones
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Nov 9, 2007 7:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Methinks it's more about some people wanting to say, "I have forty books on my totally cutting-edge eReader, loser." Much like guys used to show off their spankin' new digital watches (Watch this) some thirty years ago.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Roverton on Nov 12, 2007 8:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: werewolfy on Nov 15, 2007 3:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of the ebooks do not allow printing but those that do are a pleasure to read.
With a laser printer the cost to print is not terrible.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NoPCZone on Nov 8, 2007 2:49 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Because we all read the same books? And don't go to libraries?
Posted by: chaoslegs
Comments are closed-
Posted by: adp3d on Nov 8, 2007 4:03 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» And the production costs for Ebooks...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» RE: Economics of ebooks
Posted by: chaoslegs
» Apples and Oranges
Posted by: IntlDad
» RE: Apples and Oranges
Posted by: willymack
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Tom Degan on Nov 8, 2007 4:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone assumes that the hi-tech world in which we live is here to stay. Oh, perish the thought, my dears! The fact of the matter is that our entire social and economic infrastructure could (and just very well might collapse at any moment - relagating every single one of us into the new Dark Ages. Of what use would your really neat, digital version of My Life, My Loves by Eddie Fisher do you then? I ask you!
A digital or audio book relies on electricity for it to be any good. All paper and ink needs is a candle or the sun.
These new-fangled, electric books may be fine and dandy convenience for some, but should they ever replace the good, old-fashioned analogue way of reading, that would be a tragedy too horrible to even comprehend. Ouch!
Happy reading, kiddies!
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
There's No News Like Fake News
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Then, of course, there is the problem of hardware and software shelf-lives...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd
» even worse than that
Posted by: frantaylor
» RE: even worser than that
Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Bad Idea
Posted by: VZEQICVA
» not to mention
Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: even worse
Posted by: Sushi
» RE: Bad Idea
Posted by: Basenjis
» Great Idea
Posted by: PeaceLove
» RE: Great Idea
Posted by: Sushi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: ld7440 on Nov 8, 2007 6:56 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chaoslegs on Nov 8, 2007 7:35 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well besides the issue of not everyone having a ebook reader (assume everyone does), will you be able to loan your data file to that friend or will some book publishing version of RIAA go nuts on you and sue you for stealing their copyrighted material?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Digital Rights, what will it mean for sharing
Posted by: juanpecan81
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avacyn on Nov 8, 2007 8:56 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not for any technology that makes it more instead of less difficult for kids to read. Another problem with ebooks, that isn't stated in the article, is that a significant minority of people have trouble processing text off a computer screen as opposed to paper. They can read the words, but have problems processing the meaning - especially when the text covers the whole page rather than is in short sentences like an email would be. I'm not a neurologist so can't give the explanation for this.
In the end, I think there is a place for both ebooks and paper books and that ebooks have their place. But I think we are a long way from replacing paper with ebooks.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: SOWILO on Nov 8, 2007 10:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All that will be left is the TV and shitty Hollywood corporate movies.
Why don't we just commit cultural suicide?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Maxwell House on Nov 8, 2007 11:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, that and four more years of GDub.
Technology is all great and fine in some ways, but how can you improve the simple book? Answer: You can't. It's perfect as it is, so don't screw with it. As for those "technological advances", my niece's school last year chose to "print" their high school yearbooks on CD's, or DVD's or some sort of D. Imagine your senior year yearbooks on a DISC- no signing your friend's books, passing them around in class while you should be studying, no leafing through them casually on the bus with your friends or swooning over the picture of the cute guy in your history class. A few years down the road, technology will change, the disc will go by way of the 8-track, and chances are you won't have a way to view your yeardisc anymore. But your yearBOOK? You can look fondly at those dorky pictures of you and your friends when you thought you were so cool, forevermore.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» When an e-book
Posted by: hurricane hugo
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CJC on Nov 8, 2007 11:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's what the American Heritage dictionary has to say
"Codex...was the word (used by the Romans) for a little book made of thin wooden strips coated with wax upon which one wrote....The Christians adopted the codex for scriptures used in their liturgy because a codex is easier to handle than a scroll and because one can write on both sides of the parchment."
A book is printed as a codex. A computer screen works like a scroll. Leaving aside other pros and cons what serious reader really prefers a scroll to a codex?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: avagee on Nov 8, 2007 1:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Right now an mp3 player has the memory to hold a few thousand novels, apparently within 10 years the same amount of money will be able to buy enough memory to hold the library of congress. No one will be able to afford to fill it, but it seems like everyone having access to that scale of information has to be a 'good thing'.
There is some kind of disconnect between what is technically possible and socially desirable and people wanting to make sure they get paid. I see eBook downloads can cost three times what a paperback costs - whats up with that? Why haven't ebooks taken off? Digital Rights Management and 'strange' pricing - it's almost like publishers don't want to go there ...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Daniel35 on Nov 8, 2007 2:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here I'm looking at the technical possibilites. First we should have standard formats so that any and all viewable electronic information that doesn't require specialized input could be viewed on most choices of gadgets with a screen. Second, possibly we could even avoid being distracted by meaningless ads.
Personally I don't want to be limited to having to sit at a desk or carry around something weighing even a couple of pounds, or squint at a tiny screen, holding it in one hand while maybe typing with one finger on a tiny keyboard. My ideal would be a multi-purpose headset terminal for all electronic communications with people, computers, recorders etc. It would include earphones and microphone. The screen(s) would resemble the latest in virtual reality screens, probably two separate screens for 3-D possiblilites. These days they could probably be built into the earpieces of reflective sunglasses, viewed and magnified by the mirrored inner surface of the glasses. A small flexible keyboard, with more functions than large conventional ones, could be worn around the waste, or across the knees when sitting. It's obvius these days that a significant computer could be worn about wherever we choose. I think that such could be had any time we're ready to ask for them.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DaBear on Nov 8, 2007 2:04 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ebooks vs. print books? Nonsense, they both have their role and place. The 'Merkaan obsession with false binaries, absolutist thought, and extremism is utterly pathetic and indicative of the level of illiteracy to which we have all stooped.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ed herrings everywhere
Posted by: EJ
Comments are closed-
Posted by: vertical on Nov 8, 2007 5:52 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Digital reading
Posted by: YogiBear
Comments are closed-
Posted by: annieb on Nov 8, 2007 6:46 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: anothername on Nov 9, 2007 3:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not everyone can afford books so they frequent this invention called a library. I have yet to hear a discussion of e-books and public lending.
Where are the artists and graphic designers that create book covers? How many people have bought a book either by the cover or even for the cover? How will they fit into an e-book world?
If printed books disappear, will copy editors be even less likely to be employed? I stopped buying books from one publisher about 10 years ago because the preference for saving money over customer appreciation led this publisher to bypass paying somebody to read a book for continuity, spelling, and other errors. (While the frequency of errors was on average one every other page, the real reason I don’t buy from that publisher is the total disdain it has for customers who complain. I met other readers who had complained to the company without positive results.)
Will authors be less likely to concede to editors’ demand for editing? I read one book that was widely awaited. After it was published, many people in the industry were using it as an example of why computers do not make everybody a better writer and why the power of an author’s prior sales does not mean he should not accept the advise of an editor in the future.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Questions
Posted by: PearlJones
Comments are closed-
Posted by: VannaLaRoche on Nov 9, 2007 7:38 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Methinks it's more about some people wanting to say, "I have forty books on my totally cutting-edge eReader, loser." Much like guys used to show off their spankin' new digital watches (Watch this) some thirty years ago.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Roverton on Nov 12, 2007 8:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: werewolfy on Nov 15, 2007 3:11 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Many of the ebooks do not allow printing but those that do are a pleasure to read.
With a laser printer the cost to print is not terrible.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




