comments_image -

White House Withholding 600 pages of Abramoff Docs

Steve Benen: Rep. Waxman has told the White House it has two choices: claim executive privilege or fork over the docs.
November 1, 2007  |  
 
Advertisement
 

This post, written by Steve Benen, originally appeared on The Carpetbagger Report

Nearly two years ago, then-White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan promised the press corps that a "thorough report" would be released "very soon" documenting contacts betwen the White House and disgraced GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff. Not surprisingly, that never actually happened. The Bush gang thought they could just stall, reporters would eventually stop asking, and the scandal would eventually go away. Sure enough, that wasn't a bad strategy, at least as far as cover-ups go.

Of course, the questions never actually went away, they just hibernated thanks to a Republican Congress that had a philosophical objection to oversight. Roll Call reports today that the questions are making a comeback.

House Oversight and Government Reform Chairman Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) is demanding hundreds of pages of documents from the White House that he says indicate the depths of contacts between Bush administration officials and disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff.
In an Oct. 31 letter to White House counsel Fred Fielding, Waxman said the White House has released to the committee 3,700 pages of documents detailing Abramoff's contacts with the White House, but has refused to release about 600 pages that, according to the White House, "contain internal deliberations among White House employees, or that otherwise implicate Executive Branch prerogatives."
Waxman said the committee's investigation thus far indicates that "some senior White House officials had regular contact with Mr. Abramoff," and his letter demands production of the documents by Nov. 6.
Waxman has told the White House it basically has two choices: claim executive privilege or fork over the docs.

As Paul Kiel noted, Waxman added a sardonic little quip in his correspondence with the White House counsel's office: "Given the prior statements by White House officials, it is surprising that there would be this volume of documents of internal deliberations involving Mr. Abramoff."

Kiel added a helpful primer, for those rusty on the details and most recent revelations.

Steve Benen is a freelance writer/researcher and creator of The Carpetbagger Report. In addition, he is the lead editor of Salon.com's Blog Report, and has been a contributor to Talking Points Memo, Washington Monthly, Crooks & Liars, The American Prospect, and the Guardian.
submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
See more stories tagged with: bush administration, abramoff, waxman
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Pro-Coal Group Pays People to Wear Its Shirts at EPA Hearing

By Heather Moyer | Sierra Club

 
 
Kids Inundate NY Governor With Concerns About Fracking

By Seth Gladstone | Food and Water Watch

 
 
Shareholders, Top Doctors Demand McDonald's Assess its Health Impacts

By Sara Deon | Civil Eats

 
 
Republicans Block NY Minimum Wage Increase That Would Give 880,000 Workers a Raise

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Why Don't TV Meteorologists Believe in Climate Change?

By Katherine Bagley, | Inside Climate News

 
 
New Book Says Teenage Obama Was a Huge Pot Head -- So Why Won't He Legalize It for the Rest of Us?!

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Pew Poll Finds Clean Energy Is A Political Wedge Issue for Republicans

By Stephen Lacey | Climate Progress

 
 
Mitt 'Not Concerned with the Very Poor' Romney Visits West Philly, Gets Lesson in Keeping it Real

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Corporate Media Stokes Racial Angst in Election Coverage

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
5 Things to Know About the Paycheck Fairness Act (The Next Big Legislative Battle for Women)

By Annie-Rose Strasser | Think Progress

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]