Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Man From Plains: The Film That Might Make Jimmy Carter a Movie Star

By Adam Howard, AlterNet. Posted November 5, 2007.


Man From Plains is a moving, redemptive portrait of a president and a presidency that has been unfairly maligned and reduced to a punchline for far too long.
Man From Plains trailer

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Adam Howard

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

There's a memorable moment in Man From Plains, the acclaimed new documentary starring former President Jimmy Carter, that takes place on a commercial airplane. In the middle of the flight, Carter makes his way down the aisle, greeting and shaking the passengers' hands. The audience in the theater thinks this scene will quickly dissolve or that Carter will eventually go from recognizing each person to simply waving. But instead the camera lingers long enough to show that Carter intends to meet every single passenger on the plane. They seem stunned, flattered and elated that such an important man would take the time out just to say hello.

Earlier in the film, as Carter watches one of the interns from the Carter Center deliver a speech, his face beams with his trademark toothy grin. When she finishes and Carter reaches the podium, he begins to tear up as he thanks the interns, genuinely moved by their enthusiasm and dedication to the causes he holds dear.

Man From Plains is filled with touching, lovely scenes such as these, and the film succeeds best when it attempts to be a character study of Carter. Directed by Academy Award winner Jonathan Demme (The Silence of the Lambs, Philadelphia), the film follows Carter during his media tour for his infamous 2006 book Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. The film touches on the uproar the book's title caused and the former president's passionate feelings about the crisis between Israel and Palestine. It also weaves together anecdotes and footage from Carter's triumph at the Camp David Accords in 1978.

Although the exploration of the book tour encompasses the majority of the film's languid two-hour-plus running time, it is probably the least interesting thing about it. Carter endures interview after interview where the host questioning him has clearly not even read his book and must repeatedly offer explanations for the presence of the word "apartheid" in the title. The protesters who mock him outside book signings are often grotesque in their ignorance, and the film does a good job of investigating how simply trying to open a dialogue on this subject has now become controversial.

All in all, Demme's film doesn't delve much deeper into the content of the book than the superficial cable news shows already have. We see that Carter has the best of intentions, and we get a sense that his book makes a simple, reasonable plea for an end to violence and an Israeli withdrawal from Palestinian territory, but there is little new light shed on the subject of the crisis or the substance of the book. Carter makes a strong point of how there have been no peace talks between Israel and Palestine since Bush took office and how "not many people care about that, but I do." But, for the most part, the movie only soars when the focus is on the remarkable post-presidential life of Carter and not the polarizing subject of Israel and Palestine, which he boldly chose to take on.

The footage from and about the 1978 Camp David Accords is particularly engrossing. Rosalyn Carter shares a fascinating anecdote about how some personally autographed photos Carter gave Begin for his grandkids helped change the then-Israeli prime minister's mind about signing a peace agreement with Egypt. We also catch glimpses of Carter being ahead of the curve on energy issues, and we see how his gentle sense of humor endears him to everyone from celebrity talk show hosts to little kids.

In the 2006 through 2007 footage, what comes across is Carter's sincerity, tenacity and basic humanity. Whether playfully flirting with a makeup girl on the Tavis Smiley Show or building a house for a displaced group of musicians from New Orleans, he is a lovable and inspiring presence throughout the proceedings.

Man From Plains lacks the urgency and passion of, say, An Inconvenient Truth, and it lacks the jaw-dropping revelations of Michael Moore's Sicko. What it does have is a moving, redemptive portrait of a president and a presidency that has been unfairly maligned and reduced to a punchline for far too long. Few could see this film and its beautiful montage in the finale -- which takes you from Plains, Ga., to Ghana and other places all over the globe where Carter has done great work -- and not leave feeling that he is a patriotic, sensitive and humane man.

Man From Plains opened on Oct. 26 in select cities.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: israel, film, movies, palestine, middle east, jimmy carter, demme, man from plains

Adam Howard is the editor of PEEK.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Jimmy Carter wins.....the worst president ever award
Posted by: pammers on Nov 5, 2007 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our hostages were held for 444 days by Iran. Imagine being held in captivity for over a year, while the president does nothing. Reagan becomes president and tells the Iranians what he plans to do ( and they know he will) and the hostages released in a matter of days.

Worst inflation during the Carter years. Lines to get gasoline if it was available at all. Yes. Jimmy Carter, the worst.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Buffoon Posted by: LMNOP
» Final Solution? Posted by: Iconoclast421
» AIDS dementia speaks up? Posted by: LMNOP
» guilt you Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Reagan the worst! Posted by: peacelf
» RE: Reagan the worst! Posted by: Iconoclast421
A Far Better President than the One We Have Now
Posted by: ProgressiveManiac on Nov 5, 2007 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course that's not saying much - the one we have now is a strong contender for being the worst President ever.

However, Jimmy Carter always got press coverage that was worse than he deserved. He was the first President that I recall ever getting the kind of ridicule that later followed Clinton through his two terms. The press hounded him about silly little things like the attack rabbit and the lust in his heart and they criticized him about more serious issues like being too much involved in the details of his job as President.

In retrospect, it seems like the right-wing attack machine was just getting started with Jimmy Carter and were using him as their first punching bag. They've gotten better at it with Clinton, Gore and Kerry, but the public has also become more aware of the unfair treatment that Democrats get from the media.

And now the public is more aware that holding the hostages until Carter was out of office was something orchestrated by Republicans (specifically by George Sr.). Surprise, within hours of Regan taking office, Iran releases the hostages and months later arms shipments are made to Iran. Just a coincidence, of course.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jimmy then and now!
Posted by: peacelf on Nov 5, 2007 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Carter's administration was wrought with economic and political problems, but he was the only president who made peace in the Middle East. Where would we be if that peace had lasted?

peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Inconvenient Truth, the Prequil
Posted by: Urstrly on Nov 5, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If we had listened to Jimmy Carter and gotten serious about reducing our dependency on foreign oil, investing in alternate sources of energy and cutting our consumption, the icecaps would not be melting. Instead, we galloped through the eighties colluding with Ronald Reagan to redistribute our wealth to the rich and turning out bigger and bigger SUVs so that the rest of us could pretend to be rich. Not even Bill Clinton would sign on to the Kyoto agreements for fear of restricting our economic expansion, and then we put two oilmen in the White House. Not only did they start a war for oil in Iraq, they got the blessing of the Supreme Court to meet in secret with the oil companies, so I suppose you might say they were "successful."

Jimmy Carter has the personality of an engineer, not a politician; he looked at the facts and reported what he saw. No sugar-coating. No waffling. No back-peddling. I think we failed him, and ourselves, because we are such suckers for smooth talkers who will tell us what we want to hear.

Carter seems to have mellowed over the years, and he certainly hasn't stopped working for what he believes. He's a kind of throw-back to Teddy Roosevelt, and we'll miss him when he's gone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carter funded hill tribes against Kabul 6 months before Soviets entered Afghanistan
Posted by: jayjanson on Nov 5, 2007 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As was to be expected, there was no mention of President Carter having secretly funded, armed and trained the fundamentalist hill tribes, attacking a modern women emancipating government in Kabul, in order to sucker the Soviets into entering Afghanistan SIX MONTHS LATER, AS BRZEZINSKI would later BRAG to a French Newspaper. (See 'Le Nouvel Observateur' interview attached at bottom)

President Carter's heartless criminally homicidal secret attack on a small friendly nation's government using ethnic and religious divisions to foment civil war goes unprosecuted. Our presidential CIA government is above all laws, treaties, and our own constitution.

Basic blood is always on the hands of media persons. Without the public's deception the insanity of greed and war on vulnerable nations could not take place.
jay janson
---------------------
Interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski U.S. President Carter's National Security Adviser

By 'Le Nouvel Observateur' (France), Jan 15-21, 1998, p. 76. Note: There are at least two editions of 'Le Nouvel Observateur.' With the exception of the U.S. Library of Congress, the version sent to the United States did not include the Brzezinski interview.

Question: The former director of the CIA, Robert Gates, stated in his memoirs ["From the Shadows"], that American intelligence services began to aid the Mujahadeen in Afghanistan 6 months before the Soviet intervention. In this period you were the national security adviser to President Carter. You therefore played a role in this affair. Is that correct?

Brzezinski: Yes. According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise: Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I wrote a note to the president in which I explained to him that in my opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention."
---------------------------
google "Brzezinski brags" and 26 pages of articles come up.
Carter began this fundamentalist cycle of violence as a cold war weapon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thanks Adam
Posted by: wawa on Nov 5, 2007 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You wrote a refreshing article and I most appreciate your insight:

"the uproar the book's title caused and the former president's passionate feelings about the crisis between Israel and Palestine.....Carter endures interview after interview where the host questioning him has clearly not even read his book and must repeatedly offer explanations for the presence of the word "apartheid" in the title. The protesters who mock him outside book signings are often grotesque in their ignorance, and the film does a good job of investigating how simply trying to open a dialogue on this subject has now become controversial."


Having been to Israel Palestine 5 times since June 2005, it is APARTHEID; which is the Afrikaan word
SEPARATION is the English and
HAFRADA is the Hebrew and

THE WALL is called the HAFRADA WALL by Israelis,

And THE WALL has been deemed illegal by the International Court of Justice and must come down for it does not follow the Green Line and;

We American TAXPAYERS contibute 1.25 million per mile to SEPARATE Palestinians from Palestinians, divide them from their land, families, resources and holy sites.

There are also over 100,000 Arab Israelis living in 100 UNRECOGNIZED Villages in Israel.

They did not flee in 1948 and have been given Israeli citizenship-but NOT EQUAL RIGHTS!

They pay taxes yet receive NO electric, water, education facilities.

Not long ago on these shores insurgents rose up because of taxation without representation.

e

Eileen Fleming, Reporter and Editor
Http://www.wearewideawake.org/
Author "Keep Hope Alive" and "Memoirs of a Nice Irish American 'Girl's' Life in Occupied Territory"
Producer "30 Minutes With Vanunu."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jimmy Carter was a good president and a good man
Posted by: zooeyhall on Nov 5, 2007 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is so good to finally see Jimmy Carter getting the historical rehabilitation he deserves. All I know is that graduating from high school in 1973 there were jobs and economic security for the middle class and just a much better and humane attitude in society and government. When Reagan got elected, everything went downhill from there. And I mean for the ordinary people and the weak and those in need. For those who supported Reagen and now the Bushites things went great. And I am talking about the buisiness people, the money people, the COC types, the NAM members, and just generally those who have a ruthless social and economic Darwinist attitude and world-view.

I remember Rosalynn Carter remarking, about 2 years into Reagen's presidency, with an observation I will never forget. She said that Reagen made it OK to despise the poor, to be unapologetic about greed, and to be selfish.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very Well Stated Posted by: MeridaLady
Yes and no - let's not get carried away here
Posted by: war_on_tara on Nov 5, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the BIG problems with George W. Bush as president is his sophomoric emphasis on personal diplomacy - "I looked into Putin's eyes" & that sort of crap. Carter had exactly the same problem! True, he had better results with Begin & Sadat. He was lucky (so were we) but no more than lucky, I suspect.

I'm sure Carter is a charming & gracious man to anyone he meets. A relative of mine met him and it was like the airplane scene in this movie. And that goes as far as the "who'd you rather have a beer with" reason certain people voted for Bush over Gore or Kerry. This sort of swooning is equally as idiotic with politicians whose policies progressives generally agree with, as it is with politicians whose policies are monstrous.

Carter followed Kissinger's disastrous advice and let the Shah in... funded the Mujahadeen & essentially founded the Taliban... deregulated the airlines (something most here, I bet, would blame on Reagan)... Carter was a decent president domestically and a disastrous one in foreign policy, with the shining exception of the Egypt-Israel peace treaty.

True, Carter was a much, much better president overall than Reagan turned out to be... but since the 1980 election turned on the Iran hostage crisis, which was entirely of Carter's own making, it is unfair to blame the voters (as many posters here are doing! without even realizing it!) for supposedly wanting Reaganomics. I thought at the time that if only Iran were out of the picture, the voters would have tolerated the rather ordinary recession long enough to re-elect Carter.

Having said all that, I realize I've enjoyed all of Jonathan Demme's movies and will undoubtedly see this one! Maybe it'll lighten my view of Carter a bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Judged Harshly, and Unjustly
Posted by: Andie927 on Nov 5, 2007 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love Jimmy Carter, and always have. I just always thought he was to "good" of a human being, to be President. Sad but true, in the world we live in, doing your best, and trying to do what's right isn't 'good enough'. Not with the dirty, deceiptful politics of the Right-Wing slim machine!

I've read, and heard from many sources, but never from Pres. Carter, that it was the behind the scene workings of people like Bush 1, Rumsfeld, Cheney that caused the Hostages to be held so long! Just coincidence that were released as soon as Reagan was elected? Carter was handed a mess, a post war debt/economy and made the best of it! The Repugs. are setting-up the next Democratic President for all the same pitfalls.

Look at all the 'Good Works' Carter has done since he's gotten out of office! That says a lot about the man.
What did Reagan, Ford, and Bush 1 do for anyone, after their terms in office were up??? Play golf, and raise money for the party? I don't want to hear about Clinton, he was a Blue Dog not a Democrat in my opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You go Jimmy!
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Nov 5, 2007 8:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am glad to see jimmy Carter finally getting some good publicity. I have long felt that he has been unfairly maligned by idiots like the first poster who don't have a clue.

all the other commenters have done a great job of setting the record straight.

The only thing I can add is that jimmy Carter had a solar water system installed in the white house and Ronald R. had it taken out. nuff said.

linked test

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You go Jimmy! Posted by: jrobertclark
Carter's problem was that he talked too much
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Nov 5, 2007 8:55 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He had absolutely no sense of politics, what to say and what not to say. He had a lot in common with Herbert Hoover who was an "intelligent engineer" but who could have had better political sense. Carter clearly suffered from foot-in-mouth disease.

Carter also got himself involved in trivial issues that should have been left to subordinates.

Reagan, in contrast, understood political speech and the art of staying out of political minutia. Having said that, there's no doubt that Carter was much smarter than Reagan or the two Bush Presidents, and that he probably had a clearer image of world problems than any of those three. If he had been a cross between Reagan the politician and Carter the political thinker, he would have had a much more sucessful Presidency.

In contrast, our present Idiot-in-Chief seems to have virtually no skills as a President!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He's the Real Deal
Posted by: Libertine on Nov 5, 2007 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I cast my first vote as an eighteen year old in 1976 for Jimmy Carter and again in 1980. 30+ years later, I still believe that I did the right thing.

Unlike many politicians today who wrap themselves with the mantle of piety in order to gain the support of the conservative religious right, Carter has been a practicing Christian his entire life. And, also unlike most of today's political Christians, his faith influenced him to take liberal positions: for peace, for women's rights, for racial equality, for gay rights, to help the poor, and so on. He doesn't just talk the talk; he walks the walk -- he's the real deal.

To further give a clue into Carter's character, about ten years ago, I was working for a company that was situated right by an exit to an Interstate highway. One of my coworkers had gone next door to McDonald's for lunch and as he was waiting in a very long line, Jimmy Carter came into the restaurant, along with his Secret Service bodyguards. Without fanfare, they took their place at the back of the line and waited their turn, just like everyone else, chatting with other customers as he waited. Can anyone imagine Dubya ever doing the same thing?

He may have not been the very best president we ever had, but he is far from being the worst. And if we rated presidents by character, he'd certainly be on the top ten best list.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough of this cult of personality nonsense, PLEASE!
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Nov 5, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's really one of the most dominant themes in the U.S. - put some hero up on a pedestal so everyone can cheer for them.

Carter probably didn't have a clue about what was going on all around him when he was unexpectedly elected. Nowadays, he would never have gotten that far - they'd have switched the election results, like they did with Gore. What can one say, but "Welcome to the national security corporate state, where elections have been replaced by selections?"

After all, the deal with the Saudis to recycle their oil profits back into the U.S. in exchange for military protection had already been set up in the 1973-74 period, and was settled in 1975 with the assassination of Saudi King Faisal and his replacement by Fahd and his close associate, Bandar Bush.

So when Carter came in and made noises about renewable energy as part of his populist ploy, there was zero chance of getting such reforms through. He put solar panels on the White House in a symbolic gesture, but neither he nor Congress had any interest in undercutting the economic interests of the powerful fossil fuel lobby by promoting renewables.

In fact, Carter sucked up to the fossil fuel interests in the hope of getting a second term, even proclaiming the "Carter Doctrine" - that the U.S. would intervene militarily in the Middle East if the oil exports were threatened (a fact unmentioned in the above article). He did found the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, but guess who controls that institution?

Bechtel and Battelle Memorial Institute (engineering, oil pipelines, nuclear weapons, biowarfare and spyware) control it:

"January 22, 1998

MIDWEST RESEARCH, BATTELLE, BECHTEL TEAM FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY LAB CONTRACT

Midwest Research Institute (MRI), Battelle, and Bechtel announced today that they will team in the upcoming competition to operate the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, Colorado.

NREL, which MRI has managed and operated for the U.S. Department of Energy since 1977, is the nation's leading laboratory for renewable energy research. The lab's work involves developing technologies that provide reliable energy from sun, wind, plants, and other renewable sources."


What can we say about Carter? He had good intentions, but was also an ambitious politician willing to put those intentions on hold in order to get re-elected. He also had no idea about what was going on behind his back, and he was also willing to ignore the vicious abuses of U.S. client regimes in Israel, Iran, and Indonesia.

Put him next to the Bush clan and he looks like a Boy Scout with a halo, though.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet--you are doing your job!!!
Posted by: zooeyhall on Nov 5, 2007 11:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can tell by the right-wing flamers that respond to an article like this. I have heard that some right wing organizations have "agents" who monitor liberal sites like Alternet. And if a site seems to be getting too much attention or coming out with "dangerous" ideas, they try to torpedo it.

Just goes to show how paranoid and bankrupt of ideas the Right is in this country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CALL YOUR REPRESENTATIVE NOW!
Posted by: higginslads on Nov 6, 2007 12:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A sitting member of Congress is introducing a measure to impeach the vice president of the United States and the story isn't visible on Alternet. This should be the leading story on a website that bills itself as an "alternative" to the mainstream. Some alternative! More like left gatekeeper.

For those who are interested in doing something constructive about our current state of affairs, please call your representative and urge them to support Mr. Kucinich's bill. The Capitol switchboard is:

1-800-828-0498
1-800-862-5530
1-800-833-6354

Just ask the operator for your representative's office. If you don't know it, tell her/him where you live and she/he will look it up. Once transferred to your representative's office, politely tell the person who answers the phone that you urge your representative to support Kucinich's articles of impeachment against the vice president. You will probably be asked for your name and address.

I just did this. It's the first time I had ever called my representative (Rodney Frelinghuysen in NJ). It was easy and I felt better after doing it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Real Deal
Posted by: Southern Gal on Nov 6, 2007 6:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jimmy Carter is an exceptional man. His work after leaving the presidency reflects his humanity and his concern for the citizens of the world. I admire and respect him for trying to bring peace to the Middle East and for caring enough to get involved in world affairs and advocate for what he thought was important. I like the way that he walks among the people and doesn't put himself above the rest of us. He can be a role model for the rest of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Real Deal Posted by: 2FedUp