Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Getting Real About the Economics of Cocaine

By Bill Piper, AlterNet. Posted October 24, 2007.


President Bush's plan for battling the war on drugs will only cost taxpayers dearly and make trafficking more profitable.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Bill Piper

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"Less Gasoline Available to U.S. Consumers" might be how headlines would read in major newspapers if reporters covered recent decreases in the supply of gasoline in the same way they're covering recent decreases in the supply of cocaine. Of course, such a headline wouldn't pass the laugh test. The supply of gasoline may be down 10 percent from last year, but anyone wanting to buy it may do so (without getting in a long line). The same could be said of cocaine, but that hasn't stopped newspapers from repeating President Bush's myth that we're winning the war on drugs.

According to a declassified report by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), wholesale cocaine prices increased 33 percent on average in the United States between January and June 2007. Retail prices (the price cocaine users actually pay) increased an estimated 15 percent. For comparison purposes, this is the equivalent of gas prices at the pump going from $2.50 a gallon to $2.87 in six months.

There are many factors that could be causing cocaine prices to rise. Bush's drug czar cites recent arrests and seizures in Mexico. He could be right. Major busts of key players in the drug trade can sometimes disrupt the supply of cocaine, at least until drug cartels regroup and new players step in. It's equally likely, though, that the price increase is just a normal market fluctuation. The U.S. cocaine market has seen many short-lived price increases over the last 30 years, but the price of cocaine always ends up falling again.

An economist might tell you that one of the biggest factors contributing to increased cocaine prices is the decline of the U.S. dollar. Latin American drug cartels are increasingly shipping their drug supplies to Europe instead of the United States. This could be a two-for-one business strategy for them. Build their market share over there, while boosting their profits through higher prices here. (To the extent that drug cartels can use violence to maintain oligarchical control over cocaine markets, they can increase their profits by reducing the supply of cocaine).

Regardless of why cocaine prices are rising, it is far from clear that it is a good thing. Consider the following:

  • Higher drug prices contribute to increased violence in our communities. While most cocaine users are nonviolent, the minority who commit crimes to support their habit will commit even more crimes to pay for higher prices. Increased prices will also likely spark turf wars between violent drug gangs. In their best-selling book Freakonomics, economist Steven Levitt and journalist Stephen Dubner review the scientific literature and conclude that falling cocaine prices resulted in a 15 percent decline in violent crime in the 1990s. Sustained increases in cocaine prices could drive crime rates back up significantly.
  • Higher drug prices tend to lead to decreased purity, which can have devastating public health consequences. As cocaine purity falls, some people may switch from smoking or snorting cocaine to injecting it, increasing the spread of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C and other infectious diseases unless sterile syringes are made widely available.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: drugs, economics, cartel, cocaine, drug enforcement agency, drug trade

Bill Piper is director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Why aren't we more cynical yet?
Posted by: LMNOP on Oct 24, 2007 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"President Bush's plan for battling the war on drugs will only cost taxpayers dearly and make trafficking more profitable."

What's the part that the administration would object to? That's their plan for everything that can shunt tax dollars to cronies.

But I bet it wont "only" cost taxpayer dearly and profit his drug running buddies. It will help everybody that profits from the War on Drug Users, and it will be used to disenfranchise and incarcerate minorities preferentially.

"The Bush administration is citing rising cocaine prices as a reason to give Mexico $1.5 billion for supply reduction efforts there."

Well, if the Bush administration said it, it's a deception. I'll bet that the money is being used to help turn Mexico into a police state, too, as part of a plan to dissolve the national borders North America and monitor it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No to Plan Mexico!!!
Posted by: mutualaid on Oct 24, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No to Plan Mexico!!!

Global network demands accountability in the murder of US Journalist Brad Will

Contact:

Friends of Brad Will, Media Representative, Harry Bubbins
h.bubbins(at) gmail (dot) com,
http://friendsofbradwill.org


Friends of Brad Will, a global network pushing for accountability in the murder of US journalist Brad Will in Oaxaca, Mexico, in 2006, denounced plans to fund a "Plan Mexico".

"One year after the murder of Brad Will, no one has been arrested. Under the guise of stopping drug trafficking, US taxpayers could be funding human rights violations, corrupt local officials and Blackwater-style mercenaries
in Oaxaca and elsewhere. This is exactly the wrong message to send at this time." said Harry Bubbins, a media representative for Friends of Brad Will.

FoBW has drawn attention to the fact that Congress has been kept out of the discussions about this $1.4 billion initiative, finally due to be discussed by Congress in Washington on Thursday. As the BBC reported, Mr Bush and
Mexican President Felipe Calderon have been working on the details of the plan for several weeks.

"We are confident that Congress will ask hard questions about the murder of a US citizen, and not just rubber stamp this military aid package that could lead to further human rights abuses." added Mr. Bubbins.

Activists with Friends of Brad Will intend to be present at Congressional Hearings on October 25th and has suggested four questions for the Congress Members to ask the Administration:


i. What has been learned from 'Plan Columbia' which makes you think that this aid package will have a good effect on human rights, corruption, and narco-trafficking?

ii. What makes you believe that a country whose police and military are recognized every year in US State Department country reports to be serial abusers of human rights should be lavished with US taxpayer-funded lethal weaponry and training?

iii. Why do you believe this lethal power will not be levelled against activists and ordinary Mexican citizens as has been the case in the past in Atenco, Chiapas, Guerrero, and Oaxaca?

iv. What signal are you sending to the Mexican authorities who have ignored those in their ranks who were implicated in the shooting of US journalist Brad Will a year ago Saturday and to those who have engaged in a cover-up which the Mexican media labelled absurd ?

-_------_---_______-------________--------____-

Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere
Eliot L. Engel (D-NY), Chairman

Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere, to be held in Room 2172 of the
Rayburn House Office Building .
Date: Thursday, October 25, 2007
Time: 2:00 PM
Subject: U.S. Security Assistance to Mexico
witnesses:
Panel I

Mr. Jess T. Ford
Director
International Affairs and Trade Team
U.S. Government Accountability Office

_____------______-------________

http://friendsofbradwill.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: No to Plan Mexico!!! Posted by: donl51
Legalise it. But there is WAY too much money involved to be sensible
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 24, 2007 6:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
about it. Besides the money earned from illegal drugs (sometimes goes to governments and government agencies in addition to private 'drug dealers') there is SO many billions spend in spending to government agencies, local police, police seizures (no court case necessary to seize your assests), think-tanks, university research, military, payments to corrupt governments (Mexico for example), etc that we will NEVER get logical about illegal drugs and treat the 'problem' as a medical/social one and legalise them. We, and other reactionary governments like the UK, even are forcing other countries to make drugs illegal (this is happening in the Netherlands where they banned 'magic' mushrooms and are cracking down on marihuana.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Action: the Antidote to Despair
Posted by: mutualaid on Oct 24, 2007 7:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
here's what you can do about it:

go to hearing listed above and raise your voice.

send others to the hearing. . .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

When the issue of drugs...
Posted by: bobtr900 on Oct 24, 2007 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...comes up I usually think of the Reagan/ daddy Bush/North conspiracy putting drugs and death into the greater Los Angeles area.

Let Pope John Paul/ Benedict also answer to that agenda of Republican Party corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE PHONEY WAR ON DRUGS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 24, 2007 8:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why would George Bush fight such a huge money maker? Does anyone think he really gives a damn about your kids? From growing the stuff, selling it, rehab to get cured, the purchasing power of a successful dealer, etc. The cost of the crime that goes with allowing it to go on just doesn't justify doing anything about it. If we put an end to the drug problem our economy would collapse. Legalizing it makes the whole operation taxable. So the small time offenders go to jail just for appearances. Sorry to be so glum. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My research says otherwise
Posted by: drblack on Oct 24, 2007 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I know some folks who use these kind of things and according to them there is as much cocaine as ever and it is of better quality and the same price then 6 months ago.
I read an economists thoughts on the war on some drugs. he wrote that if 99% of all smuggled drugs were seized it woould still be profitable because the true cost of the product is so low.
How can something that costs pennies per gram cost $100 per gram? make it illegal.
The only way that the violence ,corruption of police and politicians , theft, and all the other manufactured dangers around some drugs can be ended is to repeal drug prohibition now.
Only a complete repeal of drug prohibition will end the black market which causes 99% of all the problems associated with drugs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

There will ALWAYS be a demand for drugs
Posted by: drblack on Oct 24, 2007 11:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your last line says it all except for the most important point.
There will ALWAYS be a demand for drugs. Human kind has always been involved in altering perception and it always will.
It is a pipe dream to think that humans will stop partaking in conscience altering activities which have gone on throughout human history and before.
The only way to stop the insane madness which the manmade catastrophe of the War on some drugs has created is to completely repeal prohibition .
Drugs are freely available now so that won't change if prohibition is repealed. The violenece and enrichment of some very evil people will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

War On Drugs (being sold by non-govt officials)
Posted by: loxias on Oct 24, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Our government has profited heavily off of drugs for decades if not longer. Remember Noriega? Noones read the reports of planes that have been in Guant. crashing in the SA jungle with tons of coke on board? Why do you think heroin production is skyrocketing in Afghanistan? Does anyone really live in such a bubble that they don't think that our profit-centric government has the slightest qualm about dipping their collective fingers into any and every venture that can be imagined? Were you all home-schooled?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prohibition puts us at the mercy of those south of our border.
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 24, 2007 11:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recall the reaction to the threat (was it just a threat?) of Mexico to legalize. When Mexico is ready to forgo the US subsidies (it's only a matter of time) the US decline will increase as did the drug trade to classic China.

US citizens don't know how to stop, to set limits for ourselves. We can do so when forced by war or economic depression.
Drug use is just another form of consumerism, and whether legal or illegal, we shall continue to worship at the altar of consumerism.

The alternative is to grow up. Keeping us children keeps the rich richer.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I admit. I go to the meetings. Posted by: Sojourner
Ha!
Posted by: Sushi on Oct 24, 2007 7:08 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This from the top coke-monkey hisself!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Heres one possibility
Posted by: donl51 on Oct 26, 2007 9:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could it be....that G.W.& Co are in the drug trafficking business?...that would be perfect if you're into making tons of money from both ends of the deal ,you've no morals control a country w/ a big mil. and lots of weapons ...shit whata perfect deal......and nobody's bothering you !!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» He has the connections for it Posted by: Cooltruth
Killfile was on MSNBC today
Posted by: Lauren on Oct 30, 2007 11:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My post is on probation over there, only being allowed in their green room, so here it is here. They also don't allow links.

*****

I went through my outbox and picked out some oldies but goodies for killfile readers.

*****

First a forward of a portion of a letter I sent nearly two years ago to Leonard Pitts. (I generally post these things on AlterNet.) There was quite a reaction to this from the religious right. I am a witch.

Subject: The true meaning of Christmas
Date: December 12, 2005 1:19:45 PM PST
To: lpitts at herald.com
Cc: kindGSL at comcast.net

Dear Mr. Pitts,

I am delighted to celebrate my pagan solstice holiday with you. I am also quite happy with the name Christmas, or the Christmas season, if you will. It feels inclusive, I like that. The Romans renamed our holidays long ago, we witches went along with it to avoid death and torture, what need is there of a new name now? Christmas will do.

I am especially happy to share our many symbols of joy, unity, the expansive, cyclical nature of the universe and so much more. But most especially, I am proud to share the Christmas Tree, a precious symbol to some of the tree of life and knowledge, Ganja. A sacred tree brought down from the Himalayas, growing wild in India, Asia, and parts of Africa.

The tree god ordered Adam not to eat, the one growing to this day in the walled gardens of Eden, now known as Iraq. The one Jesus used when making his holy anointing oil. The one leading to the happiness, enlightenment and spiritual awakening of so many people around the globe.

In the Koran, Christ was born under the palm tree. This is a Sufi way of speaking in riddle, the palm tree being a symbol for marijuana. I have no doubt Jesus was a dedicated cannabis consumer. That he enjoyed a distinctive, cannabis induced mental state is clearly demonstrated in the historical literature. It is not surprising his ministry only lasted three years before they did him in. His community persists though, a testament to the greatness of his vision.

Other religions also have wonderful vision and insight about the nature of god and the universe, well worth investigating and weighing in balance. After all, trying to comprehend the nature of god is what religion is really all about, right?

*****
You will have to repair these www links to get them to work (remove the space after the "." ).

On Being Stoned, a psychological study of Mj
druglibrary. org/special/tart/tartcont.htm

1972 Consumers Union report - Licit and Illicit Drugs. Don't miss the chapter on marijuana replacing alcohol.
druglibrary. org/schaffer/Library/studies/cu/cumenu.htm

Marijuana - The First Twelve Thousand Years
This is an important history book in east - west relations. Highly recommended.
druglibrary. org/schaffer/hemp/history/first12000/abel.htm

Cancer treatments?
mapinc. org/drugnews/v01/n572/a11.html?1979

Christian bible, Exodus 22:18, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live."

*****

Lauren Unruh
Anointed Sister,
THC Ministry

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Link please
Posted by: Bearzerker on Nov 1, 2007 5:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...In one of the largest economic studies of the global cocaine market ever conducted, a RAND Corp. study for the U.S. Army and the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy found that drug treatment is ten times more effective at reducing cocaine abuse than drug interdiction, 15 times more effective than domestic law enforcement, and 23 times more effective than trying to eradicate cocaine at its source. Researchers concluded that, for every dollar invested in drug treatment, taxpayers save an estimated $7.46 in social costs. In contrast, taxpayers lose 85 cents for every dollar spent on source-country control, 68 cents for every dollar spent on interdiction and 48 cents for every dollar spent on domestic law enforcement...

you cant do that to us poor readers... bait us with such facts without providing a link at least to see for ourselves...

A very nice article... blatant, in your face facts on basic supply and demand economics and how current governmental policy is doing more harm than good
Huge Governmental Departments given power to address certain sociological concerns through policing is wrong and is part of the problem that needs to be addressed.
If theres a problem within the Bureaucracy's reason for existance... lance the problem and try a diffrent approach...

DEA, ATF, DHS, FBI, CIA, DoJ, DoD,.... GoD....
Why all these bloated bureaucracies at the federal level providing internal security and policing... where are the states themselves who have legitimate responsibility's, why are there duties being starved for funding and being usurped by these Federal bureaucrats?... we need an Audit on the continued existence of bloated departments within the federal government... policies re-established, and another plan for the future framed...

Do you smell dissatisfaction within the mainstream about the government?... I sure do, the choices of either Demoncratz or reThugnicans is disturbing to say the least!

Lets get it right this time

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Action against the Drug War: Stop Plan Mexico
Posted by: mutualaid on Nov 12, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plan Mexico ACTION steps [edit]

Plan Mexico must be opposed by those with the power to do so; that means, US:

U.S. taxpayers and activists in a privileged place to talk to Congress and make our voices heard.

Immediate action: Contact and schedule local meetings with your congress people in San Francisco (Speaker of House of Rep. Pelosi), San Francisco and San Matteo plus (Chair of Foreign Affairs Committee Rep. Tom Lantos), from Ossining, White Plains, Yonkers, to New Rochelle (Chair of Foreign Operations Appriopriations Subcommittee Nita Lowey). And your own Congressperson.

Or just drop by their district office (look up on their websites). If you can’t visit, at least call.

Tell them:

* Plan Mexico was formed without input or consultation from Congress, it needs to be pealed off from the Iraq Appropriations Bill and considered as a stand alone item, and human rights concerns must take precedence over unaccountable militarization that would insert Blackwater-style mercenaries and practices into Mexico. On-going widespread human rights abuses by security forces would be exacerbated by Plan Mexico;

* To demand that Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice testify before the full Foreign Affairs Committee; to attend the hearing and to ask questions about Brad Will and others murdered by Mexican security forces; to oppose Plan Mexico;

* No reward should be given to the Mexican government for the lack of accountability for and cover-up of murder of Brad Will when photographic evidence and witnesses make clear the culprits. Plan Mexico’s lethal training and weapons are a BUSH Administration signal that “impunity is okay with us; a u.s. journalist’s murderers don’t need to be help to account”;

* Plan Colombia has resulted in increased human rights abuses in that country and increased coca cultivation for each of the last three years; Plan Mexico heralds the expansion of that failed drug policy into Mexico;

* Plan Mexico will increase the power of the Mexican security officials to monitor, harass and disappear activists and social movement people; it will lock in disparity between rich & poor caused by free trade pacts and give more weapons and training to corrupt and brutal security forces.

BIG PLAN MEXICO HEARING on NOVEMBER 14th at 10 a.m.

Will you join us in D.C.?

We have some offers of housing and rides but could use more offers of logistical support. Be in D.C. on November 14th for the Plan Mexico hearing in front of full Foreign Affairs Committee in Congress and MORE. It will be. . . .fun.

Contact to participate: mutualaid@earthlink.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]