Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Hillary's Mystery Money Men

By Russ Baker and Adam Federman, The Nation. Posted October 22, 2007.


The man who helped make Bush's first fortune now wants to claim the Clinton campaign. Is someone cooking the books at Hillary Inc.?

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Russ Baker Adam Federman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

In the Clintons' pursuit of power, there is no such thing as a strange bedfellow. One recently exposed inamorata was Norman Hsu, the mysterious businessman from Hong Kong who brought in $850,000 to Hillary Clinton's campaign before being unmasked as a fugitive. Her campaign dismissed Hsu as someone who'd slipped through the cracks of an otherwise unimpeachable system for vetting donors, and perhaps he was. The same cannot be said for the notorious financier Alan Quasha, whose involvement with Clinton is at least as substantial -- and still under wraps.

Political junkies will recall Quasha as the controversial figure who bailed out George W. Bush's failing oil company in 1986, folding Bush into his company, Harken Energy, thus setting him on the path to a lucrative and high-profile position as an owner of the Texas Rangers baseball team, and the presidency. The persistently unprofitable Harken -- many of whose board members, connected to powerful foreign interests and the intelligence community, nevertheless profited enormously -- faced intense scrutiny in the early 1990s and again during Bush's first term.

Now Quasha is back -- on the other side of the aisle. Operating below the radar, he entered Hillary Clinton's circle even before she declared her candidacy by quietly hiring Clinton confidant and longtime Democratic Party money man Terry McAuliffe at one of his companies. During the interregnum between McAuliffe's chairmanship of the Democratic Party and the time he officially joined Clinton's campaign, Quasha set McAuliffe up with a salary and opened a Washington office for him.

Just a few years earlier, McAuliffe had publicly criticized Bush for his financial dealings with Harken, disparaging the company's Enron-like accounting. Yet in 2005 McAuliffe accepted this cushy perch with Quasha's newly acquired investment firm, Carret Asset Management, and even brought along former Clinton White House business liaison Peter O'Keefe, who had been his senior aide at the Democratic National Committee. McAuliffe remained with the company until he became national chair of Hillary's presidential bid, and O'Keefe never left. McAuliffe's connection to Quasha has, until now, never been noted.

Another strong link between Quasha and Clinton is Quasha's business partner, Hassan Nemazee, a top Hillary fundraiser who was trotted out to defend her during the Hsu episode -- in which the clothing manufacturer was unmasked as a swindler who seemingly funneled illegal contributions through "donors" of modest means.

In June, by liquidating a blind trust, the Clintons sought to distance themselves from any financial entanglements that might embarrass the campaign. Clinton spokesman Howard Wolfson argued that the couple had gone "above and beyond" what was legally required "in order to avoid even the hint of a conflict of interest." But throughout their political careers, Bill and Hillary Clinton have repeatedly associated with people whose objectives seemed a million miles from "a place called Hope." Among these Alan Quasha and his menagerie -- including Saudi frontmen, a foreign dictator, figures with intelligence ties and a maze of companies and offshore funds -- stand out.

"That Hillary Clinton's campaign is involved with this particular cast of characters should give people pause," says John Moscow, a former Manhattan prosecutor. In the late 1980s and early '90s he led the investigation of the corrupt Bank of Credit and Commerce International (BCCI) global financial empire -- a bank whose prominent shareholders included members of the Harken board. "Too many of the same names from earlier troubling circumstances suggests a lack of control over who she is dealing with," says Moscow, "or a policy of dealing with anyone who can pay."

Ideology does not seem to be the principal issue driving either Quasha or Nemazee. Nemazee backed the likes of archconservative Republican senators Jesse Helms, Sam Brownback and Al D'Amato before moving aggressively into the Democratic camp. Quasha, frequently identified as a Republican fundraiser, gave to both Bush and Al Gore in 2000 and so far in the 2008 race has given to Republicans Mitt Romney and Rudy Giuliani as well as Democrats Barack Obama and Chris Dodd, in addition to Hillary Clinton. But Quasha's concerted efforts to get into Clinton's inner circle are reminiscent of his relationship with a pre-Governor Bush.

A student at Harvard's business school at the same time as Bush, Quasha was a little-known New York lawyer when he took over the small Abilene-based Harken Oil in 1983, using millions from offshore accounts held in the name of family members. Quasha's now-deceased father, Manila-based attorney William Quasha, was known for his close friendship with Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos and his ties to US intelligence; he was also a member of the "Eagles Club" of major GOP contributors.

In 1986 Alan Quasha embraced a struggling George W. Bush, rescuing his failing Spectrum 7 oil company, folding it into Harken Energy and providing Bush with a directorship, more than $600,000 in stock and options and a consulting contract initially valued at $80,000 a year (which was raised in 1989 to $120,000). The financial setup allowed Bush to devote most of his time to the presidential campaign of his father, a former CIA director who as Vice President was the Reagan Administration's overseer of a massive outsourcing of covert intelligence operations, and who had his own warm relationship with Marcos.

Harken's financials were famously complicated. Reporters from top publications like the Wall Street Journal, Time and Fortune went at Harken with zest, but they ultimately failed to unravel all its labyrinthine activities. In 2003 Harken was described in the trade publication Platt's Energy Economist as "a toxic waste dump for bad deals, with a strong odor of US intelligence spookery and chicanery about it." Indeed, the company was kept afloat by an all-star cast of financiers with ties to BCCI, Saudi intelligence, the South African apartheid regime, Marcos and the Shah of Iran. The company perennially lost money for ordinary investors while benefiting insiders like Bush, Quasha and Nemazee. Indeed, Harken has lost money nearly every year since Bush's days there, piling up cumulative losses in the hundreds of millions.

Nevertheless, in 1990, when the Dallas Times Herald ranked Harken fifth on its list of worst-performing local firms, the tiny oil refiner beat out the giant exploration company Amoco for an offshore drilling contract in Bahrain that was potentially worth billions. As George W. Bush biographer Bill Minutaglio wrote, "Oil analysts were stunned that bottom-feeding Harken...could hook such a meaty international contract ... not only hadn't Harken drilled overseas, it had never drilled in water. Speculation immediately surged that it was because Bahrain wanted to do business with the son of the U.S. president."

Bush appeared to benefit from insider trading when he sold two-thirds of his stock in Harken at a peak price after the Bahrain deal -- and just before news emerged that the company had failed to find oil and its share price plummeted. He also failed to report his sale of company stock on time, leading many to believe that he had something to hide. Immediately after a 1991 Wall Street Journal article detailing Bush's involvement with Harken, the SEC launched an investigation, but unsurprisingly, with George H.W. Bush in the White House, it came to nothing. The Journal article speculated that there was more to the picture:

What does emerge is a complex pattern of personal and financial relationships behind Harken's sudden good fortune in the Middle East, raising the question of whether Bahrainis or others in the Middle East may have hoped to ingratiate themselves with the White House. Even more intriguing, there are numerous links among Harken, Bahrain and individuals close to the discredited Bank of Credit & Commerce International, a banking empire that used Mideast oil money to seek ties to political leaders in several countries.
Thanks to his income from Harken, Bush was able to become managing partner of the Texas Rangers -- a glamorous and highly visible sinecure that would eventually earn him nearly $15 million and make him a credible front-runner for the Texas governorship. This rescue and makeover of a ne'er-do-well son was a key step in W.'s path to political power.

Quasha's Clinton play began in 2003, when he bought Carret Asset Management, a once-revered private equity investment firm that manages nearly $2 billion in assets. Its founder, Philip Carret, a Wall Street legend and hero of Warren Buffett, died in 1998; the firm was sold twice

before Quasha bought it for a song. Some were troubled when they learned the identity of the new owner. "I was horrified that he was going to hide behind my family's name," says Renee Carret, a longtime executive at the firm whose grandfather started the company in 1963. When Quasha took over, she resigned. "I just personally didn't want to be affiliated with him. There were too many questions that were left unanswered."

As his co-chair in the private firm, Quasha chose his old friend Nemazee, a fellow Harken investor. By the time of the Carret acquisition, Nemazee, a founding member of the Iranian-American Political Action Committee whose family was close with the late Shah of Iran, had become a significant fundraiser for the Clintons and the Democratic Party. In 1995 he raised money for the DNC. In 1998, in the midst of the Lewinsky affair, Nemazee collected $60,000 for Bill Clinton's legal defense fund in $10,000 increments from relatives and friends. Clinton subsequently nominated Nemazee as ambassador to Argentina but withdrew the nomination after an article in Forbes raised questions about Nemazee's business dealings in the 1980s and '90s -- which noted that the American-born Nemazee magically became "Hispanic" by acquiring Venezuelan citizenship because of a requirement that certain California public pension funds be run by minorities.

Failure to be named ambassador did not, however, hamper Nemazee's rise within the Democratic Party. By 2004 he was New York finance chair for John Kerry's campaign, and in 2006 he served under Senator Chuck Schumer as the national finance chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC) -- a period during which the committee raised about $25 million more than its Republican counterpart. This past March Nemazee, at the behest of McAuliffe, threw a dinner for Hillary at Manhattan's swank Cipriani restaurant, which featured Bill Clinton and raised more than $500,000.

The exact nature of McAuliffe's duties at Carret is unclear, and Quasha, Carret and McAuliffe all declined to answer The Nation's questions on this matter. But McAuliffe seems to have served, at least occasionally, as a good will ambassador for Quasha's business operations. He brought Wang Tianyi, head of a formerly state-owned Chinese firm and a business associate of Quasha's, to meet with Bill Clinton. And Quasha has visited the ex-President at his Harlem office over the past several years, according to Joe Wozny, former president of a Carret affiliate. Wozny recalls that Quasha "was up there quite a few times, meeting with Bill Clinton." As for that Washington office, the Carret website says only that it specialized in providing "information regarding products and services for institutions."

But the office seems to have benefited McAuliffe -- and Hillary Clinton. When McAuliffe stepped down as DNC chair in February 2005, he said he planned to hit the lecture circuit and spend more time with his family. He may have done both, but he did so as vice chair of Carret from the new company office on the seventh floor of the venerable McPherson Building, once the home of the John Kerry campaign and just off K Street's lobbyist gulch. Simon Rosenberg's New Democrat Network, where Mark Penn, chief pollster and strategist for Hillary's campaign, has served as a fellow, was housed next door to McAuliffe and O'Keefe.

While there, McAuliffe found time to pen his memoir, What a Party!, his paean to the Clintons and his role in raising record amounts of money for them and the party. Yet the memoir itself, for which he earned a seven-figure advance, makes no mention of Carret or his role as its vice chair.

Three people working in nearby suites said they remembered McAuliffe and O'Keefe working out of the office, but none of them remembered the Carret name. Nor did any of them have any idea what McAuliffe was doing as Quasha's vice chair. One person who visited McAuliffe in the suite recalled that he was working on his book but said he was unaware of the official function of the office. "Terry holds his cards pretty close on his business activities," he said.

According to another visitor, McAuliffe was using his time to lay the groundwork for Hillary's long-anticipated presidential bid. With McAuliffe leading Clinton's ravenous fundraising operation, the possibility that Carret's Washington office was opened up, at least in part, to serve just such a function is bolstered by the fact that Carret opened the office only after hiring McAuliffe -- and closed it down once he left. During that period, though no Clinton campaign committee yet existed, there were signs that he was already operating on her behalf. In 2005 he appeared on CNN's Crossfire, where the former Democratic chief did not bother to feign neutrality in the primaries: "Personally, I hope she runs," he said. "We would be lucky if she did run, I'll tell you that." In 2006 he kept one foot in Clintondom as a member of the Clinton Global Initiative, an organization whose membership is primarily by invitation to elite business leaders. Wang, whose China International Industry and Commerce partnered with Carret soon after McAuliffe joined the company, was also named to the initiative in 2006.

Meanwhile, during McAuliffe's employment at Carret, Quasha himself donated large sums to the DSCC. He gave $26,700 in June 2006 and $25,000 that October and also personally contributed $4,600, the maximum allowed, to the Hillary Clinton presidential exploratory committee.

Since his start as a young fundraiser on Carter's 1980 re-election campaign, McAuliffe has consistently melded politics, policy and private enterprise. By the time he was 30, he had launched a dozen companies, his own law firm and numerous venture capital companies. Perhaps his most controversial association was with the telecommunications company Global Crossing, where McAuliffe managed to turn a $100,000 personal investment into an $18 million windfall. After McAuliffe sold his shares and got out, the company collapsed; nearly 10,000 employees lost their jobs, and investors lost $54 billion. McAuliffe defended the firm's top executives, who were close with both the Bushes and Clintons, but went on to attack President Bush for similar patterns at Harken.

At a DNC meeting in Las Vegas in 2002, McAuliffe spoke about the recent collapse of Enron and questioned whether Bush could "restore confidence to Wall Street when he has engaged in the same practices he condemns today," a reference to Bush's Harken profiteering. That same year, associates of McAuliffe, fronted by a fake grassroots organization, released an aggressive ad campaign seeking to highlight the Harken-Bush connection.

It is not surprising, then, to learn that neither McAuliffe's connection to Carret nor Quasha's role in the firm have been widely publicized. Carret employees said they were surprised that when Quasha acquired the prestigious firm he did not choose to publicize his coup, instead keeping it quiet. In fact, the company's website does not reveal his role as chair -- or much of anything about the firm. The company's chief financial officer, Marco Vega, said he was unable to provide details on Quasha's role in the company, or even to confirm his current title.

The silence is deafening. Repeated requests for interviews on this topic were ignored or rebuffed by the offices of Hillary Clinton's campaign, Bill Clinton, Alan Quasha, Hassan Nemazee, Terry McAuliffe and Peter O'Keefe. McAuliffe's spokeswoman, Tracy Sefl, who works for the Clinton-connected communications firm the Glover Park Group but represents McAuliffe informally, said that McAuliffe would not grant an interview or respond to detailed e-mailed questions on these matters. Sefl minimized McAuliffe's involvement with the company, claiming he was only "an adviser to Carret -- as he was to many other companies."

But a vice chair is much more than just an adviser, and Carret's opening an office off K Street was not a casual gesture. Notably, though the DC office was closed after McAuliffe left for Hillary's campaign, McAuliffe protégé O'Keefe has stayed on as Carret's managing director for marketing -- providing Quasha with an ongoing pipeline to the Clinton operation.

With an international man of mystery like Quasha, it's nigh impossible to definitively identify his endgame. But one thing he seems to have a stake in is free rein for hedge funds -- and preservation of the low rate at which their profits are taxed.

In 2005, while McAuliffe was on his payroll, Quasha traveled to Bermuda to speak at the MARHedge World Wealth Summit, which addressed the topic "Hedge Fund Management in a Perilous Investment Climate." McAuliffe, too, weighed in on the well-being of hedge funds as the featured speaker at a 2006 investors' conference of the Carret unit Brean Murray, Carret & Co., where, according to advance publicity material, he planned to address the "current political debate in Washington, DC and its impact on Wall Street and the status of potential further hedge fund regulation." Also indicative of an interest in influencing hedge fund policy is the presence on Carret's International Advisory Board of Philippa Malmgren, who served as George W. Bush's liaison to the financial markets, and who often speaks and writes on politics and policy related to hedge funds.

According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Hillary Clinton, whose daughter, Chelsea, works for a hedge fund run by a prominent Democratic donor -- came in second only to Joe Lieberman in cash raised from hedge fund managers during the 2006 election cycle. She has belatedly and reluctantly joined other presidential candidates in calling for a change in the law so that fund managers would pay taxes at the same rate as everybody else. Clearly, her supporters among hedge fund figures have much to gain by electing a President who feels Wall Street's pain.

Whatever Carret's overall objectives, the company is on the march. "We've taken the Brean Murray and the Carret platforms and expanded them into China, India, Eastern Europe and Russia, and we will be doing so in Latin America as well," Nemazee said in a 2006 interview with Leaders magazine.

While Quasha & Co. keep an eye on hedge fund regulation, they also appear to be helping the repressive Chinese government keep an eye on its own people. Brean Murray, Carret recently acted as the sole placement agent in an $8 million deal with the Shenzhen-based China Security and Surveillance Technology. China Security won a contract last year from the quasi-governmental Shenzhen Cyber Café Association to install video monitoring systems for more than 1,000 local Internet cafes, popular outlets for criticism of the regime. A Brean Murray, Carret press release celebrates its cooperation with the clampdown: "the estimated 2.19 million registered entertainment halls in China must purchase video-monitoring systems covering entrances, exits and main corridors. The Company is actively pursuing similar opportunities within the other provinces of China."

Is there cause for concern over Alan Quasha's apparent efforts to gain influence with a potential President of the United States? Amazingly, to reassure the public on the integrity of its operation, the Clinton camp has rolled out none other than Quasha's business partner Hassan Nemazee. In an interview with the New York Times on the implications of the Hsu affair, Nemazee, who describes himself as an economic policy adviser to Hillary but was identified by the Times as a "fundraising bundler for Mrs. Clinton, as Mr. Hsu had been," declared, "The Clinton campaign has done as much if not more than any campaign to protect itself from situations such as this, and none of the other campaigns, other than hypocritically, can point a finger at the Clinton campaign on fundraising problems."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: campaign, hillary clinton, fundraising, election 2008, money and politics

Russ Baker is the founder of the Real News Project. Adam Federman is the research associate of the Real News Project. They may be reached at contact@realnews.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Message to the Democrats:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Oct 22, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey Democrats! Do you want to know why I left your party almost a decade ago? You people are just dumb enough to give the nomination to Hillary Clinton.

Prove me wrong, Dems! Please prove me wrong!

I will be voting for the party of FDR next year come hell or Black Water. But if Ms. Clinton is the nominee I'm forced to vote for - trust me on this one, campers - I'll be holding my nose. You need a nominee who is going to inspire your base and Hillary Clinton is not the candidate who will do that. How do I know? BECAUSE I AM YOUR BLOODY BASE!!!! Or at least, I was. Hillary Clinton is one of the many reasons I am no longer in the fold, so to speak. I desperately want to see a woman elected to the presidency in my lifetime - BUT PLEASE! - not the Queen on the focus groups! Not that woman!

Let's be clear, Dems: If Hillary Rodham Clinton get's the nomination at your convention next summer, you will almost certainly produce another third-party uprising at the polls in 2008. That's a chance you can't afford to take again. You remember what happened in 2008, don't you? Of course you do.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
And now a few words about Clarence Thomas....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Message to the Democrats: Posted by: rocketman
» RE: Message to the Democrats: Posted by: Tom Degan
Vote for Dennis.
Posted by: douglashoyt on Oct 22, 2007 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Link:
http://www.dennis4president.com/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Alternet is a part of the 'vast, right-wing conspiracy'. How dare you question
Posted by: albrechtkrausse on Oct 22, 2007 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary's finances (or Bill's for that matter)? The only reason to question them is if you are anti-women or some rightwing wacko. Don't dare investigate cattle futures, Whitewater, Mr.Wu, Charile Trie, Mr.Hsu, the Chinese takeout thousands, the Chinese communist money, etc. You bigoted, anti-women internet site. Stop now!! Don't you understand that she will be the next President? Who are you to question the selection of the bankers and ruling Bush/Clinton dynastys?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cooking Frogs
Posted by: Axiom69 on Oct 22, 2007 8:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once she is President disparaging articles like this one will not be allowed lest you be investigated as an enemy of the state. She will take the Patriot Act to depths that the republicans only dreamed of. Regardless, the sheople will elect her and we will get exactly what we deserve. For too long we have taken our rights for granted and while we were watching American Idol the fox has been raiding the hen house. We are not losing our rights at a wholesale rate. If that were to happen even the most politically blind would rebel. No, we are losing them at such a slow pace that most are too busy too notice, until it's too late.
I've never done this so PETA members please hold your outrage: I have HEARD that if you put a fog in hot water it will jump out but if you put it in cold water and heat it up slowly it will stay until it dies. That's what we are in this country right now, cooked frogs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Cooking Frogs Posted by: jbur816
» RE: Cooking Frogs Posted by: Axiom69
jonni rae
Posted by: jonnie rae on Oct 22, 2007 8:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More frightening than this, I think, is the support she is receiving from Blackwater. I watched Bill Moyers last night and he had the author of the book on Blackwater on; I as well as Moyers, I think, was shocked to realize that Clinton used Blackwater in Bosnia, that there are more paid mercenaries in Iraq than US soldiers, that they are basically answerable to no one and that they are giving money to the Clinton campaign. So America has a separate, private army funded by taxpapers. They are also recruiting contracts from Fortune 500 companies to provide "security" for them. Bill Clinton wanted NAFTA. He got it; lots of corporations made billions of dollars. Millions of American workers lost their jobs. HIlary, like her husband, is beholden to these corporations, she will do nothing to stop job exportation or to change conditions for workers. She is talking about UNPAID family leave extension. Who can afford to be UNPAID? Not the poor, not the working stiff who got screwed by the corruption and shortsightedness of the Clintons. Where you get your money is THE key. Follow the money and you will know what that candidate will do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: jonni rae Posted by: jbur816
The writers of the Constitution knew well that power corrupts.
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 22, 2007 9:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So their answer was a system of checks and balances. Looking at it from today's perspective, it seems their solution required that power be dispersed so that corruption would be diluted. And if an honest politician managed somehow to get into the mix, all the better.

That solution now seems unable to handle to vast increases in power of our time. For the consequence is vast increases in corruption.

This article brings back recollection of the rental of the White House bedrooms to generous contributors and accusations of campaign fund raising on White House telephones.

Is it that the *reforms* in campaign fund raising and the new rules that restrict officeholders from taking lobbying jobs immediately upon leaving office don't work? Or is it that journalists have lost interest in those attempts at reform, because they are working and there's no drama and sensationalism in laws that work?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We are being lied to, to death.
Posted by: monkeywrench on Oct 22, 2007 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been said in the dark hub of corporate circles that they own all of one party and half of the other one. With Hillary in the White House, that secondary ownership will increase exponentially. As much as I HATE the Bush administration, and as long as I have been a Democrat (all my adult life), I am now, after hopeful first blush at Hillary's running, sickeningly depressed at what we will likely get if Hillary actually becomes president.

I fear that it will be more of the same, with an important difference: this time the purveyors of self-enriching dictatorship will be smarter, and thus more clandestinely devious.

This is just what we, America and the world, do NOT need at a time when humanity's survival on Earth is seriously threatened, and could come to an end in our childrens' lifetimes. We are all on our own; while our environment falls apart, and who we laughingly call "leaders" do nothing more than play power games and line their pockets, we are played for suckers.

Lao Tsu was right: divide and conquer. This is the ONLY function of the two political parties today.

If some future (and, I hope, wiser) species writes an epitaph for the late, not-so-great human race, it will probably read: "They were too clever (and greedy) for their own good."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All the polls show Hil leading
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Oct 22, 2007 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and I just don't understand it. I read Alternet and other Liberal blogs (and not so liberal blogs) and no one seems to like Hillary. None of my Dem friends like her. I have not liked her since I started watching where she gets her money. Her phony health care plan is an INSURANCE program only. Real health CARE does not seem to be an issue. Insurance companies love her! Banks, credit card companies and all financial institutions love her. I lost all respect for her when she voted for the damn bankruptcy law. I take that back. I first lost respect for her when she voted for the Iraq war.
Back to my main point, who is supporting her in the general electorate?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Republicans Posted by: jbur816
» RE: epublicans Posted by: jbur816
Top 10 Reasons Not to Vote for Hillary
Posted by: rjgwood on Oct 22, 2007 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
10. Questionable financial dealings and ties.
9. On the board of Walmart during their heinous anti-labor sweat shopping inciting climax.
8. Health care reform she likes is a big give away to big insurance.
7. Husband orchestrated NAFTA & Welfare reform & she approved (Husband also first president to hire Blackwater).
6. Voted with Bush declaring Iran's army a terrorist organization opening the door for military action w/out congressional consent.
5. Takes money from Hedge Funders and from big Republican donors.
4. Strong financial ties to big oil and other big corporations through campaign contributions.
3. Big AIPAC supporter and sides with zionist/conservatives on unwaivering support for Isreal's aggressions.
2. Uses the same K street firm as Erik Prince.
1. Voted for the Iraq War.

Her and her husband are corporate whores who do NOT represent the people. If we elect this group, we may not be pleasing the social conservatives, but the big money, influence peddlers will be quite pleased with another Clinton Whitehouse. Reason enough to tell all your friends:

"Hillary? Like Hell!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 11. The Bankruptcy Bill Posted by: rjgwood
Take a look at the other side
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 22, 2007 10:41 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It means that the rats are jumping off the sinking ship, the the good ship Republican. If the money people are giving to Dems, it means that they expect them to be governing for a good while to come.

Of course as the old saying goes, he that pays the piper calls the tune. Just what are they buying? Hillary is at least a whole lot smarter than our present Idiot-in-Chief, so possibly they're trying to get some competence in Washington-- competence that they can control.

Problem is that smart people may not be as easy to control as dumb people. Teddy Roosevelt wasn't as sympathetic to the trusts as JP Mrgan would have liked, nor was Truman to organized labor when national security trumped their interests. These money people may end up with a loose cannon on their hands.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Party changes, policies stay the same.
Posted by: Doggycuny on Oct 22, 2007 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
H. Clinton already has one foot in the Whitehouse and no American has even cast a vote yet. Doesn't it make you wonder why we bother to vote. It's all rigged. Has been for generations. Money determines the presidency, not voters. It goes back to the elitists. They didn't (and still don't) believe the average citizen had the intelligence to vote responsibly. Maybe that's true. True because our media and society has turned us ignorant. We are not citizens anymore, we are consumers. And that' the word!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Will people wake up in time?
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Oct 22, 2007 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary supports Codex alimentarius. This is backed by the NWO

Here is the latest update on Codex alimentarius. Watch the video if you can.
http://www.healthfreedomusa.org/index.php
Here is Hillary Clinton's public statement on Codex alimentarius
http://www.aapsonline.org/newsletters/aug05.htm
Additional codex info from the Clinton era.
http://www.converge.org.nz/pma/aptent.htm

Hillary Clinton publicly supports the Codex alimentarius plan and has gotten together with none other than Bill Frist to draft The Frist/Clinton bill (S. 1262), the Health Technology to Enhance Quality Act in support of Codex. Codex is being quietly advanced by GLOBALISTS (WTO, Monsanto).


Also the following Book was very interesting:
Ron Brown's Body: How One Man's Death Saved the Clinton Presidency and Hillary's Future by Jack Cashill

You can purchase it at amazon.com

Also, I do not like the idea that Hillary wanted to put ID chips in the health cards she was proposing.
http://archive.newsmax.com/archives/articles/2001/3/5/220402

She is pro war, in bed with pharmaceutical companies, met with the Bilderbergs in 1997 and this is just a start. She is bad news. I will never vote for her. People are must wake up to the propaganda. This is all planned for the New World Order.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Any Dem can beat the GOP candidate
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Oct 22, 2007 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All we need is a really good Democratic congress. Get rid of all the "old' corporate thinkers and then, only then, we may get the people's business done; Real health care (not insurance), bankruptcy laws for people not corporations, ending Iraq war, reform medicare perscriptions, and on and on. Lets forget who the media wants and vote for someone who will work for middle America. Hillary, more than anyone, will only be beholding to the large corporations. Do we need more of that? Haven't we had enough with the bush administration and their corporate friends?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JOHN POLIFRONIO
Posted by: johnp on Oct 22, 2007 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you folks, for making my vote for Hillary more certain, each time I read the posts from you Hillary-haters.
It isn't just Bush we're fighting; it's people like you: selfish and stupid, like your president.
GO HILLARY!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JOHN POLIFRONIO Posted by: VZEQICVA
How many times?
Posted by: Lincoln fan on Oct 22, 2007 3:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How many more elections must we have before the voters wake up to the fact that elections are a charade? Can anyone with a grain of sense believe that we can have two parties financed by the same corporate establishment? The corporatocracy is in control of both parties. We can vote the Republicans out and we can vote the Democrats out but we can't vote the establishment out.

We must take the control of both parties out of the hands of the establishment and put that control in the hands of the people, where it Constitutionally belongs. It can be done but it must be done before the election. Look into The Lincoln Initiative now. It's a radical but sound strategy.
Bob Reichenbach,
Director,The Lincoln Initiative.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How many times? Posted by: VZEQICVA
NAFTA Shrugged! (Jesus vs. Ayn Rabinowitz)
Posted by: SweetEarth on Oct 22, 2007 5:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
C’mon Guys, Quit Posturing, whining you can’t help yourself –you hate to go there but you will, dutifully vote for her. You must be Market fundamentalists–you endorse the guy who gave us NAFTA (which Bush Sr. tried & failed to get through congress), concentrated media (controlled now by the Friends of Bill who owe him, big! for crippling the formerly free press), who first hooked us on WMDs –bombing/starving peoples for resisting Mc-Burger-King –you gotta love all this because these were the things institutionalized by Bill Clinton in the 90s, eagerly endorsed by the W and followed through by Hillary. Quit alibing you’re “social” liberals. You’re not liberal anything– The only thing distinguishes you from the f-a-r right mean, stingy, heartless bastards in the companion (not alternate) party is you bristle at the word “Jesus” and ridicule Christians. I’m no Christian but your mean Ayn Rabinowitz– author of “Atlas Shrugged” and the celebration of greed vs. Jesus’ philosophy and way of life — I mean, give! me! a! break!

In the parade of extinguished life forms inextricably connected to our own, we can ill afford this current Global-Shrug. Trashing the perfect *living! gifts of creation for hyper-indulgence & frivilous consumption isn’t simply cruel & uncivilized its uniquely unforgivable. We’re stripping our own children! of a sustainable home on THEIR! Planet, Earth.

The egregious loss of the sacrosanct bound up with us, the tragic loss that foreshadows the end of Earth was the loss of our Respect For Life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Welcome, HRC supporters.
Posted by: gradioc on Oct 22, 2007 6:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Glad to see some Clinton people here, because, to be honest, I was beginning to wonder if the whole polling thing was being made up. I don't personally know anyone that wants her to be President.I cannot support her for the nomination. I think she has the firmly held beliefs of an alley cat. Her vote for the Iraq war I can forgive her. Like most sane people she had no idea the Bushies would ignore international law and invade a soveriegn state without the sanction of the UN security council.(I knew that they would but I pay more attention than most Senators.)I cannot, however, forgive her her vote on the bankrupcy bill, a vote that goes against the interests of the working people of this country in order to protect the banks from their own predatory lending practices.But, at the most disturbing end of all her votes in the Senate, the reason I will never pull a lever with her name beside it, is her vote for a Flag Protection Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.She proved with that vote that she is either, a) willing to do anything to get elected President, b) completely unaware of what this whole American experiment in Liberty is all about, or, c) both. I think the answer is c.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Welcome, HRC supporters. Posted by: jbur816
Hillary supporters
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Oct 22, 2007 9:42 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sound like Repubs! Come on Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, please vote for anyone but Hillary. Since our nominees are decided by Jan, the rest of us only hope that you see through all the advertising BS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hillary supporters Posted by: jbur816
Hillary!
Posted by: mcthorogood on Oct 23, 2007 12:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hillary Rodham Clinton, the leading Democratic candidate for U.S. President, may be called as a material witness in the State of California, in what may be the largest election fraud in U.S. history. All news of this case has been effectively censored in the U.S. mainstream media. Read the full story in The Wall Street Journal, "For Clinton, 2000 Fund-Raising Controversy Lingers".

Hillary may have violated the law by not reporting large contributions to her successful 2000 campaign for U.S. Senator. Mr. Peter F. Paul claims that his contributions were omitted from the public reports filed with the Federal Election Commission, and Hillary denies all knowledge of these contributions. Read the latest ruling in Case B191066, Paul v. Clinton.

Hillary even denies knowing Mr. Paul, a three time convicted felon, who made the contributions to her 2000 Senate campaign. A video, "Hillary Exposed", produced by the Equal Justice Foundation has been viewed more than 862,000 times. A case such as this normally ends any aspirations that a politician may have for public office, and raises more questions about possible illicit fund-raising practices in the Clinton camp.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate candidates
Posted by: frank69 on Oct 24, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's the Money party vs. the People party. Which party do you think will "win?" I'm not voting for MONEY! Are you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement