Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fox (Pro) Business News Is the Latest Insult to Your Intelligence

By Danny Schechter, Huffington Post. Posted October 17, 2007.


How will Fox's new business channel's vigorous pro-business attitude fare during a time when pessimism about the U.S. economy is so high?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Danny Schechter

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The fox has come back to guard the hen house. But if history is any guide, the hens and the chickens will not be too welcoming.

The arrival of the Fox Business News channel is to its backers comparable to the cavalry coming over the hill to save the business world, if not the capitalist system, from detractors if not from itself. Whereas Jesus sought to drive the moneychangers from the temple, Fox's Roger Ailes has his sights on those subversive "liberals" who have wormed their way into posing as friends of the business world on CNBC. He has vowed to blow them away.

CNBC's owner, General Electric, a company known for its corporate conservatism and its past patronage of Ronald Reagan, has to be amused to find itself on Rupert Murdoch's enemies list. Regarding CNBC, Murdoch sounded like the Grinch of Christmas Past in hinting but never really spelling out his agenda to a British outlet last week: "They dwell too much on failures or scandals."

"We don't get up every morning thinking business is bad," said Ailes. "Many times I've seen things on CNBC where they are not as friendly to corporations and profits as they should be."

Roger Ailes, a right-wing Republican street fighter, has been repositioned for this task. He is downplaying his hardcore GOP Bushevik ideology to recast himself as a self-styled populist, the champion of the little people, fueled by a $300 million war chest from the evil empire run by the shadowy, Orwellian-named News Corp.

Ironically, on the same day that Fox aired, one of the institutions Murdoch seems to admire, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), opened its congress in Beijing with its own plan for politically correct capitalism. They, too, are purging their liberals. What symmetry! (Hu may be on first, but Rupert is pitching.)

Back in New York, on Wall Street, the credit crisis just won't go away with a new wave of major defaults on loans, banks reporting billions in write downs and losses and fresh warnings from the chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank that the economic slowdown is here. An economist at Goldman Sachs dismissed a new plan by three big banks and the Treasury Department to "calm debts in housing" as a "P.R. move." P.R. for business is at the heart of the Fox Biz mission.

On top of that, some of the people whom Ailes hopes to champion and convert into viewers are out protesting against predatory lenders and boycotting Countrywide Financial, the nation's largest lender and mortgage servicer. In some parts of the country, the partisan war is giving way to a new type of debt-driven class war between borrowers and lenders.

In other words, the business arena is a lot messier and more complex than the political arena that Fox News was able to polarize with simplistic pro-war slogans, personality baiting and an "us versus them" patriotically correct deception. A mechanistic pro-business versus anti-business frame is not the same and is not going to work.

That's why Roger has paid more attention to sizzle than steak with a new stable of foxy presenters aimed more at the eye than the head. Snazzy graphics, hot colors and special music, complemented by "conversational" anchors, round out the carefully thought-out packaging. At least one show will come from a bar. After all, he is competing against sexy "money honeys" like CNBC's Maria Bartiromo.

TV can't be all slogans and flag waving -- a reality than many Fox critics miss by just focusing on what is said and not on the attitudes and look that drive Fox's audience-friendly media environment.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: business, corporations, murdoch, cnbc, fox business news, fox

Danny Schechter writes a blog for MediaChannel.org. He directed the film In Debt We Trust about the credit crunch. Comments to Dissector@mediachannel.org.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Inquiring Minds Want To Know
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 17, 2007 5:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember back when Murdoch got insider treatment by the NeoCons in Congress in order to get US citizenship? Newt was in charge then and got a hefty book deal from Murdoch- Murdoch got the ststus he needed to buy the (then) Metromedia chain of TV stations. Smells like a payoff to me.

It would be really sweet if Congress did an ethics probe and revoked Murdoch's special citizenship and forced Faux to divest itself of it's US broadcast holdings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A lie
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Oct 17, 2007 5:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most of the people who think they're doing well have probably lost huge amounts of money this year and don't even know it. Fox News doesnt represent anyone's interests, except the top 0.1%. Even most of the top 1% is losing right now. Especially if they are invested in real estate! But currency devaluation affects everyone. You pretty much have to gain 10% a year on your stocks just to keep up with inflation. But of course most saavy investors can't even figure that out, or maybe they just like lying to themselves. Those are the ones who might get some use out of Fox Business channel. I'm tempted to watch it just to see if they are telling people to move to Dubai and outsource their manufacturing needs to China. It's the winning solution! It's sad watching the most basic human values erode in an insatiable quest for riches. How rich can you be when you sell out your own country? Maybe Neil Cavuto will answer that question.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A lie Posted by: owlsliveintrees
» RE: A lie Posted by: thekidde
» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
Fahrenheit 451 becoming the reality
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 17, 2007 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hardly listen to the regular broadcast networks, and haven't for almost 7 years. Don't miss it one bit. Except for an occasional program on PBS. Not by any means perfect but they do have programs that assume that their viewers are not complete idiots. As Ken Burns put it, PBS is "an oasis in the desert".

I urge people to avoid listening to TV---it is truly poisonous and depressing. Honestly, listening regularly to today's mainstream broadcast media--whether radio or television--can start doing bad things to your head!

One of the best books I have ever read is Ray Bradbury's Fahrenheit 451. In it he describes a violent, vaccuous media that keeps the populace dumbed-down and diverted. I find myself thinking more and more every day that this novel by Bradbury is becoming reality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fox Biz channel is going to be a joke, however......
Posted by: eosrk on Oct 17, 2007 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it would have been an complete flop if Mr. Murdoch hadn't bought out DowJones to even be crediable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
Sly as a Fox
Posted by: rocketman on Oct 17, 2007 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do not suspect that the economy is as easy to polarize as the political scene. People can either buy a house, feed a family or afoard insurance, or they can't. No amount of sly talk will change that!

There are any number of outlets that play the game Fox is always accused of.. NBC for one, MSNBC, many online outlets.. all depends on your views..

The state of the economy depends on the state of your bank account - not easy to say how great we are doing if you are unemployed!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fair and balanced
Posted by: donl51 on Oct 17, 2007 1:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Poleezzze! give me a BREAK!!! Fox news is as far from that saying as earth is from pluto, I watch/listen on occasion becase its nec. if you intend to comment on it ,I even did a test gave it my best, tried to have it on in the background all day ,self employed artist ,work in my studio at home, I'm also a news junkie! your IQ could drop, you could go crazy or blind, if you're unfortunate enough to make it too O'Riley you can be pulling out all your hair, I've, in my travels met people who get their primary news from Fox, they start to see the light after our talk on 9-11 that really! Hussein really wasn't behind it. My wife gets a kick out of their Bulls&Bears on Sat.,then when Malkin and/ or Coulter are on [I call it gag management ] I could go on for hours on Fox news ,but why?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fair and balanced Posted by: rocketman
It's an all-out propaganda push.
Posted by: Coleman on Oct 17, 2007 4:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't wait to see the programming. My guess is that half will go to free corporate cheerleading, one quarter to cute small-business interest pieces, and another quarter to the mystical capitalist priests commenting on the way the tea leaves have settled (financial markets). A right-wing populism is flourishing, but is it really in the interests of capital to promote these political strategies? I mean, really. Those poor conservative people who voted against their economic interests will be dumped on and insulted just like those poor liberals always were on the old Fox News.

It makes perfect sense, really, to launch this new propaganda arm right now during (what is, statistically, perceived to be) a crisis. It re-draws the battle lines along class*, providing clarity where the position of the old Fox News was ambiguous. For instance, will the problem of illegal immigration be downplayed on the new business channel? We'll see. I hope Alternet keeps a running tab on the differences between the old Fox and the (real, capitalist) Fox. I, for one, don't have the stomach to do it for long.

*Will the new "us vs. them" be between those in favor of mega-corporate administration of, well, everything and those against such an arrangement? In short, corporatism vs. democracy? Dust off your copy of Das Kapital.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Punishing Corporate Fascists
Posted by: US Citizen on Oct 17, 2007 8:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The media should publicize those CEOs and company owners who are encouraging this United States fascism of the last few years. I found out the the CEO of Target, Bob Ulrich, financed the Swift-Boat people, who defamed Bob Kerry's military service in 2004, imto Minnesota in 2006 to defeat a Democratic candidate for governor who otherwise would have won. Since then, I don't shop at Target, because that would support this right-wing troglodyte who is even worse than WalMart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why is this an issue? Change the channel
Posted by: alleybear on Oct 17, 2007 9:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is this an issue? Change the channel if you don't like it. Do some original thinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is time to send all these Murlocks
Posted by: Nick on Oct 18, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to were they came from

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Business ignores FOX News
Posted by: MThomson on Oct 18, 2007 11:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone I know who holds stocks or invests in the markets in some way has long known FOX News to be propaganda. FOX says housing markets are up when they're slipping and currencies are solid when they're crashing -- in short, they lie to their audience and all investors know it. And professional investors don't care. They monitor Bloomberg or WSJ and other news that has LESS of an agenda on politics and more of a dedication to making money. Only pensioners losing their shirts in the market follow FOX advice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

www.votenic.com
Posted by: votenic on Oct 22, 2007 8:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WEEKLY POLL

http://www.votenic.com

Results Posted Tuesday Evening.
FREE, NON-BIASED

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]