Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Rudy Giuliani's Dirty Campaign Money

By Ari Berman, The Nation. Posted October 16, 2007.


Giuliani is cozying up to Bush's big oil billionaires to fund his race for the Republican nomination.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Ari Berman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In March 2001, as Dick Cheney assembled his secret energy task force, Haley Barbour, one of the most powerful Republican lobbyists in Washington and a former chair of the Republican National Committee, fired off a memo to the Vice President. "A moment of truth is arriving," Barbour wrote, "in the form of a decision whether this Administration's policy will be to regulate and/or tax CO2 as a pollutant." Barbour pointedly asked, "Do environmental initiatives, which would greatly exacerbate the energy problems, trump good energy policy, which the country has lacked for eight years?"

The memo bore the imprimatur of Barbour's lobbying firm, but the real work was being done by Bracewell & Patterson, a midsize Texas law firm with a client list as long as the plume from a smokestack. Bracewell would go on to become one of the key lobbying outfits on energy policy in the Bush II era. Its clients have included massive coal-burning power plants like the Atlanta-based Southern Company; more than 450 oil companies represented by the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association; and Texas heavy hitters like Enron, ChevronTexaco and Valero Energy. All these interests had a major stake in persuading George W. Bush to abandon his campaign pledge to regulate carbon dioxide, the leading source of greenhouse-gas emissions. Two weeks after receiving Barbour's memo, Bush reversed his position and decided against naming CO2 as a pollutant, leading to more than six years of inaction in combating global warming.

It was the first of many victories for Bracewell & Patterson. In the coming years the firm would persuade the Administration to exempt coal-burning power plants from new pollution controls, forestall plans to reduce mercury emissions and shield the makers of MTBE, a toxic gasoline additive that contaminates drinking water, from costly lawsuits.

In March 2005 Bracewell got its biggest boost yet. At a press conference at the Waldorf-Astoria in New York City, the firm unveiled a new partner: former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani. It also unveiled a new name: Bracewell & Giuliani. It was a huge coup for the firm. "He's going to help expand Bracewell's reputation nationally and internationally," Bracewell lobbyist Scott Segal said at the time.

It was also a shrewd move for "America's mayor." Giuliani had already enjoyed a string of business successes following his term as mayor. He had launched the consulting firm Giuliani Partners shortly after 9/11, and he'd partnered with Ernst & Young to launch an investment bank, Giuliani Capital Advisors, which was sold in March to an Australian company for an undisclosed sum. Giuliani jet-setted around the globe in a Gulfstream, giving speeches at $100,000 a pop. His 2002 book Leadership sold more than a million copies.

A law firm would solidify Rudy's financial empire -- but not just any firm would do. Partner Giuliani wanted to become President Giuliani. He needed money and, more important, political connections. Bracewell offered a gateway into the lavish world of Texas Republican fundraising and easy access to the same titans of industry who had helped make the Bush family rich and propelled W. into the White House. The former mayor of one of the bluest cities in the country had just inked a whole lot of red.

Strike Force for Industry

The arrival of the second Bush Administration and the ascent of Bracewell went hand in hand. After persuading the Administration to abandon its CO2 pledge, Bracewell launched a full-court press on behalf of another industry priority: relaxing restrictions on coal-fired power plants. In 1999 the Clinton Administration had sued nine companies for failing to add new pollution controls when updating or expanding more than fifty of their plants. The companies wanted the EPA rule, known as "new source review," changed and the lawsuits dismissed. Enlisted in the cause were key GOP lobbyists, including Barbour; C. Boyden Gray, White House counsel for Bush Sr.; and Marc Racicot, former governor of Montana, a Bracewell partner who was a top lobbyist for Enron and head of the Republican National Committee.

In May 2001, two weeks before the Administration unveiled its energy plan, Barbour and Racicot met with Cheney and urged him to abandon the Clinton-era rules. Over the intense objections of career EPA attorneys, the Administration decided to torpedo the Clinton lawsuits and granted the power plants the huge loopholes they sought. Senior EPA officials resigned in protest, and fourteen states sued to block the rules changes. Eliot Spitzer, New York Attorney General at the time, accused the Administration of "gutting" the Clean Air Act and "putting the financial interests of the oil, gas and coal companies above the public's right to breathe clean air."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: rudy giuliani, election 2008

Ari Berman, based in Washington, DC, is a contributing writer for

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
fill in the blank. it could be about any of the candidates running.
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Oct 16, 2007 3:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
turn on the lights in the back kitchen of any of these operations and watch the roaches run.

in the immortal words of dr. suesse: a bribe is a bribe, no matter how small

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hillary has 100 million, where did that come from?
Posted by: pammers on Oct 16, 2007 4:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama is raising tons of money too, alot of it from shady sources. The focus should not be on one candidate, but repealing the flawed McCain-Feingold legislation. The 527's are pumping in oodles of bucks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
Well...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Oct 16, 2007 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When it takes this kind of money to run for president the money has to come from somewhere...and it most likely won't be anywhere pretty. Also, this kind of cost keeps anyone but the major party front-runner candidates from having an actual hope of winning, especially when paired with a corporate-run media that barely mentions any other candidates. Look at the debates... run by the media. Who gets how much airtime determined by the media. And who runs the media???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Who runs the media? Posted by: dustdevil
Dirty Money
Posted by: rocketman on Oct 16, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's the nature of politicians, they turn a blind eye to sources of financing. No one is exempt. Hiliary is probably the worst in taking from anyone though. Arabs help Carter and bailed out his farms. Bill Clinton get millions each year from Arabs sources.. But when it cost hundreds of millions to run, how is a poor boy/girl to cope! The American dream got very expensive!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» www.votenic.com Posted by: votenic
Bribes are bribes. Period.
Posted by: farmertx on Oct 16, 2007 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It doesn't take millions upon millions of dollars to run for public office any more. Not with the Internet.
The candidates will tell you that it does. That allows them to hire consultants to craft a theme that will appeal to voter's.
What happened to stating your position and allowing the voter's to decide who is better able to represent them?
The candidates will tell us that they need to travel all over the country for face to face visits with voter's. Yes, that is nice. But the same basic result could be had by Internet based forums.
True campaign finance reform will not happen until only voter's who are eligible to vote for a particular candidate can donate to that candidate.
Businesses, Unions, trade groups, 527's and PAC's have no business giving money nor in-kind services to any candidate.
The individuals who belong to those groups can donate, provided they live within that candidates' district.
No candidate can resist taking "donations" under the current system and expect to have a real chance at getting elected.
And we all have seen what kind of candidate emerges under these conditions.
And we have all seen what kind of laws these candidates support once they are in office.
And party affiliation makes no difference when it comes to accepting bribes. Anyone who offers a candidate more than $2000 is expecting some consideration from that candidate, beyond mere representation. The candidate who accepts that kind of money knows that and is willing to live with it.
And that does not serve the best interests of the American citizen.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Texan Tom Hicks owns some voting machines
Posted by: dustdevil on Oct 16, 2007 7:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article left out the fact that Tom Hick's investment company, Stratford Capital Partners, is a major investor in Hart Intercivic, the nation's 4th largest voting machine company. Their machine is called Eslate. As with Diebold, we have a rabidly partisan Republican, owning a big chunk of the machines on which we vote. Their source codes are also secret. We just have to trust them. With mobster Giuliani added to the mix, the fraud is bound to escalate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

finished
Posted by: davy on Oct 16, 2007 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he gets in after bush, THAT'S IT, we're finished.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: finished Posted by: donl51
Fossil fuel interests control the Republican Party
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Oct 16, 2007 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The story is the same - from the Saudi oil shieks who own major investments in Newscorp (FOX) to the Republican lobbying firms like Barbour, Griffith and Rogers to the current installed criminals in the White House, the Republican agenda is all about serving international energy interests while screwing over the U.S. public.

This doesn't make for good news coverage, however, so every once in a while they get up and give lip service to 'halting global warming' and to 'energy independence'. Recall Bush's calls for hydrogen cars back in 2000? Or Arnold Schwarzenegger's much publicized push to combat global warming? Meanwhile, the guy is pushing hard to allow Chevron to set up liquified natural gas terminals in California so that Chevron can start selling their Burmese gas in the U.S. That's how the Republican party operates.

For a good example, see Mississippi Governor's Associates Profit From Katrina Recovery
By Timothy J. Burger


Here you have a case where engineering firms like Camp Dresser McKee (also a major contractor for 'reconstruction of Afghanistan water supplies' - a bad joke) and Waggoner Engineering have paid Barbour, Griffith and Rogers hundreds of thousands of dollars per year, paid off Barbour's nephew, and donated thousands to the governors reelection campaign. In return, they get their hands on lucrative contracts in Katrina and Afghanistan - and they just might be in be with you local city council as well.

The problem with the Democrats is that they also have a fair number of fossil fuel tools - the most notable being John Dingell, whose wife is a GM lobbyist and who regularly attacks fuel efficiency standards for the U.S. auto industry, and who has refused to let the Democratic Party support renewable energy.

neurolingo.gnn.tv

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Juiced in on or even before 9-11, and obviously from the beginning, "the pick"
Posted by: xbj on Oct 16, 2007 4:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A neocon in quasi-liberal disguise, Rudy had better pray that the powers that be that out-hacked Diebold the last election can't do it again, or he's toast along with every other NaziGOP asshole politician.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

inclement
Posted by: inclement on Oct 16, 2007 10:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article did not mention how Giuliano's legal firm's major client is the trans american superhighway, that is the seam of the destruction of the United States and the beginning of bush's pet plan the North American Union [the merging of Mexico, US and Canada] with the US becoming the 20 mile wide nafta superhighway. A non profit business by the name of nasco will be acquiring all the land they need by the employing a new law congress just passed' The business use of eminent domain'. A vote for giuliano is a vote for bush.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems are saints aren't they
Posted by: rasc on Oct 17, 2007 9:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone forget to talk about Obama & Hillary and the HSU involvement. Oh wait the MSM didn't cover it so no one knows about it right ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nationalize the American Oil Industry...
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Oct 17, 2007 9:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This among many other reasons is why we must Nationalize the American Oil Industry...!


It is the answer to so many problems and issues and the future..!

Simple as that..


http://nationalizeoilallenergy.blogspot.com



TJ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If George W. Bushit had been actually doing his job on 9/11
Posted by: Ellie1 on Oct 17, 2007 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Rudy would have been a post script to the whole disaster. But because our coward-in-chief was MIA (again) Rudy was accessible to our lazy media-the only one accessible. Before 9/11 Rudy was a very divisive and unpopular mayor-just as Bushit is an unpopular and divisive president. Want more of the same? I actually see a few Rudy bumper stickers in my town-a town that lost over 30 people on that day. Some people are just assholes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

www.votenic.com
Posted by: votenic on Oct 22, 2007 8:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
2008 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION WEEKLY POLL

http://www.votenic.com

Results Posted Tuesday Evening.
FREE, NON-BIASED

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]