COMMENTS: 12
The Latino Agenda for the 2008 Election
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Karen Linares's face contorted as she stared at the thick, rusted pipe and the bottle of brown water before her. The reddish-brown props used by an environmental panelist speaking about water politics at the second annual National Latino Congreso reminded Linares of water she's seen in the numerous places she's called home.
"The LA river water running by my house is full of filth," said the 22-year-old Salvadoran-Chicana delegate to the five-day convergence of left-leaning Latinos held this past week in her hometown. "I saw the same brown water in El Salvador. In Tijuana you see the sewage trickling down the dirt roads," she said. Asked what, if any, connection existed between the water she saw in her neighborhood and the water in her parents' homelands, Linares answered, "Clear water runs upward where the money runs. Brown water runs down where poor brown people are."
Asked how to resolve the water problems of the more than 588 million Latinos in the hemisphere, Linares responded by drawing from the deep well of the two-pronged -- electoral and mass-based organizing--Latin American political culture now rooting itself in the United States: "I'm going to organize for the [California water bond] initiative. I also want to organize to help our people in the South."
Listening to Linares, one hears echoes of the global citizenship that is thundering with increasing frequency from Canada to Patagonia. Flowing into and through Latino and Latin American political gatherings like the Congreso is a new Latino agenda, one that transcends the more nation-state-based "ethnic" politics of a previous era. Among the many resolutions passed by Linares and 1,500 other delegates were measures relating to a range of local and hemispheric issues: opposition to the Iraq war -- the top concern for Latinos, according to polls; overturning Bush Administration travel restrictions to Cuba; opposition to the expansion of NAFTA or CAFTA; and support for several environmental initiatives.
Central to the new Latino agenda is the development of an electoral strategy to complement to the grassroots efforts for the 2008 presidential election, regarded by many to be the most important Latino vote in US history.
Congreso organizers like Antonio Gonzales, executive director of the Southwest Voter Registration and Education Project, know that Democratic presidential candidates have won 248 or more electoral college votes in the last four presidential elections. He knows that this translates into Latinos wielding significant influence because most of them live in swing states.
If trends first seen in 2006 continue, he says, the Democrats can secure the 277 votes they need to win the presidency next year by simply winning Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada, all sites of major Latino voting blocks. By simply adding Florida to the historic Democratic core, they get 275 votes.
To illustrate the new Latino politics, Gonzales points me back to what Linares and growing numbers of Latinos are calling "water justice." He cited Latino support last year for California's Proposition 86, a successful ballot initiative that increased funding for water and park projects.
"That proposition would not have passed without the 85 percent Latino support for it. They were decisive in its success," he told me. "This was also the first-ever environmental bond initiative that lost white votes."
Some of these same white voters were among the majority who supported Proposition 187, the 1994 ballot initiative that sought to deny health and education services to the children of the undocumented and which also launched the movement that inspired current immigrant-rights activism.
Immigration has been and continues to be at the heart of Latino politics. Congreso co-convener Oscar Chacon, leader of the Chicago-based National Association of Latin American and Caribbean Communities, an immigrant-led network of more than eighty organizations, links local immigration to global trade -- only he views immigration through a much wider lens than that of the white voters who supported Proposition 187.
"NAFTA has been the main cause for more than 1.3 million Mexican campesinos to lose their livelihoods. Not surprisingly, the number of Mexicans who have emigrated to the United States rose 60 percent in the first six years after NAFTA," said Chacon, adding, "We can only resolve immigration issues by addressing the bigger question of what is forcing so many people to emigrate in the first place. The first step is to stop expanding the same agricultural rules of NAFTA to Peru and other Latin American nations."
Hemispheric concerns like Chacon's will enter US voting booths in the upcoming elections. Poll after poll indicate that Latino voters, especially the immigrant voters who now make up half of all Latino votes and who are the fastest-growing voter segment, harbor profound concerns about the increased workplace raids, racial profiling, lack of immigration reform and other signs of ill-treatment of immigrants. Though most polls tell us that, like most (North) Americans, Latinos' number-one political issue is the Iraq war, a Gallup poll conducted in July indicated that one-third of Latinos named immigration as their number-one issue.
Republican attacks on immigrants have helped galvanize the marching and voting army that may well realize the GOP's worse fears. Most of the attendees to the Congreso were among the millions chanting a time-honored Latin American slogan, Ahorra marchamos, manana votamos --Today we march, tomorrow we vote.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: gretavo on Oct 15, 2007 6:21 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I am Latino and I will only vote for a candidate who supports a new and real investigation into 9/11
Posted by: Constitutionalist75
» RE: I am Latino and I will only vote for a candidate who supports a new and real investigation into 9/11
Posted by: rocketman
» So you'll be voting for the Monster Raving Loony Party? (NT)
Posted by: brunowe
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Oct 15, 2007 6:25 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and that population explosion is caused by the psychological terrorism practiced by the Catholic Church that threatens hellfire to any woman who demands the right to decide if and when to birth her children with the help of a family planning clinic. To the Church, only her macho husband has the right to make family decisions and her job is to produce all the children that he and God will allow. In that medieval, tribal way of thinking, a large family is a blessing because the children may grow up to make them rich.
But it doesn't work for them because the young workers are in competition with millions of others just like them who all suffer under the domination of very rich families whose political power keeps wages so low that nobody can improve their lives - except to emigrate to North America, where their rapidly increasing millions are now creating a new majority in the Southwestern part of this former USA that could be manipulated to literally take over the states that once, long ago, belonged to Mexico.
But can this new Latino majority be persuaded to approve of such a transfer of sovereignty from the former USA to Mexico? Why would they want to return to the poverty-stricken way of life they came here to escape? No way, in my opinion. The vast majority want the opportunity to work and build a prosperous life for their families, so they would hate the very idea of Mexico taking back the states it lost in the Mexican-American War so many years ago. Except for a few fanatic nationalists, they all want to be Mexican-Americans, not Mexicans.
So, what should be done? Just the opposite, in my opinion. Instead of the former USA giving back states to Mexico, that nation of super rich and poor should be reformed by the Mexican people themselves to create a far more democratic society so there would be no reason for millions to emigrate North, or anywhere else - and if all the over-populated nations of the World would practice family planning to bring humanity back into balance with the Earth's ability to support them, there would be plenty of everything for everyone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Invasion By Population Explosion
Posted by: anonymous black writer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Phenix on Oct 15, 2007 12:50 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The brief quotes from the 22 year old activist Karen Linares. Not surprisingly I found a giant disconnect in her activism. I will not excuse it by saying she is 22. I am 25 and when I was 15 I would have known better than to support a water bond initiative that will further starve the Rio Grande of water. Her analysis of water politics is correct since one must infer that the brown people are a sub in for the poor.
I am not sure if the water bond issue has received any major coverage by Alternet but I've read about it on other progressive or libertarian and even socialist sites. I am not even sure if I've read any positive reviews of the proposed bond. The negatives range from cost, pollution, habitat destruction, and water table/aquifer depletion. I assume however that the bond may improve the quality of her water while robbing the land of its daily need of H20.
The writer did not go into any great detail about well anything. I would have appreciated a mention of NAFTA's role in rural emigration. It would dovetail nicely with the narrative of America's economic and industrial decline.
I have not seen any analysis of the the Prop 86 and 187 votes but I assume that white voters voted against each in similar numbers. It appears to me that the health care activist groups need to cover both legal and illegal residents and the best route for this is to attack the lowly smoker.
O and the white comment. How ridiculously low can you go? I simply can no longer tolerate the color or gender analysis that I see on a daily basis. Yea, I'm that dreaded overly educated white male that has started to take these arguments personally.
Honestly if you are here ILLEGALLY you do not deserve any benefits that are meant for LEGAL residents. If you are ILLEGAL you should be processed and shipped to your county of origin at the expense of your country. The analysis that ILLEGALS do jobs that Americans won't are bogus at best. Especially people who points towards the construction industry. That industry was the BACKBONE of America's MIDDLE CLASS. People who support the rights of people who work ILLEGALLY are flagrantly wrong. BTW, I have nothing wrong with immigrants. My only real friends in college were all LEGAL residents and ALL of them WAITED to get their citizenship.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: POSC 101 Essay?
Posted by: cruzcontroll
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Gentrification Through Natural Selection on Oct 15, 2007 2:26 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Oh No I did not say something flattering about Mexicans
Posted by: Gentrification Through Natural Selection
Comments are closed-
Comments are closed-
Posted by: apophenia_monkey on Oct 15, 2007 9:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
mind you, ol'robert never even played the game--just read the back of the box.
this article is yet another stellar example of his shallow abilities.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
My Experience with a Psychedelic Plant That Thousands Have Used for Release from Severe Addictions
Is Using a Checklist the Answer to All Your Problems?
On Anniversary of Iraq Invasion, Time to Rethink Anti-War Activism




