Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How Bad Will the Next Recession Be?

By Scott Thill, AlterNet. Posted October 26, 2007.


If our government really is a corporation and Bush is its CEO, we're all likely to be self-employed contractors out of a job.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Top Stories

America's Frightening Alzheimer's Epidemic
Rebecca Hyman, AlterNet

CNN's Lou Dobbs Is Clueless When It Comes to the Drug War
Tony Newman, AlterNet

U.S. Sergeant Refuses to Go to Iraq: "This Occupation is Unconstitutional and Illegal"
Karin Zeitvogel, Middle East Online

Election 08: Misogyny I Will Not Miss
Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group

Dire Consequences with a McCain Supreme Court?
Robert Parry, Consortium News

California Gay Marriage Ban Overturned
Huffington Post

Three Things That Won't Help End the Foreclosure Crisis
Dean Baker, Liz Chimienti, Center for Economic and Policy Research

More stories by Scott Thill

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"My rant was the rant heard around the world," CNBC personality and ex-hedge funder James Cramer told viewers of his cable show Mad Money, a talk-radio spectacle involving its host's over-the-top antics like hitting sound-effects buttons and giving stock advice at breakneck speed. The setting was 2007's fiscal third quarter, a highly volatile period in which the market nosedived on the heels of a subprime housing and credit meltdown.

In the rant, broadcast on the show Stop Trading! before becoming an online hit, Cramer aggressively screamed for a rate cut from the Fed for his "people [who] have been in this business for 25 years!" -- by which he meant, of course, the hedge funders whose deceptive bundling of mortgage-backed securities built on subprime loans and no oversight from the SEC whatsoever are finally getting their comeuppance.

Cramer, who ignored repeated requests for participation in this story and its predecessor, viewable on AlterNet here, made it pretty clear that his friends in the hedge fund industry manipulate the credit and housing markets for fat-ass paydays. But there he was a few days later, backtracking hard. He was even lucky enough to get on The Colbert Report to do some much-needed damage control, asserting that he was really defending the millions of suckered Americans about to lose their homes, thanks to highly leveraged loans manipulated by investment banks and private equity groups like Blackstone, KKR and Bear Stearns (now the target of a criminal investigation) into Kafkaesque packages called CDOs (collateralized debt obligations). Those labyrinthine Ponzi schemes allowed hedge fund managers and private equity groups to not only buy out big names like Sallie Mae, Hilton, Chrysler and more, but also skim huge percentages off the top for themselves, their wives, mistresses and mansions.

And here we are, after the subprime collapse and Cramer's rant hear 'round the world, teetering on a fourth quarter that is screwed without some help from the Federal Reserve Bank. In fact, we could be headed to the type of economic recession that the Los Angeles Times recently reported may swallow us all -- at least until 2009, if we're lucky. Others aren't so optimistic: Paul Krugman, a noted economist and caller of bullshit on fantasies financial and military, like the occupation of Iraq, wrote in an aptly titled New York Times op-ed called "Very Scary Things" that "what's been happening in financial markets over the past few days is something that truly scares monetary economists: liquidity has dried up ... This could turn out to be nothing more than a brief scare. At worst, however, it could cause a chain reaction of debt defaults ... Let's hope, then, that this crisis blows over as quickly as that of 1998. But I wouldn't count on it."

That was Krugman's take on Aug. 10. The 1998 crisis he's referring to? That would be total implosion of Long-Term Capital Management, a hedge fund made up of bond traders and Nobel Prize-winning economists that tanked billions and needed to be bailed out in order to avert an American recession under President Clinton. Hedge funds have the Midas touch, it seems, for making gold only for their shareholders, and few else, before needing a federal lifeboat.

Sure enough, in the days since Krugman's very scary thoughts, the situation has worsened. "Signs of progress have appeared," said Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke to a German conference on Sept. 11, "but ... most countries have only just begun to undertake the policy changes that will ultimately be needed ... in part because of the greater recent volatility in financial markets and investors' demands for increased compensation for risk-taking." Henry Paulson, current secretary of the treasury and former CEO and chairman of investment bank Goldman Sachs, a major beneficiary of the CDO bonanza and one bank that helped bail out Long-Term Capital Management, added that our current economic crisis will take longer to fix than the other major depressions of the last two decades, including the Russian default of the '90s and the Latin American debt nightmare of the '80s.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economic recession, hedge funds, stock market, federal reserve, globalization, climate change, iran

Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm.com. His writing has appeared on Salon, XLR8R, All Music Guide, Wired and others.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hope Your Liquid & Not in $
Posted by: NoPCZone on Oct 26, 2007 1:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've been posting for long time now, here and elsewhere, that things were going to get fugly.

We (The US) are likely a candidate for an addendum to Barbara Tuchman's The March of Folly.
From Stoneschool.com
"To qualify as folly for this book, Tuchman explains, acts have to be clearly contrary to the self-interest of the organization or group pursuing them; conducted over a period of time, not just in a single burst of irrational behavior; conducted by a number of individuals, not just one deranged maniac; and, importantly, there have to be people alive at the time who pointed out correctly why the act in question was folly (no 20/20 hindsight allowed)."

Never in human history has a society squandered so much for so long for the benefit of so few, ending up with little of long term value to show for it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hope Your Liquid & Not in $ Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: Hope Your Liquid & Not in $ Posted by: Badger1492
How bad?
Posted by: talkville on Oct 26, 2007 3:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Depending on the constanly developing definitions, I've been depressed all through my long life -- thus, I don't much care -- I expect it. It just depends what musical chair your sitting on as to how bad the next recession will be. And the music's playing, so get ready.

P.S.: This is no apology for depression as commonly understood. Live long and prosper!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the illustration of 'musical chairs' Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» musical chairs Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: musical chairs Posted by: talkville
USA:Westerneurope
Posted by: richholland on Oct 26, 2007 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in many westerneuropean countries there is a shortage for skilled workers.
Euro considers a blue card like the USAgreencard.
So why young americans donot come to Europe en masse???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» the illustration of 'musical chairs' Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: USA:Westerneurope Posted by: photon's feather
» RE: USA:Westerneurope Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: USA:Westerneurope Posted by: VZEQICVA
» RE: USA:Westerneurope Posted by: heid
» RE: USA:Westerneurope Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: USA:Westerneurope Posted by: BrianOfNairobi
» RE: USA:Westerneurope Posted by: albrechtkrausse
» RE: USA:Westerneurope Posted by: BrianOfNairobi
Wake up call - Alarm sounding
Posted by: skoog5600 on Oct 26, 2007 5:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for the consice and detailed article on the impending state of affairs in the good ole US. I for one a, happy to see the giant flounder and fall to the ground.

Having once been an American, and becoming ashamed at what the country has become and stood for, I moved out to a peaceful land where there is national health care, an awareness and action concerning global warming and a very convenient mass transit system.

I have seen this coming for quite some time. I remember lamenting to one of my professors a few years ago about the good old days of the US. He said, those days are long gone and it will get worse. He was right. I just didn't know that fall from grace would be so rapid.

Oh and by the way, this article barely scratched the surface about the impact the occupations and wars are and will continue to have on the US.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wake up call - Alarm sounding Posted by: makeadifference
» RE: Wake up call - Alarm sounding Posted by: makeadifference
We could all see this coming
Posted by: Democritus on Oct 26, 2007 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We all know that "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch." But for the past seven years we have behaving as if we do. As soon as the Bush Administration started giving away our budget surplus so that multi-millionaires could enjoy tax cuts, and as soon as we increased our billions-of-dollars borrowing from China and Japan to fund an oil war in Iraq, we knew we were in trouble. Yet what did we do about it? We re-elected the Shrub so he could keep doing what he was doing.

Pre-Bush one could go to Paris and enjoy 94 eurocents to the dollar. Now it's $1.43 for a single euro, and about $9 for a bottle of Coca Cola. That's the real measure of how our dollar has eroded, not the phony statistics the government puts out. Look at the price of gasoline, the price of milk, the price of housing--despite the credit crunch. The day of reckoning is coming when, instead of pulling up the rest of the world to our living standard, we will be pulled down to the average--just another nation trying to get by selling weapons to other countries so they can make war against one another, trying to keep cool when the planet gets hotter.

What's the solution to living in such a dreary, globalized world? Get yourself a house in the mountains, dig a well, and plant a vegetable garden. Ride out the storm with the gold and jewelry you've traded your ever devaluing dollars for. And stock your cellar with lots of fine wines. You'll have plenty to drink about in the new world that's coming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We could all see this coming Posted by: Democritus
» need a roomate? Posted by: Grandma Crabby
» RE: Too many people,,, Posted by: nightgaunt
» RE: Too many people,,, Posted by: BrianOfNairobi
Fragmentation of the US
Posted by: Urgelt on Oct 26, 2007 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paul Saffo's argument certainly has the advantage of being interesting.

He cites California's defiance of the Bush administration with respect to the employment of the National Guard to the borders and its stance on alternative energy development, which is opposed to Bush's policies, as evidence that the states are showing signs of pulling away from federalism.

I hate to be the one to break it to him, but this is nothing new. There has always been friction between states and the federal government in the US. Always. Once, it broke into open warfare, but the issues were a lot deeper and more emotional than how much effort to put into making solar panels.

Friction is normal, because local interests don't always align to national. That's true in any nation. It doesn't become shattering to a nation, however, unless the means of reconciliation and resolution do not exist. That's what happened to produce the Civil War; the means of reconciliation could not be found except in civil war.

Today, California can send a whomping big delegation to Congress, influence Presidential elections, take the Federal Government to court, combine its political weight with other states. It can insist on authorities the Constitution arrogates to the states. It can wield economic muscle and achieve things in the market that bypass politics altogether. No issue has yet arisen that unduly strains the mechanisms for reconciliation. What would have to happen to change this dynamic?

I can think of one thing that might do it. If the US succumbs utterly to fascism and loses its democracy, the notion of states' rights would be lost. Rigidity would set in. Local interests would have no means of expression, no ability to compete with national interests. That's a very uncomforable state of affairs for local interests.

At that point the question becomes one of ruthlessness. If a fascist US employs all of the ruthlessness which fascism is famous for, then citizens will be too afraid to do much about it.

If a fascist government fails to show enough ruthlessness, though, the US could fly apart into fragments.

I've been watching the fascist forces in play in the US for some time now, and thus far, I see no hesitancy on their part, no reluctance, no qualms. Lie and propagandize, check. Torture, check. Narrowing school curricula to nationally-approved content (NCLB), check. Unitary theory of the executive, check. Election-tampering, check. Politicization of law enforcement - check. Pre-emptive war, check. Emergency prison camps - built and ready.

I don't think there will be any shortage of ruthlessness.

If fascism takes full hold - and it's very close now - then I think only an unconditional wartime surrender could cast it down. At that point the fate of the US would be in the hands of foreign powers. Whether we fragment, or whether we continue to exist as a nation, will be out of our hands.

But I think that's unlikely, too. We could be defeated on the battlefield, sure. But as a nuclear power, extracting an unconditional defeat out of the US would be no easy thing to do.

In short, I think Saffo is wrong. The US will still be around in 2050 and beyond.

It might not be a nice place to live, though. Much depends on whether we are able, at this late date, to find the means to prevent fascism from finishing what it has started.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fragmentation of the US Posted by: Morphizm
» RE: Sucessor to the USA? Posted by: nightgaunt
Most federal employees and self-employed contractors in federal depts are LATTE LIMOUSINE "LIBERALS"
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 26, 2007 6:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The sad part about it is they always ride high no matter what. Of course, as long as they can't be laid off unless Congress approves of it, there's nothing to stop those motherfuckers. If GOD exists, DC would be BULLDOZED by now !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great Point Posted by: Gravitas
» And, I'll bet good money Posted by: form516
Advice Please!
Posted by: andy on Oct 26, 2007 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just how long is it possible to keep building this house of cards with a fiat economy before hyper inflation sets in? Can they just keep printing the money and pass the debt onto the next generation? What the fuck is going on with the stock market? Recession seems a full gone conclusion yet the fucker keeps on rising!
I am a little confused, my mother has made lots of money in her shares, is now the time to bail? if so how do i explain the gravity of the looming threat when everything on the news seems hunky fucking dory?

Advice please!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL Posted by: Sojourner
» Hold ProZac Posted by: eddie torres
» RE: Advice Please! Posted by: jimbee
» RE: Advice Please! Posted by: aka_bozo
EVERYBODY IS AN EXPERT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 26, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Financial reporting has become like any other news. We don't separate fact form opinion. One week a person in an expert on hurricanes, next week it's recession. etc. Economics is a complicated. I worked in the business for 20 years. Only a very small percentage of people in the financial sector are experts. Most are just talking heads and are not qualified to give advice. Rule 1. Saving and investing are not the same thing. Be careful. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So what's your point? Posted by: heid
get ready folks
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on Oct 26, 2007 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just wait until the idiots attack Iran and gas shoots up to $10 a gallon.

EVERYTHING will collapse then. Expect the economy to literally go in the toilet overnight. the house of cards will fall faster than you can blink.

If you study the current lending laws, it is unfucking believable what our "leaders" in Washington have done to let mortgage companies and payday lenders, neither of whom are any better than MAFIA LOAN SHARKS rip off unsuspecting people.

I have met people who have had "predatory" loans and after YEARS of steady payments, they STILL owe MORE than they originally borrowed!

Not surprisingly, the MSM does not cover predatory lending adequately. They tend to blame it on "loose" lending practices and not being careful enough about checking income, etc.

BULL. Our fine government allowed banks and other lenders to take marketing advice and strategies from the godfather.

Charge all your credit cards to the max then tell the banks to go to hell. Remember when they passed the wonderful new bankruptcy bill? They "promised" to lower interest rates on credit cards. Did your rates go down? Gee, mine didn't either. They went UP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: get ready folks Posted by: nightgaunt
bringem on
Posted by: solrev on Oct 26, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“What matters is what we will have lost, and that is an identity based on nationhood altogether.” The globalists’ world is imploding, their survival depends on getting control of oil and creating a new oil backed currency before the dollar crashes. The fatal flaw from the beginning was underestimating the nationalists. In the immortal words of War Games, “hell yes we’re still here”. If the Middle East nationalists can stop them in their tracks, we will survive the recession. If they win in the Middle East, we will survive the depression. Either way we get our country back.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» "Either way we get our country back." Posted by: makeadifference
I'd like to pay off some bills
Posted by: motorchickd on Oct 26, 2007 9:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'd like to pay off some bills, since I just lost my job, but my husband how understands this stuff unlike me, and says but if we cash in our all our 401K, we pay big time and lose lots. But then I question whether we lose no matter what if it all collaspes. He says we could pay off all our bills except our house though. Plus if we take a chance and keep the 401Ks, we could double it, plus some. But I say but it could collapse...and the discussion goes round and round. Plus his dad left him some land to share with his 2nd wife unitl she dies and she's in very good shape. Sad but true. It all makes me depressed, since I will be 65 in ten years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Free advice Posted by: NthnBrazil
» RE: Free advice Posted by: aka_bozo
Pirates always appear when given the opportunity.
Posted by: Sojourner on Oct 26, 2007 11:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When seafaring expanded, a new world opened, but it was a world without law. Mass transportation and communication today have opened a world to more old fashioned piracy.

So long as nations insist on avoiding international laws, courts, and cops, the pirates will pillage wherever they can. Letting Bush employ the US as a band of pirates has degraded the US as world leader.

Yes, pirates live high until they are caught and hung. Already the US faces the rise of opposition from Russia and China. It may be hard to imagine us being the bad guys and those the good. Pirates always think themselves heroes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Civil War II
Posted by: CTvoter on Oct 26, 2007 11:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although Bush is undoubtedly going to go down in history as the worst President our country has ever seen, I have a sick feeling that most of us won't be around to enjoy the aftermath of his fall from grace. A civil war without sides is more akin to bloody chaos. Nobody is safe when the spoils of war is food.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Civil War II Posted by: nightgaunt
Something you can do if you're REALLY worried
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Oct 26, 2007 1:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you have money, don't bother with the crap that Wall Street wants you to buy. Get silver coins. Read Ted Butler at www.investmentrarities.com

As it turns out, much of the silver inventory in the world doesn't exist except on paper. Recently, one major broker was caught selling and holding silver inventory for clients that didn't exist. Swiss banks are issuing silver certificates against silver they can't prove they have. The silver shorts are short almost a 3/4 billion oz of silver, most of which they couldn't deliver if they had to cover their positions. etc.

The only problem that I can see is that the Bush Administration may declare that silver is a stratigic metal and try grab it for the shorts (which include major investment banks).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Buy lead, not silver or gold. Posted by: albrechtkrausse
How Bad Will the Next Recession Be?
Posted by: MAD on Oct 26, 2007 1:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's going to be so bad that you'll wish you voted for Ron Paul. He is universally reviled by the Alternet set but the economic problems facing us are much bigger than gay marriage and abortion - Alterneters' two biggest sticking points.

With our crushing debt and fading credit markets, he'll be far too busy tending to the economy to worry about such issues. He may not be your dream candidate but he wants to shrink government, deficits, debts and spending more than any other 5 candidates combined.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» and I see... Posted by: zipper696
Wait ! It Gets Worse !!!! : "Peak Oil"
Posted by: mmckinl on Oct 26, 2007 1:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did you know that America actually used less gas last year?

"There's really no way this can't get worse. At Econbrowser, U.C. San Diego economist James Hamilton takes a sober look at the current global supply and demand situation for oil.

His one line summation: "The answer is pretty simple, really -- demand keeps going up but supply doesn't."

But the most interesting data point is this:

Demand for oil from China has continued on its exponential trend, growing more than 8 percent in 2006. Whereas Chinese consumption accounted for 3.4 percent of world demand in 1990, it now represents 8.6 percent. And if Chinese consumption has increased with global production constant, that means oil use by all the rest of us must decrease. For example, U.S. petroleum consumption fell 200,000 barrels a day during 2006. And what persuaded Americans to do that? Higher oil prices."

from Andrew Leonard at Salon in "How the World Works"

and this nugget from "The Nation"

"Beyond the Age of Petroleum" by Michael T. Klare
http://www.thenation.com/doc/20071112/klare

Financial meltdown , spiking energy prices , 2 wars raging and a 3rd on the table.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't panic too soon.
Posted by: aka_bozo on Oct 26, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, even during the "great depression", the one that "world’s greatest generation" grew up in (and walked up-hill to school in both directions, and brought up the kids that right now are our fearless political leaders) only had 25% unemployment.

If you are working, there’s no depression.

If you, or someone you know, is still spending money on overpriced restaurant food instead of cooking at home, there’s no depression.

If you, or someone you know, is still planning on flying to Vegas (to watch his brother race – instead of paying off the credit cards, who keep calling him incessantly and I have to listen him make excuses about how he has no money) there’s no depression.

If “big dick Rammmm trucks” are still selling, there’s no depression.

If you, or someone you know, is going on a cruise, there’s no depression.

Sorry, the peasants where I work don’t seem to know there’s any problem. They’re massively in debt, popping out kids, haven’t got a clue what’s happening in the world, consistently vote Republican AND when things go south will blame “those liberals” for what happened.

Liberal lose again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Neimoller warning works now. Posted by: nightgaunt
» RE: Don't panic too soon. Posted by: Missing Piece
The Sytem is Unsustainable
Posted by: Democratic Socialist on Oct 26, 2007 3:23 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I see around me is unsustainability, disorganization, debt, pollution, and economic chaos -- and that is my OPTIMISTIC assessment.

The economy must be brought on to a more stable foundation soon or it will begin to disintegrate (I believe that we are already in the beginning stages of this in America). It's as precarious as it has ever been, and any semi-major economic event could plunge the nation in to a widespread depression. The amount of oil alone needed on a daily basis to sustain this system is mind boggling.

The unsustainability of America's economic system is frightening, and unless we start planning for more locally sustainable communities I don't forsee a very bright future for humanity. Those economies that are able to pull through will be those that are more locally/regionally based, i.e. those that haven't already slipped in to the abyss of globalization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Sytem is Unsustainable Posted by: aka_bozo
Where to put investment money - anyone?
Posted by: launcher on Oct 26, 2007 4:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have some practical financial questions, given today's topic: My wife and I hold several stocks and mutual funds in our IRA accounts. If a real economic meltdown begins, and the U.S. dollar starts a serious decline, where should that money go? Some of our mutual funds are focused on international markets, including emerging markets. Are these funds generally hedged against the U.S. dollar because they invest in foreign companies? What about stocks of foreign companies that trade in dollars on a U.S. exchange (NYSE in this case). Are there certain bonds or other investment vehicles that will maintain their value - or even increase in value - during a drop in the dollar? And any thoughts on gold as an investment? (My gut says "no way" on the latter.)

I realize AlterNet is not a personal finance forum, but I figure my questions underscore the scary tone of this article AND the answers given (if any) may actually help a few readers. Thanks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I have a question,
Posted by: drfun on Oct 26, 2007 5:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when many were bragging a few years back how much "equity" they had built by trading up in homes. Did anyone think that what goes up, must come down?
Jimmy Carter had a bold vision for America's Energy policy as president. What has followed since in the U.S., has been pure rape of the planet, and now developing countries like China and India want their citizens to have the same "western living standard". Of residing in absurdly large homes that are overstuffed with possessions, that require more energy per fuel tank, than much of the 3rd world would consume in a year per person.
The $ and the U.S. will soon lose its status as the world's currency and superpower, which will bring forth the "New World Order" as promised by Bu$h Sr.. A "Terrorist" nation with nuclear weapons and has used them in the past!
By the union of Canada, Mexico the U.S. and the monetary system of the Amero. The living standard for "middle class" Americans and Canadians will drop, while those of Mexico will rise.
I find it odd, that these new "transportation corridors" to support the infrastructure of this newly created "economic zone", can be completed with the concerns of peak oil and its future consequences.
Throw in the destruction of the world's remaining rain forest and the melting of glaciers and polar icecaps over the next few decades. Along with the massive building of coal and nuclear powered plants to meet the growing energy demands of a ever growing population. Which will continue to increase the CO2 emissions.
Include the erosion of the tilled soils for beautification and food production, by poisoning them with fertilizers and pesticides, along with a rapidly depleting supply of fresh clean water.
What kind of "New World Order" will future generations inherit?
As an earlier comment said: That such a precious world's resource, has been squandered by so few, in such a short period of time. Leaving such a trail of destruction in its wake, over the history of the world. Is a pathetic contribution to the species of "Homo Sapiens".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Ponzi scheme endeth...
Posted by: NumberSix on Oct 27, 2007 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Part of what we are not seeing is that the 500-year-n-change banking experiment....inventing money from thin air, aka fractional reserve banking....is about to implode.

Generating money from debt, like capitalism, Smithian, trickle-down...only works where growth and expansion can take place. Well, gee, golly, we've run out of resources, new lands, and ideas. There is no more UP to be had, hence, the Ponzi mess of money-as-debt has finally caught up with us: Nobody can truly generate a real profit to outpace the massive debt surrounding us.

And about time, yes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Late Capitalism is an inherently stagnant system.
Posted by: yellow on Oct 27, 2007 4:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since 1971, the booms and busts of the US business cycles have been increasingly extreme. There are weaker expansions, increasingly funded by debt, and more severe contractions which result in greater amounts of bankruptcies and unemployment. The upswing of each succeeding cycle results in greater economic concentration than the previous one. Each upswing has also relied on greater amounts of consumer debt to sustain its short lived expansion.

The reason seems to be an ever growing concentration of wealth and income and shrinking consumer demand. Industrial utilization capacity has been steady at an average of about 81% for the past three decades. Average annual rates of economic growth since the upswing from the 1981 recession has not exceeded 3%, a drastic reduction from the roughly 4.5% during the 1950s and 1960s period of expansion. The real reason behind this stagnation which has used financialization to sustain the system, is the decreasing levels of effective consumer demand and income in the general economy. This is because capitalism is increasingly skewing the distribution of income and productive assets and shifting income toward the top where the tendencies toward saving is greater than toward spending. Thus, productive investment declines or technologically replaces labor thus employing fewer and fewer workers and contracting demand even more. The globalization of the world economy has worsened the distribution of wealth and killed off the middle classes in the industrialized countries. The concentration of labor intensive manufacturing in low wage countries has skewed the global distribution of wealth even more while global supply chains eliminate small retail business and high cost manufacturing suppliers who provide union jobs with benefits. The resulting global upward redistribution of wealth from late capitalism's pattern of economic restructuring has caused stagnation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What an exciting time to live
Posted by: ghoster on Oct 28, 2007 2:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yep, going to be a show, only the lucky ones will have anything to gloat about, and just think in the blink of an eye it could all be solved. Mass extinction get rid of about half of the world's population and then you have some breathing room, don't and you get more problems. Think that the big boys don't already know this? Think that they don't already have a solution to this? Guess again, most on this planet are considered "useless eaters" so get ready and what you think will happen, forget it, no not a controlled descent into barbarism. But a rapid random non existence is awaiting all on this place without a rat hole to jump into. Think that you will "move to the mountains and grow a garden" sure until the pick up truck with eight guys and automatic weapons show up to Harvest your place. Ever see Mogadishu? Think Falluja, or any other war zone that the grand US military has made uninhabitable. Those same people are going to be right here, think they forgot their trade? Don't count on it. Yep, gonna be a show, so get ready for your new lifestyle, and you aren't going to need that plasma TV, football is cancelled this season.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]