Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Evolution of the Suicide Attacker

By Jalal Ghazi, New America Media. Posted October 9, 2007.


The war in Iraq has served as a suicide bombing school for insurgent groups around the world.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jalal Ghazi

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The war in Iraq has enabled insurgent groups to develop the relatively modern innovation of suicide bombs into a strategic weapon.

Suicide operations, the signature weapon of the Iraqi insurgency, have evolved into a tactical method of warfare used by insurgents around the world. These "moving and thinking bombs" are more effective, numerous, adaptable and sophisticated -- able to carry out both mass killings and targeted political assassinations -- and are harder to counter since women and children are being used to carry them.

A study by the Gulf Research Center, a Middle East think tank, analyzes these operations from a technical perspective. The report, "Security and Terrorism: Suicide Bombing Operations," published in Arabic and English, focuses on suicide operations in Iraq, Chechnya, Sri Lanka, Afghanistan, and Israel.

Although the study does not provide evidence of direct relations between insurgent groups operating in different countries, their similar tactics strongly suggest that they are learning from each other. The Iraq war has served as a suicide operations school for insurgent groups around the world, Dr. Mustafa Alani, director of Security and Terrorism Studies at the Gulf Research Center, told the Dubai-based Al Arabiya television network.

Suicide bombings in Afghanistan increased from one attack in 2001 to 118 in 2006, according to Hekmat Karzai, director of the Center for Conflict and Peace Studies in Kabul. Half of all operations carried out by the Taliban in Afghanistan are now suicide operations.

The Taliban has successfully used these operations to undermine the Kabul government. This was evident in the latest attack on a police bus in the heart of Kabul on Tuesday, which killed 13 officers and civilians. Immediately after the attack, Afghan President Hamid Karzai offered the Taliban several posts in his government if leader Mullah Omar agreed to enter into negotiations with him. The Taliban refused the offer, a clear indication that they have the upper hand.

Suicide operations have evolved into a strategic weapon, Alani writes, because "in many cases, the suicide bombing technique has proved to be smarter than the high-tech Smart Bomb." These "human-driven bombs" can reach their targets like no other weapon, making them effective in targeted assassinations as well as mass killings. This is attributed to two unique characteristics of these so-called "moving and thinking bombs," Alani adds. "Moving bombs" refer to vehicle-born bombs, while "thinking bombs" refer to person-born bombs.

Mass killing suicide bombings are designed to maximize the number of causalities and psychological impact of the operation. Techniques such as the "trap combination attack" involve two suicide bombers: one detonates in a confined place, while a second bomber detonates near the exits as victims seek escape. "The rule is that the higher the number of human casualties inflicted in the attack, the better and higher the rate of gain and the impact generated for the group and its interests," Alani explains.

Nicole Stracke, a researcher in the Gulf Research Center's Security and Terrorism Program, studied 550 cases of suicide operations that took place between 2003 and 2006. She reached a similar conclusion: "Suicide attacks in Iraq appear to be a successful technique," she writes, "as the insurgent groups utilizing this method have developed a flexible approach and responsive, adaptable tactics in their operational planning." Stracke adds that these attacks have weakened the Iraqi government, prevented its legitimacy, limited the freedom of movement of American soldiers and restricted their interactions with ordinary Iraqis.

According to Alani, up to 150,000 Iraqis have fallen victim to suicide bombing attacks. Many American soldiers in Iraq have also been killed in suicide bombings. The most lethal attack took place on Dec. 21, 2004, when a suicide bomber detonated his bomb in a mess tent on an American base in Mosul, killing 14 U.S. soldiers.

Suicide operations are increasingly being used to assassinate high-level officials in Afghanistan. In 2001, two Al Qaeda members pretending to be journalists blew themselves up near commander Ahmad Shah Massoud, the leader of the Northern Alliance and strongest opponent of the Taliban. In 2006, the list of assassinated Afghan officials included the late governor of Paktia, Hakim Taniwal, former governor of Helmand, Muhammad Daoud, and Member of Parliament Pacha Khan Zadran.

In Iraq, suicide operations have been used both in both mass killings and targeted assassinations. On Aug. 29, 2003, a suicide bomber detonated an ambulance loaded with explosives outside Imam Ali Mosque, killing 126 people. Since then, many high-level Iraqi officials have been assassinated. The latest of these was on Sept. 13, 2007 when Abdul-Sattar Abu Risha, leader of the Anbar Salvation Council, an alliance of tribes who declared their support for the Iraqi government and U.S. forces, was killed just 10 days after he met with President Bush and one day after General Petraeus addressed Congress about U.S. progress in Anbar.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, suicide bomber

Jalal Ghazi monitors and translates Arab media for New America Media (a project of PNS) and Link TV.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
About Funding The War In Iraq
Posted by: calm on Oct 9, 2007 3:29 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the politicians refuse to cut the Iraq War funding, then why don’t the anti-war folks just walk down to their local bank and ask for their money in Canadian dollars? It would bring Bush and The Clowns to their knees overnight.

Nobody would lose any money because the more people who demanded Canadian dollars, the higher the value of the Canadian dollar would become.

It sure beats depending on street protests and having to schedule time to attend protests.

By exchanging funds at the bank, you could do it on your own time and quietly without much scheduling problems.

Calm

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: About Funding The War In Iraq Posted by: darkenergy
» Hi! DarkEnergy Posted by: calm
» dont think so Posted by: Iconoclast421
» Hi! Nedtheredhead Posted by: calm
» RE: Hi! Nedtheredhead Posted by: Nedtheredhead
» Black Wednesday Posted by: calm
» RE: Black Wednesday Posted by: calm
Suicide bomber killed 241 US Marines, when Reagan was president
Posted by: Nugeman on Oct 9, 2007 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Suicide bombers killed when the USS Cole was attacked when Clinton was president. Suicide bombers climbed on board Israeli buses, entered crowded restaurants when both were president. The point is this barbaric tactic was used long before the war in Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Words Posted by: Joshua Holland
Bomb is a bomb!!!
Posted by: messedup on Oct 9, 2007 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why differentiate! Be it delivered by car, truck, airplane, tank, satellite guided, or by foot, does the bomb discriminate?, not really. They are all delivered by humans one way or another.

The insurgents just can't afford our high tech delivery methods so they go the hand delivery route. Their target is to want to blow up anything and everything American or associated with Americans.

Now go ahead. Tell me how an intellectual or a scholar is going to stop people from wanting to kill each other.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bomb is a bomb!!! Posted by: fitzjohn
» those pesky inhuman muslims! Posted by: gretavo
» RE: Bomb is a bomb!!! Posted by: newtype_alpha
Kind of funny!
Posted by: farhada on Oct 9, 2007 6:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
>The war in Iraq has served as a suicide bombing school for
> insurgent groups around the world.
And those graduate will have no where to go than into "pieces"!

Kind of sick, but I could not help it :)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is this artical, in support of, or in opposition.
Posted by: ray burchard on Oct 9, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's an antiquated male dominated mindset holding onto it's favored domination, inspiring it's down trodden women and childern to become cannon foder in their campaigned refusal to change, (resisting universal evolution)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» support of, or in opposition to. Posted by: ray burchard
IT'S THE WEAPONS THAT HAVE EVOLVED
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 9, 2007 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These people go out in a blaze of glory that most of us don't understand. I watched Ken Burns "War" and the Japanese Kamikaze pilots actually went to their own funerals just prior to their mission. Family, Friends and the whole ceremony. It's not a mental "place" most of us can fathom. It's the glory in knowing they've done something that serves a greater purpose. Unsually there is a financial reward to the family. This is scary to most of us and it's just as well. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Whats the difference
Posted by: Nedtheredhead on Oct 9, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans have killed far too many in the name of 'protecting self interest', yet they complain when other nations do exactly the same thing. Of course the means by which each protects their interests are different, America develops WMDs and stockpiles more that the world will ever need, and only 'sells' them to those they claim are 'friends' while the Iraqis, Iranians, Afghan's, Pakistani people, and numerous other individuals, bodies and countries use whatever means at their disposal.
The day America stops becoming an unwanted 'guest' in everyone elses countries is the day we have world peace.
I don't condone suicide bombers, but I fully understand why they do it.
Every country invaded by a foreign force use whatever means at their disposal to prevent that invasion. Until America as a whole, realises they have created this very unpeaceful world, we will continue to see expansions of radical nationalists from countries we know, and ones we don't as yet know, fighting for their right to exist in this so called free world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not new
Posted by: Melvin on Oct 9, 2007 10:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Suicide bombing is not new & goes back to WWII. The first time I read of a suicide attack was an RAF crew that purposely crashed into a bridge during the Battle of France. the second was a US Navy crew that crashed into a battle ship during the Battle of the Midway. It happened more times after these two instances & the crews were heros!
The 'fanatics' have little other recourse than to use these tactics; do we expect them to don coats of red & form squares!
One day in the future dare I say that we in the west may have to turn to such tactics to rescue our democracy from a ever more repressive government/s.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

oops!
Posted by: Spot on Oct 13, 2007 6:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
dunno if anyone cares or not, but something carried is borne, not born.

something of a person would be called a baby.
something born of a truck is just unnatural.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]