Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Five Lies About the European Economy Debunked

By Steven Hill, The Washington Post. Posted October 8, 2007.


Western Europe has achieved a balance between capitalism's dynamism and socialism's humanity -- no wonder the Corporate State has to lie about its success.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Steven Hill

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In the global economy, today's winners can become tomorrow's losers in a twinkling, and vice versa. Not so long ago, American pundits and economic analysts were snidely touting U.S. economic superiority to the "sick old man" of Europe. What a difference a few months can make. Today, with the stock market jittery over Iraq, the mortgage crisis, huge budget and trade deficits, and declining growth in productivity, investors are wringing their hands about the U.S. economy. Meanwhile, analysts point to the roaring economies of China and India as the only bright spots on the global horizon.

But what about Europe? You may be surprised to learn how our estranged transatlantic partner has been faring during these roller-coaster times -- and how successfully it has been knocking down the Europessimist myths about it.

1. The sclerotic European economy is incapable of leading the world.

Who're you calling sclerotic? The European Union's $16 trillion economy has been quietly surging for some time and has emerged as the largest trading bloc in the world, producing nearly a third of the global economy. That's more than the U.S. economy (27 percent) or Japan's (9 percent). Despite all the hype, China is still an economic dwarf, accounting for less than 6 percent of the world's economy. India is smaller still.

The European economy was never as bad as the Europessimists made it out to be. From 2000 to 2005, when the much-heralded U.S. economic recovery was being fueled by easy credit and a speculative housing market, the 15 core nations of the European Union had per capita economic growth rates equal to that of the United States. In late 2006, they surpassed us. Europe added jobs at a faster rate, had a much lower budget deficit than the United States and is now posting higher productivity gains and a $3 billion trade surplus.

2. Nobody wants to invest in European companies and economies because lack of competitiveness makes them a poor bet.

Wrong again. Between 2000 and 2005, foreign direct investment in the E.U. 15 was almost half the global total, and investment returns in Europe outperformed those in the United States. "Old Europe is an investment magnet because it is the most lucrative market in the world in which to operate," says Dan O'Brien of the Economist. In fact, corporate America is a huge investor in Europe; U.S. companies' affiliates in the E.U. 15 showed profits of $85 billion in 2005, far more than in any other region of the world and 26 times more than the $3.3 billion they made in China.

And forget that old canard about economic competitiveness. According to the World Economic Forum's measure of national competitiveness, European countries took the top four spots, seven of the top 10 spots and 12 of the top 20 spots in 2006-07. The United States ranked sixth. India ranked 43rd and mainland China 54th.

3. Europe is the land of double-digit unemployment.

Not anymore. Half of the E.U. 15 nations have experienced effective full employment during this decade, and unemployment rates have been the same as or lower than the rate in the United States. Unemployment for the entire European Union, including the still-emerging nations of Central and Eastern Europe, stands at a historic low of 6.7 percent. Even France, at 8 percent, is at its lowest rate in 25 years.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: europe, economy, social welfare system

Steven Hill, director of the New America Foundation's political reform program, is writing a book comparing Europe and the United States.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Great Article. Good to hear myths debunked about the rightist "sclerotic economy" canard.
Posted by: yellow on Oct 8, 2007 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US is still the number one destination for global foreign direct investment inflow according to the UN Council on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). According to UNCTAD, the US accounted for nearly 17% of global direct investment inflows (about $1.5 trillion) in this year approaching a quarter trillion dollars. This is probably due to rapidly declining real wages and a large domestic market capable of absorbing output. Also there is already so much manufacturing fdi in the US. The declining dollar also cheapens the purchase of US assets.

Much of the article is dead on. Europe is growing again and employment levels are picking up. High productivity is probably the result of better treatment of workers and better health care. A strong Euro could invite massive imports and reduce employment but EU balance of trade deficits seem to be smaller than those of the US. Probably because they don't have the same global supply chain model based on Walmart that sends manufacturing jobs overseas at a quickening pace that increases every year. Also the EU is more energy efficient. They have mass transit and conserve energy.

There is much the US can learn from the EU. So long as Bush is at the helm pushing his oil friends' interests, well never make the EU's progress.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's been clear
Posted by: spencerh on Oct 8, 2007 11:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for quite a while that Socio-Capitalism if the current most equitable, work-supporting, pro-human happiness system we've devised to date.

It's long past time to move on to an explicit mixed/heterodox economic model in US and far, far away from the Market Fundamentalist (Libertarian/Objectivist) model. It would consist of the following:

* Based on markets. Markets work.
* Strong regulation. Unregulated markets don't work.
* Strong worker and environmental protections.
* Strong social systems. Nationalized health care and free higher education, to start.
* Strong social safety nets.

The most important thing is that it's not ideology based beyond "what is best for people and the city/state/nation?". That would be the only guiding principle. With that in mind, we'd constantly renegotiate the variables (state vs. market control, regulation vs. lack thereof, social systems present or absent, public vs. private ownership, and so on) with regards to our system to keep it working best for people and locality. It's a reality-based system, freed from the constraints of failed or failing theories.

One of the most important parts: anything that's judged to be a market failure is taken out of the market. Police protection, the Military, fire protection (which are out already), health care, and education (which need to be taken out) are the most salient examples.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Clear as a... Turd Blossom? Posted by: eddie torres
Steppenwolf__
Posted by: Steppenwolf__ on Oct 8, 2007 1:47 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. As a long-time economic democracy and labour activist with a key interest in European history and business, I can attest this is pretty accurate stuff--and it's only the beginning.

While things are far from nirvana over there as well, it's clear that the strong historic influence of the socialist movement has paid off.

By "socialism(or communism)," of course, I mean the actual practical historic meaning of the democratic control of business and the economy by workers and their communities; the primary mode of long-term sustainability and well-being in development; the primary satisfaction of human need and self-improvement; fundamental liberties and inclusive decision-making, etc. I don't mean bureaucratic state capitalist corporate structures--in particular the totalitarian centrally regulated supposedly "transitional" economic model of the Leninist/Stalinist/Maoist regimes.

[URL=http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ 1468-232X.00302?journalCode=irel]Lenin: Industrial Management under a State Capitalist Monopoly Framework [/URL]

[URL=http://tinyurl.com/2hwvh9]Progress Publishers, Moscow; Lenin: State Capitalism During the Transition to Socialism (Index) [/URL]

[URL=http://tinyurl.com/28jzxl]Lenin and Bukharin on the Transition from Capitalism to Socialism[/URL]

[URL=http://www.marxists.org/reference/ archive/mao/selected-works/ volume-5/mswv5_30.htm]Mao: State capitalism on Building the Economy-- Conference on Financial and Economic Framework 1953[/URL]

(the spaces in the URL links allow we to post them here--otherwise they would be too long. To follow them, just take the spaces out).

It seems while the regimes of the East were champions of meaningless socialist-sounding rhetoric, Western Europe has been actually trying to practically implement socialistic economics with obviously a large degree of success. While the economies there are also predominantly capitalist, it's clear the socialistic influence has paid off for them with higher living standards, better working conditions, more innovation and dynamism and overall greater social and personal liberty.

As in comparison with the backward-ass oppressive and un-innovative trickle-down corporate capitalist economics in North America, especially over the last 30 years, Europe is clearly weathering the horrors and challenges of the global economy far better than here and gives people some chance of hope for improvement, instead of the further erosion of living standards and freedoms we are suffering from here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

post imperialism or neo-imperialism?
Posted by: peacelf on Oct 8, 2007 3:01 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is safe to say we can celebrate the positive outcomes of European economies. They are by far more democratic than the U.S., but does their wealth still come on the backs of poor people around the world?

In other words, do they use sweatshop labor to produce their goods? Do they have a pool of low wage immigrant labor? And, in a world market, are they exploiting cheap resources from poor third world countries?

I hope the answer to these are negative, but I'd guess otherwise. Moreover, they may have great environmental standards in Europe, but the rest of the world needs a good kick in the gas.

Something to think about when crafting america's post imperialism.

peace

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

All I know is
Posted by: JSquercia on Oct 9, 2007 2:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All I know is that the Euro is killing the dollar . In 2003 I visited Italy and the Euro and the dollar were comparable .I believe it was $1,05 for a Euro . Today it is $1.40 for a Euro .
Many feel that the driving force in the Invasion of Iraq was Saddam's desire to switch to the Euro as the basis for his oil .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sharing & caring
Posted by: fearn on Oct 11, 2007 4:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having lived in both places this is all about sharing and caring. Europeans care about much more than work and money. They care more about each other and putting a few million of their fellow citizens in jail would be considered a massive failure of their societies. They understand that paying taxes is for the common good. They understand that unlimited wealth is a problem. Many protest militarism which is a fraction of US spending. Building durable, quality goods is a way of life so Walmart has had a tough time dominating Europe. Alternate energy is big business and getting bigger quickly because the oil guys have less clout. There are many more reasons but Europe just seems so much more civilized!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]