Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Our Grandparents: The Real Environmentalists?

By Clayton Dach, Adbusters. Posted October 3, 2007.


Whether by choice or harsh necessity, those who came of age during the Great Depression might have a thing or two to teach us about being green.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Clayton Dach

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

My mom is confessing to me over the phone.

"I have to admit," she says, "as a kid I thought my baba was a horrible old woman." The horrible old woman is her dad's mother, Pearl, the great-grandmother that I'm too young to remember. "She had almost her entire backyard filled with strawberry bushes, but when we'd go over there, she would see us looking at them and she'd scream, 'Don't you touch those strawberries!'"

"We didn't understand how she could have that much and not let us have any. So we would wait until she wasn't looking, and we'd crawl on our bellies through the dirt and bite the strawberries right off the plants."

I didn't ask her to confess these childhood crimes, exactly, yet she is confirming the suspicion that led me to give her a ring: although they are among the most familiar faces in our lives, on certain counts our grandparents don't just seem to come from the distant past, but from the queerest reaches of outer space. It's pretty safe to wager that, for most of us who graduated from diapers among strip malls and cable television, our grandparents lived lives astonishingly different from our own. (Even my parents -- who are still in their 50s -- are able to regale me with stories that make it sound as if they grew up competing for nuts and seeds with the woolly mammoth.)

Look to the current spate of environmentally minded "ordeal books," whose authors detail Herculean struggles with self-imposed sustainability challenges -- 100-mile diets, a year without shopping or electricity, life without TV or the tiniest scrap of garbage. I applaud them all, yet I imagine that my grandparents would be less impressed, seeing as how they could handily check off the entire list of deprivations and likely add a few more besides. The very fact that this genre has been saddled with the "ordeal" moniker should serve to illuminate the howling chasm between my baba's youth and my own.

And so I have to suppress my generational pride (not to mention that lingering sense of injustice over my gido's unwillingness to accept my teenage haircuts) and admit something unflattering: If my grandparents hail from outer space, it is from a planet quite possibly more sustainable than the one I have always called home, and despite having gone about their business not knowing their greenhouse gases from their carbon credits, they might still have a thing or two to teach me about being green.

They appear to have the credentials to back them up. By and large, they used less water, burned less gas, needed less electricity, put less carbon up into the air, imported less food, bought fewer cars, built much smaller homes and threw out way less garbage. Moreover, whether they accomplished this by choice or by harsh necessity, they managed it all without organic grocery stores and front-loading washing machines and hybrid gas-electric cars and compact fluorescent lightbulbs -- all of those glittering new consumer choices that we keep hearing so much about.

Regrettably, I arrived at this realization a little too late, since all of my grandparents have passed on. So I did what any self-respecting young(ish) man does upon finding himself in a jam: I called my mom and dad for help.

Clean your plate (and quit showing off)

I've always enjoyed getting on my dad's case for his shitty diet, which, as far as I can tell, consists of two parts red meat, two parts milk, one part potato, and only incidental traces of vegetable. In turn, and maybe in revenge, my dad enjoys nauseating me with tales of how much he loved it when his mother would set aside bacon fat and other pan drippings for spreading on toast at breakfast.

There's more to his rhapsodizing about lard than arterial hardening. That congealed animal fat was just one aspect of a general refusal on the part of his parents to say goodbye to anything that could still be put to good use. Having little disposable income probably had something to do with that. So did the provenance of these inconspicuous scraps of food, which, no matter how humble or downright unappetizing, represented many months of backbreaking labour.

My dad, like my mom, grew up on a farm among the wheat fields and underwhelming curves of the central Albertan parkland. With a few exceptions like spices and sugar, nearly everything they ate was grown or raised right there, on the farm, with the family's own hands. Sinking one's teeth into a juicy drumstick meant weeks of turning eggs several times a day in an incubator, followed by months of feedings and poo shovelling, followed by a few furious minutes of squawking and thrashing and spurting blood, followed by the plucking and the gutting and the dismembering, followed at last by the actual cooking. After all of that, throwing away any part of that chicken would have been nothing short of criminal. (To this day, Dad remains a big fan of the gizzards, while Mom claims to have always loved "sucking the jelly right off of the toe bones.") As for those things that couldn't be grown, edible or otherwise, it was all bought with money from the grain harvest, from selling gallons of cream to the local creamery, or from moonlighting whenever there was slack in the farm work.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: green, environment, consumption, sustainability

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Our grandparents as environmentalists
Posted by: tempyra on Oct 3, 2007 2:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I particularly liked this article - it made more of an impact probably because I was listening an interview on the radio this morning with an environmental scientist on the topic of cleaning around the home. Basically, our grandparents were on the right track there too (before the craze for over-specialized chemicals I mean) - stripping the sheets and airing mattresses to get rid of dust mites, opening the windows and doors everyday and using washing soda, baking powder, vinegar, hot water and plain old elbow grease for cleaning round the home. Not only was this low tech approach arguably better for health (minimizing allergic and toxic reactions) but better for the environment. Wouldn't it be cool if we could, with our improved knowledge of the environment, choose to start re-using these old fashioned methods?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Our grandparents as environmentalists Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
» Health Posted by: suprmark
» RE: Hey! That's my generation Posted by: Edward George
My fascist-sympathising grandmother was more green...
Posted by: Frankstank on Oct 3, 2007 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Than the average environmental campaigner today. And that is sad. She kept a full garden brimming with fruits and veggies. She also kept chickens until they were banned in urban areas.

She always cooked fresh meals from scratch. And while simple at times, her food was always tasty.

Her politics would make your toes curl: she hated immigrants, openly spoke badly about black people, voted for right-wing parties. But she was green.

I have a hard time listening to so-called green campaigners who fly all the time, drive SUVs, live like yuppies. Their credibility is compromised in the extreme.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I agree Posted by: Frankstank
» RE: I agree Posted by: sunflwrmoonbeam
Some grandparents yes... some, no.
Posted by: greentime on Oct 3, 2007 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The grandparents in my family did live closer to the earth. and yes, they did recycle and save and reuse and not waste as much as current generations.

However, they also used DDT and a host of other toxic chemicals and believed controling or even destroying nature was a viable approach to "progress" at the top of the food chain. They did not avoid cancer, heart disease and a host of other maladies. They lacked a holistic view of the natural world. Biodiversity wasn't on the charts.

It is nice to be nostalgic, it is good to look back and see the positive parts of the past. I would caution though, that we see the whole picture. Where our beliefs are taking us must be in balance with the truth of where we believe we have been.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My old man
Posted by: mazel on Oct 3, 2007 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
was from that generation. He was very strict about the electric ("Turn off that damn light when you leave the room!"), the natural gas ("Close the goddamn door--are you trying to heat the neighborhood?") and the water ("You left the faucet dripping--what the hell's wrong with you, you think water is free?") But he loved to drive, and he used Raid like housewives of the day used Glade.

I enjoyed reading this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT REALLY ISN'T ALL ABOUT BEING GREEN
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Oct 3, 2007 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until recently, people were not completely self absorbed. Decisions of all kinds were made with consequences in mind.Without thinking, people had a sharing mentality. The food, electricity, roads, water, etc. belonged to everyone. F.U. was not yet a philosophy. Looking back, the motive was not about "green" or conserving. Waste was simply wrong. As people felt the need to compete as consumers, that all changed. And so did we. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Century of the Self Posted by: parmenicleitus
A Word for Modest Living
Posted by: rileycase on Oct 3, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I consider myself a conservative. I am usually not pleased with the "environmentalists" because I suspect that part of their agenda is simply to be anti-Republican and anti-capitalist. Our personal efforts at modest living will not slow down global warming. But I do believe that from a Christian perspective we are to be good stewards of the earth and that means living modestly and responsibly. I grew up on four acres (inside the city limits) where my family kept chickens, cows (for a while), 10 kinds of fruit trees, and a root cellar. My father never got anything extra on a car and he drove cars until they wore out. We never used DDT. We hardly ever ate out. Even when he could afford most anything he wanted my father bought shoes at the church rummage sale (to the embarrasement of my mother and my sisters who kept buying him new things).
I have tried to live the same way. Last night I was at our local Lowe's rummaging through the dumpster (in a suit) when one of the employees asked me what I was doing. The answer: checking to see what you are throwing away. I have found a lot of good stuff there. I refuse (often but not always) to buy the fruit and vegetables at our local grocery store if I know it was grown in California. My fruits and vegetables are (not 100% but for the most part) organic (you can't do apples and roses and cabbage without spray). I chair out local Rescue Mission because we are in the business of reclaiming and making use of anything given to us (as well as reclaiming lives).
My wife grew up on a farm in North Dakota which was almost 100% self-sufficient. Her father cut ice and mined coal even.
When I took economics 101 I realized this life style does not help the economy, which thrives when people spend, spend, spend. Fashions change monthly. People trade cars every year. Stores throw away food because they are afraid of law suits if they give it away.
I am not always sure what motivates the "greens" that I know. For me part of the motivating is to live modestly so I have more resources to share with others (my goal is to give away 20% of my income each year).
I find this perspective very much alive among conservative Christians, especially among groups like Amish and Mennonites.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Word for Modest Living Posted by: FriendlyFeminist
» RE: A Word for Modest Living Posted by: Jeff Hoffman
» California? Posted by: sweet_byrd
» RE: California? Posted by: rileycase
» RE: California? Posted by: sweet_byrd
The good old days
Posted by: rocketman on Oct 3, 2007 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what a great article... we do live in times of excess and take many things for granted. When one has to buy bottled water you know our environment is in trouble... my father grew up as a farmer before WW2. The stories are amazing but one can see such appreciation for the small things that count - not how many cars can I own at once!

This could be the sole reason Gore might be the best choice

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Too bad they did fight to legalize INDUSTRIAL HEMP.
Posted by: maxpayne on Oct 3, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then us younger ones would have had something to learn. But here's something better to do so that future generations will proudly look at us for getting something right. Fight to not only legalize INDUSTRIAL HEMP cultivation and growth but to also block monopolization from Big Oil as they're the ones responsible for buying out and stifling growth in the alternative renewable (solar, wind, hydro, geothermal, hemp, etc ...) market.

And lastly, ABOLISH the DEA, FDA, CIA, FBI, FCC, Corporate Welfare SHITPOT, Chamber of Commerce, etc ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's not green, it's just sane
Posted by: alby on Oct 3, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Texas, where I live now, rainwater collection is considered a big innovation, but my Polish-American grandparents were using salvaged 55-gallon drums to collect rain to water their garden in suburban NJ. Why pay for H2O when it falls from the sky for free, Papa used to say with a grin.

Everyone has neat little lawns and no vegetables, neighborhood associations are furious at the thought of a chicken in the backyard, and green is fine: as long as it looks pretty and doesn't mean "poor" or "immigrant".

But that is exactly why our grandparents were green, for the most part.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The best of times, the worst of times...........
Posted by: Basenjis on Oct 3, 2007 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My mother solved the heat loss problem by hanging blankets in the doorways separating other rooms from the warmer living room and kitchen. The living room was heated by a pot-bellied stove and the kitchen by a wood-burning range whose oven door was often left open to help warm that cavernous country kitchen.

I, myself, am a child of the Great Depression. I grew up on a farm where every member of the household had his or her chores to do and woe to those who failed to remember.

My dad switched from raising tobacco to growing tomatoes during those years and from the age of seven until we lost the farm when I was fourteen, I helped plant and hoe and weed and pick tomatoes as well as keeping up with other chores such as hand pumping water for horses, cows, pigs, sheep and whatever sundry other farm animals we happened to have. I can tell you there were lots of them and they were very thirsty.

The worst job was picking great fat, squishy, green caterpillars off the tobacco plants and depositing them in large mason jars. Fortunately that didn't last long as my father, in obedience to his conscience, stopped growing the more lucrative tobacco and switched to tomatoes.

When my peers and I get together, we talk about those times and someone always says, "yes, but we lived in the best of times in America, the very best that America has ever had to offer." Then my sister launches into her routine keeping us in stitches when she describes her favorite depression garment, a red silk petticoat she wore at twelve with ribbons and ruffles and flounces made from something found in an attic trunk.

We had nothing new. All my life my feet have bothered me due to the misplacement of bones caused by wearing my older sister's hand-me-down shoes. Everything we had was cut-down, made over, adapted from something else, or simply stitched together from flour sacks. Even the "sheets" on our beds were cut from coarse laundered tobacco canvas. I still remember trying to avoid lying on the seams as they were not only uncomfortable, but left their marks next morning.

Those were difficult times. but I had a good childhood. I learned early how to cope on my own, a most useful thing that has benefitted me all my adult life. I am a great problem solver.

Since a lot of history of the human race has been lost due to the burnings of libraries, distortion of facts and other acts of human ignorance, we don't really know what all we have been through down through the milleniums. The experts keep pushing back the time span of human life on this little planet. We've been around a very long time. I do not believe that this time we have trashed the earth beyond salvation and that we are about to blow every last one of us and the planet, too, into oblivion. Good people armed with all kinds of innovative new ideas and scientific knowledge, spiritual energy and practical insights as well as many ordinary but far-seeing, earth-loving, inventive, common-sense activists both here and in other parts of the world. Our part is to simplify, simplify, simplify, strip down to those genuine good essentials, educate ourselves, share, cooperate and become a part of the solution.

I am no scientist, but I wonder if it is true as biological geneticists are telling us that the overwhelming percentage of information contained in DNA-coding appears to be "garbage" or the stuff left over from previous failed adaptations to environmental changes or realities, if this, the worst of times, may not be just another human evolutionary blunder. Human beings are remarkably resilient. We've had to be to survive over and over our own self-destructive habits. Maybe--just maybe-- it's still not too late to change directions. We know the problems and we know the solutions. We can do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a teenager
Posted by: UnEasyOne on Oct 3, 2007 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I lived with my single parent mom. She sold real estate, wore nice clothes, drove a nice car, ate out a lot and (as I learned later) had a decent income.

On the other hand, the light, gas, water bill often went unpaid until they were cut off and our house was always on the verge of foreclosure. My three younger brothers and I were literally on the verge of starvation. My mom's idea of grocery shopping was to buy some canned goods and ten or fifteen cheap TV dinners to last us a couple of weeks. I started stealing food until I could find work and rarely ate at home - because anything I ate was literally coming out of the mouths of my little brothers.

For a while, my depression era grandmother and aunt moved in with us and took over the shopping and cooking. On about half the money mom had spent, suddenly there was more food in the house than we could eat. I didn't stay in the house long after that, so didn't learn much from em - but I remembered.

I had found out how much money mom was making, you see - and I had been turning over every nickel I earned to her. What are you gonna do when the lights and water are off, or the house is about to be repossesed?

I split and hitchhiked around the country for a couple of years. I stopped stealing, but learned how to get by on practically nothing. There were times that what I ate was a handful of peanuts, a handful of raisins and a handful of granola three times a day for weeks. I was usually hungry - but I felt GREAT! I am sure I was healthier then than any time before or since.

Meantime my mom was making more and more money and getting deeper and deeper in debt.

When I decided to settle, I decided that I was gonna have to learn how to live within my means. Before, I had always tried to find the best paying job and spent the money as fast as I could - because mom was always gonna have a heart-rending sob story and "borrow" whatever cash I had.

I got a job as a janitor paying $75 bucks a week (I had found a garage apt. for $75 a month - it was the late 70s). I managed to take care of my expenses, save $2 a week, and had an entertainment budget - $2 a week. (Movie matinée and no popcorn).

From that point, I moved on to better paying jobs - increasing my expenditures by half the increase in salary. I had gotten married to a girl I met on the road (she was NOT a fan of my thrift ) and she got pregnant.

I began saving furiously and looking for a better job. My grandmother told me the people next door to her were about to lose their house. I negotiated with the owner and took over the house and payments after making up their arrears. I started a job and moved into the "new" house (actually very old) the month my son was born.

My (very old ) car was junk and I had to drive about 40 miles a day to work. I had wiped out my savings moving in and it was a struggle for a while, but in about 6 months I had a better car and was starting to save again.

Then, when my son was 2, I got disabled. Suddenly no income. My wife (who considered what I earned "our" money and what she earned "her" money ) stayed around till "our" money was used up and split the day before her payday.

So I was about as broke as one can be. My house note was low, but I had NO income - and a kid to support.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As a teenager part 2 Posted by: UnEasyOne
rural Nebraska pre-1970s: almost totally self-sufficient
Posted by: zooeyhall on Oct 3, 2007 10:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I grew up on a farm in northeastern Nebraska. I was born in 1955 but can still remember how we were almost totally self-sufficient with food. I remember that mom every year had this huge garden with tomatoes, cucumbers, onions, peas, beans..just about everything. WE also had fruit trees. In those days, kids were kept busy "nipping" beans, shelling peas, grinding tomatoes for juice, peeling apples for caning, gathering eggs from our chickens, plucking a chicken for the evening meal...you name it. (I can't imagine a modern city teenager catching a chicken, chopping it's head off, scalding it with boiling water and then plucking the feathers!)

One of my earliest memories as a child is mom on a hot summer's day with this huge pressure cooker and jars and jars of stuff being gotten ready to put down the basement.
I remember in the early spring my siblings and myself sitting on the doorstep with my dad, cutting up seed potatoes from a big burlap bag. And then Dad going out with the plow and plowing furrow after furrow while us kids put the potatoes in the furrow.

And of course there was butchering. About the only thing that was a concession to what would be called modernity was that Dad in the fifties bought a big Frigidaire deep freezer. But my uncles and grandparents would all come and spend an entire day butchering a cow or two and several hogs. They had all the meat saws and sausage grinders to do a complete job.

It was like this on every farm back then--whether rich or poor. My folks said that in the 30's and 40's that about the only things that were bought were flour, coffee, and things like salt. EVERHTHING else that was eaten was home grown.

When the 70's came, and Mom and dad were getting older and my older siblings had left home, they gradually went over to buying "store" food (as my mom called it).

Now as to the question whether it was a BETTER lifestyle then what we have today--it had it's pros and cons. The main advantage was that you could live on next to nothing $$$-wise. It also was a family enterprise that really taught kids responsibility and working for their parents. Compared to the fuel costs of modern foods brought to your local grocery store--home raised and processed foods had a virtully nil cost.

On the negative side would have to be placed the sheer amount of hard work it took to do all of this. You needed plenty of help and it had to be available at the time you needed it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

there are those of us...
Posted by: Farmertim on Oct 3, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
who still do everything listed above as it pertains to food, but with a little help from the commercial side of the industry.
As an organic/biological farmer who provides everything we can grow directly to people in the area, I can say it can be done, but the only hold back from making the shift to local food and a cooperative effort in getting fed each day is the ability of people to realize that it is important.
The saddest thing I see every day is the inability of people to show up on time to get what they said they wanted when I said it would be ready.
Some how people have begun to think that food is not important and if you miss a delivery, Oh well..I'll get it at the store.
My grandparents couldn't afford to go to the store, not because of gas prices...they didn't have the money to go to the store, and what for anyway, we can grow it for nearly free.
Most of my product is dairy..milk, cream, butter..I keep telling people its much easier to make your own butter and is cheaper as well...nope I will pay you to do it for me..I don't have the time.
What.. it takes 5 min to make a lb of butter now a days..nope make it for me.
It seems eating has become like our lives.. a goal of luxury not nessecity, and when you get to that point its not much further down the road to crappy quality.. but boy does it look nice.
I can't even get people to return the pint jars to forgo a $1.00 charge for not bringing it back...nope charge me.. got to go.
And these are the most responsible green consumers I know.
This article has brought the argument of "green" to the basics...its not what you can buy to be green...its what you can do to be green with less and still have what you need...not live and work for what you want, with your foot to the floor on your way to more money to buy more green items to save the environment......
They still make caning jars, and most can be gotten free at rummage sales, pressure cookers are still made, you just have to set the time a side to do so..more over realize that not working so much is the best green move one can make!
who knows you just might bump into someone who still knows how.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the grasshopper and the ant
Posted by: madaha on Oct 3, 2007 12:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the commenters who say it's not about being "green" - it's not! It's about being PRACTICAL. The moral of the fable of the grasshopper and the ant isn't to become more environmentally aware, it's to not fritter away your time, and plan for the future of resource scarcity (winter). We've been a nation/world of grasshoppers for 2 generations now, and we need a good dose of practical wisdom from the now practically extinct ants.

Here's one link among many with the story for those unfamiliar:
http://www.umass.edu/aesop/content.php?n=0&i=1

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I was lucky
Posted by: Chloe2005 on Oct 3, 2007 12:24 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to have grown up in a well off family. We lived on five acres outside of the city. My parents were always avid gardeners because they loved it. We ate fresh food. My mother baked her own bread. ( I used to trade my tuna sandwiches on homemade bread for peanut butter & jelly on Wonder bread). We had fruit and nut trees, berries, etc. my mother canned and bought dairy from the neighbor. She was a gourmet cook who had taken cooking lessons all over the world. My mother also did her own sewing even though she could afford the best. She did these things because she loved it. She did not believe in wasting. She recycled. She gave a great deal. She shared with people. It's time to take the best of yesterday and combine it with the best of today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The War (WW2)
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Oct 3, 2007 12:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
pulled America out of the Depression and I remember everyone was advised to grow a "Victory Garden". By that time my father had purchased 3.5 acres and we lived out of our garden, raised our own chickens and were much healthier than many of our neighbors who were stuck with store-bought groceries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Difference Between Green And Poor
Posted by: Jeff Hoffman on Oct 3, 2007 2:17 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that people do not consume much because they cannot does not make them green, except possibly with envy for those who can. The reason that the difference is so important is that if and when poor people become middle class or rich, they will consume all they can if they're not green. The grandparents and great grandparents remembered here were not being frugal because they wanted to spare trees or wolves -- in fact, they hated the latter and almost caused their extinction -- they lived simply because that was all they could afford to do. As soon as their children or grandchildren became rich or middle class, they began consuming as much as they could, which greatly contributed to putting us in the ecological mess we're in today.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For Almost All Of Human History, People Lived Sustainably
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Oct 3, 2007 8:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the thirld world, Baba's lifestyle is still today's lifestyle. People have such short historical memories they think that if they personally cannot remember something, it is ancient history. But as the article itself says, approximately half of Earth's population is still rural, most of them in the developing world, where many poor villagers live in medieval conditions, often without electricity, running water or internet connections.

The modern technology-based urban Western lifestyle has existed for less than a century. It is still a very brief social experiment, and not one that has any assurance of success.

The idea that urbanization can progress indefinitely could not be further from the truth. Modern urban civilization is a historical anomaly, an evanescent bubble on an oil pond, to be exact. It is so artificial and fragile that a few month's interuption of oil supplies would leave millions of city dwellers to starve in situ, without trucks to haul in their food from thousands of miles away. And how many of you would like to bet that some catastrophe like this will never happen? I think it's time to plant "victory gardens" again and break our reliance on distant food sources.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]