Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Will Drug Lord Do Less Time Than the Average American Nonviolent Drug Offender?

By Anthony Papa, AlterNet. Posted September 27, 2007.


Why Colombia's top drug lord may get off easier than small-time offenders in the U.S.
Advertisement

The U.S. government recently praised the arrest of Colombia's top drug lord Diego Montoya when he was captured earlier this month. Law enforcement and military officials say it was a powerful blow to Colombia's most powerful drug cartel, comparing it to the capture of Al Capone during Prohibition.

Montoya, who had been on the FBI's top ten most wanted list, is said to be responsible for providing as much as 70 percent of all the cocaine in the United States. In 1999, a $5 million bounty for his capture and extradition was offered after he was indicted in a federal court in Miami.

There is much talk about how this capture will affect the drug trade and the flow of drugs into the United States. But the question on my mind is how much time will he serve when he is brought to the United States to stand trial for the death and destruction he has caused? I would be willing to bet that he will get less time than many Americans who are now serving extraordinarily long sentences, many for low-level, nonviolent drug law violations under the notorious mandatory minimum sentencing laws. Some would ask how would I come to this conclusion.

If you look at the recently completed federal sentence of former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega, who served a 17-year federal sentence for drug trafficking, it might give you a hint what is in store for Montoya. In Noriega's case the U.S. attorney negotiated deals with 26 high-level drug dealers, including drug lord Carlos Lehder. They in turn received a package of perks that included leniency and cash payments, and were allowed to keep their drug earnings in return for testimony against the infamous general who was once a strong United States ally before he fell from grace in 1989, when the U.S. invaded Panama.

There are many Americans in prison that are serving sentences of more than 17 years in prison for simple drug crimes. These are marginalized offenders that don't have the bargaining chips to establish deals. For example, Elaine Bartlett, a mother of four, served a 20-to-life sentence under the Rockefeller Drug Laws for seven ounces of cocaine. Her husband, Nathan Brooks, was sentenced to 25 years to life. The list goes on and on. There are an estimated 500,000 Americans locked up because of the drug war. Many of them are serving lengthy sentences because of a 30-year government campaign to demonize illicit drug use and implement mandatory minimum sentencing.

In 1986, mandatory minimum sentencing laws were enacted by Congress, which compelled judges to deliver fixed sentences to individuals convicted of certain crimes, regardless of mitigating factors or culpability. Federal mandatory drug sentences are determined based on three factors: the type of drug, weight of the drug mixture (or alleged weight in conspiracy cases), and the number of prior convictions. Judges are unable to consider other important factors, such as the offender's role, motivation and the likelihood of recidivism.

The push to incarcerate drug offenders has been further exacerbated through the current federal sentencing law that punishes crack cocaine offenders much more severely than offenders possessing other types of drugs, for example, powder cocaine. Distributing just five grams of crack carries a minimum five-year federal prison sentence while distributing 500 grams of powder cocaine carries the same sentence. This 100:1 sentencing disparity has been almost universally criticized for its racially discriminatory impact by a wide variety of criminal justice and civil rights groups, and in Congress. Although whites and Hispanics form the majority of crack users, the vast majority of those convicted for crack cocaine offenses are African Americans.

Because of the war on drugs, which mandates mandatory minimum sentencing, average drug offenders are routinely elevated to kingpin status and condemned to serve out long prison sentences that should be reserved only for actual drug kingpins, not individuals that are fabricated to that level. It's time to end these draconian laws and implement a sentencing structure that promotes fairness and justice.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: drugs, drug war

Anthony Papa is the author of 15 Years to Life: How I Painted My Way to Freedom and a communications specialist for Drug Policy Alliance. He can be reached at: anthonypapa123@yahoo.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Hip hip hooray!
Posted by: mizipi on Sep 27, 2007 2:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me see now.....the arrest of one person will greatly reduce the drug traffic to the USA?????? Just like getting rid of Saddam liberated Iraq.....?????? Our government law enforcement and military are nothing more than useless ways to waste tax moneys that belong to the people of the USA.

So, let's slap every ignorant voter on the back and hopefully we will continue to elect leaders who tell us how good we have it, while laughing all the way to the bank!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hip hip hooray! Posted by: Loyal Joe
» Big Frickin Deal!! Posted by: Ely Whitney
» RE: Hip hip hooray! Posted by: donl51
Unevenly applied justice is an intrinsic element pay to play system
Posted by: american on Sep 27, 2007 5:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since O. J. Simpson, the person who has enough money has won every legal case that has come across my purview. Thus the wealthy, who have enough money for a front line defense in terms of being capable of maintaining secrecy and paying for the services of professionals to handle all of the details involved in skirting the law, get away. The problem is both cultural and systemic. It is cultural in that in American society, more value is placed on wealthy people than on people of humbler means, even though the person of humbler means may be a far greater person as an individual. The problem of unevenly applied justice is systemic in that it is a pay to play system; there is a price for admission to justice and that price is called the legal profession. Even the Supreme Court has shown in that they appointed Bush to the Oval Office, that they will put aside rigorous justice in return for favor. As long as an individual has access (meaning lots of money) to a good lawyer and other mechanisms to defend against justice, statistically speaking, it is not very likely at all that they will wind up in a concrete cell.

Of course, it would be as much a problem if there were completely free decent legal representation as to get rid of common and decent laws; in our present experience, however, there is a single segment of society that for all intents and purposes is above the law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In VA Beach, drunk drivers get paroled and freed faster than nonviolent offenders.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 27, 2007 6:16 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, it further breaks down along racial lines. Moreover, it's very rare that nonviolent offenders even get a parole and even then it is once in a blue moon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

all montoya needs to do
Posted by: somegirl on Sep 27, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is talk about how much he hates chavez and castro and he will be let go like posada carriles. doesn't matter how big of a crime network you run, as long as you're waving a winger flag.

thanks, alternet...yet another travesty of justice i'm gonna have to watch as it plays out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bob Dylan said it best..
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Sep 27, 2007 9:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bob Dylan said it...


"Steal a little and they throw you in jail, steal a lot and they make you king..!"

Simple as that...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lost in the Buzz
Posted by: 3rd-Chimp on Sep 27, 2007 11:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mr. Papa rightly questions the madness of U.S. drug sentencing laws and the justice of our punishment of drug offenders. I heartily agree with him. Yet, I worry that in asking these questions, nothing of substance is contributed to the discussion of U.S. drug policy.

It seems to me that this piece is just adding to the buzz surrounding an isolated PR event. In doing so, it takes our attention away from the bigger picture. Our focus is drawn to this dramatic picture of a single tree when the real issue is bigger than the forest; it’s the eco-system.

We’re being offered another flimsy justification for the “War on Drugs” [WOD]. It has all of the markings of another hollow victory like the slaying of Pablo Escobar in 1993 or the arrest of Manuel Noriega. It seems pointless to ask what effect Montoya’s removal from the drug trade will have on drug use no matter the extent of his sentence.

The real question is what are the driving forces behind all of this. In a society where powerful economic interests make huge profits from the WOD, what are the incentives to solve the root problem and end the war?

The breadth of the economic influence of the WOD is breathtaking. Who makes money on it? Who supplies equipment, weapons and training to law enforcement and others involved in the WOD? Who manufactures the chemicals for crop eradication? Who manufactures the chemicals for illicit drug production? Who builds the prisons? Who trains and equips the guards? Who owns and runs the prisons in an era of privatization? Who stands to lose should we succeed and eliminate substance abuse as a significant social problem?

Focusing on the narrow issue of unfair sentencing, the questions I’d like answered are who is making money because of harsh sentencing and how are they influencing sentencing guidelines.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The children of inmates
Posted by: Infamous on Sep 27, 2007 10:39 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For example, Elaine Bartlett, a mother of four, served a 20-to-life sentence under the Rockefeller Drug Laws for seven ounces of cocaine. Her husband, Nathan Brooks, was sentenced to 25 years to life."

So what happened to these children? And what happens to child pornographers? Do they even get caught?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Relative expediency
Posted by: herbal on Sep 28, 2007 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why should any reaction to drug laws include comparison of jail terms? I am not a stoner but know that there is incredible money wasted in the 'war' in drugs in pursiut of mostly victimless crimes. Decriminalization and legalized supply in a "name-your-poison educated atmosphere is the only strategy that can help reduce inequity concerning society and drugs. What of the white collar crime of prescription drugs that are freely promoted in advertising (US is one of only two countries in the world) or prescription, and oft times addicting, drugs. Why should the author not compare small offenders jail time with the zero time of the major drug companies? In China, their chief drug regulator was executed when he took bribes to allow unproven drugs into the market that killed many people. Does this country provide the same penalties for Tan Sheet reported drug murderers, drug company executives, as street dealers who sell to overdose victims? Fenfen, Vioxx, Crestor, Zelnorm, Meridia, Neurontin,Prempro, Clelebrex, Risperdal,Pemoline, Rezulin, Bextra, etc. Look them up on: http://www.drugrecalls.com/ And these are just the recalled drugs that kill people.
How many people died from marihuana use, even heroin, or from dietary supplements or alternative medicine compared to legal drug deaths from prescription drugs??

According the the FDA's own published account, there are over 100,000 iatrogenic deaths last year in US hospitals alone due to misprescribed prescription drugs!

So what are relative times of jail time compared to the fundamental injustice of all drug policies in the USA?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just goes to show you..
Posted by: emd0764 on Sep 30, 2007 9:49 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you have money in this society, you receive no punishment for what crimes you commit. This is getting out of hand. I think our government is getting too much power. When are the American people going to have enough & stand up for our rights?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just goes to show you.. Posted by: donl51