Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bush Leaves Kids Uninsured to Protect His Ego

By Dean Baker, TruthOut.org. Posted September 25, 2007.


Perhaps there is nothing that can be done to change the balance of forces within Congress at the moment and, as a result, millions of kids will go without health insurance.
Advertisement

It can be embarrassing to admit a mistake. It can be really embarrassing to admit a mistake when you're the president of the United States and the mistake was taking the country into an unnecessary war. Admitting this mistake would be embarrassing to the president, to his party, and even to many Democrats who also thought a war with Iraq was a good idea at the time.

To avoid such embarrassment, the official policy of the United States is that no mistakes were made. As a result, more than 160,000 US soldiers remain in Iraq incurring casualties at a rate of more than 400 a month. Of course, the bloodshed and destruction has been far greater for Iraqis.

While it is less important than the direct human cost of this war, there is also the cost to the budget. By conservative estimates, the war is now costing the country $120 billion a year. This is equal to 4 percent of total spending or approximately $400 per person per year.

Another way to assess the importance of spending on the war is to compare it with other budget items that have been in the news. The State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP) provides an obvious example. President Bush is threatening Congress with a veto if it appropriates more money than he has requested.

The difference between the bill likely to be approved by Congress and the amount requested by President Bush is $30 billion over five years or $6 billion per year ($20 per person per year). The Congressional Budget Office estimates that this money would be enough to insure another 4 million children.

Let's compare the amount in dispute on the SCHIP bill with spending on the Iraq War. The $120 billion a year in spending on the war comes to about $10 billion a month, or $0.3 billion a day. This means every 20 days we spend enough money in Iraq to make up the full difference between the SCHIP bill likely to be approved by Congress and the amount of money requested by President Bush. Since CBO estimates this additional funding would ensure four million kids, we can conclude that every day we spend enough money on the war in Iraq to insure 200,000 kids for a year.

For the moment, the prospect for shifting money from the Iraq War to SCHIP or other domestic priorities looks bleak. President Bush would veto any measure that sought to bring about such a shift and there is certainly not a veto-proof majority for such steps.

Perhaps there is nothing that can be done to change the balance of forces within Congress at the moment and, as a result, millions of kids will go without health insurance. But there should at least be some recognition of the sacrifice these kids are making to protect President Bush's ego. Perhaps we can issue them all T-shirts, or maybe even medals, saying something like "I sacrificed health insurance to protect President Bush's ego." If we can't actually guarantee these kids decent health care, we should at least be able to acknowledge their sacrifice.

Of course, there are other ways to pay for expanding SCHIP, such as cutting the subsidies private insurers receive in the Medicare program. We can also change the Medicare prescription drug benefit so the drug companies only get to charge the same prices for drugs as they charge the Veterans Administration. Taking back these subsidies would provide far more than enough money to expand SCHIP, but these industries made big campaign contributions for these subsidies and don't intend to give them up without a big fight.

At this point, it seems likely SCHIP will not be expanded, or at least not by as much as Congress would like. If the political die is cast, the world should at least know millions of kids in this country will go without health insurance in order to protect President Bush's ego. People should know the truth.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: schip, bush

Dean Baker is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. TomPaine contributor.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Kids don't vote; seniors do
Posted by: defrag on Sep 25, 2007 10:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not much question why Bush let the Medicare prescription drug plan go and not this, despite the vast difference in cost.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Doctor Robert (Revolver)
Posted by: clawjack on Sep 25, 2007 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a Shame that this Egomaniac who could not recall even one mistake made during his first term is ripping off the most vulnerable members of our society to prosecute a war based on lies. To deny healthy care to children is surely an insult to our nation which calls for the "wretched refuse of the teeming shores " to be made welcome here. This Silver Spoon ought to have a modicum of decency if he is truly a follower of Jesus Christ. If His favorite Philosopher if going to be His Judge how much chance does he think he'll have when he refuses these children the crumbs from his table.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems playing Games
Posted by: Bettybb on Sep 25, 2007 7:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the Dems were serious about wanting to pass this law, they would not have changed the manner to determine entitlement, and let illegals get 3.7 billion worth of benefits.

All the Dems want is a fake campaign slogan implying the Repubs are anti health care for kids. But the American people are smart enough to realize that Repubs want that too, it is just how is it to be done and at what cost.

And I have voted for the Dems for 20 years. But this is just stupid game playing on their part, and only serves to annoy.
Besides, I think it will backfire. What will be taken away by the public is that Dems denied American kids health care because they wanted illegals to get it too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats are NOT being progressive here
Posted by: Puffin on Sep 29, 2007 3:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unless you're a smoker, being in favor of SCHIP won't cost you a dime. If you non-smokers are feeling all smug and smart, may I suggest that it's your patriotic duty to take up the habit. After all, it's for the children.

But the Democrats, those who call themselves progressives, need to reconsider. Taxing the sin du jour, while approving spending for war, seems pretty regressive to me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]