Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Fred Thompson: Desperate Republicans Cheer for a Reagan Wannabe

By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com. Posted September 24, 2007.


In Fred Thompson's fantasy world, all you have to do to be president is pretend you're the Gipper and act tough on TV.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Matt Taibbi

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

I can say exactly when I first knew that Fred Dalton Thompson is dangerous. It is 12:07 p.m. on Sunday, September 9th, in Manchester, New Hampshire, just outside a restaurant called Chez Vachon. Thompson has just served up another mumbling, noncommittal tour through a packed diner of breakfasting locals, sitting glumly through the requisite this-sure-is-great-coffee shot. Then, once the needed photos are banked, the lumbering B-list character actor -- who plays a video called "The Hunt for Red November" at every campaign stop and sells buttons that, in an unsettlingly McLuhanian twist, pimp him as the "Law and Order candidate" -- tries to make a quick beeline back to his bus. But a cheeky local TV reporter shouts at him before he can reach the door.

"Senator!" the reporter calls out. "What's harder, playing the president or being the president?"

It is a shitty New Hampshire day; as Thompson stands on the street in a blue polo shirt, cold rain splashes visibly off his bald head. There are times when the candidate's eyes go blank and you almost see a big sign in his brain screaming, "Line! Line!" Finally, he glances back at the reporter and grumbles, "Well, neither of 'em are that hard."

I turn to the TV guy, not sure of what I'd just heard.

"Did he just say ... ?"

"Yeah," the guy says, dumbfounded. "He just said being president isn't that hard."

I'm still trying to process this when I spot Carl Cameron, the right-wing hatchet man for Fox News. Cameron is whaling on Thompson, doing a mocking impersonation of the candidate's "Security, Unity, Prosperity" campaign shtick.

"We're, uh, gonna be yoo-nited bah owre yoo-nity!" Cameron cracks.

A crowd of reporters doubles over in laughter. Then they get in their vehicles and chase after Thompson to the next event, so they can feverishly record those same hackneyed lines again and again for posterity. They'll laugh in private, but they'll be repeating that shit on air with a straight face for the next 400 days.

Well, I think as I stand by myself on the curb, so much for Fred Thompson. After all, logic dictates that anyone who's too much of a lightweight for Fox News is probably...

I freeze. Probably what? Probably a shoo-in for the presidency, that's what! I shudder as I realize my mistake, and suddenly the candidacy of Fred Thompson, which seemed impossibly silly just a few minutes ago, makes deadly serious sense. Thompson may act like a blank slate -- a homespun version of Being There hero Chauncey Gardiner running on a platform of "Whatever you say" and "I'll get back to you on that" -- but he represents something else that no one, after seven years of George W. Bush, could possibly have expected: a new low. It was bad enough when the GOP field was led by a grinning Mormon corporatist and a fascist ex-mayor itching to take his prostate pain out on the world, but Thompson is the worst yet -- a human snooze button, campaigning baldly for the head-in-the-sand vote by asking Americans not to think but to change the channel.

And that, after all, is what the campaign trail is all about. Give voters a chance to go lower than they've ever gone before, and you'll get numbers in a heartbeat. Ladies and gentlemen, meet the next Republican front-runner. ***

In person, Fred Thompson reminds you of a lot of good actors who go numb when asked to play themselves. If you've ever listened to interviews with Laurence Olivier or Robert De Niro or any of a hundred other talented performers who can manhandle a script but seem at a loss when it comes to who they themselves really are, you'll recognize the same thing in Thompson.

That makes it all the more painful when you watch him try to sell his oddly thin biography as a great "American story." He has a few items of note on his résumé: minority counsel for the Republicans during the Watergate hearings (where he tipped off the White House that the committee knew about Nixon's secret tapes), lawyer for a Tennessee whistle-blower who exposed a cash-for-clemency scam in the governor's office, and two largely undistinguished terms as a U.S. senator. In between, there are about twenty-eight years of his adult life where he acted in bit parts in a few movies, and lobbied a little. Thompson's campaign video runs out of stuff to talk about after around ninety-eight seconds.

But he is on television, and has been in a movie with Sean Connery, and in the world of politics -- which is basically Hollywood for the ugly and talentless -- that makes him something close to a god on Earth, a veritable rock star. And despite his disinterested pose and empty-suit résumé, his TV persona gives him a natural advantage on the trail, one that most politicians can only dream of.

You have to see it to believe it, the effect that Fred Thompson has on certain crowds. Reporters who describe his public appearances as "bland" and "uninspiring" and "vague" and "blurry" do so because they're looking for the wrong thing; they're looking for theatrics, for fire and brimstone, for that candidate who can get crowds howling for blood. What Thompson inspires is something much more appropriate for Americans of the TV age: He gets audiences purring in a cozy stupor. Their eyes glaze over and they end up looking like a bunch of flies happily lapping up their own puke.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: matt taibbi, election 2008, fred thompson

Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
There is no there there
Posted by: vox persona on Sep 24, 2007 1:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This just goes to demonstrate the disenchantment Republicans feel toward their slate, but I felt the same way about Reagan in '80. But they elected Ronald (6) Wilson (6) Reagan (6) anyway, steering us on our tragic journey toward corporatocracy. Now we have son of 666 with George (6) Walker (6) Bush (4)....Damn, just missed it. He must be a 666 wannabe doing the bidding of his puppeteers, the real "beast".
Thompson has name and face recognition, making him a shoe-in for the votes of the unthinking Repug droids, and the rest of the sheeple will just fall right into place. Why oh why can't the average American citizen have the sense of the average Alternet responder? Now, that's an electorate I could be proud of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Cheney's middle name Posted by: Ellie1
» George (6) Walker (6) Chimpy (6) Posted by: Iconoclast421
The fact he's pimping the easy answer really makes me think he may win.
Posted by: darkenergy on Sep 24, 2007 1:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he does, than people with the means to do so should move out of the country. Canada, Mexico, South America, Africa, and Southeast Asia all look like good options, since Europe is not open to much immigration.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fred Zeppelin
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 24, 2007 2:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beautiful! Just what this country needs more than anything in the world: ANOTHER BRAIN-DEAD, FEEBLE MINDED, FAILED "B" MOVIE STAR AT THE PINACLE OF WORLD POWER!!! I am so happy, I could vomit! Somebody, please pinch me, I must be dreaming!

Who wants to make a bet that this silly bastard gets the Republican nomination next year? In the America of 2007, substance has gone right out the window. Truth be told, it took its final bow in this country many, many years ago. Think about it: Dennis Kusinch is, by far the most intelligent, gifted candidate of all of them; and yet, he doesn't have a chance in the world. Why? Because he doesn't look good on television, that's why! The big box with the tube in the center (Sorry, I haven't yet gone flat screen) is killing our culture.

Yes, the American people are just about stupid enough to send Fred Thompson to the White House. And if the Dems are foolish enough to give Hillary Clinton the nomination next year, that's exactly what's going to happen.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fred Zeppelin Posted by: dayenta
» RE: Fred Zeppelin Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: Fred Zeppelin Posted by: JosephtheLibertarian
» RE: Fred Zeppelin Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Fred Zeppelin Posted by: rkewen
» RE: Fred Zeppelin Posted by: rk_tech68fl
» RE: Fred Zeppelin Posted by: JSquercia
» As George Carlin said: Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
A Perfect TV Age President
Posted by: Lector on Sep 24, 2007 4:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In America it’s easy to be president with the right connections and has nothing to do with how smart you are. And Taibbi is right; that someone like Fred could easily make it to the White House (if the masters of the political game decide they want him as a puppet). If Bush has been able to play the President, than certainly a professional actor can.

Fred’s early Judea-Christian religious influence is ingrained, like most Americans. He will carry this into the 2008 election and appeal to American Fundamentalism, not necessarily Christian Fundamentalism. Of course, the idea with Fred’s southern down-home campaign approach is, as God became one of the people through Jesus so may Fred become one of us through the Presidency. And a lot of fed-up, confused, misinformed people will buy into it.

If Fred became president little would change; he wants to loosen restrictions on wiretapping, he believes it’s the solar system that’s warming, not the earth, and his fantasy about the American health care system is incredible. If Hillary became president, well, I haven’t see any big solutions about Iraq coming out of her. No, there is nothing unusual about Fred more than any other candidate, liberal or conservative. They are all fundamentalists in the sense that they feel America is justified by the virtue of its mission, that America is the city-on-hill and is considered virtuous and rarely criticized by both parties so there really is no candidate who will make any significant changes in military diplomacy. America will continue to install war bases all over the planet and we’ll wonder why the occupied will continue to hate our freedom to do as we please.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Perfect TV Age President Posted by: Tom Degan
Things You Don't Know About Fred Thompson
Posted by: Thirdrailradio on Sep 24, 2007 6:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out the new hit piece on Fred Thompson, including a few things the media never talks about. To read it click
here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

C'mon...
Posted by: JoshuaLudd on Sep 24, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... Reps like actors so much... why not just go all Weekend at Bernie's and just dig up Reagan's corpse, tie some strings to it.. and have the media introduce him as the latest frontrunner candidate.

He'd win by a landslide in the primaries... and he would still be the most original and independent candidate of the field hands down.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHY WOULD ANYBODY 'WANNABE' REAGAN ?
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 24, 2007 7:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Way over rated. Anything good that happened on his watch would have happened anyway. He did not personally end the cold war or single handedly take down the Berlin Wall. He did however start a landslide of deregulation that brings us to where we are today. People do not do a good job of policing themselves. That's just the way it is. Starting with banks and insurance companies alot of regulations should still be in place. Thanks Ron. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You also forgot the deficits Posted by: ReallyBearish
Thompson is a no talent hack and always has been a has been- He's perfect for President!
Posted by: vomeggido on Sep 24, 2007 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S. is very much into its no-talent scene stealing hacks who highjack their opponents spotlight with aggressive gestures and outrageous lies, rather than meeting their peers equally via talent. This has always been the case with these jerks whom worship the spotlight.

Not one of them can act even Jesse Ventura (Although, I will give it to Jesse- he seems to be an exception when it comes to being a voice of the people for the people and by the people).

Fred Thompson should be ignored. If this goon was in a movie or a television show- I did not watch. I don't care who else was in it. To this day I will not watch In The Line of Fire with Clint Eastwood because Thompson is in it. Most critics and Hollywood insiders agree that Thompson screwed this movie up. There is proof right there.

Hollywood courted him because of his political ties and wealthy friends. That is it. He is a joke without those things.

Fred Thompson is was and has always been a neocon republican lobbyist. No matter how in denial this sonofabitch is- he will always remain on the ladder of success one of the very lowest rungs that needs to be stepped on the way to the top.

His rung is a squeaker too. I wish he would just shut up- I find it incredulous he believes he has anything relevant to say.

If Fred wanted true success he only needed to produce a one man show show called "Much Ado About Nothing".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fred thompson
Posted by: sonny0412 on Sep 24, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
go fred your my candidiate for 2008 and on
i want and better way..i always said if you can do it on cbs then you can do it anywhere....
and fred theres quite afew of us who do want you in office..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: fred thompson Posted by: TennMom
» Did you mean 'orthography'? Posted by: vox persona
» RE: fred thompson Posted by: bulbman
» Why? Posted by: Suz
The failure of conservatism
Posted by: Intellect on Sep 24, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reagan sold the Republican Party to the braindead Christian right wing who believe in supernatural fairies, ghosts and fantastic stories from the bronze age instead of science.

Reagan, with his idiocy that began the destruction of America as we have know it is only the second worst president we have ever had. His administration holds the record for the most people prosecuted for misdeeds while in office, but I am sure the current Bush crony conspiracy will surpass the Reagan record.

Fred is just an actor impersonating a "conservative" politician who is running for the presidency. He once lobbied for Planned Parenthood although he says he had no memory of that. Maybe he is afflicted with Alzheimer's as Reagan was in addition to his Hodgkins Lymphoma.

The right wing Christian zealots will lunge at Thompson though. They are so desperate that they would support the worst possible candidate to try to retain control of the White House and whatever Republicans survive the next election. They will vote for Fred because their religious leaders will tell them to, and never having been taught to think critically for themselves, they will vote against their own best interests for their faith like the sheeple they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shoo-in
Posted by: willymack on Sep 24, 2007 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Fred Thompson is a perfect front man for the neocons. He can parrot their drivel in a manner certain to evoke warm emotions from the thinking-challenged, because he's one of them. Too bad those same mental midgets are so numerous as to compose a very large minority-if not a majority-of our electorate. It'll be yet another "election" in name only, as the fix is almost certainly in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What you don't know about Fred Thompson
Posted by: Thirdrailradio on Sep 24, 2007 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out the new hit piece on Fred Thompson, including a few things the media never talks about. To read it go to < thirdrailradio
/a>

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Matt, You Rock
Posted by: dayenta on Sep 24, 2007 9:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Matt, You are as bracing as a shot of single malt. Keep it up. You can't write them fast enough for me. Thanks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Matt, You Rock Posted by: kelly.nickell
» RE: Matt, You Rock Posted by: dayenta
I liked Reagan
Posted by: dismayed on Sep 24, 2007 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I knew he was against the working man/woman and pro corporate everything, but when he spoke I could not help but like him. He was a damn good politician. Not so Fred, he is as fake as a $10 Rolex. I do not see him beating Hillary or even Guliani.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I liked Reagan Posted by: CatDad
» RE: I liked Reagan Posted by: Suz
» RE: I liked Reagan Posted by: dismayed
Awesome Article
Posted by: rkewen on Sep 24, 2007 10:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Awesome Article, Matt.

Anyone who could read this (with the caveat that they also understand it) and still vote for this clown could probably also be talked into strangling themselves to death. So the strategy is clear, start talking 'em into it before they get a chance to vote.........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Easy? Of Course being a Moron is Easy
Posted by: thehousedog on Sep 24, 2007 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, being the POTUS is easy if you do nothing except take vacations and let other people that you trust do all the work for you. Its also easy being a senator if you have people advise you on how you should vote, or being a member of congress if big donors tell you how to vote. Its easy being all of these people. What is hard is for those of us who have a brain to understand how morons like these get elected in the first place. Perhaps having easy answers is what people want - but easy answers never got anything accomplished - take "mission accomplished" for example....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reagan Wannabe
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Sep 24, 2007 12:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you mean a trained broadcaster that can read his lines just great with pluck and zeal,who has a degenerative mental state and follows orders from his VP.... Yeah Thompson is a wannabe. Reagan did nothing great for this country except make a shitty speech sopund like the word of god. The Wall came down because the Russian economy selfdestructed under the heavy burden of it military spending. We are doing the same. Reagan made freinds with the folks that were later called 'terrorist enemies'. Is this what Thompson aspires to.
As an actor he played enough corrupted politicians that we should know how he'll be if elected. The other Thompson,the bully from Elroy,as we call him in Wisconsin,would'nt be any better. He likes hookers too much to an effective leader.
We don't need any more 'wannabe anythings'. We've been chuck full of them. What we need is a 'Gottabe'. Someone that
has at heart,SERVICE TO THE PEOPLE. How can you tell that? They won't ask for a contribution, they'll ask just your vote.
We need a Gottabe Peacemaker, Gottabe healthcare provider, a Gottabe Environmentalist, a Gotta be Tax reformer
a Gottabe Education supporter not a indroctrination supporter.
Someone who comes from the only vote that really counts THE DRAFT VOTE. We can have all these things we just have to THINK OUTSIDE THE SYSTEM!!! Vote outside the system.
Vote for someone that has no corpie supporters or national commitees....in short, for a true human.
DRAFT JEFFREY& FOR PREZ '08
www.youtube.com/RevJeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fantasy world ?
Posted by: ssegallmd on Sep 24, 2007 4:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In Fred Thompson's fantasy world, all you have to do to be president is pretend you're the Gipper and act tough on TV."

I think he's right. What a pity, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

be nice...he's gonna be your next president
Posted by: may261989 on Sep 24, 2007 8:07 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For us foreigners, we never get used to how these illiterate show ponies ( Bush,Reagan ) manage to get anyone to vote for them.
Then again, Americans love a braindead,vacuous, camera friendly dumbass grinning fool , so as I said be nice... .he's gonna be your next President.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Smalley talk
Posted by: skydog on Sep 25, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I'm crooked enough, I'm dumb enough, and doggone it, fascists like me."

Hey Stuart: "Denial ain't just a river in Egypt!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Young and even dumber-
Posted by: dismayed on Sep 25, 2007 8:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Tis true!, and when I have had the occasion to watch footage of Reagan speak recently I still find him a much much more compelling a pol than Thomson.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He wont...
Posted by: indiangreek on Sep 25, 2007 9:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not too worried that Fred Thompson will become President. He won't. End of comment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Look at Clinton before criticizing republicans
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Sep 25, 2007 11:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She will most likely win, and yet do you think she will do anything about the Federal Reserve, which has deliberately devalued our dollar to the point where it is now worth less than the canadian dollar?? Ha. Did she and her huband reform health care the last time they lied their way into office? Hell no. Will she stop the iraq war? Hell no. Will she bomb iran? Probably. Will she do anything to overturn NAFTA? No. Hillary wont do anything good, we have history to teach us that. She wont be able to reap the benefits of cheap oil and a huge tech boom like her husband did. Her presidency will have many democrats longing for the Bush days...

Yet despite the almost prophetic certainty of this outcome, dems will still flock to vote for her! In other words, the democratic party is controlled just like the republican party.

They're both picking their "quarterback" based on his/her chances of winning! Well this isnt football. The goal is not to win. You remember what they used to teach... "its how you play the game" and all that bla bla bla... what happened to that, anyway?

Both parties are heavily financed by groups of people who benefit from having a system where people just want to "feel good" about their candidate's chances of winning. Regardless of what their candidate actually stands for or what they will do when they get in office. The media supports that same paradigm.

The most important thing for any activist to do right now is to put a stop to that paradigm. That's why Ron Paul has to win. He wont have the power or the support to piss off democrats the way Bush has done. The democrats will likely have a veto proof majority in 2009... So he wont be able to make things worse. (Even if that was possible.) Ron Paul will simply try to stop bad bills from becoming law. Both the bad republican bills, and the bad democratics bills. He'll force the congress to write constitutional laws. And by congress writing the laws, I mean congress, NOT the lobbyists! Even if it shuts the damn government down. And I can tell all this just by looking at his record. I dont need a million dollars in advertisements to tell me this. He is Dr No.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overhyped Fred
Posted by: Jeff Johnson on Sep 25, 2007 11:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't believe that Fred Thompson is doing so well in the polls. He has done nothing to merit such strong support among Republicans, and much less the Independents who will ultimately decide the '08 race. I ran across a blog that gives a couple compelling reasons why it would be a big mistake for Republicans to nominate Fred: www.forget-fred.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thomson will win with a little help from his friends MOVE ON and HILLARY
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Sep 27, 2007 6:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Republican was concerned about Obamanation. He is articulate, handsome, well groomed and takes a page from Bill "I was impeached" Clinton on how to answer a question without saying a thing. But now Shrillery has a huge lead in the polls over Obamanation. 40% of the USA refuse to even consider voting for Shrillery.
Once she is nominated the actions of the Move On org will discust the swing voters, driving them like cattle to Republicans like Thompson.

I like what I see.

ALTERNET - MOVE ON - MEDIACUTLURE what would we do without you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]