Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

World's Water Supply at Risk

By Kevin Danaher and Shannon Biggs and Jason Mark, PoliPoint Press. Posted September 26, 2007.


One of the world's leading water experts explains how our local water supplies are threatened across North America and across the globe.
greenecon
greenecon

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Abortion Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following conversation is an excerpt from the new book Building the Green Economy: Success Stories from the Grassroots (PoliPointPress, 2007) by Kevin Danaher, Shannon Biggs, and Jason Mark. You can read more about the book here.

Maude Barlow is possibly the world's leading expert on water struggles. She is the national chairperson of the Council of Canadians, that country's largest citizen's advocacy group, with members and chapters across Canada. She is a director with the International Forum on Globalization, a San Francisco research and education institution opposed to corporate globalization. In 2005, she received the prestigious "Right Livelihood Award," given by the Swedish Parliament and widely referred to as "The Alternative Nobel." She has received honorary doctorates from six universities and has authored or co-authored 15 books, including Too Close For Comfort: Canada's Future Within Fortress North America; and Blue Gold: The Fight to Stop Corporate Theft of the World's Water (with Tony Clarke). Her most recent book is Blue Covenant: The Global Water Crisis and the Fight for the Right to Water.

Q: What are the greatest threats to local water supplies?

Maude Barlow: First of all, we are creating an ecological crisis by not taking care of our water supplies. Surface waters are being polluted, and we are mining our groundwater at unsustainable rates. At the very time when corporations are privatizing everything, our governments are allowing corporations to move in and take over the ownership of essential resources like water.

So we have a double whammy: Our governments are allowing corporations to pollute our water, and then they are signing contracts with corporations to bring in clean-up technology and make billions of dollars cleaning it up. The very sector of society that is polluting our water is turning around and selling our water back to us. And this is going to be more and more of an issue in the future. We'll be increasingly drinking water that has been polluted by corporations, then cleaned up by corporations, then bottled and sold to us by corporations.

Q: What are some success stories of people protecting their water?

MB: The people of Uruguay held a plebiscite and got enough votes for a referendum in the national election in October 2004 in which they called for a constitutional amendment saying that water is a human right, and they won. The government was forced to change its constitution, and Uruguay became the first country in the world to vote on whether people have a human right to water, and the private companies were forced out.

There have been quite a few successful fight-backs across North America. The city of Atlanta allowed a private company to come in to run its water system, and the city kicked them out two and a half years into a 20-year contract. They said, "Get out. You lied. The water coming out of the taps is brown, and you raised the price. Get out." We kept private water companies from taking over the water systems in Toronto and Vancouver. There's a big movement in the heart of France, led by Danielle Mitterand, the widow of the former French president, Francois Mitterand. She is leading this fight to bring water under public control, and many city mayors of some good-sized towns and cities -- not yet Paris -- are backing her. So even in the belly of the beast, there are some exciting movements.

Q: What about the struggle against Coca-Cola in India?

MB: When you dig deep into Coca-Cola's practices, you see it's really a bad company. They are using military satellite imagery to find clean sources of groundwater and then going in -- often in poor tribal communities -- and setting up a plant and just helping themselves to the water until the water is gone. I call it water mining. We're working with folks in the state of Kerala, India, who have taken the Coca-Cola company all the way to their Supreme Court to fight the way Coke comes in and sucks up massive amounts of groundwater, pollutes it with sweeteners and chemical additives, and then makes huge profits selling this nonnutritious drink to the public. The Supreme Court of India has ruled largely in the people's favor. Yet Coke is still fighting; they refuse to give up. But these grassroots activists don't give up, either. It's been a real successful fight-back against Coca-Cola.

Q: Does it seem to you that the United States and Canada are more, or less, water-conscious than people in other nations?

MB: Individually, we are terrible water-guzzlers. We use a great deal of water per capita through our industrial practices, agriculture, mining, and, in my country, through oil extraction from tar sands. We take a little better care of our groundwater than many Third World countries because we citizens have a little more control; the corporations tend to be from our countries, and we can exert greater influence on them. There is serious pollution -- I'm not suggesting there isn't -- but we don't see the kind of blatant pollution you see in many poor countries. In some countries, the water is foul due to the combination of absolutely no sanitation systems, people using river systems as toilets, to bathe in, to cook in, their garbage dumps, their sewage dumps, everything goes into those open waterways where there's no purification or any kind of water reclamation. As industrial growth and the industrial model moves into the Third World, it's bringing massive pollution.

Also, people are being driven off the land. They are moving into urban slums where there's no water, and they create more of a problem because they are adding to the numbers in the cities that are not treating their sewage. About 90 percent of the sewage in the countries of the global south goes untreated back into waterways, rivers, and oceans. It's a cyclical problem that intensifies as we move from rural sustainable living to urban unsustainable living.

We're creating massive water pollution problems. It's lower in the U.S. and Canada because we've got more money for clean-up and slightly better laws for industry. But water pollution is happening just about everywhere. The only societies where water is still treated sacredly are in ancient tribal societies. Many rural communities in India, China, Africa, and Latin America are still living the way that their ancestors did centuries ago; they aren't creating significant levels of pollution.

Q: Who's using the bulk of the water here in North America?

MB: Most of the water is used by industry and agribusiness, which is also an industry. The industrial food production system uses nitrates, chemical fertilizers, and pesticides, which contaminate a lot of water. Intensive livestock operations create horrible pollution. So one of the most important things we can do is to create a more sustainable agricultural system.

Q: Are there any really tough issues that the movement needs to face that you feel we're not confronting adequately?

MB: That's the part of my new book that surprised me the most: the technological takeover of our planet's water system. We have been following very closely the big utility companies like Suez and Vivendi, who run water systems on a for-profit basis. And we have been following the bottled water companies, and those have been the kind of two big ones.

And then we have been worried about major movement of water through pipelines, but we have not been keeping our eye on the whole issue of technology to clean up dirty water, whether that's desalination, water purification, nanotechnology purification. It's going to be the "great white hope," and it's all unregulated and very corporate controlled, and it doesn't surprise me that when you look at the United Nations' millennium development goals on water, nobody is talking about cleaning up polluted water. Because, hey, there's gold in those hills. The more our water becomes polluted, the more precious it becomes. The more desperate people are, the more they will pay for their water, and the more money there is to be made from cleaning it up.

The fastest-growing sector of the private water industry is this high technology water clean-up section of this industry, and we must get a better handle on the whole thing. I think that what we are seeing is a cartel of water that is being created like the cartel that has been created for energy. For a long time now, when there was a find of a new field of oil or gas, some large corporation owned it even before it was out of the ground. I see them doing this now with water, and I call them water hunters. These water hunters move in with one goal: to monopolize control over a precious resource in order to make money.

Q: Are you noticing a greater receptivity to your message about the coming water crisis?

MB: Most definitely. I was in down in Lubbock, Texas, on a local radio station, and this guy called in and said, "I'm a right-wing, diehard, Republican, red meat, conservative businessman. And I think the little lady's right. Water is different. You can't have anyone monopolize it." It was fascinating; he totally had my argument. We didn't agree on anything else, but we agreed on the importance of retaining public control over this vital resource. So that is hopeful.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: water, coca-cola, water privatization

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
PRIVATIZE IT!
Posted by: Tom Degan on Sep 26, 2007 12:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You just wait and see. The day will come when these hideous bastards try to privatize our water supply. How would you like to rely on a company like Kellog, Brown and Root for your water? Five years ago I would have dismissed this kind of talk as fantastic, wild speculation. Nit any more friends. I have come to the point in my life where I wouldn't put anything past these murderous assholes. At least the Nixon gang of long ago tried to be low key about their crimes. A group that is as overtly criminal as the Bush Mob is capable of anything. A very horrifying thought, any way you slice it.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PRIVATIZE IT! Posted by: donl51
» RE: PRIVATIZE IT! Posted by: Basenjis
» Get ready for Prozac! Posted by: Iconoclast421
» RE: PRIVATIZE IT! Posted by: symcokid
Living Like There Is No Tomorrow
Posted by: NoPCZone on Sep 26, 2007 1:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1- The number one source of groundwater contamination in the US is not agribusiness- as bad as they are. It's the crap people dump on their lawns to make it green and to kill certain weeds in favor of other weeds. It's more than past time we all stop putting this poison on our lawns and go organic. If you live in a dry climate investigate Xeriscaping.

2- Start treating water like the precious gift that it is. Waste not- want not.

3- Get involved locally to protect the the lands that recharge your aquifer from development. This is a widespread problem.

4- Get involved and oppose any privatization of municipal water systems. A small cabal of companies are buying up public water systems and are making a grand mess of things for profit.

There is a way to live with the earth as a part of nature rather than act like you can live apart from it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Living Like There Is No Tomorrow Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
» RE: FORE!!! Posted by: parmenicleitus
» Live with Nature Posted by: Cathyc
Lawns? We don't need no stinking lawns.
Posted by: PJAW on Sep 26, 2007 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Originally an aristocratic statement, "I don't need to raise a garden, I'm rich", lawns have become an accepted (mandated) part of many cultures, all up and down the economic spectrum. Makes you wonder just how much arable land would be available for food production if it weren't preoccupied by grass.

I live in the Great Lakes basin, world's largest accumulation of fresh water, but there's no security in that fact. The argument is still about how much pollution to allow and we're a long way from halting it altogether. Of course with human ineptitude a play, maybe it will become a moot point anyway. Seems we've managed to mess with the outflow to the point where levels in the upper basin (Superior, Michigan and Huron) are dropping to historic lows, and may contiune. Nice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Indy Water- prtivatization killed it
Posted by: DrSuess on Sep 26, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am in Indianapolis, and Indy Water is owned by Viola. It is one of the communities that have sold out to "Private corporations”. Since Viola has come in, there has been no change in the water quality- but quite a change in the price. I now pay about as much for water as I do for electricity in my “all electric house”.
They have the most minimal customer service. If you have a problem with any complexity- their customer service cannot handle it. What steams me is that Indy Water thinks I bounced some checks- and charged me a bounced check fee (14.50) and then tacked on double my bill as an additional fine ($90 went to $180). However I did not bounce any checks- and I am finding that they have no customer service center in Indianapolis that I can resolve this problem with. I am now trying to get through their non existent customer service center to get this matter resolved. I may wind up taking them to small claims court to force the issue.
So here we have a MONOPOLY industry- I have no choice to use them- and they cannot even be bothered to have a customer service center in town.
They have a CEO who earns millions- and increases his paycheck by screwing his customers. I used to be a fan of American business. But all I can say is that American business has lost its emphasis on serving the customer. Heavens knows where their accounting and service people are- probably somewhere in India.
Taking monopoly services private is a marginal situation at best. It is horrible when companies think that customers service is "quaint"- and an unnecessary impediment to their CEO's next million dollar pay raise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PRIVATIZATION = RAPE! Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: PRIVATIZATION = RAPE! Posted by: lamar
» RE: Indy Water- prtivatization killed it Posted by: Kitty Lady Oregon
We need to bring back the STEAM ENGINE for autos which Big Oil/Gas/Coal bought out.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 26, 2007 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least from there we can reduce our dependence on petroleum which in turn will reduce the water wars. Remember, Big Business is your ENEMY from local to national. Weaken and defeat them hard and cold !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another problem we are sleeping through
Posted by: Gravitas on Sep 26, 2007 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet another REAL crisis looming that we are not doing enough about. I would like to see the looks on the faces of the current Casandras when famine, drought, and economic collapse come into their full effect! Conservatives on the right and liberals on the left will finally realize gay marriage and "love handles" were the LEAST of our problems!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Barlowe is a bit of a hack
Posted by: lamar on Sep 26, 2007 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maude Barlowe is a trainwreck. She complains that governments are "allowing" corporations to take over water supply and delivery (they are usually asking for it), then she says we take better care of our water than 3d world countries because our corporations are local, then admits that Vivendi, Suez are the big players. They aren't American. Nuon (Dutch) used to own Utilities, Inc. It is now owned by a subsidiary of AIG. United Water is/was owned by Suez (French), and likely to be sold to Gaz de France. Even more, Aqua America, a publicly traded corporation from USA just got nailed in Florida for providing shoddy service at high prices.

The point is that this is about competence vs. incompetence, not foreign vs. local.

Further, Barlowe completely fails to address any of the small and midsized towns that don't have the resources to operate a water system. Why not look at Charlotte County Florida, where the County Utility is so far in debt it can hardly keep up with environmental mandates.

Here's another example of making up your mind before you know the facts: Barlowe says, "...Uruguay became the first country in the world to vote on whether people have a human right to water, and the private companies were forced out. There have been quite a few successful fight-backs across North America."

This happened in 2004, a mere nanosecond in the lifeline of a water system, yet there Maude goes declaring it a success.

Cynthia Barnett wrote a decent book on the water problem called Mirage. She's not a crazy ideologue like Barlowe is. She doesn't shill for any corporations, and has similar disdain for bottled water. And she's a reporter, not a hired gun from a research group dedicated to making up their mind before they know the facts.

Heck, I support private water yet I can't understand why we waste so much on bottled water.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Barlowe is a bit of a hack Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Barlowe is a bit of a hack Posted by: Jordonquits
» RE: Barlowe is a bit of a hack Posted by: leafsong1
» Contradictory statement Posted by: Cathyc
As the world's rich resources are well plundered, the necessities become the new markets
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 26, 2007 9:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What are you going to sell when you run through the all the world's resources? When all the beaver pelts and teak forests are gone, what do you sell to make a profit?

All that's left are the basic necessities - water, energy, food, shelter and air. Control the water, and people will have to come to you to buy it. If you own the only well in the village, you can make people pay and pay and pay.

Of course, you'll need some security guards to make sure that noone 'steals your water' - or burns your house down, but you can pay them in water as well.

Look at the Bolivian-Bechtel model - it failed there, and now Bechtel and friends are trying to export it to the United States!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE EVER-GROWING HUMAN POPULATION
Posted by: Constitutionalist75 on Sep 26, 2007 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
uses ever more water every day until our planet's weather cycles can no longer process everyone's need and we get massive droughts, floods and huge storms as the living system tries to correct itself. So, why should you do anything if Nature will eventually straighten itself out anyway? Look at planet Mars. There was once plenty of water there too, but it's now frozen underground on a dead surface. So, Nature will eventually correct itself, but it might do better without the human race! - unless we change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Unless we change.... Posted by: Cathyc
» RE: Unless we change.... Posted by: Constitutionalist75
Old News
Posted by: Knobby on Sep 26, 2007 4:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Several several years this has been going on behind closed doors and out in the open...
Read: THIRST- Fighting the corporate theft of our water by Alan Snitow & Deborah Kaufman...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Breeding Populations, the root of the problem
Posted by: common intelligence on Sep 26, 2007 6:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no doubt the people are not being informed about the root of the problem which is over population. Intelligent, higher IQ or even just more aware people do know. But third world and many immigrant populations just don't get it. For instants: I know of two illegal aliens with insecure jobs whom have 4 & 3 kids each and one with another on the way. I asked them, "How do you expect to take care of them"? Their answer, "Oh it'll be OK, I'm not worried".

The sad point here is the same for every aspiring parent. Hormones are overriding intelligence. The compulsion to breed overrides true survival wisdom. The biological mechanism most people are running on does not come to the forefront of their consciousness to allow them to be aware of the dire consequences they are bequeathing upon their off-spring or the rest of humanity for that point.

Politicians are being afraid to rub Christians the wrong way. You know, the old "be fruitful and multiply" thing, for fear it'll be detrimental to their votes, both Reps. and Demos.

It is a fact that the consumption of resources of all kinds, not just water, is exceeding the "real" need, (except for trash consumer manufactured products and unnecessary by-products) and not being able to provide enough "manpower" to acquire or distribute the resources relative to the demand. Sounds like basic economics, eh?

Remember, " Mother nature bats last!"

It's estimated the Population of Californian is to increase by 20 Million by 2040.
and the United States is to increase to 400 million by 2040.
Do you think they'll all fit in the Grand Canyon, or where?

Now simple logic tells me with oil vaporizing daily by the increase of consumption as it is, we can't even keep pace with demand now. We are over the hump of peak oil production. The housing consumption has been cut off by economic manipulation, less people can afford homes, more people are immigrating are simply piling more into less housing. Prisons are overwhelmed (more prisoners in less space. It's the same syndrome).

The writing is on the wall. The government does know the problem but really can't do anything to curtail it.

Humanity is simply "amusing it's self to death" (Credit to Roger Waters*). The waste of resources is built into this failed economic model that the republicans are adamant in maintaining for the status quo.
The Home owners, that are quietly sitting on the laurels, are so "* Comfortably Numb" they are paralyzed and scared to voice their paranoia.

( Have you ever seen, I have, the incredible magnitudes of Chinese shipping containers being trained across our country every single day 24/7 and wondered , "how much inneccessary shit is coming into the US that is absolutely a bunch of impulsive pile of wasted man made garbage? Where in the hell do we put it? The US is buying it way to it's own demise.)

Anyway you cut the cards, Population is the problem. and it is dovetailed by the economic model of capitalism that is burring world in quagmire of an irreconcilable solution.
That is unless a hard decision is made to make the people of the world realize every single human being must Live Small now. Then to hell with capitalism.

This is coming down to raw survival tactics.

The only way to stop it is STOP PARTICIPATING.
Stop Feeding the Machine.
Stop your wastful living. Get Small, live simply,
Be happy!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

water bad, oil badder
Posted by: Missing Piece on Sep 26, 2007 6:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with the person who said when all other resources have been depleted the only thing left for corporations to make a buck on is what we take for granted, water.

This is definately an issue but lets get our priorities in line. Peak oil should be at the top, we have a chance to finally start a renewable sustainable way of life but we are all missing the boat. We could easily drive electric cars and then use that large battery to store our solar and wind, and when were not driving it could power our home. Granted, we would live much more modestly, but we would be able to tackle global warming by doing this.

Many of the problems we have today can be blamed on cheap oil and that is all about to change. The problem is do we do nothing so that when the tap does run dry we beg government and corporations to save us or do we take action now.

Listen, when oil is at 200.00 dollars a barrel and it will be very soon, you will understand what your real problem is. Water falls from the sky, oil does not.

Good Luck, get out of debt, build an earth home off the grid, buy silver coins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: water bad, oil badder Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
Water and Agribusiness: Feces galore
Posted by: ecofriendlynet on Sep 29, 2007 12:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Besides global warming, the massive amounts of pollution from factory farming can be learned here:

Giant livestock farms, which can house hundreds of thousands of pigs, chickens, or cows, produce vast amounts of waste -- often generating the waste equivalent of a small city. While a problem of this nature -- and scale -- sounds almost comical, pollution from livestock farms seriously threatens humans, fish and ecosystems. -- NRDC

Source: http://www.nrdc.org/water/pollution/ffarms.asp
Natural Resources Defense Council


Dioxins have been characterized by EPA as likely to be human carcinogens and are anticipated to increase the risk of cancer at background levels of exposure.

Most of us receive almost all of our dioxin exposure from the food we eat: specifically from the animal fats associated with eating beef, pork, poultry, fish, milk, dairy products. -- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Source: http://www.epa.gov/pbt/pubs/dioxins.htm
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Royality Fee's and Levy charges for the...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Sep 29, 2007 1:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...industrial use of our Fresh water!

30-40 years ago, in home water purification was almost unheard of on the west coast and the water was excellent. Today most homes have bottled water either delivered for drinking or have an in house water softener and UVL because the water that comes from the tap this day is so contaminated that people DO get sick simply by taking a bath and/or shower.

What the hell happened in just 40 short years that has so contaminated our drinking water supply and how do we get back what we once had in abundance?

If the major contributing factor to poor health and environmental contamination is through the water table then why not charge a fee for the industrial use of this vital supply, after all its as much mine as it is the locale industries and agribusiness!
People already pay this fee through property taxes etc, and so does industry but as industry seems intent on commercializing this basic right, is it not in the interest of every person worldwide to charge a royalty for the mining and consumption of this resource, with all proceeds going to purification for domestic and mother-natures use?

I'm just thinking of this because of the heavy demand the oil industry is putting on water supplies in the tar sands development... so much water is used and the huge contamination ponds need to be addressed now...

Huge problem, little discussion... thanx for bringing this to our attention

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement