Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

U.S. Government's Plan to Protect You From Terrorist Livestock

By Jim Hightower, Hightower Lowdown. Posted September 19, 2007.


A new animal-tracking system could put Big Brother in your backyard -- even if you're not a farmer.
09192007story
09192007story

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Jim Hightower

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

A friend of mine tells a story about the political demise in the 1950s of an entrenched Oklahoma state representative, whom we'll call Elmer Goodenuff.

Rep. Goodenuff, who chaired the ag committee, had been in office so long that he'd grown tight with the capitol crowd, but he had lost touch with the folks back in his rural district. Thus, when some supermarket lobbyists asked him to sponsor a bill requiring that all egg producers be regulated by the state and have to pay an egg-grading fee, he saw no problem with the measure. It was for the public's health, the lobbyists told him. His constituents, however, did have a problem with it. In those days, many small farmers made their spending money by selling eggs fresh out of their chicken yards -- yet here was ol' Elmer hitting them with a bureaucratic rigmarole and a fee that would make their little egg stands more trouble than they were worth. It turns out that the supermarket lobbyists' real agenda had been to get rid of all these bothersome mom-and-pop competitors.

Suddenly, the chairman found himself facing political opposition -- a young lawyer from the home district had filed to run against him. Shortly afterward, the two candidates came together for a debate at the county fair. The lawyer spoke first, limiting his talk to only three sentences: "Hidy folks, I'm so-and-so, and I'll make you a good state representative. If you give me the chance, I'll fight for you ... not for the special interests. Now I yield the balance of my time to Mr. Goodenuff, so he can explain his egg bill to you." Still clueless, Elmer did try to explain it, but his explanation was hardly good enough -- the more he talked, the more votes he lost. His egg bill retired him.

Chicken trackers

I expect that many of today's state legislators and Congress critters -- Democrats as well as Republicans -- are going to experience their own Goodenuff comeuppance if they continue to go along with special interests pushing a new regulatory program that is presently roiling rural America into a full-tilt revolt. This is yet another of those sneaky programs blindly authorized under the screaming banner of "homeland security." It has received practically no mass-media coverage, but I'm sure you'll be excited to learn that the National Animal Identification System (NAIS) sets up a whole new surveillance program to defend you and yours from a rather odd national security threat: terrorist chickens. And terrorist cows, horses, pigs, sheep, llamas ... and so on. Advanced under the benign guise of protecting public health from outbreaks of animal-borne diseases, this program is intended to tag and track every farm animal in America from birth to death.

It is, to say the least, intrusive. NAIS would compel all owners of such animals to register their premises and personal information in a federal database, to buy microchip devices and attach them to every single one of their animals (each of which gets its very own 15-digit federal ID number), to log and report each and every "event" in the life of each animal, to pay fees for the privilege of having their location and animals registered, and to sit still for fines of up to $1,000 a day for any noncompliance.

This is Animal Farm meets the Marx Brothers!

It would be one thing if this were meant for the massive factory farms run by agribusiness conglomerates, which account for the vast number of disease outbreaks. After all, they have corporate staffs, computer networks, and existing systems of inventory tracking. But no -- rather than focus on the big boys that cause the big harm, NAIS targets hundreds of thousands of small farms, homesteaders, organic producers, hobbyists ... and maybe even you.

Me, you shriek?! Yes. If you keep a pony for your kids or board a couple of riding horses, if you've got a few chickens in your backyard, if you've got a potbellied pig or a pet goose, if your youngsters are raising a half-dozen ducks as part of a 4-H club project, if you maintain a buffalo or a goat just for the fun of it -- indeed, if you have any farm animals, NAIS wants you in its computerized grasp.

Every farm, home, horse stable, or other domicile of these animals would have to have its address and precise GPS coordinates filed into the system's central computer, along with the name, phone number, and other personal data of the owner/ renter of the premises. Owners of the animals would have to tag every one of them (luckily, fish ponds are not included!) with an approved tracking mechanism -- most likely by implanting radio-frequency ID chips into them.

Then comes the burden of logging and reporting the "events" in each animal's life. These not only include sales and deaths, but also any movement of the animals off the registered premises, including taking them to a vet, going to a horse show, presenting them for judging at the county fair, trucking them to another farm and participating in a roundup or sporting event.

This is far more onerous than the burden put on owners of guns and autos, the only two items of personal property presently subject to general systems of permanent registration. Gun owners, for example, can take their guns off their premises (to go hunting, attend a gun show, or just carry them around) without filing a report with the government. But NAIS would deny this freedom to chicken owners! The authorities are declaring hens to be more dangerous than a Belgian FN Five-SeveN handgun, and every time Hen No. 8406390528 strays from her assigned GPS locale, NAIS autocrats would require her owner to report within 24 hours the location, duration and purpose of her departure -- or be subject to a stiff fine.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: agriculture, corruption, farmers, nais, livestock, usda, government waste

From "The Hightower Lowdown," edited by Jim Hightower and Phillip Frazer, September 2007. Jim Hightower is a national radio commentator, writer, public speaker and author of Thieves In High Places: They've Stolen Our Country and It's Time to Take It Back.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
paying for something you get no benefit from
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy on Sep 19, 2007 3:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
brilliant! just like the war in iraq. just like fema salaries. just like department of 'justice' officials. nothing for something!

1-*steals underpants*

2- ?

3- *profits!*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» obey my authortah! Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» I am not an R-tard! Posted by: LMNOP
Practice run
Posted by: mazel on Sep 19, 2007 4:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today, farm animals. Tomorrow, human beings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Practice run Posted by: Bozwell
» RE: Practice run Posted by: aonghus36
» RE: Practice run Posted by: lepidopteryx
» RE: Nope. More Like Stalin's Footsteps Posted by: parmenicleitus
» RE: Nope. More Like Stalin's Footsteps Posted by: parmenicleitus
» RE: Practice run Posted by: MindyB
Puts the kibosh on "But what can you do?"
Posted by: heid on Sep 19, 2007 4:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All those people who use the excuse, "But what can you do?" need to read this article. This is what individuals can do: Stop disastrous programs. Prevent corporations from stealing our rights and valuables. All it takes is caring enough to do something, anything - write a letter, speak out, go to a protest, put out a sign.

Silence is what allows this to continue. All those who hide behind the words, "But what can you do?" deserve what they get.

I'm sickened on seeing things like the video of the University of Florida student tasered - when clearly under control - and arrested for trying to incite a riot, something he clearly hadn't done. But what's far worse is all those people who just sat there doing nothing. If these students are the future of America, then America's future is surely nonexistent.

Without any public fanfare, people stood up and said, "No!" to the travesty of chipping all farm animals. As a result, it may not happen. These people have shown that it can be done - and that there is no excuse for allowing America to become a fascist state.

I wonder if Americans will eventually appreciate their own complicity in the future they're rapidly entering?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A better way
Posted by: profmarcus on Sep 19, 2007 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
typical government invasionist nonsense... this will do nothing to control animal-borne diseases... a proposal was made several years ago to simply send a dna sample of every animal used in food production to a national registry... that way, should an infection or disease break out, the dna of the infected food could be immediately traced to its source and the entire chain of the production cycle would be totally visible... unfortunately, the giant packing houses solidly oppose traceability, so the proposal died...

And, yes, I DO take it personally

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Detention, and tagging.
Posted by: mike_burns on Sep 19, 2007 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need the tagging, locateing, and all the other controls for all the chicken hawks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hestia
Posted by: Kafwood on Sep 19, 2007 4:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NAIS is another example of building a case for government interference to meet the needs of industry. The real justification for the NAIS program is the RFID producers profits and mega-farms that are systematically trying to limit decentralized food choices for Americans.

Even if you don't own farm animals, you should care about this issue. Check out: NoNais.org

As the "Buy Local" and organic food movements gain traction with U.S. consumers, agri-business feels threatened and wields the bureaucracy to institute onerous policies for small producers. But can they succeed in duping the public as consumers begin to peak behind the screen of illogic that supports centralized and mechanized food?

And the importance of preserving the expertise and infrastructure of small-scale local farmers as we continue our culture's journey into energy descent (peak oil), can't be underscored enough. Protecting small producers benefits all of us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Exactly Posted by: Juniper
Um Folks Are You Seriously Going To Allow this to be done to you ?
Posted by: itchyvet on Sep 19, 2007 5:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WOW ! Talk about Big Brother, this has to take the cake.
However, seeings as I live in the land down under, does not pose a threat to us,"at this point in time".
After reading all the above comments, I find it strange that not a one has thought of the "CONTROL" of food sources within the U.S. especially when mention is made within the article that INDUSTRIAL AGRICULTURE will be exempt from this legislation.
OMG, once again, I find myself asking the U.S. citizens, "WHO STANDS TO GAIN FROM THIS THE MOST ?"
Seriously folks, this is nothing other then an attempt to stitch up the agricultural industry to the benefit of the conglomerates. Surely this can be recognised by all ?
I suspect Alan Jones is right in his belief we are heading to a Prison Planet where the imates do Big Brothers bidding without a murmur from the compliant inmates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'd Been Wondering....
Posted by: grumble-bum on Sep 19, 2007 5:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Just what the status of this dubious program was. Previous articles that I have read on the subject gave the impression that it was going to quietly take effect (or already had), & was in effect a "done deal". This is exactly the sort of top-down, industry-led government intervention that we (a country vastly ignorant of the origins of our food, among other things) often allow to pass unquestioned. It's great to see that small-scale producers & consumers are rallying, as Mr. Hightower describes.

As someone who works rather closely with both innovative & more traditional local growers to bring their food animals to the consumer, I was dismayed (though hardly surprised) when I first heard about this transparently greedy & wrong-headed plan. However, despite the seemingly overwhelming corporate & political forces arrayed in support, I had a hopeful feeling that the initiative would prove unworkable. My glimmer of optimism was based in part on the sheer absurdities of scale (the logistical improbability which is openly acknowledged by the mass-livestock industry itself in it's structuring of the system), a faith in the outrage of the small producers, & a gut feeling that the whole thing could become moot through a process of organized, steady non-compliance.

It would appear that this is indeed what is happening, & it's fantastic to see. Thanks are due to Mr. Hightower both for lending his visibility/platform to the effort, & for going into such detail about the causes & effects. Kudos also to Alternet for once again giving this important issue the front-page treatment.

One last observation: I do have to wonder what the hell a supposedly civic/trade group like Future Farmers was thinking in deciding to push this initiative. Wouldn't such a plan essentially guarantee their demise?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's a bad day for the pork barrel
Posted by: hagwind on Sep 19, 2007 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a great, and important, article, and for a whole bunch of reasons. The NAIS schemers aren't dummies: they bet on a strategy that's worked before. Dream up a plan that will support corporate interests, in this case agribusiness and the "microchip in every brain" lobby. Dress it up to look like a matter of "homeland security" and consumer protection. Count on Congress to miss the fine print and the mass media to be asleep at the keyboard -- not least because so many reporters and editors are city slickers who are clueless (often willfully so) about the lives and priorities of small-town and country people. When people begin to smell the rat rotting in the pork barrel, back off the "mandatory" bit -- just tell people that they can't transport their livestock, let their kids join 4-H, etc., etc., unless the animals are registered. No one's forcing anyone to register, right?

But it's not working according to plan. True, the fight's far from over, and it's foolish to underestimate the determination of the USDA and the NIAA: they've got way too much at stake to give up easily. But NAIS is encountering much fiercer resistance than its backers ever expected, or had reason to expect, and why? Because of an awesome grassroots organizing effort. Hot damn! (I got my first heads-up about the issue from other horse owners, IIRC almost two years ago. That's how I knew it was safe to trash the intimidating-looking official snail-mailings that arrived in my mailbox.)

All this is exhilarating enough, but it gets better: the grassroots resistance didn't start in the big cities, and it sure didn't start within the Democratic Party (or the Republican either). It started "out there," among people who are all too often dismissed wholesale on this board as "sheeple."

Wisconsin state representative Barbara Gronemus sponsored the NAIS bill in her state -- and now regrets it. "Appalled by the way it's being implemented and by the financial squeeze it puts on family farmers, she says, 'I could just kick myself for putting my name to it now.'" Good for her. When was the last time one of your elected reps admitted s/he goofed and set out to rectify the error? Here's hoping this starts a trend, and that NAIS will continue to falter until someone gives it the coup de grâce.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Did she not READ the bill? Posted by: TennMom
Absurd regulations mean its time to cut government beaurocracy
Posted by: fearless flower on Sep 19, 2007 7:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's happening everywhere. Bloated, unnecessary government entities not only drain us of our tax money, they have no real purpose and so have to invent "problems" and annoy us with asinine solutions to try to justify their own existence.

Every government office should be accountable to a citizens watchgroup or ethics committee working with local elected officials to monitor its performance. I'd volunteer to do that and I bet a lot of other fed up people would too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Subject DH98656-00001120 'Fluffy'
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Sep 19, 2007 7:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
************************************************
USDA CONFIDENTIAL
NAIS
************************************************

Name: Fluffy
Species: Canine
Threat Level: Yellow

************************************************

October 14, 2008:

Subject 'Fluffy' observed sleeping on front porch for several hours. At 13:30, subject roots around in back of yard and buries unidentified package.

At 14:43 subject meets with unidentified canine in front yard, subject sniffs unidentified canine's genitals for several minutes. Both subject and other canine, hereafter referred to as 'Peaches', engage in suspicious 'rough play'. It is suspected this is largely for show and masks a hidden form of communication.

At 15:00 Peaches defecates on front lawn, then leaves. At 15:05 subject eats Peaches feces. At 15:15 subject vomits.
Subject sleeps on front porch for remainder of afternoon until owner arrives home from work.

************************************************
Notes:

Recommend covert action to retrieve unknown package buried by subject.

Subject is known to associate with other suspected canine militants and 'runs with the big dogs'.

************************************************
USDA Confidential
Authorized Use Only
************************************************
************************************************

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IBM has a patent for tracking people
Posted by: wireup on Sep 19, 2007 8:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read the book SPYCHIPS and you will learn that IBM has a patent for using RFID technology to track people!

http://www.spychips.com/documents/patent-info.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

microchip all politicians who allow the corporateers to pick our pockets
Posted by: Suzon on Sep 19, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and put the little guys out of business!

The politicians who back these kinds of mandatory schemes are effectively issuing licenses which allow the taxation of the public by corporateers.

(Let's not use the language of the social predators. A "corporation" is not a person and therefore is not entitled to rights. A "corporation" is a fiction, bogus, a sham and a false front. Every "corporate" action is taken by indentifiable individuals. Let's not discuss "corporations"; let's talk about corporateers.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wow
Posted by: Axiom69 on Sep 19, 2007 9:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A completly informative article! As much of a news junkie that I am I'm surprised that this is the first I've heard of this. Great Job!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

More and more legislation is introduced out of the public view.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 19, 2007 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article. Shows exactly how corporate lobbyists and their hired politicians coordinate to keep the public from being aware of what they're up to.

If you have a spare moment, type "National Animal Identification System" into the Google News server - up comes a handful of local rural papers, largely opposed, cheers from industry PR sites like RFID Journal and CattleNetwork.com, and my personal favorite:

Amish say tags for cattle are the Mark of the Beast, Sept 1 2007.

If you're not familiar with that Revelations text:
"He causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark or the name of the beast, or the number of his name."

There is indeed a movement to do the same thing for humans, led by Britain. They seem to be working hard to make Orwell's 1984 a reality, what with their car-tracking systems, total surveillance camera blanket, and now this, courtesy of the BBC: All UK 'must be on DNA database', Sept 4 2007

"The present database in England and Wales holds details of 4m people who are guilty or cleared of a crime.

Lord Justice Sedley said this was indefensible and biased against ethnic minorities, and it would be fairer to include everyone, guilty or innocent."


Again, a bogus humanitarian concern is used as the justification for moving towards a totalitarian police state - all citizens will now line up for fingerprinting, retinal scans, and DNA sampling. You will need to apply to DHS for interstate transit papers as well. It's all for your own safety. Big Brother loves you. War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

May the farce be with you
Posted by: willymack on Sep 19, 2007 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We Americans invent more ways to scam people-one way or another-than you can shake a stick at. That's because most of us are fat, dumb, and happy, and prone to believe any scam artist who offers us "something for nothing". The "terror" scam is no exception. Cheney/bush are the REAL terrorists, war criminals, war profiteers, treasury looters, etc. Their crimes are so numerous and up-front that many of us simply have become numb to their depradations, and probably won't react in time to prevent our transition from a democracy to a fascist dictatorship, if, in fact, it hasn't already happened.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GSC
Posted by: garycathey on Sep 19, 2007 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oklahoma experienced just this type of thing first-hand. Tyson foods pushed a law through our state legislature making it illegal to sell or deliver chickens or chicken products through a third party that wasn't a licensed meat processing facility. It was totally underhanded and got no media notice. We wouldn’t even have known about it except our community supported agriculture (CSA) co-op was raided by the state and they confiscated all the chickens they were distributing (but not the ducks, geese or other poultry Tyson isn’t concerned with). Now, our local farmers can’t distribute chickens through any co-op or CSA in Oklahoma. Their chickens can only be sold through a licensed meat-processing facility or directly from the farm. I would like to give our state legislators the benefit of the doubt and believe they were obviously thinking it was a public health issue and didn’t consider the true ramifications but we’ve been trying to get it overturned for over a year now and we’re not getting anywhere. The growth of CSAs and agriculture co-ops was obviously making headway into Tyson’s practical monopoly on the chicken market so they found a way to quash the competition. So much for the “free market economy” I keep hearing such good things about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The USDA Could Hardly Care Less About You
Posted by: parmenicleitus on Sep 19, 2007 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USDA rubs elbows with big agri-business all the time. There is nothing new about this. One of the most recent (and largely unreported) scams has to do with organic milk. Those of you who care about where your food comes from and what's in it should read the following articles about Aurora Organics and the USDA taking the usual path of least resistance. You can find the articles here and here.

When the USDA dictates what is "organic" for you and fails to live up to its own low standards, you should be worried, very worried.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here is the next step
Posted by: lrrysgl on Sep 19, 2007 11:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blackwater will throw a few million dollars around in campaign contributions so they can wind up getting a $600 million contract to have its mercenary army guard every chicken, cow and goat on a family farm. Of course, the family farmer (and we, the taxpayer) will wind up paying for it, but you can bet that giant agribusiness will have a loophole that excludes them from paying anything....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

voluntary...
Posted by: lunatic on Sep 19, 2007 11:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...as in the federal income tax is "voluntary"?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tagging animals inOztralia
Posted by: Recher on Sep 19, 2007 12:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would be on the extreme left of politics. I live in Oztralia.

Asutralia has adopted the system you are talking about.

We call it NIS (National Identification System)

You fail to understand how helpful this system would be in the event of a disease outbreak.

In NSW we have had a similar system for bananas!!!!!! for decades!!!! whereby movement of bananas must be recorded so that if there is an outbreak of a disease at one place propagules from that farm can be traced.

Per animals here in Australia we are especially concerned about hoof and mouth. The tag system is not a major cost impost and really truly is cost beneficial and not totalitarian liek trhe author presumes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tagging bananas in Oz Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive
Passive resistance works. Do it, or just don't do it.
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Sep 19, 2007 2:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the same govt. that tried to force all health care workers to get toxic small pox vaccinations despite contraindicated conditions and no epidemic. The same govt. that wanted to force all arab immigrants in the U.S. to register with the govt. In both cases, so few people complied, they just passively resisted by not doing it with not a lot of political organizing, just refusing to comply, that both programs were abandoned.

Don't register your cows, man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jim Hightower, Populist Hero.
Posted by: MobileSucks on Sep 19, 2007 2:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Jim Hightower is a national treasure. Not an overstatement one single bit. He does damn fine work, damn fine!

~Subscribe to "Higher Lowdown" and support first rate muckraking reporting by a great populist activist. It's a great deal at $15 for one whole year, or get it online for only $10!~

Note: I don't work for Hightower; I have a subscription and I personally recommend it to all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

breach of trust
Posted by: makesenseofit on Sep 19, 2007 2:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Someone told me not to be shocked if one day we find out the government is buying lists of people from non government contract entities uncovering every rock to dig up
personal information on every possible person they can. Since the money made comes in the form of so called commission ( the more you get the more you make).
And now another data base extravaganza for the feds to play with for and in the future. ( the animal futures) Believe you me it sounds like BIG Brother...
TOTAL AND COMPLETE CONTROL.

Terrorism ( or the threat thereof) is costing us Americans our freedoms and our rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Capithingalism
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre on Sep 19, 2007 4:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Add to "disaster capitalism" "regulatory capitalism".

I am finding it helpful to consider modern capitalism in the light of the movie "The Thing". It is an apt allegory. Like The Thing, this shape-shifting capitalism inserts itself into the institutions of Government, Law, Regulation, Education, into the Public Commons, anywhere it can, really, and attempts to morph those entities into profit generators. This way all aspects of human activity and all social constructs will be turned into corporations.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ya mean...
Posted by: Bbear41 on Sep 19, 2007 4:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... 'My Pet Goat' will be registered?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

JUST WHEN I THOUGHT IT WAS SAFE TO GO OUT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 19, 2007 6:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live less than a mile from some beautiful New Jersey Guernsey cows. Should I be taking any precautions and it is OK for me to use my microwave oven. And What about tin foil? I've just been pushed over the edge. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: JUST WHEN I THOUGHT IT WAS SAFE TO GO OUT Posted by: Fat Man at the Buffet Line
this is how the Mark of the Beast is going to come about
Posted by: eosrk on Sep 19, 2007 6:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in a for of an RFID tag program for homeland security.
....and the bible thumpers won't even see it coming, cause it's already in place, called credit-debit cards!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Animal Farm
Posted by: Jest2007 on Sep 19, 2007 7:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I guess George Orwell's fantasy has finally come true. It seems that the "war on terrorism" is becoming a petri dish of horrors for the citizens of this country--forget about the terrorists. The government is providing enough horrors--loss of civil rights; constant war; and, now, a full frontal assault on farm animals and pets. What will Bush and the political hacks in Washington think of next? McCarthyism is alive and well in the United States.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Chickens with VIN numbers
Posted by: Will Brady on Sep 19, 2007 8:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really. I can't waith.
Next we ought to do this with flies, mosquitoes, rats, pigeons and seagulls. That way we can come closer to identifying the sources of other disease vector hosts as well.

Those Congress folks have GOT TO BE super-smart. No body else has thought of this. I wonder why.

And, with sarcasm dripping from my saliva, I'm out of here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Microchip implants cause cancer in lab rats
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Sep 20, 2007 1:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Read about it here and here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Microchip tracking
Posted by: zekeput@msn.com on Sep 20, 2007 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sometimes, paranoia is just, paranoia! Not everything the government does is out to GET YOU!! Diseased cattle, horses, etc, etc, are, routinely, shipped throughout the US and the world. I have friend working for the Dept of Agriculture who tells absolute horror stories about the state of food safety. Things like a Dept inspector quickly shipping his own diseased herd before symptoms were visable. Other countries have already installed this system with great success and it is necessary unless you want to be eating more tainted food. The system currently in place is old, out of date and filled with "good old boys" who resist any type of inspection on the basis of a personal problems with authority.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RFIDs for the Stupid
Posted by: LeftCoastProgressive on Sep 20, 2007 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, RFIDS are programmed with data just prior to insertion. The are READ ONLY thereafter. What could they say about the animal, plant, or human into which they are implanted? Size,weight,age, color eyes, color skin, green, ripe, overly ripe, hairy, tested healthy, etc., etc. A RFID is a SNAPSHOT taken of the object into which it is inserted. If the object has been moved since the insertion of the RFID, hot dog..you can tell where it came from and condemn a whole herd or plantation.

Much ado about nothing, signifying heavy greed is afoot!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

j
Posted by: jmp3954 on Sep 20, 2007 9:32 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This program is certainly an Orwellian horror, and we must resist it with all of our might. It must be stopped by any means necessary. Yet it has support from the left as well as from the right, as per Recher's comment about a similar program in Australia. He seems to think that chipping's purported value in outbreaks of animal disease justifies a massive invasion of people's privacy and an exponential augmentation of governmental surveillance of and control over individuals. I suspect that if this program had been proposed by a Kucinich or Nader administration it would have been enthusiastically supported by most of the posters on Alternet.

But it could make for interesting politics - radical greenies and sagebrush rebels on the same side.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO MORE FACTORY FARMED FOOD!
Posted by: freedom4us on Sep 21, 2007 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SEE: nonais.org ; www.libertyark.net ; farmandranchfreedom.org for more info.
This is so CRITICAL! Those in power KNOW that those who control ENERGY AND FOOD, CONTROL THE WORLD! If the government with funding and Lobby support from MEGA-INDUSTRIALIZED agriculture corporations (USDA jobs are filled by people from there) take away our right to grow our own food and buy our food from farmers who take care of their livestock, crops, quality of product, and use SUSTAINABLE FARMING METHODS, we will be FORCED to ONLY be able to buy hormone and antibiotic-riddled livestock grown and slaughtered in filthy, overcrowded and unhealthy conditions where new diseases and more resistant diseases will develop. They PUT ARSENIC IN CHICKEN FEED TO GET RID OF PARASITES! LOOK IT UP ON THE INTERNET...also arsenic is a heavy metal that builds up in the body. That's why they can claim 'no antibiotics' in chicken - try to find ARSENIC FREE labeled except organic! How much $$ can all the corporations make if WE MUST tag and track ALL our animals? ...think about it -> $$$$

...be afraid ? - if you have a horse and want to go for a trail ride you will be required to report ALL animals met and details where you went and when , and you MUST report it in 24 hours or pay a $1000 (one thousand) a day fine...vets will not be allowed to treat animals NOT REGISTERED with the USDA or be fined or lose their license...once your property is registered with the USDA it is 'under government control' and they claim to have the right to come on your property and kill all your animals or seize them AND THERE IS NO GETTING OFF THAT LIST!...oh yeah-but you still pay your taxes, etc...the USDA has already watched farmers properties from satellites and tried to fine one for putting up a fence on the farmer's own property...its all about more profit$ for corporation$...the USDA has been tricking and threatening people into a VOLUNTARY program!!!... TAGS DO NOT CONTROL DISEASE!!!! E-COLI CONTAMINATION OCCURS IN SLAUGHTERHOUSE AFTER TAGS HAVE BEEN REMOVED! TB in cattle is caused by exposure to diseased wildlife ! Tags do not stop this ! TB was eliminated in cattle in Michigan in the past and it was NOT done because of TAGS!

TAGGING AND RELATED COSTS WILL CAUSE OUR SMALL FARMERS OUT OF BUSINESS BECAUSE THEY MUST TAG EVERY ANIMAL, SPEND TIME USED IN FARMING TO DO LABOR INTENSIVE COSTLY RECORD KEEPING THAT IS NOW TAKEN CARE OF BY COST EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT METHODS ALREADY!!!! THIS MAKES LESS COMPETION FOR THE HUGE AGRI-CORPS WHO WILL GET MORE POWERFUL BECAUSE OF BIGGER PROFITS. Feedlots and factory farm corporations ONLY NEED ONE TAG for 10,000 animals!! IF TAGS WORK SO WELL IN "KEEPING US SAFE" - why don't THEY HAVE TO TAG EVERY ANIMAL???? THEY are where the problems and dangers of disease HAVE THE HIGHEST DANGER AND PROBABILITY TO OCCUR!!!!! Big factory farms pass their cost to us through the increase in the price we pay.

USDA wants to tag farm animals first because farmers are a smaller group than pet owners. They are not organized, are rather isolated, and are already beaten down by the Dept of Agriculture and are in constant fear of losing their farms. NAIS WILL GO TO HORSES, BUNNIES, DOG, AND CATS..then us. The USDA has ALREADY gone on peoples property, killed all their animals, and then sent the owners a bill with NO PROOF OF DISEASE. Look up "Henshaw Incident" on the web for ONE case (there has been others)! THE NAIS WILL MAKE IT EASIER! BE AFRAID-BUT BE AFRAID OF THE GOVERNMENT CONTROLING OUR FOOD SUPPLY BY "FEAR TACTICS" !!!!. Thats what the current administration has figured out how to use so well against us - keep us afraid! History has proven famines occur when government run agriculture fails. Those who lived through disasters were societies where diversified, sustainable agriculture existed. Educate yourself before its too late! Support local farmers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

48 hour traceback
Posted by: DonkeyOdy on Sep 22, 2007 10:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USDA has said NAIS is needed to provide traceback within 48 hours in the event of a disease. They claim this will be done across species and across state boundaries and could involve the interaction of hundreds of animals. So, here is the test:

1) On July 20, 2007 I followed the procedure to request that the USDA remove me from their NAIS database. One person - one record - up-to-date contact information - just delete it. Should be a slam dunk, right?

2) As a control I contacted the Social Security Administration to resolve an earnings discrepancy, and I contacted the Farm Bureau (big supporters of NAIS) to cancel my farm and ranch policy.

The SSA was super nice, professional, and sent me a written confirmation within two weeks. The Farm Bureau sent my refund on Sept 21, 2007. I have not heard a peep from the USDA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Animal or Child left behind!
Posted by: vomeggido on Sep 26, 2007 9:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They always use animals and children to exploit the evil in the world then try to show up as heros with solutions for protection!

Animal terrorists? YOU HAVE GOT TO BE FUCKING JOKING!

No wonder the elite are laughing their asses off while they line us up for the showers!

Stop falling for it people. America needs to wake up right now. If we showed up at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue with torches and pitchforks- we would find out real fast- their ultimate agenda.

I personally am sick of this slow death procession- End it or fix it. Lets find out once and for all- TOGETHER!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]