Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

U.S. Is Paying Off Iraq's Worst War Criminals in Attempt to Ward Off Attacks

By Katie Halper, AlterNet. Posted September 18, 2007.


The insurgents who were shooting at U.S. troops six months ago are now on the payroll [includes video].
Militias

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Katie Halper

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Title: Director's Cut: New Video shows the truth in Anbar that Petraeus does not want us to see.

When Bush was in Iraq two weeks ago he posed for photographs with Abdul-Sattar Abu Risha, the leader of the Anbar Awakening, an alliance of Sunni tribes who vow to back the United States and fight against al Qaeda.

Last Monday, General Petraeus testified to Congress that "a year ago" Anbar province "was assessed 'lost' politically ... Today, it is a model of what happens when local leaders and citizens decide to oppose al Qaeda and reject its Taliban-like ideology."

Three days later, the assassination of Abu Risha in Ramadi dramatically undercut Bush and Petraeus' claims of Anbar victory and peacekeeping. But what else is the administration keeping from us about Anbar?

Rick Rowley, a journalist and independent filmmaker of Big Noise Films, was one of the last people to videotape and interview the Sunni sheikh, and his video report Uncovering the Truth Behind the Anbar Success Story, presents a very different picture of the Anbar Awakening.

Embedded with the U.S. Army and Iraqi militias, Rowley shows us that the Sunni "freedom fighters" with whom the United States is now allied are not just insurgents who had been killing Americans but war criminals responsible for sectarian cleansing.

Rowley, and his co-producers David Enders and Hiba Dawood, are the only Western journalists to bring a camera into the refugee camp where the displaced Shiites recount being attacked, bombed and driven out by the very tribes Petraeus and Bush are hailing as heroes.

Rowley's report, which includes interviews with candid U.S. soldiers and footage of a military commander handing a Sunni leader a wad of cash, suggests the role of bribery and coercion in building alliances that serve short-term goals in Anbar province, but in the long run deepen a multisided civil war. I talked to Rick Rowley about his report and what he thinks it indicates about Iraq's future.

Katie Halper: What brought you to Iraq, and what were you hoping to capture?

Rick Rowley: We knew that one of the major stories the Army was going to use to justify keeping troops there was the supposed success in Anbar. The first investigation we did was into the Anbar reconciliation program. We spent six weeks crisscrossing Iraq, embedding with different militias to try to get a picture of the state of Iraq during the surge.

KH: You were the last Western journalists to videotape an interview with Abu Risha. What was he like? What was his significance?

RR: He seemed stiff and scripted. He told us some incredible lies during the interview. Three times he said he was the leader of all the Arab tribes of Iraq -- both Shia and Sunni. And like a bad poker player's tell, every time he told a lie he sniffed loudly.

He was a figurehead for a movement, the face they put on this story. Operationally, militarily, he wasn't particularly important. In his interview with us he said there was 100 percent security in Ramadi, that he was head of all of the tribes in Iraq. That has proven, in a horrifying way, to not be true. His assassination has blown a hole in the American story about security in Anbar. It's going to have a chilling effect on other tribes in other parts of the country who were thinking it might be safe to work with the Americans.

KH: Bush and Petraeus are hailing our alliance with Sunni tribes in Anbar. Can you tell us about these "freedom fighters" the U.S. is now allied with?

RR: There have been a lot of reports about the fact that the people who the U.S. is working with, the supposed "freedom fighters," the "counter-insurgents" are former insurgents. They were Iraqi al Qaeda before they started working with the Americans. That is troubling because if they were fighting the Americans once, they'll fight Americans again. And more troubling for the future of Iraq is the fact that many of the tribes that the U.S. is working with are war criminals who are directly responsible for ethnic cleansing and who are using American support to prepare for sectarian civil war. The U.S. is funding Sunni militias. They already funded the Shia militias. They're now funding all sides of this sectarian war.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: iraq, anbar

Katie Halper is a co-founder of Laughing Liberally, a political comedy group and one of the national directors of Living Liberally and artistic director and comedy curator at The Tank a nonprofit performing and visual arts space for emerging artists. Katie blogs regularly for the Huffington Post, Working Life, and the political comedy site 23/6.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Fancy that
Posted by: vox persona on Sep 18, 2007 1:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's no surprise that we are funding all sides in a civil war our boy emperor unleashed in his invasion/occupation of Muslim holy land. Our money is disappearing by the ton, $3 billion/week will buy a lot of misery. Iraq is now hell on Earth thanks to chimp. No matter what our stated policy is, we endorse death squads, even incorporate them wholesale into the 'police force'. We'll stand down when they stand up. Yeah, right. Don't hold your breath. It takes one of our 18 year olds a couple moths after joining and going through basic training to find themselves being a target in Iraq, but 4 1/2 years after toppling Saddam, they cant defend themselves yet? I remember Bush campaigning against nation building and being the 'world's policeman'. Lies built on lies, this bogus occupation being the mother of all lies. All war supporters should join up now, because our military has been broken by these chickenhawk neocons.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Well there sure is...
Posted by: TT5 on Sep 18, 2007 2:28 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a lot of paying to do!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Well there sure is... Posted by: katyalynn
» Hahahaha, I like you. Posted by: Prophit
Ameican business as usual
Posted by: marid on Sep 18, 2007 3:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
arming some group of thugs or other. An old business practice that has come back to haunt us time and again. Saddam, Shah of Iran, Noreiga, Osama, and a host of other despots and tyrants we put on the payroll. Then we arm them while they do our bidding and then later they become our enemies and they kill our people with the weapons we gave them. Great business model.

The Merchants of Death make out on both sides. Free Market Capitalism, gotta love it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Subterfuge
Posted by: ray burchard on Sep 18, 2007 4:34 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Could this vile capitalistic policy of manipulating, and thereby direct, the runaway train of insurgency be likened by, lets say, a news agency using both acknowledged and anonymous shills embedded in it’s scribed patronage’s discussion group to orchestrate the group’s modality and there by push it’s agenda (the appearance of the voice of the people)?

Its obvious the internet policy of anonymous posting has a societal downside as it's duality.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHAT??!!??
Posted by: peacefullaim on Sep 18, 2007 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This story is incredible!!! Does Congress know this?? Why is this not headline news?? I am absolutely dumbfounded! Just when I thought things could not get more absurd. . .that Bushco had reached the limit of lying. . .they cross yet another line of pure, unadulterated bullshit. Not to mention the disgusting blind eye of the main stream media. Someone please explain to me how this is not treason????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHAT??!!?? Posted by: farmertx
» RE: WHAT??!!?? Posted by: CatDad
Isn't this the heart of the surge?
Posted by: robchapman on Sep 18, 2007 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't the Coaltion's redesignation of insurgents to freedom fighters and the subsequent policy of paying, training and equipping them the heart of the Surge?

How will the Iraqi National Government establish control of the areas where the Coalition has reconstituted the Tribal militias?

This policy is a recipe for disaster and the best the GOP, Administration and Pentagon can come up with.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Spending habits?
Posted by: Knowmad on Sep 18, 2007 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Almost 50 million without adequate health care, crumbling infrastructure, wide open borders and ports, the highest incarceration rate of all nations, increasingly crippling debt in the economic engine of the middle class, rampant corporate corruption, filth like cheney and his bosses calling the shots, a lapdog mainstream media, disintigrating global opinion, children burdened for life through underfunded and often whacko-infiltrated education, crippling, increasing deficits virtually across the board . . . and on and on.

All this, and your 'leadership' decides that the best use of your money is to spend 3 billion a week (at least) on a whim of a war, and their wet dream of global domination; and doing so while ignoring, even promoting, the promulgation of the very fossil fuels which are gradually choking the planet, and everyone/thing on it, to death.

It's not as if you're incapable, or need a Budgeting 101 refresher. You've simply been taken over by insecure criminals, and must do whatever it takes to begin to get your desperate situation back to something resembling sanity. Taking to the streets last weekend in Washington was perfect, but you need to do something every weekend, or they'll just ignore you and you'll become old news. Once you do get the reins, you could then apply a little common sense, compassion and fiscal restraint in your financial undertakings.

You allowed the hideous cheney/bush/coporate/neocon cabal to develop and grow, and only you can, must, deal with them; for your country, the world, the innocent other lifeforms, and all our children and their children.
~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Spending habits? Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: Spending habits? Posted by: fedupw/bush
» RE: Spending habits? Posted by: starvinmarvy
America created, trained, funded, and armed Osama bin Laden and still defends him and the likes.
Posted by: maxpayne on Sep 18, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So arming the insurgents shouldn't even be a surprise. If they don't arm them the Military Industrial Complex, already fucking and raping America to DEATH, will be forced into BANKRUPTCY mode.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Their film is on Youtube
Posted by: AussieGeoff on Sep 18, 2007 7:02 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3

It totals about 31 minutes (including additional commentary inserted by Democracy Now).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOT TO OVERSIMPLIFY, BUT
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Sep 18, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Bush is a man with nothing left to lose. That makes him very dangerous. His reckless behavior puts us at risk every day. His power trip goes unchecked. I don't believe a single general trusts him any more than I do. He does not know what Iraq is all about much less what to do about it. The entire world is afraid of him and us and for good reason. Too much time has been wasted analyzing new strategies. He's got to go before he decides we need a police state. And there won't be a thing we can do about it. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bush or America? Posted by: justaguy
Congressional Republicans need to know this
Posted by: mgloraine on Sep 18, 2007 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My hat's off to anyone who actually goes to the war zone and talks with the people. I can claim to be too old and embroiled domestically to stick my neck out, but I suspect that were I suddenly to be restored to a state of youth and total freedom, Iraq is the last place I would be heading.

So this report and others like it come at the price of great personal risk for the journalists on the ground, who went the extra distance to get some truth! Somebody throw some money and Pullitzer Prizes in their direction!

In the mean time, it seems like it might be useful to make a concerted effort to bring this info to the attention of those Senate Republicans who might need a reason to help override a presidential veto. Surely they can grasp the impending disaster for US troops in a country gearing up for a civil war which is already in progress. With BushCo arming all factions, how do they expect US casualties to be anything less than astronomical? About the only thing that could be used to form a consensus amongst the warring factions there is the nationwide resentment of the occupation and hatred of Americans! I don't believe that counts as "nation building".

It may well be that the Republicans' predicted "blood-bath" in response to US withdrawal is in fact an inevitability whether we stay or leave. But it is obviously true that the more Americans are present, the more Americans will be killed. And the more weapons and untraceable cash we inject into the mix, the more death and mayhem will result.

It would be a great service to humanity to stop Bush, Cheney and the crony corporations from establishing the basis for a war that keeps the Halliburton / Carlyle cartel peddling death for profit for the next 50-75 years. What other motive can there be for deliberately fueling the fires of civil war?

If everyone in Congress is afraid of trying Impeachment, the very least they can do is cut off the money. BushCo is very actively and very deliberately making the situation in Iraq as bad as possible. For BushCo, the war in Iraq means guaranteed income, whereas for the rest of the world it means guaranteed death, financial ruin, sorrow, and despair.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Such Hypocrisy!
Posted by: indiangreek on Sep 18, 2007 8:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time that any Democrat tries to point out to any Republican that the conflict in Iraq is a civil war between Sunni, Shia, Curds, the Republicans make fun and say, "Oh, sure, are you going to just stop and ask them, 'Excuse me, Sir, are you Sunni or Shia?' before we shoot them?" (John McCain on Meet the Press) Well, now, in order to exit Iraq with some kind of dignity (before the war money runs out next year) the Republicans are now striking deals with all those militia factions (that switch sides on a minute by minute basis, depending on who pays them the most), just so they can say they left as winners and heroes. Republicans attack Democrats as being "cut-and-runners", while the video clearly shows that THEY are desperately trying to find a way out of this war, within which they clearly are in way over their heads! And they will never admit that they are, mark my words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey, It works in America...
Posted by: K.D. on Sep 18, 2007 8:59 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...whats the difference? Black on Black, Black on Latino...its the American way. Its easier to win a war you don't have to fight.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Shocking", "Such Hypocrisy", "WHAT??!!" . . . Whatever!
Posted by: MAD on Sep 18, 2007 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grumble, Growl and Scowl!!! That's precisely what Americans do when confronted with such, hmmm, shocking news, and none more than your average Alternet reader. A clear picture is emerging of our dear, indignant Alterneters.

"My god, I'm shocked and dismayed at the actions of our government and it's kleptocratic, warmongering friends but I'm utterly helpless to stop it".

Just curious - do any of you feel legitimate anger, indignation, shame, etc? Do you really or do you just feign it because it's what you're supposed to do? After all, the war is going on over there.

Here's what I think. You publicly express contempt but you still drink your martinis and laugh with friends. You still go on buying crap from China you don't really need and revel in how cheap it is. You still worry about climbing the corporate ladder while whispering about 9/11 in private. You speak of the hypocrisy of this administration but I rather think you should take a LONG, HARD LOOK AT YOURSELVES.

Here's what I really think. You're all nothing but a bunch of self-righteous cowards who won't lift a finger to affect meaningful change in this country but Alternet makes you feel tough!! Notice how the calls for impeachment have died away? Notice how the Dems rolled over and you went . . . YAWN. Notice how troop levels INCREASED and you all rolled over and went back to sleep. Stop pretending to be something you're not. You're cowards too afraid to risk that shiny little Volvo coupe in the garage. Even those of you driving a Yugo and working for a pittance are too cowardly to act. What's wrong? Low sense of self-worth preventing you from acting? Did your alcoholic daddy convince you that you don't deserve any better? Sniff, sniff.

ALL OF YOU - STOP WHINING! You don't have that right anymore. What exactly is this site for? What have ANY OF YOU DONE AS A RESULT OF AN ARTICLE ON THIS SITE? Changed to long life light bulbs? Switched away from Dasani water? You're a bad, collective joke and you know it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» So you're the Lone Ranger? Posted by: mgloraine
» So, you're Mr. Rogers? Posted by: MAD
» QED Posted by: mgloraine
» RE: QED Posted by: MAD
» I did say law-abiding citizens Posted by: mgloraine
» You're right Posted by: leafsong1
Want the truth?
Posted by: willymack on Sep 18, 2007 10:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here it is:
1. The Iraq "war" was, and is, about STEALING THEIR OIL, with Iran being next.
2. The bushies don't give a fat rat's ass who or how many people die to satisfy their quest for money and power. As long as the war profits and the kickbacks therefrom keep rolling in, everything's hunky-dory with them.
3. The neocon bastards who run the show have NO INTENTION OF RELENQUISHING POWER, now, in 2008, or at any other time, and will use every subterfuge and dirty trick to maintain it.
4. We, the American people will allow this situation to degenerate to the point where our country will become just another tinpot dictatorship, headed for an ignominious exit from the world stage.
Can you handle the truth?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great article - shows the world what real journalism looks like.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Sep 18, 2007 11:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a contrast between the managed, embedded reporters who work for CNN and FOX and Rowley, Enders and Dawood. As ever, this only shows the depths to which corporate journalism in the US has fallen.

There are probably a hundred similar tales to be told all across Iraq and Afghanistan. However, this is the most dangerous place on the planet for journalists. According to CPJ Iraq: Journalists in Danger, over a hundred working journalists have been killed in Iraq:

JOURNALISTS KILLED ON DUTY: 112*

Here is a statistical analysis of journalists killed in Iraq since hostilities began in March 2003, as compiled by the Committee to Protect Journalists. CPJ considers a journalist to be killed on duty if the person died as a result of a hostile action—such as reprisal for his or her work, or crossfire while carrying out a dangerous assignment. CPJ does not include journalists killed in accidents, such as car or plane crashes, unless the crash was caused by aggressive human action (for example, if a plane were shot down or a car crashed trying to avoid gunfire). Nor does CPJ include journalists who died of health ailments. Capsule reports detailing each death are available by following the links below.

* In addition, CPJ keeps a separate tally of media support workers who have been killed. That number stands at 40.


Thus, we all owe a big thank you to this independent news team for putting their lives at risk in order to bring this story to the attention of the US public.

However, we also all owe a big rotten tomato to the corporate press for lying through their teeth on a daily basis. If we were to dump a truckload of pig entrails on the front steps of every corporate media conglomerate in the country - that might get the message across.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worst War Criminals?
Posted by: xi_people on Sep 18, 2007 1:58 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again American myopia is on display for all the world to see. Since the biggest war criminal in Iraq is the collective US military presence itself, any paychecks sent to its soldiers should -- by definition -- be what the author is actually referring to.

When all is said and done, the Iraq invasion and its probable aftermath -- the bombing of Iran and possibly Syria, as well as a planned invasion of Saudi Arabia -- will go down as the biggest war crimes against humanity in the history of the planet, by a very wide margin. That is, if anything resembling a true accounting of past events is possible in the not-so-distant future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Worst War Criminals? Posted by: babs
Yeah right, great article!
Posted by: slick_rolla on Sep 18, 2007 2:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The worst criminals in iraq are american!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Incredibly, the chimp-in-chief has shown that it possible to be worse than Saddam
Posted by: chief of okeefe on Sep 18, 2007 6:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congrats to the Boy Emperer!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hey, I saw this on TV!
Posted by: Mercurial Georgia on Sep 18, 2007 9:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't like Fox TV, and most Freshly Created Shows, because they usually suck...but several months ago, I tuned in to watch the season 6(?) opening of "24", because Alexander Siddig was going to be in, that guy who was Doctor Bashir in Star Trek:Deep Space Nine?

The ending, or rather, the end of Siddig's arch because I stopped shortly watching after that, was disappointing. The opening was very interesting. U.S. paid money to Fayed the terrorist, for the location of Hamir Al-Assad (Siddig), the head of their organization... Instead of going in, since Assad is in their own country, US went for the expensive overkill of an airstrike. Fortunately, Jack Bauer (Kiefer Sutherland), managed to save Hamir on time, because it turns out that Fayed was behind the attack, Hamir was trying to call it off.

With the aid of American money no doubt, the attacks increased and eventually LA was nuked.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just like Romans
Posted by: leafsong1 on Sep 20, 2007 3:25 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Paying one barbarian tribe to fight another, hiring barbarians to do their fighting, and then wondering why every barbarian warrior in the world is beating a path to where the empire is fighting. Empirically stupid in a classical sense. Yet another sign of impending imperial collapse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just like Romans Posted by: Doubtom
THE HOLY EARTHY GENOCIDE TRINITY OF THE BLOODTHIRSTY ORGIES AT "LOS AZORES".
Posted by: Vicario on Sep 21, 2007 10:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe that SUCKER BUSH do not know how to make love, promote love or provide love for seval reasons:
l. He is addicted to genocides and war crimes and not to love.
2. He betrayed CHRIST and substituted him on earth, thinking that CHRIST is out of date and hot old.
3. He founded THE HOLY EARTHY GENOCIDE TRINITY OF RHE BLOODRGIRSTY ORGIES AT THE AZORES.
4. He enjoys loving whatever his predeccessors did to promote the NAZIFASCISM.
5. He has got a rusty cock because of the drugs he used during his life.
6. He loves watching sex and that is why he ordered hus troops to convert ABU GHRAIB into a SEX SHOP or KAMA SUTA for sexual experiences and everything related to sex. such as oral, sodomic and devilish sex.
7. He is not in need for sex, because he menstruate from his mazzle and filters out curtains of burning smoke from his back.
8. He follows staigt up the ways of life of CONDOLESSA, related to conceptions, preceptions, ideologies, theologies and sexualities.
9, He should be nominate for the OSCAR next year, as the PROGRESS, CIVILIZATION, TECJNOLOGY, PRECEPTIONS, CONCEPTIONS, IMMORALITY, IDEOLOGY AND THEOLOGY HAVE BEEN TURNED INTO INSTRUMENTS OF MASACRES, GENOCIDES, ATROCITIES AND CRIMES OF WARS, THE GENERATIONS HAVE EVER SEEN.
VICARIO
VICARIUS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]