Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

If You Want Peace in Iraq, Stop Trying to Kill Muqtada al-Sadr and Negotiate With Him

By Adil E. Shamoo, AlterNet. Posted September 12, 2007.


In D.C., there's a belief that Iraqis will tolerate the United States if they can just get the occupation right. But it's the occupation itself that inflames Iraqis' passions.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Adil E. Shamoo

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

News reports indicate that the U. S. is negotiating with the Shiite nationalist Muqtada Al-Sadr, leader of the powerful Mahdi Army. Washington should accommodate Al-Sadr's demands to ensure the safe and orderly withdrawal or re-deployment of our forces as well as to enhance the possibility of a more peaceful outcome for Iraq.

Negotiating with Al-Sadr is distasteful to some Americans. American blood has been spilled by those who have followed him. But this is war, and the United States has already crossed this barrier by arming and collaborating with Sunnis in the Al-Anbar region who have fought and killed far more Americans than al-Sadr's Mahdi Army. Moreover, the British just negotiated the withdrawal of their troops from Basra with Sadr's forces in the south, notwithstanding the recent hollow claim made by their defense and foreign secretaries in a recent opinion piece.

In the simplest possible terms, the United States should negotiate with Sadr because he is arguably the most powerful politician in the country today. At present, Muqtada al-Sadr has millions of Shiite followers, and among his fiercest supporters are the poor living under squalid conditions in al-Sadr city, named after his father. He controls six cabinet members and 30 lawmakers. More importantly, Al-Sadr has the Mahdi Army beside him -- even if he does not control all of it. If elections were held today, he could double his support in the parliament. Yet unless there is meaningful acceptance of some of Sadr's demands, this voting bloc in parliament will likely further paralyze the Iraqi government.

Al-Sadr has shown remarkable flexibility and acumen since our invasion, increasing his support dramatically during our occupation. Many of his followers are willing to die for him. His three-part approach of participating in democracy, fighting the government, and building a grass roots, service-oriented organization has endeared him to most Iraqis.

Al-Sadr became popular because he has espoused policies and services that are admired by most Iraqis. He is fiercely nationalistic. His support includes many Shiites who were among the poorest and most oppressed during Saddam's regime. His Army and his followers provide safety to the areas they control. He facilitates the daily services of healthcare, education, water and electricity, often where the Iraqi government and occupation forces have failed. He advocates a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. forces. He wants Iraqi oil to remain under the control of the central government. He strongly condemns the killing of Iraqis whether Sunnis (no matter what happened in the past) or Christians. Finally, like most Iraqis, he wants the country to stay unified. Sadr has even ordered his Mahdi Army to stand down for six months to help coalition forces have a clear fight against Al Qaeda.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, al-sadr

Adil E. Shamoo, born and raised in Baghdad, is a professor at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. He is a contributor to Foreign Policy In Focus.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The last thing .....
Posted by: Captainmagic on Sep 12, 2007 7:18 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
that you would do is kill the man....in fact you would be better to protect him as one might imagine the outrage/retribution/matyrdom etc that would prevail on his demise....yankee doodle wouldn't be that stupid would they?...Mmmmmm!

Captain OUT.
P.S. There is no doubt in my mind that Iraqi's will offer the yank's their old tradition of letting the foe LEAVE under silent guns. You just have to LEAVE and peace will be given a chance...EOS

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The last thing....However is,
Posted by: Captainmagic on Sep 12, 2007 7:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
..........O.I.L..... and the coalition of the drilling..... Ho Hum!..you know...more butchery.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right On!
Posted by: jbello on Sep 13, 2007 7:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's about time people tried to look at the situation in Iraq from the point of view of the Iraqis. I completely agree with what you say about Al Sadr. Not only is Muqtada al Sadr a nationalist and a patriot from the standpoint of the people, but his father and brothers were martyred to the cause when Saddam was still in power so he has credibility that goes way back.
Al Sadr has been negotiating with the Sunni leadership behind the scenes and I think having people from his party involved in the government could help to stabilize the sectarian violence and achieve the reintegration that everyone wants to see Maliki's government support. As long as Al Sadr's forces remain outside the government, they contribute to instability in Iraq. Inside the government, they could have the weight to ground it and make it viable.
I hope that our people really are negotiating with Al Sadr. The last time they initiated 'negotiations' with him it was a setup and he was nearly assassinated by US forces. That was one of the reasons he went into hiding. Diplomacy requires trust. I hope we can do better, but if we leave, the forces in Iraq will take care of the situation. How much better if we could work with them than against them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]