The Pot Smokers Who the Government Says Don't Exist

only a dictator wants for everything a law.
why not accept tolerance for medical potsmokers, why not allow homegrowers to some plants and arrest gangsters and CEOof large drugcoorporations.
wether you are hooked to smoking crack, tobacco, pot, working 60 hours a week, overweighted and still daily in McDonalds you live in the land of Free and Brave but you are a slave.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The government knows and has known for years that Marijuana is not only totaly beign and harmless to all, but also the best medicine on Earth. But the two problems are (1), the government doesn't give a rats ass about it's citizins or our medical health, only in receiving kick-backs from the big DRUG companys to push poison on the public. Dangerious DRUGS like Aspartame (the toxic "sweetner" in all "diet" products) prove that.

Note the word "drug" I capitalized in refering to actual drugs, never Marijuana which is a PLANT not a drug. The Earth and god(s) make plants, man makes drugs. Man does not make Marijuana, mankind is at war with the Earth and (the) god(s), the war against gods creation, including Marijuana is proof of that.

And (2) the government is ran primarly by Xians who REALLY don't give a rats ass about human beings, and especially those in pain. Well except in taking sadistic enjoyment in seeing others suffer. Like the Evil inhuman monster they worship, they (Xians) also worship terror, evil, and missery. At least in inflicting it on others and watching them in pain, "because your a sinner and diserve it!". And of course all pleasure is "sin" itself. Anything that brings any pleasure must have massive negative side effects (like man-made DRUGS or Alcohol) or it's "illegal". Marijuana has no such negative so it's the Xian anti-god facist governments worst enemy.

When I had 3rd degree burns from a house fire Marijuana was the ONLY thing that helped. The burns are healed and I continue to use Marijuana (with my adult children also) now for nice healthy safe pleasurable fun. Screw the government I don't recognise "laws" from a lower authority over a higher one. And no anti-god, anti-life, anti-humanity, government of man has authority over the Earth and the creation of the most high. Becides with the a-hole in the highest office in the land totaly ignoring Federal Constitutional Law and International Law, why the hell would any sane indivual do more than laugh at Marijuana "laws" (and of course take needed precautions against the jackbooted robat pig cops of the thug coward politicans) having any meaning compaired to Presidental treason? Screw um!
Reverend Setnakt, SoT/SoA

~Xeper~

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why not legalize it .. some interesting information on the plant is to be found here .. http://www.herbdatanz.com/cannabis_picture_monograph.htm

The plant has been used since history began .. the reefer madness mythology was probably initiated by the alcohol barons after the laughable prohibition era with its crime wave, machine guns and that gum boil Eliot Ness.

At this point in time it is used more for recreational purposes than as a medicine. Its usefulness as a medicine would cut into Pharmageddons bottom line .. it is no secret that the FDA and the BMC are shills for the synthetic drug barons.

Alcohol is legal .. the death toll from it is horrendous .. the crimes of great violence committed under its influence are legion .. it destruction of mind and body and especially when it has reached the addiction zone is well documented.

There has to be further reasons for its prohibition and the great sums of money spent in enforcing what is basically unenforceable.

Used for recreation it is mind expanding unless it is abused ..

It reveals many things especially how we as a society have been got at .. first in our formative years of state schooling .. and secondly with the Sheeples Orwellian Booby Tube with its subliminal messages .. and thirdly by political and commercial control of the print media both electronically and hard copy.

This is not good for business or politics if people become aware of what a seriously distorted society we in the western world live in and accept as normal .. unlike alcohol it does not promote violence ..

But then again if people understood what is being done to them with the mind control techniques and the medical drugs it could provoke wide spread unrest .. that would never do would it?

It may make war illegal .. that would never do would it ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe everyone who supports legalization should gather in groups of at least 20, walk to the local police station, and just blaze up in public. Maybe the best way to fight the system is to clog it with an overabundance of minor drug offenders who are clearly non-violent. The cops can't arrest EVERYBODY...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's always nice to read a positive article about Cannabis, but it's usefulness to PEOPLE is not at all relevant, because people are the absolute last thing this government cares about. As long as the CIA and other black areas of the government can fund arms deals and who knows what else using drugs, it will never be legalized. US govt does not want competition in the drug business. This is also why home growers are a threat. Growing your own at home reduces the demand for the commercial product, therefore it's a matter of national security to keep it illegal. This govt is more evil than we will ever understand.
dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My husband thought maybe marijuana might help with my appetite, so he 'scored' some for me. It not only restored my appetite, it also took a lot of my pain away. It makes me sick to think we both could [be] arrested. When is this country going to wake up?"

When are YOU going to wake up? Your goventment doesn't give a rat's ass about you or your comfort, and it will harass and persecute you even unto suicide if you dare defy them by trying to find relief in a way that challenges their beer profits and authori-tay. You probably love your country. But clearly, it doesn't love you.

"I just hope some day the government will stop demonizing a very useful tool."

America will be the very last country to decriminalize marijuana just as it was the last to outlaw slavery. This is a cruel, judgmental and hypocritical culture.

"If marijuana can help me with all my other problems in addition to possibly reducing the size of my tumor and extending my life, then why on earth would our government not allow me to have it?""

Because, as I said, it doesn't give a rat's pitoot about you, sir. America is about profit, not health, happiness or comfort. What other interpretation is possible?

Speaking last month to the Associated Press, Tom Riley -- spokesman for the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy -- launched into an all too common ad hominem attack against medical marijuana and those who advocate for its regulation. "There is a charade going on here," he charged. "[P]eople who are interested in drug legalization using genuinely sick people as pawns to get sympathy to get their agenda through."

Listen to this f**king Republicanhypocrite (one word). The government's own anti-marijuana campaign is nothing but disingenuous red herrings about the dangers or ineffectiveness of marijuana as a medicine, or its use financing terrorists (no, that's the American government's own trafficking in cocaine that was used to finance al-Contra in Nicaragua to terrorize the democratically elected Ortega government). Who's being disingenuous here? Who's the terrorist here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If it's legalized, it will become unaffordable. As long as the right people get what they need, the rest of the population will have to wait. In time it will be legal. Probably when enough Republicans are outed, like the perverts who suddenly started to appear out of the woodwork. It shouldn't be much longer. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let me count the ways......we know them all...

One thing to do is to"OUT" the hypocrites. Make Prohibition POLITICALLY INCORRECT. The citizen who has no health insurance or access to medical care and has pain in most cases will self medicate, with alcohol and tylenol. Contrary to REPUB belief Americans DO work hard and have real physical PAIN. Too much of that LEGAL combination is really hazardous to your health, unlike Cannabis.

New York State Conservative Party Chairman...Michael Long.....re NYS Legislature push to legalize Medical Cannabis...."the measure could encourage fraud among unethical physicians trying to cash in on writing prescriptions" Blame prohibition on the people trying to relieve human suffering, that is a good one.

From what rock did that politician crawl out???

Check out the LEAP Law Enforcement Against Prohibition....leap.cc

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marijuana is legal in Alaska -- has been for 25 years. It's because we support our right to use it in the privacy of our own homes.

But YOU are never going to win with current tactics.

I live in a logging area and I know one certain thing: Marijuana fiber would destroy the market for wood pulp. Clearcuts must happen (management wise) to provide cheap wood for your homes.... what do you do with the 2/3 of the forest that CAN"T be used for building ? It's made into pulp.

Basically all paper, toilet tissue, diapers, cardboard and plates are a by-product of the timber industry ! And YOU support the timber industry just like you support the oil industry !

Be honest here -- how much paper runs through your printer ? Bathroom ? Weekend Picnic ?

Replacing that fiber source with someting better would destroy the timber industry, same as the oil industry, chemical industry and yes the Big Pharma industry. Hemp is the bane of corporatism and there is no going forward along your current lines, it just isn't economical especially when you are part of the problem.

If you want to get Marijuana (or any other natural herb like Opium) legalized there is only one path -- as a Religion.

Think about it: God in his Bible clearly states that ALL things created are done so for the use of Mankind, and that ALL things created are good. Try shoving that down the throats of Christian Conservatives and you might have some success. There is HUGE Biblical support for this position in Corinthians for a start.

If God created it mankind shouldn't have the power to legislate it. Religious fervor is your only chance....

In the meantime, if you are really sick you could simply move to one of the most beautiful places on earth and grow FOUR PLANTS with have FOUR OUNCES set aside for use -- the terms of the 1975 Raven Decision. That's a lot of weed for anyone !

Look it up for yourselves if you don't believe me. Pot is ABSOLUTELY LEGAL in the privacy of your home in Alaska.

Stop snivelling and get out there and do something ! Become and activist or pack your bags and move to a place where you can get your medicine.

The clean air and water will do you some good,

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Throughout history, the legal and moral status of psychoactive drugs has kept changing. During the 17th century, the sale and consumption of tobacco were punished by death in much of Europe, Russia, China and Japan. For centuries, many of the Muslim domains that forbade the sale and consumption of alcohol simultaneously tolerated and even regulated the sale of opium and cannabis.

Alcohol prohibition in the United States was repealed after just thirteen years while the prohibition of other drugs has continued for over 75 years. Why? Alcohol prohibition struck directly at society's most powerful members. The prohibition of other drugs, by contrast, threatened far fewer Americans with hardly any political power.

Only the prohibition of marijuana, which some sixty million Americans have violated since 1965, has come close to approximating the Prohibition era experience, but marijuana smokers consist mostly of young and relatively powerless Americans.

Richard Posner, Chicago's chief federal appeals judge, and one of the nation's leading legal scholars, says marijuana use should be legalized as a way of reducing crime. Posner, a Reagan administration appointee once described by American Lawyer magazine as "the most brilliant judge in the country," explained his views on marijuana in The Times Literary Supplement, a British publication, and in an interview that followed shortly thereafter.

"It is nonsense that we should be devoting so many law enforcement resources to marijuana," said Posner. "I am skeptical that a society that is so tolerant of alcohol and cigarettes should come down so hard on marijuana use and send people to prison for life without parole."

Posner, chief judge of the 7th U.S Circuit Court of Appeals, is the highest-ranking judge to publicly favor the repeal of marijuana laws. Several judges of the federal district court, a level lower than the appeals court, have made similar calls, including Robert Sweet of New York and James Paine of Florida, both Carter Administration appointees.

New York University law professor Burt Neuborne said it’s significant that "one of the leading intellectuals in the judicial system recognizes that the laws don’t seem to be working well."

Richard Cowan of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) said, "His remarks will help move the debate along. Judges are well-situated to see the damage done to the public and to the justice system by these laws."

Cowan says more than 400,000 marijuana arrests are made annually, costing the nations billions of dollars in police and court time and prison space. Posner and other federal judges have complained that sentencing guidelines force them to give unjustly severe prison sentences to relatively minor drug offenders.

'"Prison terms in America have become appallingly long, especially for conduct that, arguably, should not be criminal at all," Posner said. Making marijuana legal, he observed, might take the profit out of sales of illegal drugs and would not necessarily increase drug addiction.

"Only decriminalization is a sure route to a lower crime rate," Posner said. "It is sad that it appears so far below the horizon of political feasibility."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I recall in 1990, I read a letter to the University of Minnesota's "Minnesota Daily" from the mother of a teenager who had been stricken with cancer. His chemo treatments had made him so ill he could not eat anything. Then he smoked weed. His mother got it for him, and they smoked it together, then ate. She said these were the happiest times they had together while he was ill. Although he died from his cancer, he and his mother had found reason to rejoice in each other's company and in life, for at least a short while.

Since reading that letter, I have not doubted the use of medical marijuana one bit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you know, If medical marijuana works, thats great, Im not sure that it does, but, whatever, I think the goverment should legalise it so I can smoke it. I think Im well within my rights to do so. thats it. fuck medical marijuana, and fuck the goverment, Im going to keep smoking it, they'll have to put me in prison, and then they'll have to deal with my mother, I feel sorry for them if that happens. i really do. legalise marijuana because human beings have sovereign rights to decide what goes in their bodies. its as simple as that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How about listing places where people can be assured of legal peace while treating their infirmities with Marijuana ?

Alaska is one place. We allow four plants to be growing with four ouces of weed dried and stashed for use and it's COMPLETELY LEGAL ! No Kidding....

Also not widely known is Alaska gives every single citizen a slice of Oil Industry Profits called the Alaska Permanent Fund. This year they will give every single Alaska Resident $1500.00 and they have been doing that for over 20 years. I've personally collected nearly THIRTY THOUSAND DOLLARS. They also give us free fish and enhanced hunting regulations for locals. They even give us free timber and rock for our home construction.

What many don't realize is Alaska is a Natural Paradise wrapped in rolling papers and money. It's the land so many ecovironmentalists wish they had the guts to move to.

How about other places ? Maybe a list of where pot is decriminilized at least ?

To me a medical angle is way off base, using on a weakened population to generate compassion -- something we certainly don't ascribe to in this country. It's a losing proposition.

We in Alaska got it legal on PERSONAL PRIVACY issues alone, IMO the only venue to legalization. Years ago consensual oral sex consucted in private was illegal in many places until this existing Constitutional right was confirmed.

Follow what's WINNING. Just like Oral Sex, private RECREATIONAL use for Weed in Alaska has already WON !!!

We don't need to be sick to smoke it, and we don't need a note from our doctor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The elephant in the living room question is; why is it against the law at all?
The lies about cannabis began in the forties when synthetic rope was developed and the big corporados wanted to outlaw hemp so they could have the new market to themselves. The myths of "reefer madness" were the result.
But few are falling for that any more. Too much good is being said about it and too many people use it or know someone who does and know that it is harmless at worst, and can be the only thing that will ease the suffering in various medical situations.
The immediate problem isn't the use of this wonderful herb but the huge black market that has developed beause of its illegality. Here in the woods of Mendocino and Humbolt counties, in particular (where the modern version was developed) there are so many huge plantations hidden in the woods that law enforcement can only scratch the surface at best. Last week an operation of 40,000 plants was discovered, and the officers were shot at. It gets worse every year (and these are rarely locals). The woods are being trashed; unused deisel fuel dumped into streams, and so on. Even the local sheriff has said that legalisation is the only way to stop it, since the laws have proven only to be a very effective price support system.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it's real easy to say that person doesn't exist

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

From the Drug Enforcement Agency in 1988 (emphasis added):

The DEA's Administrative Law Judge, Francis Young concluded: "In strict medical terms marijuana is far safer than many foods we commonly consume. For example, eating 10 raw potatoes can result in a toxic response. By comparison, it is physically impossible to eat enough marijuana to induce death. Marijuana in its natural form is one of the safest therapeutically active substances known to man. By any measure of rational analysis marijuana can be safely used within the supervised routine of medical care."

US Department of Justice, Drug Enforcement Agency, "In the Matter of Marijuana Rescheduling Petition," [Docket #86-22], (September 6, 1988), p. 57.

Full text of decision

The findings of the Administrative Law Judge were not binding, and (surprise, surprise!) were (and still are) ignored by the DEA. And, IIRC, Judge Young was fired shortly after (and, probably, for) rendering this decision.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pot makes you creative, smart, peacefil, happy and progressive. Love the music of life...and it ain't that redneck alcahol country music.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I am a 52 year old vet living on my social security and V.A. pension. Due to a parachute accident, I am in constant pain. I can get percocet....but not marijuana. My V.A. primary care doctor applauds my choice...the only problem is that marijuana costs me $400 a month, the percocet is free. I'll stick to the weed...let 'em put me in jail.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Having worked as an ICU and ER nurse: give me a nice sweet pothead over a drunk any day. I'm sure many law enforcement types would echo my sentiment. Drunks are often belligerent and very messed up. A drunk may hit you. A pothead will giggle a lot, talk their head off, forget what you just said, forget what they just said, ask for food and then go sleep it off. No contest.

And, it does have medicinal properties. They are not unique to pot, but there are people for whom nothing else seems to work and the problems it can treat are both severe and painful. However, please, can we have a little less of the "Pot is the best medicine known" BS.?? It's a medicinal herb. In other words, like all therapeutic compounds, POT IS A DRUG and its being natural doesn't change that. ALL medicinal products have both therapeutic and undesirable effects. The most common side of any medicine is an exaggerated version of its main mechanism of action. Since pot is a sedative and most often used for control of muscle spasms and pain, sedation is its most common side effect. Weight gain is its other main effect and may be desirable for people with cancer, AIDS and other wasting conditions and undesirable for the person with a strong family history of diabetes or heart disease.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

IT s an easy reason why the put Marijuana as a schedule one drug. its easy to cultivate, you can grow it almost in any environment, and it is some thing the Pharmaceutical companies cannot make money off of. Why? Because it is a naturally occurring plant and cannot be patented. The other reason in connection to money is that this plant is practically a panacea; meaning, that instead of the average American buying drugs at ten to outer limits per pill. WE can just add our seeds to the ground or go to "Jimmy" down the street and take care of ourselves. It this is so, then Big Pharma would lose Billions per year. This isn't about a culture war against drugs, it is about Money plain and simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As a society we seem to have decided that the amount of addiction and damage from alcohol is acceptable. Why not use that as our standard for what should be legal and illegal? If a drug is MORE addictive and/or MORE damaging than alcohol then make it illegal, at least to sell.

Alcohol is pretty dangerous and fairly addictive. As many as 1/3 of the American adult population is believed to have had 'problem behavior' with alcohol. Of people who define themselves as alcoholics, the best statistics say only 20% die sober. People CAN overdose on alcohol and die of acute alcohol poisoning. Alcohol definitely causes life threatening withdrawal symptoms and seizures in some people (D.T.s or delirium tremens). It kills slowly through rotting the liver and causes permanent brain damage in heavy users.

If a drug causes less harm and is less addictive than alcohol, let's make it legal. This means pot would come in with flying colors since it is one of the safest pharmacologic agents known. Completely decriminalize home growing for personal use. Regulate pot sold by companies so that people know what they're getting and approximately how strong it is. (Don't kid yourself who will be selling pot if it's legal. Big tobacco and Big Pharma have plans already in place for the day it's legalized. I don't trust them to tell the truth about what they do with pot -additives anyone?- than I do with anything else they sell.)

Tax corporate grown pot and use the money to fund drug rehab for all who wish it.

I also believe that advertising of all drugs, but especially addictive and/or psychoactive drugs, should be forbidden. I hate those big billboards with liquor ads. A friend, who at the time was a newly recovering alcoholic, once commented sarcastically to me about an ad where a bottle of Chivas Regal was lying empty on its side: "Let's cut to the chase, take the whole thing home and have a bender why don't we." She said such ads didn't make getting sober any easier on people. For the record, I also think direct advertising of prescription pharmaceuticals to the public should end. Yesterday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Legalizing pot would also enable us to finally properly research it, first for its medical effectiveness.

Among the things I want to know:

Is pot better or worse than opiates or benzodiazepines for pain control and muscle spasms? (I have fibromyalgia, but unfortunately, unlike the lucky lady above, pot does zip for me; in fact, it makes it worse. Opiates work just fine for me, however.)

Just how well does pot work compared to standard glaucoma agents and drugs for Parkinsons? How does it compare to other weight gain inducing drugs like tricyclic antidepressants? Are there preferred routes of administration for some illnesses? Is it better to smoke it for glaucoma but for pain is the sustained release of pot brownies better? Do other drugs make it less or more effective? Does it decrease the effectiveness of any other drugs? Should it be used in combination (which lots of people do right now)? What is the optimum dose? If you were sick, wouldn't you want to know?

Second, there's some important stuff about pot that we don't know and won't know until we can do a long term prospective study on it. Right now it's hard to find people admitting to pot use and it's hard to separate out those who also smoke cigarettes.

There are anecdotal reports of pot causing wheezing and excess mucus production for heavy users, but it's not clear whether this damage can lead to permanent problems from COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease - emphysema, chronic bronchitits and the like.) It may be that pot's bronchodilating effect may prevent COPD; it may be that a person just can't have a 4 pack a day pot habit, unlike cigarettes; because anyone smoking that amount of pot would be unconscious long before finishing even the first pack. On the other hand, pot is held in the lungs for a longer time.

We also don't know if pot can cause lung cancer. If it does cause it, it doesn't cause a lot of it, far less than cigarettes. And here's the thing: chemically it *should* cause cancer, particularly when smoked wrapped in paper rather than in a pipe. Burning plant substances in paper releases benzylpyridine derivatives, which are nasty carcinogens. There are also microscopic changes in the lungs of pot smokers that should lead to cancer, but even so, we are just not seeing all these cases. Some studies say there is a cancer risk, others contradict them. At least one study suggests that pot contains chemicals called endocannibinoids which are tumor suppressing.

Tobacco, OTH, has known carcinogens all its own and not only do they cause lung and oral cancer (chewing the stuff is no solution) but both cause other cancers and make existing cancers far more aggressive. Cervical cancer is particularly known to occur more in smokers and to kill faster.

We don't really know whether pot use in pregnancy is safe or what effects it might have in each trimester (1st trimester is generally when the fetus is most sensitive, but it is the 3rd trimester when brain growth really gets going. Do cannabinoids affect what happens to fetal brain receptors?). One study says pot is not good during pregnancy, but it didn't clearly separate out pot from tobacco and alcohol use, both of which are known to cause birth defects. I think common sense right now says "do not use if pregnant" (except *maybe* during labor itself) until we know for sure. The fetus is so damn sensitive to everything and it's silly to eat only organic food and not drink but then smoke pot, which lots of "natural" types will do.

Also, it would be really good to know if certain people really are at risk of psychosis from heavy pot use and find a way to screen them out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If everyone here told all their individual contacts who support cannabis to write, call, or visit their state and federal reps about this all at once, the drug war would be over real soon.

They want votes, and if being against this topic became 'nuk-ya-ler' and would cost them their jobs in '08, they just might do something right for once.

Rev. Don
Pain patient since 1988 - marijuana patient since 2000, spinal cord injury.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

In his 1992 book, Visions of Liberty, former Executive Director of the ACLU, Ira Glasser writes:

"The use of wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping emerged during the Prohibition era. Roy Olmstead was a suspected bootlegger whom the government wished to search. It placed taps in the basement of his office building and on wires in the streets near his home. No physical entry into his office or home took place. Olmstead was convicted entirely on the basis of evidence from the wiretaps.

"In his appeal to the Supreme Court, Olmstead argued that the taps were a search conducted without a warrant and without probable cause, and that the evidence seized against him should have been excluded because it was illegally gathered. He also argued that his Fifth Amendment right not to be a witness against himself was violated.

"By a 5-4 vote, the Court rejected his arguments and upheld the government's power to wiretap without limit and without any Fourth Amendment restrictions, on the grounds that no actual physical intrusion had taken place.

"Olmstead's Fifth Amendment claim was also dismissed on the grounds that he had not been compelled to talk on the telephone, but had done so voluntarily. Thus the Court upheld the government's power to do by trickery and surreptitious means what it was not permitted to do honestly and openly. It wasn't until 1967, in a similar case involving gambling, that the Court overruled the Olmstead decision by an 8-1 margin and recognized that the Fourth Amendment applied to wiretapping and electronic surveillance.

"Interestingly, these cases arose in the context of crimes like bootlegging and gambling. During the past twenty years, the majority of wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping by both state and federal officials has been in cases involving drug dealing and gambling.

"Serious crimes of violence, such as homicide, assault, rape, robbery, and burglary, are rarely the target of electronic eavesdropping, which is not normally a useful tool in such cases.

"From the beginning, when wiretapping was virtually invented to enforce laws prohibiting the sale of alcohol, to the late 1960s, when gambling was a major target, to the present, when the use and sale of drugs other than alcohol are the main target, these intrusive devices have been used mostly to enforce laws aimed at punishing and proscribing personal conduct that society deems immoral.

"Because such conduct essentially involves private activities among consenting adults who are all likely to want to keep those activities secret, they are harder to investigate and prosecute than crimes like robbery or burglary, in which an unwilling victim will probably aid any investigation...the invasion of privacy inherent in wiretapping and electronic eavesdropping remains with us as part of the legacy of our attempts to criminalize personal conduct.

"The other major use of electronic eavesdropping has been to punish political dissent. For decades, former FBI director J. Edgar Hoover used wiretaps and other electronic devices to spy on political figures and citizens not yet suspected of having committed a crime. He built vast dossiers on their political activities and personal lives. Special units of local police called 'Red Squads' did the same."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe then politicians and bureaucrats will stop cynically bashing "our agenda," and finally start responding to needs of the citizens it is their duty to serve. Serve? These bastards in office are the most calloused self serving bunch I have ever witnessed. They are high on power,hypocrisy and their god. They don't give a damn about the plight or pain of anyone and heaven forbid you smoke for recreation. May they be cursed with the fires of hell for their evil ways.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm 62 years old and being a vet in this case has no bearing on my problem,.Last june '06 i was diagnosed w/stage 4 larygeal cancer,my choices we're radical neck disection followed by radiation and chemo,or a pine box,what i went through terrified me [all this from 44 years of cigarettes] anyway I knew,because i've a workingbrain that marijuana will help during chemo,seems the docs felt likewise but i was on my own there,I got the chance to use it once w/a vaporizor ,then somehow the all knowing law stepped in and said ,you can die,you're breaking the laws ,I was arrested and the rest is bullshit,needless to say i did not continue my chemo and rad ,too painfull and i just didn't give a shit ,so far so good guess/hope the surgery did the job,what i feel about this war on drug,no war on people is sheer garbage,they aren't stupid they're greedy,those who make the laws and prohibition,whatever happened to learning from experience? got bought out!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]