Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Why the GOP's Gay Wing Is Forced to Hide in the Bathroom

By Nina Burleigh, Huffington Post. Posted August 30, 2007.


It's time for Republicans to embrace their own gay wing and stop fueling the sickness of suppression that drives men like Larry Craig into airport bathroom stalls.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Ugly Truth: Most U.S. Kids Sentenced to Die In Prison Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Nina Burleigh

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The demise of Idaho Republican Senator Larry Craig amuses those of us who enjoy watching right-wing heroes crash to the ground, spiked on their own hypocrisy. It further confirms my theory: prick any conservative and the kink oozes out. The rockier the rib, the more likely you'll find pink lingerie under the trousers or a bullwhip and manacles in the bedside drawer. You can bet those Beltway dominatrices, madams and escorts (gay and straight) have been able to buy second homes -- maybe even in Sun Valley! -- with their haul during W's reign.

However, because we are people of compassion, we should also feel a little horrified by this tortured man's sad, humiliating demise. He's obviously lived his whole life afflicted by the religious psychobabble and outright bigotry of people who say homosexuality is a sickness and a lifestyle decision instead of an innate state of being that has nothing to do with illness or choice.

The sickness, of course, is in the suppression, which is why closeted men seek love in rank public bathroom stalls.

The Republican Party got Bush re-elected in 2004 by playing the homophobe card. In Ohio, their minions went door-to-door in Amish country and warned the historically non-secular inhabitants that if they didn't get out and register Republican, gay marriage would be the law of the land. Tens of thousands of Amish men and women hitched horses to buggies, cracked their whips, and raced to the nearest polling place to vote to repel the Sodomites. With their unprecedented help, Ohio, that crucial state, slid ever so narrowly into the red column, sending the Bush regime back to the White House with four more years to plot how to bomb Tehran.

The trouble with this wedge issue, as everyone now knows, is that it's Republican suicide. The hateful public stance of the party has driven its many gay members into ever more contorted acts of self-loathing excess, driving the disease of suppression out in the open and subjecting men to public stoning by their own frenzied followers.

Foley, Haggard and Craig are only the most famous. There's Florida Rep. Bob Allen, also caught lurking for sex in a public bathroom, Corporal Matt Sanchez, gay porn star and -- for a shining moment -- Fox News channel's right wing Marine of the moment. And who can forget Jeff Gannon, the right-wing faux journalist with a secret life as a gay escort favored with a hard (yes!) White House press pass by the Bush administration communications department.

Yesterday, Republicans were sprinting away from shiny-shod, crisply cuffed mountain man Larry. Craig "represents the Republican Party," Rep. Pete Hoekstra, Republican of Michigan, said. You got that right, Pete! And then: "I think it's important for Republicans to step out right now and say, 'No, this behavior is not going to be tolerated.'"

"Tolerated." Now there's a word Republicans should meditate on for a long moment.

When I was covering Capitol Hill just before Clinton's impeachment, every other young, spiffily manicured male staffer I met in Republican Congressional offices was at least androcentric, if not obviously gay. I don't have a sensitive gay-dar, but there was something about them. Ties never askew, hair immaculately groomed, cuffs gleaming, they usually knew more about my shoes than I did.

Bill Clinton's voracious heterosexuality had as much to do with drawing their rabid hatred as any of his other attributes. He loved women too much, and if only he'd given equal time and effort to seducing those beautiful men, he might have saved himself some trouble.

Republicans in Washington know there are probably more gay men in their ranks than there are on Castro Street.

Still, against all logic and sense, they won't utter a word about tolerance.

It's time for Republicans to embrace their own gay wing and stop fueling the sickness of suppression that drives men like Larry Craig into airport bathroom stalls. Until they do, they're headed straight for the toilet with him -- not that they shouldn't jump right in anyway.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: larry craig, hypocrisy

Nina Burleigh has written for the Washington Post, the Chicago Tribune and New York magazine.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Come Out, Come Out, Whoever You Are
Posted by: pongji on Aug 30, 2007 12:32 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it time that Gay Repuplicans came out of the Water Closet?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Whoever You Are? My Guess Is... Posted by: malcolmartin
I think the psychology of these freaks is a little more complex...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 30, 2007 12:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The notion of 'closeted gays' as an explanation for the bizarre behavior of many of these Republicans is probably wrong.

A better term might be 'sexual predator' or 'repressed individuals'. There are a lot of issues here - probably involving a desire on the part of these jaded Senators to dominate their victims in some form or other. Mark Foley is a classic example - here was a guy who was trying to make a name for himself by Toughening up child sex abuse laws - while engaging in precisely the sort of behavior that he was condemning.

"WASHINGTON, DC – May 18, 2005 – The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC) applauds Congressman Mark Foley (R-FL) and Senator Orrin Hatch (R-UT) for introducing sweeping legislation that will overhaul our nation’s current sex offender registration and community notification law entitled the Jacob Wetterling Crimes Against Children and Sexually Violent Offender Act of 1994.

“Today, there are more than a half million sex offenders that are “supposed” to be registered in the United States; however at least 100,000 of these offenders are actually “missing” from the system. This is a massive problem,” said NCMEC President and CEO Ernie Allen. “I commend Congressman Foley and Senator Hatch for recognizing that the current federal sex offender law needs to be revamped. This new legislation will help build a more comprehensive system for tracking sex offenders and better protect our nation’s children.”


(Hey - is Foley now a 'registered sex offender'?)

I suppose this is the kind of thing that happens to people who've been told their entire lives by religious authorities that 'sex is sinful' and that they 'shouldn't think about sex' - as a result, all they ever think about is sex. (Don't think of a blue elephant - it's sinful to think about blue elephants...).

What's unnerving is that these are the very same people who control some of the most powerful committees in Congress. Craig is on Appropriations, Energy and Natural Resources, for example, and his subcommittees include:

* Ranking Republican for the Interior and Related Agencies Subcommittee.
* Homeland Security,
* Agriculture
* Energy and Water Development,
* Labor-Health and Human Services
* Military Construction-Veterans Affairs

Now THAT's disturbing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Anderson Cooper is the Model...
Posted by: CatDad on Aug 30, 2007 1:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For how many in the GOP (as well as much of American society) wants their gays to behave...That is...they should be "non-gay" gays...You can dress well, be slender and tidy..but don't acknowledge to being a homosexual....So get married and when you feel the need to satisfy your urges...sneak out to some dangerous bathroom to get your kicks on the side...

Memo to Heterosexuals: Ultimately, when you hang on to the theory that gay people can change....ultimately it is unsuspecting heterosexuals who pay the price...Unsuspecting straight women or men who marry gay or lesbian partners who are trying to fit into society's "norms."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I had the misfortune Posted by: hurricane hugo
» RE: I had the misfortune Posted by: davidbdr
Another Hypocritical Angle
Posted by: cellorelio on Aug 30, 2007 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the reasons homophobes have argued that queers must be kept from sensitive positions, particularly ones that would require a security clearance, is because they would be subject to blackmail. Um, excuse me, but if they were living out of the closet, wouldn't that be a moot point?

And, how is it that a heterosexual with a penchant for wearing diapers and visiting prostitutes is any less subject to blackmail?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» as someone else said on another thread, Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Good point Posted by: Philip Newton
Well, whaddaya expect?
Posted by: Crazy H on Aug 30, 2007 1:57 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Clinton years showed us that the repugnicans don't want male politicians who like girls. The "election" of Dumbya showed that they don't even want male politicians with balls.

Forget Ron Paul - the GOP should nominate RuPaul.

;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Craig Arrest Interview: Audio
Posted by: LeaderofMen on Aug 30, 2007 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
CNN is broadcasting the audio transcript of the arrest interview. I wish they would have provided a written transcript because it's difficult to hear, but Craig's excuses are pathetic.

He plead guilty. He is a closeted homo. He has given the rest of us non-closeted gays a horrible name all for the Party.

According to Senator Craig the police officer saw something that 'didn't happen'. Right. Moron.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Craig Arrest Interview: Audio Posted by: SatanicJamboree
Mary Bono has bigger b*lls than most of the Republicans.
Posted by: Artkansas on Aug 30, 2007 2:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
She at least boycotted the last National Convention to show support of her constituents in the Palm Springs area

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The pathology is Rethuglicanism whether gay or straight.
Posted by: doinaheckuvajob on Aug 30, 2007 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course, being a gay Republican politician poses some serious problems in a party insisting on calling your nature a sin, and forcing the pretense of warped family and religious values as the ostentatious flag of the party.

We know what's under that flag now. But what about that flag itself-- the banner of Rethuglicanism, win at all costs partisanship that pushes for its own power and to heck with the real needs of the American people?

That's the most disturbing pathology of all.

To be a Rethuglican politician nowadays, not only do you have to be in the closet if gay, but sell your soul to a heirarchical leadership structure that hates factual information, independant journalism, science, and the needs of the American people, in fact has profound contempt for everything America has stood for in 200 plus years of the Constitution. That's some pretty intense self-aggrandizing self-hatred, to the point where the riches the Party bestows upon you for enriching it, is the goal of your existence.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Silly Liberals Miss the Gay Point
Posted by: Matt Sanchez on Aug 30, 2007 3:21 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nina in her true "tolerant" state of cluelessness refuses to condemn lewd behavior. What a moral coward.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» umm, dude... Posted by: hurricane hugo
» Okay, that is sort of funny... Posted by: thoughtcriminal
» RE: Okay, that is sort of funny... Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: Silly Liberals Miss the Gay Point Posted by: SatanicJamboree
Beltway sex workers
Posted by: hurricane hugo on Aug 30, 2007 3:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
should get hazard pay.

plur

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The tapper in the crapper
Posted by: Philip Newton on Aug 30, 2007 3:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one "forced" the Senator from "I da ho" to prowl men's rooms looking for thrills.

He clearly enjoys it. Leave him alone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Irony poor blood? Posted by: Philip Newton
If they did
Posted by: kelt65 on Aug 30, 2007 5:29 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they'd stop being republicans. It doesn't make any sense. At best, right wing gays think of themselves as some joke of nature; they're pathetic.

Besides, self loathing gays make the best conservatives.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Republicans win elections by pandering to the base
Posted by: drcyflowers on Aug 30, 2007 5:59 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why does the Republican party force its gay members to be closeted?

The Republican party represents the rich and the corporations, but those people are not enough to win elections. In order to win elections, the Republican party must get votes from its base, uneducated blue-collar Americans who are easily fooled into voting against their own interests. In return for their votes, the party does some token actions for them, such as pandering to their hatred of gays.

No Republican would be elected without votes from uneducated blue-collar Americans. Winning at all cost is all that matters to the rich and the corporations, therefore the Republican party will always work against gay rights.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Are these the moral requirements necessary to be a Republican now?
Posted by: Nedtheredhead on Aug 30, 2007 6:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Republican legislator Ted Klaudt was charged with raping girls under the age of 16.

Republican city councilman Joseph Monteleone Jr. was found guilty of fondling underage girls.

Republican congressional aide Jeffrey Nielsen was arrested for having sex with a 14-year old boy.

Republican County Commissioner Patrick Lee McGuire surrendered to police after allegedly molesting girls between the ages of 8 and 13.

Republican prosecutor Larry Corrigan was arrested for soliciting sex from 13-year old girls.

Republican Mayor Jeffrey Kyle Randall was sentenced to 275 days in jail for molesting two boys -- ages ten and 12 -- during a six-year period.

Republican County Board Candidate Brent Schepp was charged with molesting a 14-year old girl and killed himself three days later.

Republican Congressman Mark Foley abruptly resigned from Congress after "sexually explicit" emails surfaced showing him flirting with a 16-year old boy.

Republican executive Randall Casseday of the conservative Washington Times newspaper pleaded guilty to soliciting sex from a 13-year old girl on the internet.

Republican chairman of the Oregon Christian Coalition Lou Beres confessed to molesting a 13-year old girl.

Republican County Constable Larry Dale Floyd pleaded guilty to charges of soliciting sex from an 8-year old girl. Floyd has repeatedly won elections for Denton County, Texas, constable.

Republican judge Mark Pazuhanich pleaded no contest to fondling a 10-year old girl and was sentenced to 10 years probation.

Republican Party leader Bobby Stumbo was arrested for having sex with a 5-year old boy.

Republican petition drive manager Tom Randall pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 14, one of them the daughter of an associate in the petition business.

Republican County Chairman Armando Tebano pleaded guilty to fondling a 14-year-old girl.

Republican teacher and former city councilman John Collins pleaded guilty to sexually molesting 13 and 14 year old girls.

Republican campaign worker Mark Seidensticker is a convicted child molester.

Republican Mayor Philip Giordano is serving a 37-year sentence in federal prison for sexually abusing 8- and 10-year old girls.

Republican Mayor Tom Adams was arrested for distributing child pornography over the internet.

Republican Mayor John Gosek was arrested on charges of soliciting sex from two 15-year old girls.

Republican County Commissioner David Swartz pleaded guilty to molesting two girls under the age of 11 and was sentenced to 8 years in prison.

Republican legislator Edison Misla Aldarondo was sentenced to 10 years in prison for raping his daughter between the ages of 9 and 17.

Republican Committeeman John R. Curtin was convicted of molesting an underage teenage boy and sentenced to serve six to 18 months in prison.

Republican anti-abortion activist Howard Scott Heldreth is a convicted child rapist in Florida.

Republican zoning supervisor, Boy Scout leader and Lutheran church president Dennis L. Rader pleaded guilty to performing a sexual act on an 11-year old girl he murdered.

Republican anti-abortion activist Nicholas Morency pleaded guilty to possessing child pornography on his computer and offering a bounty to anybody who murders an abortion doctor.

Republican campaign consultant Tom Shortridge was sentenced to three years probation for taking nude photographs of a 15-year old girl.

Republican racist pedophile and United States Senator Strom Thurmond had sex with a 15-year old black girl which produced a child.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Propositioning OK, Being "Not Gay" All That Matters
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 30, 2007 8:24 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Senator on TV blabbing about how he is "not gay," was just ridiculous. Even more pathetic was his obvious focus, not on his "lewd" propositioning in public restrooms, but on being "not gay."
Presumably then, the propositioning is or was not the issue for him, but being "not gay" was the only thing that mattered. Well, Senator, OK then, you are or don't have to "be gay." But, please knock off the propositioning under toilet stalls in public urinals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What about entrapment?
Posted by: rad6 on Aug 30, 2007 9:46 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
OK, so Craig is a hypocrite, a liar, a cheater, and who knows what else. But I'm surprised that no one (whether left or right or inbetween) is bothered about the fact that a man was arrested for tapping his foot and flashing hand signals. First of all, don't police have anything better to do? Second of all, Craig never actually did anything, not even flash the undercover cop. Whatever the meaning of the signals, this guy was taken in for tapping his foot and sticking his hand under a stall. Is something wrong here? Even more frightening is that no one is raising any questions about this.

The second major problem of this story (some people have picked up on it) is the slippage from anonymous bathroom sex to being "gay." Craig himself is most guilty by responding to the arrest by saying "I'm not gay." All of a sudden being gay is equated not only with a freaky Republican (SCARY!!!) but also with anonymous bathroom sex. I wonder how all of this plays for people who have a shallow understanding of sexuality, which is probably a big percentage of the population.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What about entrapment? Posted by: Urstrly
» RE: What about entrapment? Posted by: okfemale
» RE: What about entrapment? Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: What about entrapment? Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: What about entrapment? Posted by: paulaH
» RE: What about entrapment? Posted by: paulaH
Entrapment My Ass
Posted by: Astroboy on Aug 31, 2007 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Larry Craig initiated contact!

If he had just sat there, took a crap and then left, we wouldn't be amusing ourselves with all this purient delight.

Intrapment is the "To Catch a Predator" show.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sex not love
Posted by: rrk70 on Aug 31, 2007 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Homosexual and bisexual men are not looking for love in toilet stalls: they're looking for anonymous sex. And maybe the inherent possible danger (getting punched or arrested) is much of the motivation. Such 'Tea Room' sex, as it used to be called, was once one of the few venues homosexuals of old had. With less repression, and the advent of being 'gay', which is different from being homosexual only in that one is open and honest about it rather than living in the closet, many other venues now exist for those with similar inclinations to meet and have sex. For those still deep in the closet, for whatever reason (being a Rethuglican, married, a self-loathing homophobic hypocrite), toilet stall sex may still be the only opportunity to satisfy same-sex needs, which are far more common than most people have been led to believe. All the recent revelations of Rethuglican involvement in such activities is doing much to educate the nation, and hopefully for the better.

It is hard to understand with Craig's situation, as with Foley's, what the crime is. Craig's case is clearly entrapment because no explicit sexual activity occurred. Foley engaged in raunchy adolescent conversations with teenagers over the age of consent, but under 18. The age of consent in Washinton is 16. No sexual activity between Foley and any of the pages has been alleged, to my knowledge. Even if Foley had consenual sex with any of the pages it wasn't illegal. So was his offense criminal speech?

Intergenerational sex may be offensive, and inappropriate to some (especially the parents of young people) but mostly only if it is of the homosexual variety. How many middle-aged men are interested in teenage females? How many middle-aged men trade in their wives for much, much younger models? If Craig & Foley were getting it on with females how many men would high-five them in the locker room, or secretly say to themselves, "lucky bastards, wish I was gettin' some of that".

These cases are really about intolerance and homophobia. If Craig was banging some female in the toilet in mid-flight (the mile-high club) or some quiet corner or broom closet in the airport would he be arrested? If Foley was hitting on late teenage females over the age of consent, as many husbands have done with babysitters, would he be seen in such a negative light? For Rethuglicans this is about homosexuality, and their expressed conviction that it is immoral, even though they are no less homosexual or bisexual than any other humans.

The rank hypocrisy of it all is absolutely disgusting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sex not love Posted by: Sushi
» RE: Sex not love Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Sex not love Posted by: greenman
» RE: Sex not love Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Sex not love Posted by: paulaH
We need a Change
Posted by: Sushi on Aug 31, 2007 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Changing because you were caught
doesn't make you honest.

Changing because you were forced to confess and now live under watchful eyes,
doesn't make you fixed.

Change because you can't live being who you are.

And change alone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We need a Change Posted by: Lauren
» RE: It's about control Posted by: Sushi
» RE: We need a Change Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: We need a Change Posted by: paulaH
Amish vote?
Posted by: annekarina on Aug 31, 2007 5:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since when do Amish vote? That's one I haven't heard of.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Amish vote? Posted by: bornxeyed
Stereotypes anyone? Nina?
Posted by: sootz on Aug 31, 2007 6:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thing that made me most uncomfortable about this article, which asks the Republicans for tolerance, was the author's own ridiculous stereotyping and speculation.

"When I was covering Capitol Hill just before Clinton's impeachment, every other young, spiffily manicured male staffer I met in Republican Congressional offices .... knew more about my shoes than I did."

And how does she know this? Discussing her wardrobe with the Republicans was she?

"Bill Clinton's voracious heterosexuality had as much to do with drawing their rabid hatred as any of his other attributes."

And besides her own flights of imagination, the evidence for this statement is ..... what?

Intolerance takes many forms. With friends like this......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not necessarily a stereotype Posted by: zyxwvut
» RE: Stereotypes anyone? Nina? Posted by: leftgayguy
I believe him
Posted by: Soco on Aug 31, 2007 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why?

Craig may be a "deeply closeted homosexual" but I can assure you he enjoys his activity. People skydive because the inherent risk gives them satisfaction and pleasure. I'm sure he also loves to pray for forgiveness and psychologically self-flagellate himself before his personal god. He can always say "The devil made me do it."

It's about sexual gratification and power. We are seeing that the political nobility in this country (especially conservative Republican) have very different values behind closed doors and mirror the average person's fears and take advantage of them. These Patricians act noble for the public. It worked for thousands of years. If the list above is correct (Are these the moral requirements necessary to be a Republican now?) and I'm sure it's close if not completely accurate, then we have an infestation of hypocrites and psychopaths in office. Ever hear of the "Franklin Coverup?" This isn't about sexuality, but that power corrupts absolutely.

Damn shame because not all conservatives are bad. There are people of principle and values who rank among them. I fear the tyranny of Liberalism more than anything. Remember, "NeoCons" means "New Conservatives" and most of this crowd stampeded to the far right. We need a moderate movement in this country.

I bet the people they duped are going to seriously turn on them. I fear they will not say "Maybe we should try to understand homosexuals" but "Look at what these dirty homosexuals are doing" without understanding that hetero and homosexuals are equally capable of what most consider perversion. Extreme fundamentalists have never understood their own humanity and their inner demons. I'm sure a guy performing oral sex on me would feel good. They are afraid of this reality and know the taboo makes it wrong and sought after. I'm sure not all homosexuals engage in bodily-fluid swapping orgies.

Hetrosexuals are jailed for public lewdness as well. Any sane person would be disturbed and disappointed if their son screwed a girl in the bushes and was caught in the act (or not). In this case, the Police were there for a reason, people complained and wanted it stopped. Not everyone wants to see people having sex in public. I'm sure rational, average gay people don't do this. I'm certain the fear from people who oppose homosexuality stems from the Larry Craigs of the world who give them the perception all homosexuals engage in lewd acts in public as a matter of course. If you are a deeply religious conservative Republican, you also bear responsibility for willingly ostracizing homosexuals. There is no commandment codemning homosexuality and Jesus himself keep company with sinners and the sick.

Sure, consensual sex between adults is okay, but sex is also a private matter. I think sex in general works better in a relationship, not on a tile floor in an airport. Semantically he did not have sex, nor is he really gay (because acknowledging it means you are at least capable of having a relationship) he just wanted to perform a lewd act in public for sexual gratification. His clever wordplay blames everyone but himself. He lies, is hypocritical, cheats on his wife and debases himself. It's not that he is a pole smoker so muchas he is a hypocrite. He should not be a Senator because he figuratively screwed the people who elected him as well as homosexuals.

Honestly, this guy wanted to get caught. Having sex in a public restroom could only increase the likelihood of getting caught. Doesn't it seem to be a gamble to do so when he had so much at stake? You may go to Vegas with the intention to win but you know your going to end up losing. What do all gamblers have in common? They lose. Reminds me of the joke were a hunter fails several time to shoot a bear and always ends up being sodomized by the bear, who finally exclaims "You aren't here to hunt are you?"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

johngary
Posted by: johngary on Aug 31, 2007 9:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to Freud, human sexuality is one of homo sapiens strongest drives. Also according to Frued the state and relegion have attempted to control and subvert that drive since very ealy times. By sublimating that drive, the sexual drive is channeled into the work of the state or "church".
But human sexuality has never been fully controled even by the powerful Catholic Church--Duhhh.
And the plain fact is that sexuality is inherintly "queer". Genitals seem to think if it feels good it is OK. For genitals that pleasure is the NORMAL DRIVE.
As long as Homo Sapiens are around "queer" behavior will abound and Emperors, Presidents, Pharoes, Kings, Popes, Senators, Parliamentarians, Brown Shirts etcetera and of course comon folk will follow their genitals.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't waste the paper
Posted by: grn1 on Aug 31, 2007 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The thing that bothers me most about this incident, is that Larry was picking up a piece of toilet paper on a public restroom floor. FOR WHAT? Was he going to use it? Was he being tidy (some sort of inference can be drawn from that). It is unfortunate that those who attack gays in society through legislation , use them for some sort of twisted head trip.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Don't waste the paper Posted by: Lauren
» RE: mick3 Posted by: Lauren
Not GAY but BISEXUAL
Posted by: knowingwoman on Aug 31, 2007 12:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a difference between being Gay and being Bisexual. I would suspect public sex is most often Bisexual men. These men tend to be more closeted than the Gay community.

In this day and age folks should become informed about the difference. While the communities cross-over (just as the Straight community crosses over with the Bisexual community), I believe Bisexuals have an entire set of their own problems. Most often these are men who are Bisexual but who function as Straight socially and most of them with their partners (female dating partners, significant others, and wives). Go check out craigslist personals sometime. Bisexual men have more of a need to hunt down a sexual encounter in these ways or in quick hook-ups than Gay men.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not necessarily a GAY issue even
Posted by: knowingwoman on Aug 31, 2007 12:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Probably Bisexual and/or men who have other issues if they are predators or are engaging in this kind of risque behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why would anyone want to be a Republican?
Posted by: leemiller38 on Aug 31, 2007 2:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Given the times, the war, the corruption, the power mongering and general incompetence of this administration and the authoritarian and repressive nature of the religious right, why would anyone want to be associated with the GOP, gay or straight!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The "pound of prevention" idea...........
Posted by: tap17x on Aug 31, 2007 3:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.............leads me to suggest that we jail ALL Refucklicans for say 30 years to prevent more molestations. This would clean up much more than just sexually deviant behavior.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I expect the Refucklican Party to.....
Posted by: tap17x on Aug 31, 2007 3:10 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
........add to their platform lowering the age of consent to three.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

After listening to the "confession" tape...
Posted by: SatanicJamboree on Aug 31, 2007 4:31 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...I have to admit that part of me wants to sympathize with Sen. Craig...regarding this incident. His politics stink, but the interrogation stinks as well.

Remember, cops lie...in the "interview" room they always lie. They are not compelled to tell the truth by law or professional standards, and they have an immense incentive to get a conviction by any means they can get away with. In a case like this--where it's the Senator's word against the cop, he HAS to get a confession, and he'll use any tool at his disposal: shame, emotional pressure and mendacity. This cop put on quite and act.

Lawyers know this, which is why Craig was an idiot to answer any questions w/o counsel present. What exactly happened in that bathroom I don't know...nor do I particularly care. Craig may well be a closet case and thus a hypocrite--if so, THAT's what he should be condemned for...but in this case he's as much a victim as a liberal gay activist caught in the same trap. I will admit, however, that it's very difficult to feel sympathy for him when he would be the first guy to insist the liberal gay activist be jailed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cashing In
Posted by: Gaubladt on Aug 31, 2007 6:56 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone know how much money the Republican Leadership is giving Larry Craig to quit the US Senate?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Craig said "I'm not gay and never have been gay" and
Posted by: jackyD on Aug 31, 2007 7:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe him, in the literal sense of the word that is. Seriously, how can such self-loathing, hypocrital, repressed humans such as Craig ever enjoy a true moment of gaity or joy in their lives?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trixie
Posted by: Trixie on Aug 31, 2007 9:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The sickness, of course, is in the suppression, which is why closeted men seek love in rank public bathroom stalls." Oh?

When was "love" ever synonymous with "sex"? Men making overtures to rank strangers in public restrooms for fleeting physical gratification wouldn't know "love" from a hole in the ground! Human beings are threefold in nature, and it is utter folly to send the body where the heart doesn't go or the heart where the head doesn't go. Only a synthesis of all three vital dimensions can produce anything approaching character that can be respected and emulated. The taudry setting of Craig's little fall from grace reveals a compartmentalized inner self that needs some major readjustment. My take on this whole sordid story can best be summed up as follows:

The Real Poop

When Craig of Idaho took a fart,
He proved he wasn't very smart.
He could have said his restroom caper
Was just a plea for toilet paper.

That's only offered as a comment on his intelligence, not as a suggestion for what he should have done. His immediate protestation, "I'm not gay!" was, in this situation, analogous to a mugger's saying, when apprehended, "I'm not a thief!" Both would define their behavior on the satisfying thrill of a moment's deliciously risky and verboten act. Sorry for Craig? No way in hell! There is such a thing as free choice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Prejudice creates hypocrisy
Posted by: metamind on Aug 31, 2007 10:22 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me be clear about my position: I want the Republican party to go away .... forever. In 2006 I ran for the U.S. Senate on the platform of "teaching virtue" and "rejecting Republicans" because "Republicans have lost their virtue." This story proves me right.

This is a story which "keeps on giving." It's a cornucopia of political blessings for America. First of all, it's about the issue of social prejudice and how prejudice creates hypocrisy by its nature. Why didn't Sen. Craig tell his fellow Republicans in the Senate at the time of his arrest or at least by the time he signed a confession and guilty plea affidavit? Because he was afraid, rightly so, that we would be accused of being a hypocrite.

Prejudice against homosexuality is one of the ways Republicans have been winning elections up until 2006. Republicans have exploited popular prejudices for political gains. That's not just a bad idea; it's evil. It destroys the social cohesiveness we need to unify ourselves and solve problems.

Then there is the fact that he thinks he can hide the truth and "make it go away." That's delusional. It's the same kind of delusional thinking which led Republicans to believe that they could conspire to create war in Iraq and then make the evidence "go away." It's the sign of a mental illness, not just with Sen. Craig, but with the Republican party as a whole. Their response to charges of lies and deceit leading up to the war are "prove it!" That's arrogance and utter contempt for the truth.

Then there is the fact that Sen. Craig didn't even trust his own party leaders with information about his arrest and conviction. That's even more shameful for a party which claims to be the guardian of political "integrity." If you can't trust your own comrades in Congress, who can you trust? Apparently, Sen. Craig trusted nobody, not even his wife.

Then there is the fact that to my knowledge only two Republican Senators have called for his resignation. Forget about the offense itself and just focus on the fact that he threw down a Senate business card and said "What do you think about that?" to the arresting officer, as if it was a "get out of jail free" card.

That action dishonored the entire Senate. Every Republican Senator who refuses to call for Senator Craig to resign is complicit in this dishonor.

Of course, it dishonors the U.S. Congress as a whole and makes America the laughing stock of the world. What a disgusting display of contempt for the "rule of law!" Senator Craig should resign immediately! The fact that Republican senators cannot speak in unity on this while they can stand in unity behind an illegal, irresponsible and immoral war is repulsive beyond words.

GET THESE EVIL PEOPLE OUT OF MY GOVERNMENT!

Finally, there is the shame Sen. Craig has brought on the people who elected him in Idaho. What kind of prejudiced bigots are they? How can they think that feeding hatred and prejudice against homosexuals is ever going to produce a good result? How foolish and ignorant are they? Shame on them! Prejudice is not a virtue. Hatred is not a "family value."

Every self-respecting Idaho Republican should be calling for Senator to resign right now. Otherwise, the judgment of this incident is going to come down on them. The people of Idaho are not "good people" if they think prejudice, fear and hatred are "family values." They need to learn the difference between virtue and vice, good and evil, truth and falsehood.

Republicans have systematically exploited our prejudices for political gains and had the arrogance to believe that they could lie their way out of it. Shame on all Republicans.

I want the Republican party to go away .... forever.

Never vote Republican. Make it so.

Steve Moyer

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Remember the $575 fine he paid when he pled guilty
Posted by: metamind on Aug 31, 2007 10:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why were the police doing this? Perhaps to raise some revenue. Perhaps the basic idea is that if we "make people pay" they will stop acting out like this in public rest rooms.

How about another approach? Teach virtue. Teach the right way to be. Elliminate prejudice. Let people be free to express affection for members of the same sex in public places. Teach love rather than guilt. ( liberate love from fear )

Rather than punishing people for wrong behavior make it perfectly clear to everyone what is RIGHT behavior. Don't push it in a closet; don't put people down for having sex; let them be free to do what is right ... in the right way and the right place(s) at the right times.

In short, teach virtue.

The cop was out of line in my opinion. He was practicing mental domination through guilt and shame. But it's a job. We need to go "up the ladder" to find out why this "sting" operation was ever created in the first place.

The examination of this issue should continue. You have made good points. Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Sexually frustrated Republicans
Posted by: herbal on Sep 1, 2007 2:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are we overlooking Ken Mehlman's outing as we peruse the Republican record; of being part of the party for gays and pederasts. Golden boy Ken was the Republican National Committee Chiarman from 2005 to 2007! The Democratic Party, for years, suffered the dubious honor of 'the party of gay advocacy' while being regularly dissed by the same hypocrite queers of the GOP who were/are die hard "Family Values" gay bashers.

The Democrats had taken on the black hole cackamamie 'gay' issue that is a no win issue with gays representing a menial 2% monority. There are bigger wars to fry.

Unfortunately, the other polarizing and losing Democrat issue is Abortion. Who can possibly say they are "for abortion"? It is not a political issue; it is a medical issue.

Niether of these issues is properly, fairly or practically a political issue. They are simply fair game for a richmen owned media to discredit well intended people who would have a live-and-let-live attitude. Never mind, have an open discussion of Roman Catholic priests as more than "child molesters". Look back in past errant-priest news and note that they are never called homosexual nor are they called pederasts. Where is open discussion of bath houses, group sex, fisting, amyl nitrate, anal sex, merkins, smegma, (lol) fungal infections, life expectancy and suicide rates? And what of Republican sexually repressed personality cum homosexuality with a frosting of southern fried Christianity? Enough of the stereotypical liberal gays. Their 2% cuts across all formal groupings.

No one would wish a public revue of such distaste, but it can no longer go unexamined.

But hopefully, present day scandal of the real Gay Old Party will conjure up memories of J Edgar Hoover, the Queen of the John Foster Dulles days of red baiting and foreign hegemony; who chiseled the foundation blocks of the rise of fascism.

A pox on the Republicans and the Blue Dog Democrats and a boost to the discernment powers of a new populist electorate; that the new Democratic Nominee will be anti-corporatist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP without Suppression is an Oxymoron
Posted by: Proud Primate on Sep 1, 2007 2:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The suggestion that the Party of Wall Street adopt Openness (Glasnost, if you will) as a policy is a contradiction in terms. Just as the Vatican burned Jan Hus at the stake in 1415 for the crime of translating the Latin Vulgate Bible into Czech so the people would know the terms of their Salvation, so the Money Power (to use Lincoln's phrase) stands or falls on its ability to:

1. Instill fear
    a. of God, who knows how bad you are
    b. of one's Masters, who find out from your Confessor
    c. of one's fellow peasants, who, God forbid, might have guessed
2. Instill admiration and worship
    a. of those who, as Larry Craig, are immune to temptation
    b. of those who "make it" in the world by saying one thing and doing another

The Money Power cannot rule a people who understand what They are up to, because:

1. The people are numerous enough to overwhelm Them
2. The people's interests are being subverted by Them, for Their enrichment

Hence, they must follow, and may not abandon Machiavelli's dictum:

—sono tanto semplice li uomini e tanto obediscano alla necessità presenti, che colui che inganna troverà sempre chi si lascere ingannare

(they are so simple, the people, and so obedient to the present necessity, that whoever would deceive always finds him who will let himself be deceived).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What crime?
Posted by: JP-1 on Sep 1, 2007 9:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think if the cop (or anyone else Craig may have cruised) had simply said to him, "Get lost. Jerk!", there wouldn't even be a story here. Craig is a low-life bathroom cruiser, not a rapist. He wasn't caught having sex. He didn't expose himself. His crime is: peering, tapping his foot, twiddling his fingers, making the assumption that the lack of a response meant the other guy [the cop] was interested, and of being a hypocrite.

I've been cruised in a public restroom. Turn away. Show a lack of interest. They leave you alone and go away. It's usually that simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What crime? Posted by: drcyflowers
» RE: What crime? Posted by: leftgayguy
I am deeply disgusted by this article
Posted by: leftgayguy on Sep 2, 2007 7:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Allow me to express my profound disappointment that you have engaged in this kind of gay-baiting which demonizes the gay community.

I will explain. This is what you said:

"When I was covering Capitol Hill just before Clinton's impeachment, every other young, spiffily manicured male staffer I met in Republican Congressional offices was at least androcentric, if not obviously gay. I don't have a sensitive gay-dar, but there was something about them. Ties never askew, hair immaculately groomed, cuffs gleaming, they usually knew more about my shoes than I did.

Bill Clinton's voracious heterosexuality had as much to do with drawing their rabid hatred as any of his other attributes. He loved women too much, and if only he'd given equal time and effort to seducing those beautiful men, he might have saved himself some trouble.

Republicans in Washington know there are probably more gay men in their ranks than there are on Castro Street."
You are alleging a conspiracy of gays to explain Bill Clinton's impeachment. This is not the case and you know it isn't. Your stereotypical thinking means nothing. Do not tell me you did not say this without the intent to pander to homophobic sentiment. Why? Why do you say this? Do you know how reading something like that, makes me, as a progressive gay man, feel? It makes me feel sad. That you would even say those things.

No, Bill Clinton was attacked for having oral sex with a woman who was not his wife. Not because he had sex with a woman. Do you really want to be this crazy? Gay people are persecuted. We are not in a conspiracy against oh-so heterosexual Bill Clinton. You should know better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Enough with the conspiracy theories
Posted by: leftgayguy on Sep 2, 2007 7:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You ARE demonizing gay people by engaging in these theories.

The Republicans have some closeted gays and lesbians amongst them, yes. But it's not some conspiracy and it's not like it's all across the board.

What if Nina Burleigh alleged a Jewish conspiracy? And used stereotypical anecdote to support this? And that Monica was in on this conspiracy to bring Clinton down?

Is this Alternet now? Anti-gay conspiracy theories ? You should know better, Ms. Burleigh. It is no different than if you said something like that about Jews. I'm sure if this was a different kind of environment you would post that. Because you are a Democrat mouthpiece who doesn't care for the feelings of groups like gays. I am a left-wing person. But I am not a Democrat. I realized that they do not have gays in their interests. They are only slightly less homophobic than the Republicans, who for your information, are mostly heterosexual, not in some conspiracy, Ms. Homophobe Loon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

again, enough with the conspiracy theories
Posted by: leftgayguy on Sep 2, 2007 7:49 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no "gay conspiracy" in the Bush administration and there was no "gay conspiracy" in Hitler's dictatorship.

Both had anti-gay policies. The Nazis executed anyone within their ranks, yes, in the upper levels too, who was found to be gay. Gays wore pink triangles in the concentration camps and were treating horribly and many suffered tragic deaths. Any theory about there being a gay conspiracy at that time is a homophobic version of Holocaust revisionism.

Bush opposes gay marriage and so does the Republican Party. I fail to see why a gay conspiracy would do these things. Ms. Burleigh believes that Bill Clinton was the victim for being heterosexual, ignoring the whole adultery element. Well hmm, Larry Craig is now gonna resign. So why wasn't he insulated from prosecution? Oh right, there's no conspiracy, and Bill Clinton was attacked for being an adulterer, not like I believe that is the worst thing about him.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sorry this was meant for malcolmartin
Posted by: leftgayguy on Sep 2, 2007 7:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
*

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What next, Nina?
Posted by: leftgayguy on Sep 2, 2007 7:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What minority now will you target?

I swear some Democrats are just as racist, misogynist, homophobic, and classist as the most bigoted Republicans around. Minority groups are only votes to these Democrats and can freely be used as political footballs regardless of how they feel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

They hate gays
Posted by: leftgayguy on Sep 2, 2007 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their homophobia is much more subtle. Much like white liberal racism, there's straight liberal homophobia. Don't expect them to know better, they are blinded by prejudice.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's get real; if the GOP abandons bigotry it dissolves into nothing
Posted by: xbj on Sep 3, 2007 9:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First of all, the GOP's REAL base is the rich elite. Big business, big tobacco, big war contracting, if it's big, it's GOP, because the GOP is the party of no regulation whatsoever, as small a government as possible, because the smaller it is, the easier it is to completely buy off and control. Small but certainly NOT powerless, because the GOP has done more to consolidate real power in the hands of itself and favored monopolies, shredding the Constitution and Bill of Rights and every bit of social progress made during the entire 20th century to bits in the process. If allowed to continue we'll have 10 year olds in sweat shops before you can say "William Randolph Hearst".

This has been the case since the 20th century; that's the real "heart" (or rather, lack of one) of the GOP.

Which is why the GOP was able to merge so successfully with fascism and Nazism.

Which effectively fixed the GOP's biggest problem; the uber-rich are a distinct minority in this country, and with the successful dismantling of the middle class, decreasing the upper class and causing overwhelming growth in the ranks of the poor, the GOP's potential base is continually getting smaller, not larger.

Until they took a page from Nazism and merged with false religion, in this case, false anti-Christianity in all its bigoted intolerant militant "'Save' American unborn and screw the rest of the planet" glory. Indeed, the GOP actively worked and supported organizations whose sole aim was to convert true Christianity, a religion of pacificm and peace to the point of martrydom (TRUE martyrdom, where you don't take as many innocent people as possible along with you against their will) into Christianism, a militant intolerant political-grubbing behemoth more akin to Nazism than true Christianity as lived, taught, and died by Jesus Christ and even non-Christians like Ghandi. And yes, Christianism even has its own group of duped suicide martyrs, American troops. Who lose their souls if not their lives.

If the GOP were to abandon their newly created (in the last four decades anyway) perverted base of the "common man" throughout the Bible belt and beyond, their base would shrink to a mere 4% of the total population. You can't have a party survive on that, which is why the GOP helped to create and then lied down with their whore of Christianism in the first place.

So you see, the GOP can't ever get out of bed with the ugliness it helped create; if it abandons the "Christian" "Right", and God forbid, those poor duped people wake up and rediscover and realize just what Christianity really is and God forbid even more, become liberal as Christ truly was, there will be no one left in the GOP but a handful of elite power mad bastards... the party of Cheney's and Murdoch's.

They'd be lynched before they could say "Praise Jesus!" and that would be the end of the GOP.

So no, the GOP is not going to ever accept the homosexuals in its ranks, except behind closed doors, at "invitation-only" "Eyes Wide Shut" parties with studs like Jeff Gannon and the group of stolen young prostituted boys he once was and came from. It's those parties, to which Larry Craig obviously was never invited, that keeps closeted homosexuals trapped in the GOP forever. Not to mention even worse cretins like pedophiles and other assorted perverts.

There's your real GOP; ever now, and ever shall be, until the rest of the world wipes it off the face of the planet.

Or until Christiansim takes a real good long hard look at Jesus Christ, gets down on their knees in tears, and repents and rejects the Nazis they've become. And turns on those who lied them there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement