Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Promise of Low Power FM

By Michelle Chen, In These Times. Posted August 30, 2007.


The chances that Congress will allow the expansion of low power FM broadcast radio stations to exist in big radio markets offers a huge opportunity for citizens to communicate outside of the corporate airwaves.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Michelle Chen

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The movement to develop alternatives to mainstream corporate-owned radio got a boost recently with a bi-partisan congressional bill to expand low-power FM (LPFM), a class of frequencies devoted to non-commercial community groups. Though LPFM stations only broadcast a radius of three-and-a-half miles, they offer the chance to bring seldom-heard voices on the air.

Media activists and reform groups see LPFM as a cheap, accessible medium that counterbalances the formulaic music and news of conglomerates like Clear Channel, while offering ownership and control to underrepresented groups. A recent study by the media-policy think tank Free Press found that women own 6 percent of the country's full-power commercial radio stations; people of color and ethnic minorities control just 7.7 percent. It can cost as little as $5,000 to launch a no-frills LPFM station. About 800 stations have been established since the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) began licensing them in 2000.

The voices aired on low-power stations include evangelists, social critics, tomato pickers and indie rockers -- all linked by the credo that radio should reflect the heterogeneity of the communities it serves.

Low-power broadcasters "are only able to succeed because they are authorized by the local community," says Hannah Sassaman, an organizer with the Prometheus Radio Project, a Philadelphia-based radio advocacy group.

Prometheus has led the grassroots push for LPFM and is now building support for the Local Community Radio Act of 2007, introduced in June by Reps. Mike Doyle (D-Penn.) and Lee Terry (R-Neb.) in the House, and Sens. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.) and John McCain (R-Ariz.) in the Senate.

The bill would repeal strictures that have stunted LPFM's growth. In 2000, lawmakers passed rules that in effect restricted LPFM to rural areas, after industry interests alleged that their "interference" would impinge on full-power broadcasters. But new research from the FCC shows that expanding low-power radio, even in denser markets, would not disrupt existing stations. Nonetheless, the National Association of Broadcasters recently reprised its warnings of "inevitable interference," while opposing the bill.

Media activists say LPFM not only poses no technological hazard, but serves community needs that commercial stations ignore. When Hurricane Katrina hit, low-power outlets emerged as a community-based crisis response in Texas and Mississippi, where volunteer-run stations broadcasted on-the-ground news to survivors and tracked the relief effort.

Prometheus has helped seed new LPFM stations through "barnraisings" -- collective construction projects that lay the technological groundwork for stations and train locals in media production.

One barnraising alumnus, the Florida-based Coalition of Immokalee Workers (CIW), has used LPFM over the last four years to organize some of the country's most vulnerable laborers. CIW broadcasts on political and labor issues to Haitian and Latin American farm workers in their own languages, and provides safety information when hurricanes hit.

"Through LPFM, our communities can have an independent voice, whose commitment is to the community itself and not to any other interests," says CIW Co-Director Lucas Benitez. "It gives us a place to analyze the problems we face daily, and a place to look for solutions together."

KOCZ in Opelousas, La., run by the civil-rights group Southern Development Foundation, has helped revive the area's famed Zydeco music scene by promoting local artists and provided a dedicated forum for community news.

"If we did not have this type of media democracy, people would not have the opportunity to educate themselves and move themselves up," says John Freeman, one of the station's founders. "[Full-power media] only wanted to control what these people could hear. It was a disgrace."

With more frequencies, LPFM might finally gain ground in big cities. REACHip Hop (Representing Education, Activism and Community Through Hip Hop), a New York-based media-activist group, is partnering with Prometheus and like-minded activists to start a station centered on the city's youth. Activist Rosa Clemente says REACHip Hop envisions the station as an outlet for politically oriented public affairs programming and as an alternative to corporate hip-hop stations.

"This is a perfect way for our generation to create our own institutions, run by our own people," says Clemente.

Michele Gutierrez, an organizer with the Bay Area-based Youth Media Council, which focuses on media as a tool for social change, says LPFM is only the start.

"We must continue to challenge a media system controlled by the privileged few," she says. "The power to communicate, and therefore the power to transform society, belongs to everyone."

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: community radio, radio, fcc, low power fm

Michelle Chen has written for the South China Morning Post, Clamor, Inthefray and her own zine, cain.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
LPFM
Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN on Aug 30, 2007 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NAB is bullshitting the public as usual.
The frequencies of FM do not interfere with each other as they are unable to act as AM waves do.
To say that LPFM will interfere with the corporate bullshitters' stations i9s just that, coporate bullshit.

Also, another way to get non-corporate info is by ham radio.
However, to stay on topic, let us hope that the usual congressional buy-out doesn't happen for a rare time.
LPFM would be a positive thing to have, especially in these days of corporessional bullshit.
Hey, I like my new word-corporessional.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LPFM Posted by: staicnoise
» RE: LPFM Posted by: Krain61
Religious monopoly of LPFM
Posted by: Sunfell on Aug 30, 2007 7:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hope that the FCC is going to start blocking the religious takeover of LPFM stations. Megachurches and Christian networks snatch up local licenses and turn the local community stations into translators for their networks. It's a crying shame.

Translator Flood

Christian LPFM monopoly challenged

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Then Go Start One
Posted by: InsertNameHere on Aug 30, 2007 8:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only option is to fight back with their own worst nightmare:
Black-Lesbian, Pro-Choice, Pro-Labor, Anti-War Talk Radio!

I once knew of a college radio show hosted by lesbians called 'Dikes On Mikes'!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why LPFM and not Web?
Posted by: jhecht on Aug 30, 2007 10:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As someone who worked in radio, I wonder what the fuss is about? A Webcast/podcast/Website will reach FAR more people at a much lower cost. $5,000 gets you a "no-frills" LPFM station, with a reach of a few miles, or a bitchin' good Website, with global reach. Which is the better investment to get out alternate info?

Social organizers need to work with tools that have maximum bang-for-the-buck, because they are always underfunded.

The only advantage of LPFM, is that it's harder to for opponents to block/jam/vandalize than a Website. That might turn out to be very useful in our coming neo-fascist America...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Digital divide Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Why LPFM and not Web? Posted by: staicnoise
» RE: Why LPFM and not Web? Posted by: Badger1492
» RE: Why LPFM and not Web? Posted by: mick3
» RE: Why LPFM and not Web? Posted by: jhecht
LPFM has no defense against Corporate Hounds
Posted by: akpasta on Sep 1, 2007 1:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I live in Davis, California, home of University of California at Davis. We recently put together an LPFM station. It's been broadcasting for about two years and is hugely popular in the area. The station has massive public support. However, and out-of-town station called "Sunny FM" has just filed for a tower move to our area. They will not be occupying the same frequency as KDRT's low power 101.5fm but their projected tower move just outside of our city will interfere with KDRT's frequency and bump us off the air. Unfortunately the current law has no teeth to defend LPFM stations from big-market stations like "Sunny FM." Don't let this article fool you, the FCC will not budge when push comes to shove.

KDRT has been faced with huge legal fees to fight Sunny FM's push into our frequency band.... so it doesn't just cost $5000 to start an LPFM station. You need legal help and all kinds of other cash to ensure you can fight your case when big-market corporate hounds try to swallow your voice.

see for yourselves... the FCC will not inherently protect LPFM stations from corporate juggernauts.
www.kdrt.org
www.commonfrequency.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

My best guess is...
Posted by: bob t on Sep 4, 2007 6:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...that the christian right wing nuts will suck up much if not most of the LPFM licenses to be had. Just watch and behold...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]