Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The Iraqis Don't Deserve Us, So We Betray Them

By Robert Fisk, Independent UK. Posted August 23, 2007.


According to Washington's Strategic Class, those pesky Iraqis don't deserve our sacrifice, because their elected leaders aren't doing what we want them to do.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert Fisk

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Always, we have betrayed them. We backed "Flossy" in Yemen. The French backed their local "harkis" in Algeria; then the FLN victory forced them to swallow their own French military medals before dispatching them into mass graves. In Vietnam, the Americans demanded democracy and, one by one -- after praising the Vietnamese for voting under fire in so many cities, towns and villages -- they destroyed the elected prime ministers because they were not abiding by American orders.

Now we are at work in Iraq. Those pesky Iraqis don't deserve our sacrifice, it seems, because their elected leaders are not doing what we want them to do.

Does that remind you of a Palestinian organization called Hamas? First, the Americans loved Ahmed Chalabi, the man who fabricated for Washington the"'weapons of mass destruction" (with a hefty bank fraud charge on his back). Then, they loved Ayad Allawi, a Vietnam-style spook who admitted working for 26 intelligence organizations, including the CIA and MI6. Then came Ibrahim al-Jaafari, symbol of electoral law, whom the Americans loved, supported, loved again and destroyed. Couldn't get his act together. It was up to the Iraqis, of course, but the Americans wanted him out. And the seat of the Iraqi government -- a never-never land in the humidity of Baghdad's green zone -- lay next to the largest US embassy in the world. So goodbye, Ibrahim.

Then there was Nouri al-Maliki, a man with whom Bush could "do business"; loved, supported and loved again until Carl Levin and the rest of the US Senate Armed Forces Committee -- and, be sure, George W Bush -- decided he couldn't fulfill America's wishes. He couldn't get the army together, couldn't pull the police into shape, an odd demand when US military forces were funding and arming some of the most brutal Sunni militias in Baghdad, and was too close to Tehran.

There you have it. We overthrew Saddam's Sunni minority and the Iraqis elected the Shias into power, and all those old Iranian acolytes who had grown up under the Islamic Revolution in exile from the Iraq-Iran war -- Jaafari was a senior member of the Islamic Dawaa party which was enthusiastically seizing Western hostages in Beirut in the 1980s and trying to blow up our friend the Emir of Kuwait -- were voted into power. So blame the Iranians for their "interference" in Iraq when Iran's own creatures had been voted into power.

And now, get rid of Maliki. Chap doesn't know how to unify his own people, for God's sake. No interference, of course. It's up to the Iraqis, or at least, it's up to the Iraqis who live under American protection in the green zone. The word in the Middle East -- where the "plot" (al-moammarer) has the power of reality -- is that Maliki's cozy trips to Tehran and Damascus these past two weeks have been the final straw for the fantasists in Washington. Because Iran and Syria are part of the axis of evil or the cradle of evil or whatever nonsense Bush and his cohorts and the Israelis dream up, take a look at the $30bn in arms heading to Israel in the next decade in the cause of "peace."

Maliki's state visits to the crazed Ahmedinejad and the much more serious Bashar al-Assad appear to be, in Henry VIII's words, "treachery, treachery, treachery." But Maliki is showing loyalty to his former Iranian masters and their Syrian Alawite allies (the Alawites being an interesting satellite of the Shias).

These creatures -- let us use the right word -- belong to us and thus we can step on them when we wish. We will not learn -- we will never learn, it seems -- the key to Iraq. The majority of the people are Muslim Shias. The majority of their leaders, including the "fiery" Muqtada al-Sadr were trained, nurtured, weaned, loved, taught in Iran. And now, suddenly, we hate them. The Iraqis do not deserve us. This is to be the grit on the sand that will give our tanks traction to leave Iraq. Bring on the clowns! Maybe they can help us too.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The cycle repeats
Posted by: ScottP on Aug 23, 2007 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Apparently our planners like the cycle that they worked out in Afghanistan in the 1980's. The Soviets were rebuilding the nation and had a somewhat unpopular puppet regime keeping order. The US funded and armed various groups (called mujahedeen at the time, including bin Laden) to overthrow them. Then those groups fought amongst themselves, now being called warlords, for control of the spoils. After years of destruction using the leftover arms that the US and Soviets had shipped in, the Taliban (i.e. a subset of the mujahedeen/warlords) took control of most of the country and some twisted kind of stability took hold. But that stability was anti-western, and supported 911. So with much ado the US toppled them and installed a new puppet regime. Like the old Soviet puppet regime, it is now falling, and soon the groups will be fighting for the spoils once again.

Meanwhile, Iraq also had a stable anti-western regime, and so the US toppled that one, too. And so groups are fighting for the spoils there, too, and destroying the nation in the process (with a plot twist of having US soldiers in the crossfire, as were the Soviets in Afghanistan, but those are just poor kids).

Actions speak louder than words, and one should surmise that the purpose of a system can be determined by what it does. In other words, the goal in Afghanistan and Iraq today is the same as the goal was in Afghanistan in the 1980s: to leave behind a wreckage of warring, bickering groups to destroy each other. The blowback will provide an opportunity to expand the policy further, possibly sooner rather than later.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The cycle repeats Posted by: WillieD
Am I mistaken?
Posted by: Schroeder on Aug 24, 2007 6:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It has been my understanding that we picked Saddam for Iraq...obviously, he didn't work out. It has also been my understanding that we picked Chalabi for Iraq. . . did we? When are we going to learn? These are not our choices to make, are they? Do you think the Iraqi people should pick our next president? (On second thought, they couldn't do any worse, so maybe they should.) I am angered by everyone, Republican and Democrat who states that we need to pressure the Iraqi people to do it OUR WAY!!! How stupid do we get to be? Our way clearly hasn't worked. We should be approaching the Iraqi people with 'how can we help to repair the damage'...'how can we help to stablize Iraq'...'what do you want us to do?', instead of pretending that this administration has ever made a correct decision about Iraq. What arrogance!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

While we're on the topic...
Posted by: Knowmad on Aug 24, 2007 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a little stat I picked up from Adbusters (Issue 72):

"As of February 2007 the US had accepted 466 of the estimated 2 million Iraqi refugees displace since 2003. Sweden has accepted 70,000and Jordan 750,000."

While America is being so 'exclusive', Iraqis who worked for the US as translators, interpreters, drivers, etc. are being hunted down and killed on a daily basis. It seems bush was right in his latest flip-flop: In Vietnam they left 3,300 Vietnamese employees to the mercy of nationalists.

Freedom and democracy US style, the sequel.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: While we're on the topic... Posted by: Johanna Moren
Fatherly Ike
Posted by: reinaldok on Aug 24, 2007 9:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This Saddam - Chalabi mess is nothing new.
Marcos Perez Jiminez was the omnipotent dictator of Venezuela. PJ as the USA msm liked to call him was the very worst of the worst. It is impossible to think of a more vicious, bloodthirsty dictator than Perez Jimenez. How did our kind fatherly president, Ike Eisenhower handle the situation? Why the USA government awarded PJ with the Legion of Merit (I believe the highest medal to a foreigner). Of course the idea for the medal and its proposal came from the same guys who would appear are once again running the show. The huge, huge international oil companies. Go figure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America will finally feel the love...
Posted by: babs on Aug 24, 2007 10:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... when those ungrateful Iraqis do the right thing and give up their oil to its rightful owners, Exxon, BP, Shell, Halliburton, et al.

I mean, America has invested big bucks in this "mission" and they need to get a return on that investment. A trillion dollars and a few thousand gallons of blood SHOULD buy a lot of crude (pun intended).

Sheesh, just because they are being killed, maimed, blown up, stomped, displaced, degraded, tortured and generally screwed, these miserable Iraqi ingrates want to keep what little they have left. Imagine that?

And that Iran and Syria deliberately put their countries right on America's, er Iraq's, border should convince you that they are mighty movers of geography - and powerful doers of eeeeeevil.

Give America the oil, Iraq! The mighty U.S.A. wants what it wants and it wants it NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iraq is like...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 24, 2007 2:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... a GIANT stomach...
no matter what goodness you put into it, what you get back in return is nothing more than shit... does the cream of western society deserve this? I think not!

For God and the soldier we adore,
In time of danger, not before!
The danger passed, and all things righted,
God is forgotten and the soldier slighted.
--Rudyard Kipling (English poet), 1936

Our God and soldier we alike adore.
Even at the brink of danger; not before;
After deliverance, both alike requited.
Our God's forgotten, and our soldiers slighted.
--Francis Quarles (English poet), 1632

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Iraq is like... Posted by: HeroesAll
» RE: Iraq is like...(delusion) Posted by: blitzmesser
Wondering just what IS the answer...
Posted by: Bozwell on Aug 24, 2007 4:57 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Admit to being stymied and wonder just what the answer to this quagmire is going to be...For those that DO support it, wish they would answer just how much THEY are willing to give and what WOULD finally be enough/too much andwould like a timeframe of sorts as well. For those that want the IMMEDIATE withdrawal, well, are they ready for the chaos that WOULD follow and the consequences as well ? THERE ARE NO GOOD OPTIONS, and what options are based in reality will be a CUT AND RUN of one form or another...Just a matter of time and in the meantime, the further waste of valuable resources , both human and elsewise. When will it be acknowledged that this Iraq venture was likely THE most egregious error/mistake/tragedy that the USA ever perped (to date at least, for there have indeed been other instances where we put our fingers and jerked others around as well) Lots of chickens coming home to roost and lots of consequences going to be brunted one way or another, THAT IS THE REALITY few are will to admit !!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ungrateful eye-rack-ees and other inconveniences...
Posted by: art guerrilla on Aug 25, 2007 4:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1. 'anniversary news' ! good spot on that, sushi, you are right on target there, i did not stop to categorize it like that before...
2. bearzerker... i'm sorry you are apparently badly misguided...
3. we destroy a country, kill untold (literally) hundreds of thousands, impose our will, squeeze their oil, occupy them, then bitch-slap them for being 'hysterical' ? ? ?
4. ANYONE who refuses to recognize the immoral and illegal basis for this war, and the recordbreaking profiteering and corruption, are not deserving of citizenship, much less leadership...

art guerrilla
aka ann archy

eof

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

US/Western Powers have been raping Iraq/MidEst for decades
Posted by: loon879 on Aug 26, 2007 8:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now the rapist uncles have killed rapist daddy. They say "We will protect you from rapist fathers, you need simply let us rape our fill."

Now who wouldn't throw flowers for that!?

The rapists must leave the victim alone! Now! Come what may.

If repentance comes, let it take form after a decent interval.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Your country betrays itself
Posted by: Aussie Kim on Aug 27, 2007 11:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unfortunately, the USA is the most important country in the world.

Unfortunately, the people of the USA do NOT take this responsibility seriously enough, if at all.

You vote for idiot presidents and their dangerous, puppeteer cronies, your foreign policies are criminal scams...and then great swathes of your ignorant population have NO IDEA why people in the rest of the world get so angry and/or get even.

If you REFUSE to get compulsory voting, or even a well-rounded, basic education for everyone - LET THE REST OF US VOTE ON YOUR BEHALF.

YOUR PRESIDENT RULES THE WORLD - let the world choose, or LEAVE US THE HELL ALONE.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Your country betrays itself Posted by: Aussie Kim
Its not a war... perhaps an Occupation, but definitely a CORPORATE HOSTAGE TAKING
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Sep 3, 2007 12:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ah, its not a war.

its barely an Occupation.

what it IS could best be described as a national hostage taking to strong-arm resource-rich nations to capitulate to multi-national corporate interests... backed up by a near bankrupt nation...

basically? its a nation being held hostage by corporations, at the hands of the US... until the Iraqi people cough up those Petroleum Production Sharing Agreements.

that will rob their children & set international legal precedent.

why is the fight continuing?

1. nobody loves an Occupying Force. would YOU??
2. the NEIGHBOURS are dumping resources into the region to prevent the Iraqis from signing agreements that WILL GUARANTEE that the PLUNDER of their nations' resources ARE NEXT.

think about it.

now ask yourself what ONE THING the United States has that other, more ancient nations do not...
land.

enjoy those sub-prime mortgages & ask yourself who bought the mortgage risks from the Lenders?

duh.


Spread Love...


BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian ~~~

We, two, form a Multitude ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]