Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Dick Cheney Really Is That Bad

By Scott Ritter, Truthdig. Posted August 24, 2007.


The vice president is the single greatest threat to American and international security in the world today.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Scott Ritter

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Karl Rove, interchangeably known as "Boy Genius" or "Turd Blossom," has left the White House. The press conference announcing his decision to resign has been given front-page treatment by most major media outlets, but the fact of the matter is the buzz surrounding Rove's departure is much ado about nothing, especially in terms of coming to grips with the remaining 16 months of the worst presidency in the history of the United States.

Rove is a domestic political marauder, the personification of a conservative movement which lacks a moral compass and has a complete disregard for facts. The master of exploiting mainstream America's predilection for news-as-entertainment, under which the likes of Rupert Murdoch can manufacture headlines out of thin air, Rove helped turn "fair and balanced" into a national joke which everyone laughs at but few actually comprehend.

Rove served as the maestro of a political-smear orchestra composed of such intellectually challenged muckrakers as Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter, manipulating the NASCAR/professional wrestling crowd's addiction to seedy gossip in an effort to maintain the all-important 51 percent majority needed to win elections.

Perhaps if the Democratic Party had possessed a semblance of organization and cohesion (not to mention a post-Clinton message that could be sold to a majority of America), then Rove would be but a footnote in history, known simply as the man who helped the worst governor in the history of Texas get elected. Even the self-destructive campaign run by Al Gore in 2000, in which he distanced himself from a sitting president who, despite all of his faults, would have defeated Bush in a landslide if the Constitution permitted a third term, was enough to deny Rove his beloved 51 percent -- it was Gore, not Bush, who won the majority of votes in that contest. It took a Republican governor of Florida, backed by a compliant Supreme Court, to put George W. Bush into the White House, not any genius on the part of Rove.

"Bush's Brain" may claim that it was his careful manipulation of fiction over fact that carried the 2004 election, in which the term "Swift-boating" became synonymous with political character assassination, but it was the events of Sept. 11, 2001, and the war in Iraq which sank the Democratic Party and its candidate for president, John Kerry.

It is very difficult to unseat a president in a time of war, especially when so many Democrats voted in favor of the concept, first by buying into every post-9/11 policy put forward by the Bush administration (find me one Democrat who actually read the Patriot Act in its entirety before it was voted into law) and second by rubber-stamping the lies that led to Bush's decision to invade Iraq in March 2003. Remember, it was Kerry's inarticulate defense of his decision to vote in favor of granting war powers to the president that sank his election hopes, not his Vietnam War record.

Certainly, Karl Rove played a significant behind-the-scenes role in supporting Bush's war policies. The perjury trial of "Scooter" Libby forced the collective of deaf, dumb and blind pseudo-journalists who populate what is known as the mainstream media in America to recognize how pathetically duplicitous and petty the Bush administration could get when it came to defending the policies propping up the so-called Global War on Terror and the awful tragedy of Iraq. Rove's fingerprints were all over the decision by Vice President Dick Cheney to leak CIA officer Valerie Plame's name to the media in an effort to thwart the truth-telling of her husband, former Ambassador Joe Wilson.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: dick cheney, national security

Scott Ritter served as chief U.N. weapons inspector in Iraq from 1991 until his resignation in 1998. He is the author of many books, including, Waging Peace: The Art of War for the Antiwar Movement.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Dick who?
Posted by: cordas on Aug 24, 2007 12:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Err I didn't realise that this article was just muck raking about Karl Rove... Surely an article should have something to do with the byline.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Dick who? Posted by: zipper696
» RE: Dick who? Posted by: jack alexander
» RE: Dick who? Posted by: cordas
» RE: Dick who? Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» RE: Dick who? Posted by: gathaiga
» RE: Dick who? Posted by: 1gma
» RE: Dick who? Posted by: MT512
» ALTERNET'S MISTAKE Posted by: maddy
» Article's fixed Posted by: Joshua Holland
» RE: Article's fixed Posted by: cordas
» RE: Article's fixed Posted by: flapdoodle
» RE: Dick who? Posted by: Badger1492
» RE: Dick who? Posted by: tlees2
» dumb down for cordas Posted by: monkopotamus
Ritter is right on
Posted by: paul_revere on Aug 24, 2007 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It was a long way to go to make a point, but Scott did it well. Excellent writing! He could continue on at length with a second part expanding on Cheney, but I get it anyway.

Some of you have to go a bit deeper into the thought process to appreciate the article. Quit complaining and appreciate the content.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ritter is right on Posted by: cordas
» Ritter accepts propaganda as truth. Posted by: alternetleslie
Huh? Where's the scoop on Dick??
Posted by: warrior woman on Aug 24, 2007 4:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dick who??

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Richard B. Cheney 1941-2007
Posted by: Tom Degan on Aug 24, 2007 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If George W. Bush is impeached, the dread specter of a President Cheney shouldn't be as frightening a prospect as it might seem to the more timid of souls. For the last six years, the joke going around the Washington cocktail party circuit has been: "Bush is only a heartbeat away from the presidency". Let's face facts here, campers: The Dickster has been calling the shots from day one. Were the First Fool to be removed tomorrow and Cheney installed as prez, nothing would change - NOTHING. But that argument is merely academic and should be relegated to history's might have beens. The reality is that Dick Cheney's day's are numbered.

The vice president of the USA is a sick and dying man. Now just hear me out, people! If Bill Frist can diagnose Terri Schiavo's condition from his senate seat in Washington DC, then Tom Degan can diagnose Dick Cheney's condition from his apartment in Goshen, NY - Cut me some slack, Jack! And besides I'm totally qualified to make such a diagnosis: Two of my brothers-in-law are doctors and I once dated a nurse, thank you very much!

It is my expert opinion that Cheney will be the first vice-president since Garrett Hobart
(William McKinley's VP) to die in office. Believe me it gives me neither joy nor smug satisfaction to tell you this. The man is, after all, a human being....I think....But we have to look at the situation realistically and rationally: Cheney suffered several heart attacks in the 1970s when he was only in his thirties. It is widely believed that he suffered another one in 2000 while the election results were being faught out between Bush and Gore. The man is in his mid sixties. While this disgusting administration is imploding at all points, just think of the stress the hideous old bastard must be under. It's not a mere possibility, it's almost assured:

Dick Cheney is going to drop dead any day now.

That being the case, the Dems should have their impeachment plans in their top drawers, ready to be implimented at a moment's notice.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
"The Rant" by Tom Degan

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ichard B. Cheney 1941-2007 Posted by: custersbud
» RE: ichard B. Cheney 1941-2007 Posted by: VZEQICVA
» 'Sick' how? Posted by: Knowmad
» RE: ichard B. Cheney 1941-2007 Posted by: Conservasaurus
» RE: ichard B. Cheney 1941-2007 Posted by: Tom Degan
» RE: ichard B. Cheney 1941-2007 Posted by: Badger1492
» RE: Dick-Face Cheney 1941-2007 Posted by: vomeggido
Dick Cheney is another word for Satan
Posted by: sheena2u on Aug 24, 2007 5:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dick Cheney is indeed the worst thing that has happened to the world and to America in a long time. He is a cousin of Hitler, and he is Satan reborn. He has come to the world to wreak havoc, suffering, and destruction. He has come to dismantle our entitlement programs, wage an illegal and immoral war, and destroy our Constitution and Democracy. He doesn't need impeachment, but he needs to be put in prison where he can no longer hurt anyone.

Dick Cheney is the worst of the worst. He's a traitor to America and a serious threat to human decency everywhere, world peace, and world stability.

However, oddly, the article had next to nothing to do with Dick Cheney.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Overthrow of the US Government
Posted by: machaventia on Aug 24, 2007 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You don't have to stand far back to get a reasonably clear picture that what we see transpiring at the highest US and International levels is a contrived and carefully-orchestrated effort to subvert the Constitution Of the USA, diminish it by "Signing statements" and overthrow the elected government by present players on the political stage, without regard for party, sexual preferences or race, coordinating their efforts, determinable by the evidential nature of Law as applied and prostituted by favoritism, design or special interest, constituting treasonable acts , by anyone's assesment and review.
The perpetrators should be immediately arrested and detained, possibly subjected to the systems of rendition they have established for the punishment of dissidents presently.
The assumption of power by default may yet fall on the shoulders of the people of America, as all politicians are revealed to be involved in this subversion of the Republic and it's laws, or remain complicit by acquiescance, silence or worse.
It is all too apparent the manipulation of votes via electronic wizardry, ballot stuffing, re-districting of voters, outright chicanery, bribes and special deals pouring through the Congressmen's fingers as "Earmarks" are equally treasonous acts, contrary to the will of the people and designed to remove Justice, Representation and destroy the political, economic and health futures of the Nation.
All of this shows the futility of any electoral process as being deemed honest, as our elected representatives support an orgy of money-making schemes, abdicate their resposibilities and lead us further into an illegal war, contemplate yet more horrors, and eliminate our freedoms by the stroke of a pen or less.
A national referendum and vote on the legality, implimentation and continuance of the present leaderships is desired and warranted.
Legal types might well re-examine the Constitution for the actual powers of the people when faced with wholesale Treason or Coercion through violent means to subjegate, investigate and intimidate it's own people to suppress or destroy freedoms written as the Law of the Land, sworn to and declared to be upheld by the very people now working to eliminate our sovereignty, freedoms and liberty.
Who will call them to accountability, and how?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Overthrow of the US Government Posted by: SatanicJamboree
Use the link to read about Cheney
Posted by: dcarmack on Aug 24, 2007 6:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For some reason this copy of Ritter's piece stops about 60% of the way thru. Use the link in the intro to go to TruthDig and read the whole thing there....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ritter makes the point!
Posted by: wisewebwoman on Aug 24, 2007 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
About the great distractions of this fascist regime. All the fluffers around the Great Puppet and the biggest one of all lurking so quietly in the background, the black dark soul of the ethereal Evil Veep. Karl Rove ain't in his league, no one is. We will all drown in the blood of the million dead children on his hands. And he certainly wears the face he deserves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

free MP3 Scott Ritter talks
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 24, 2007 8:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
free MP3 Scott Ritter talks...

I think it is very much still worth listening to his pre-war talks where he explained, repeatedly and in great detail, why no giant stockpiles of WMDs were going to be found. For example, when Colin Powell asserted that tons of VX nerve gas were in Iraq, if you knew anything about VX nerve gas (how did Powell's circle not know?) you'd know that it has a shelf-life of about 2 weeks. And that's under ideal storage conditions- something that the Iraqis never even achieved.

The talk he gave with Rahul Mahajan is excellent if you want to understand the never-existent "reconstruction".

Incidentally, I am surprised and respectfully disagree with Scott when he says that HR 333, the impeachment of Dick Cheney should not be a priority for the anti-war movement. I don't know how else to shut this administration down, other that the Democrat's "strategy" of waiting until the next election, 15 months from now. Personally, I think that pushing to impeach Gonzales might get the ball rolling on investigations which result in actual accountability.

You should read Scott's book!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Scott Ritter is right about the democrats
Posted by: surfreality on Aug 24, 2007 8:35 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who is defending the constitution?
What's Hillary's position on the "Unitary Executive theory"? On torture? Rendition? Habeus Corpus?
Or Bidens', Richardsons', Edwards' or Obamas' positions for that matter?
No mainstream democrat is willing to speak up loud and clear in oppostion to these degredations of our way of life.
Where is the collective outrage?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

kinda like a sci. fi. movie, huh?
Posted by: yale on Aug 24, 2007 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In all of my years of political awareness, I have never witnessed anything to the degree of what is happening now. I never thought I would see the day when my government would try to, not only take over the whole country with evil intent, but the whole world. Dick Cheney is the master mind behind a lot of it. Bush is nothing more than a head on a stick being dangled out in front of us all. He has the least intellectual air about himself, more than any president in history. Althought intellectualism in my eyes shouldnt define who may, or may not be a qualified leader, its to bad he has taken on the crew that he has. Very little is known about our vice pres., he prefers to stand in shadows. He has made it very clear that, he has no intentions of ever being pres. He knows that his goals of world dominance are more likely to be met if he can stay out of public view. So the only other thing that we as americans know about our vice pres. who peers from behind the front line is, that he shoots his friends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» rats on a stick Posted by: kww355
Sucking the rod of Satan
Posted by: Doggycuny on Aug 24, 2007 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hey, at least in 50 years they'll all be dead and in a place where they deserve to be, sucking the rod of Satan - we can at least get some small satisfaction from that. They will continue to cause misery, not only for world citizens, but also for their own for as long as we give them power. We can always rely on the ignorant rednecks of the South to buy into Neocons B.S as long as its wrapped up in a nice Jesus package.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sucking the rod of Satan Posted by: Basenjis
Impeachment?
Posted by: Gisele on Aug 24, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeaching the evil behind the Bush won't be acceptable friends. The moment the proceedings begin, the "disaster clock" will start ticking, whereby a disaster will be brought down on the heads of Americans - thereby allowing martial law to be declared.

Martial law will be declared at some point before the next election anyway, but impeaching Georges "soul" will hasten it dramatically. The democrats are walking on egg shells trying to get through the next few months, too bad they can't see the land mines so ably planted. They're damned if they do, they're just as damned if they don't.

The George has never signed a statement that he doesn't intend to use at some point in time, and the Dick will tell him when, where, and how. There is a price to be paid when you dance with the devil. I hope America's dancing shoes are tied well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Impeachment? Posted by: Suzanna17@msn.com
Horrible article
Posted by: mdwoade on Aug 24, 2007 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article began discussing Dick Cheney over halfway through. The first part of the article was a whiny re-hash of Carl Rove. The second half of the article whined on and on about how Cheney was the evil man behind everything bad in the Bush administration. I read absolutely nothing new in this article; I mean no new facts and no new insight. Of course, Carl Rove has done bad things he will never be punished for, and, of course, Dick Cheney is an evil genius who has manipulated America into the responsibility for tens if not hundreds of thousands of deaths in Iraq. But, we already knew that. Tell us something we do not already know. Take a new look and give us a new perspective. This was just a re-hash of a re-hash of a re-hash. Horrible.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Losers
Posted by: Solar Wind on Aug 24, 2007 10:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's face it - at any other time in any other place these people would be known for what they truly are: LOSERS. Rove is not a brain- he IS A BULLY. Bush is not steadfast. He IS stubborn and arrogant in his ignorance. Cheney is EVIL. Period. Plain and simple. And we, the people, and the mainstream press must accept our role in this quagmire. I am so disillusioned with the Dems I could weep. So much ammunition but no firepower. It's just - ready - ready - aim aim. Nada.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pot calling the kettle black?
Posted by: Jaffy on Aug 24, 2007 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Completely agree with cordas in the "Dick Who?" posting.

I'm appalled by the lumping of the right leaning listenership as "the NASCAR/professional wrestling crowd". I love reading the articles on Alternet, but the somewhat self-aggrandizing tone of this one is certainly proof that Alternet is not an exception to the muckraking rule.

Why take the time to point out:

"The master of exploiting mainstream America's predilection for news-as-entertainment...helped turn 'fair and balanced' into a national joke..."

when it's clear that the integrity of this article leans a little too heavily on stereotyping and angst? I'd hate to see Alternet writers added to the list of Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and Ann Coulter...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pot calling the kettle black? Posted by: Badger1492
What would JP Morgan do?
Posted by: JayHaden on Aug 24, 2007 11:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who knows what goes on in Cheney’s mind, but he clearly doesn’t like America the way it is. Maybe his stint in the business world -- the corrupt and murky one of oil -- has seduced him into believing there’s a more direct way to create his own personal American Disneyland than through democratic process. The perfect storm of 9/11, neo-con fantasy, an immature and indifferent President, being given the job of vetting VP candidates and being a seemingly calm hand and known quantity has landed him in a bigger puddle of power than any VP ever dreamed of.

While the rest of us are trying to adapt our fairly flexible system and to fix what’s broke, Cheney has gotten a stranglehold on all the government machinery within reach and is throttling the bejeezus out of it. His guidinig mantra is "Leave nothing that works" so there are no real or rhetorical obstacles to rebuilding America as his own princess palace (exhibit A is the unfathomable threat to veto SCHIP because it might demonstrate the viability of socialized medicine). And in typical laissez faire fashion, he enlists the business ethic (an oxymoron) so that the backs of everyone else in the country are available for him and his cronies to climb over on their way to heaven. In their conflicted dual role as America’s protectors and the steely-eyed purveyors of fear, Cheney and his boy-President have gotten us to willingly sacrifice our freedoms for the good of his order.

His (and Rove’s) strategy has been to weaken and destroy essential institutions within our system of checks and balances that have inhibited America’s movement along their secret path back to the Gilded Age. Who would have ever thought that our Vice President, let alone President, would side with those that “hate our freedoms.” It’s so preposterous that while the Democrats are left trying to catch their collective breath, Cheney has chain-sawed his way through the New Deal, the justice system, the economy, most of the world’s goodwill, and our own Constitution. All the time standing innocently aside saying, “Who, me? I’m four-square behind a strong America!” Well, who isn’t? We just haven’t figured out that the barbarian is not only at the gate, he’s about to close it on us while we are out running around the world looking for barbarians. Treason is a good word for what this evil man practices. Impeachment is the remedy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How angry are you?
Posted by: rgarg on Aug 24, 2007 11:47 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Aren't you tired of all the anger you have been feeling towards Bush and Cheney and Rove and the Congress and the media and the system? Has this anger done anything good for you or for anyone? Have you wondered why 'evil' seems to be more powerful today than 'good'. My hypothesis is that it is the indifference and lethargy of the 'good' that has caused 'bad' to overpower it. Have you seen the documentary 'The Secret' that talks about the law of attraction? After watching it, it occurred to me that perhaps the reason why Bush won again was because everyone was thinking - not Bush, not Bush... rather than Kerry, Kerry. The law of nature took its course and gave the people 4 more years of what they were consumed with - not wanting Bush. Now you can 'not want Bush' for another 4 years.

The forces of nature have given power to Bush and Cheney because the majority of human beings need them. It could not have happened otherwise. I knew even before the Dems won in Nov 06 that it would hardly make any difference. The world will not change unless you change.

Put your energy into something that you feel good about. If it really makes you feel good to criticize, then go ahead and keep doing it. But if not, then stop it. Take care of your family and your neighbours and your community. Forgive those you call 'evil'. Show the leadership that you find missing in the world. Don't be preoccupied with what is wrong. See the world for what it is, and do something about it rather than feeling powerless and angry. Take care of those who are around you and who you are in a position to help. Enjoy the ride :-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: How angry are you? Posted by: VannaLaRoche
» RE: How angry are you? Posted by: louisa23
Hooray for Scott Ritter!
Posted by: tlees2 on Aug 24, 2007 12:36 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Once again we are indebted to Scott Ritter for speaking the truth. Keep working so we can impeach and convict Cheney and save our country and constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TV
Posted by: vincen13 on Aug 24, 2007 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article does not say anything about the title until the middle of the second page. Alter Net articles tend to be too long, too wordy and too preachy!

Get to the point. Be focused and intelligent in your observations. Your point is good but trying to read this is like trying to listen to a simple minded person take 45 minutes to tell you a 2 minute story.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Dirty Trail of Tricky Dick...
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Aug 24, 2007 1:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Keep in mind, as you look over this excellent little bio of Cheney, that he is pushing hard for attacking Iran. The real goal here must have some economic purpose - such as even greater destabilization of the region. Maliki's recent visits to his neighbors must have Cheney worried that peace will break out in the region...

The UnAuthorized Online Biography of Dick Cheney

Some highlights:
1962-1967 - drunk driving and draft dodging baby tricks.

1969-1974 - goes to work for Donald Rumsfeld at the Office of Economic Opportunity.

1981-1987 - chairman of Republican party (was elected Wyoming senator in 1978)

1990 - Flys to Saudi Arabia as Bush Sr.'s Secretary of Defense to force king to allow US troops on Saudi soil - an argument based on fake claims of Iraqi troops on the Saudi border. Osama bin Ladin vows revenge at this time (he had petitioned the King to use Saudi troops. Recall, this is the guy who was supported by the CIA and the Pakistani ISI for years in the Soviet-Afghani conflict).

1992-2000 - Works for Halliburton.

2001-Present - Oversees 911 disaster. Delivers billions in no-bid contracts to Halliburton while still receiving payments from Halliburton. Pressures CIA to falsify evidence on Iraqi WMDs, then turns to the Iraqi National Council for fake 'intelligence reports'.

Aug 26 2002: Cheney tells an audience of veterans "There’s no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction [and that he will use them] against our friends, against our allies and against us."

March 2002: Cheney declares "we believe that he [Saddam Hussein] has in fact reconstituted nuclear weapons."

MARCH 5 2003: Army Corps of Engineers writes in an e-mail that a contract for restoring Iraqi oil fields is being coordinated with Cheney’s office. Three days later a Halliburton subsidiary was awarded the $7 billion contract.

DECEMBER 15 2003: U.S. Supreme Court agrees to hear Cheney appeal a lower court order that Cheney turn over documents related to the Bush administration’s Energy Task Force. Cheney had been fighting efforts to disclose the documents for three years

JANUARY 2004: Dick Cheney goes duck hunting with US Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia.

APRIL 15 2005: Cheney releases his tax returns. His filings show that he earned $194,852 in deferred compensation from Halliburton in 2004.
He also has millions invested in Halliburton that dwarf his compensation

Cheney: An evil crook with a lot of blood on his hands...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HE'S GUILTY OF TREASON!!!!!!
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 24, 2007 3:59 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As head of Haliburton back in the 80's good ole Dick sold weapons to our enemy's,the folks from Iran. He made a lot of money too. He was made VP for his efforts against his nation.
This dick is so callous he even shot his 'friend' in the face,aand got the victim to say he was sorry for getting shot.
This is what wealth brings us. Fools that think and act 'above the Law'. We as a People and as a Country should rid ourselves of such a public meanace as Dick and others of his ilk. Via the 90% tax bracket.
Think Outside the System
Draft Jeffrey7 for Prez
www.youtube.com/RevJeffrey7

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What are you guys...
Posted by: opeluboy on Aug 24, 2007 4:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... a bunch of frustrated English teachers? What difference does it make if Ritter took a while to get to his point? He got there, and he did it with intelligence and passion, as usual.

Or could it be that some posters now beat up on this guy due to previous articles he wrote that offended them? Hmmm?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What are you guys... Posted by: Mogio
» RE: What are you guys... Posted by: opeluboy
» RE: What are you guys... Posted by: Roverton
OK Let impeach, imprison Cheney and get on with it.
Posted by: Susan Kipping on Aug 24, 2007 5:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scott Ritter has been in the game a long time and knows what he is talking about. I thank him for his time and energy.

Now we all know Senate and Congress have backed this corrupt administration to the hilt. They are not about to do jack squat.

Cheney needs to be thrown out of office and put in prison.

We need to get our troops home immediately and let them heal from this terrible, illegal war.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Memo to General Peter Pace
Posted by: P. Hermes on Aug 24, 2007 5:27 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beyond your call for drastic troop reductions in Iraq, the time is now for you and colleagues to arrest Bush, Cheney and Rice et al on charges of crimes against humanity and the Constitution. It is your duty as the prime military upholder of the Constitution.

DO YOUR DUTY NOW.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Deflecting Criticism of the President's Policies and Actions
Posted by: sofla100 on Aug 24, 2007 6:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, having the "evil" Mr. Cheney in there has been skillfully used as a way to deflect criticism of the President's policies and actions. Somehow, it is "his advisors," who are always to blame, or the VP, but never his (Presidents) faulty decisions to begin with. The President gets to act like a bumbling fool, unable to even articulate properly, but he is a nice guy. Just those "bad people" around him. Alas, Mr. Cheney was selected by Mr. Bush and I don't believe for a minute he is one little step removed from what Mr. Bush wants or demands to be done. Cheney's policies are Bushes policies, they have always been. Mr. Bush can play the nice, friendly guy routine, but a cadre of henchmen stand ready, (Rove, Cheney, etc.) to do the dirty work. Let's not forget what President Truman said, "the buck stops here" (with me, the President).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Trish
Posted by: Trish on Aug 24, 2007 10:46 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is even more amazing than the fact that Dick Cheney is still on the loose and wreaking havoc with our constitution and our safety, is how even progressive anti-Bush, anti-Cheney writers participate in the blackout of Dennis Kucinich from the media. He has already filed Articles of Impeachment against Cheney in House Resolution 333. He most certainly read the Patriot Act and voted against it, and has tirelessly, consistently spoken out against the crimes this administration has been committing since before 9/11. Mainstream media (including ABC's "cropping" him out of the Iowa Democratic Presidential Debate's official photo on their website and cutting their polls that showed him #1 and #2 in the debates and the race respectively,) blatantly ignores this one candidate who does stand against corruption and for the people; please AlterNet, don't you too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Roman Senate=US Congress
Posted by: Mogio on Aug 25, 2007 6:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Roman analogy is apt, but can be carried even further:

""That Congress today remains relatively mute on this crisis is one of the great mysteries of our time. Perhaps the vagaries of national politics can be blamed.""

And the aquiescence of many at Rome in the death of that Republic remains a mystery even today. The Roman Senate failed to protect its own rights and liberties in the run-up to empire and the run-down of the Roman Republic. Congress is failing us in much the same way the Roman Senate failed Rome. Its horrific to watch. A total disgrace.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jail Cheney, Bush and Lee Raymond
Posted by: Tychon.eu on Aug 25, 2007 8:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheney is a private actor - not a public servant - who is locked-in between the 1963 U.S.-imposed energy contracts with Europe (Gasgate) and domestic energy security policies. The Kremlin's Gazprom is just in time countering Exxon's White House.
Compare: www.complexxon.org

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This guy has got to go!
Posted by: weatherking on Aug 25, 2007 9:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Probably along with anyone who has shaken his hand. No telling how contagious he really is, but you can bet that his touch is dangerous. I don't know if it's delusions of grandeur or knowing how to accumulate monster wealth or the great illusion that he is actually doing a wonderful, humanitarian, progressive, compassionate act. But I am here to tell him now that he is evil personified and everyone knows this. If you don't then shame on you! Babies, mothers, fathers, brothers, are being killed because this man has said it must be so to make his power real. Hitler would have loved this man!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dick Cheny is a sociopath
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Aug 26, 2007 1:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Dick Cheny is a sociopath alias sciopath alias psychopath.
According to Wikipedia, psychopathy is currently defined.... as a
condition characterized by lack of empathy or conscience, and
poor impulse control or manipulative behaviors. The term is
often used interchangeably with sociopathy and antisocial
personality disorder......It is correlated with dissocial personality
disorder......Only a minority of diagnosable psychopaths are
violent offenders.... The manipulative skills of some of the others
are valued for providing audacious leadership. Some have argued
that psychopathy is adaptive in a highly competitive environment,
because it gets results for both the individual and the corporations
they represent. However, these individuals will often cause long-
term harm, both to their co-workers and the organization as a
whole, due their manipulative, deceitful, abusive, and often
fraudulent behaviour

Reference: "The Sociopath Next Door : the Ruthless Versus the
Rest of Us" by Martha Stout.
New York : Broadway Books, 2005.
Martha Stout says: "4% of all people are born
sociopaths/sciopaths/psychopaths." There is no cure. A written
test, the MMPI [Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory]
can identify sociopaths. The MMPI also identifies
schizophrenics and several other types of mental illnesses. The
MMPI is reliable to a good level of confidence. The MMPI
should be administered in high school along with the college
boards, or possibly to all high school students. Those with failing
grades on the MMPI should have a chance to receive medical
treatment. Psychiatry, Psychology and the MMPI had not been
invented by the time our Constitution was written. If they had,
the Constitution might have been different.
If sociopaths were identified, they could be kept out of politics.
The problem is that almost all politicians and CEOs may be
sociopaths given that 4% of all people are sociopaths. 4% is a lot
of people. The voters have a right to know the MMPI scores of
the candidates.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dick Cheney & The Power Of Nightmares
Posted by: millamoon on Aug 26, 2007 4:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THE POWER OF NIGHTMARES
Highly recommended documentary

http://www.moviesfoundonline.com/power_of_nightmares.htm

Apologies if this has already been posted here but I thought you all would be interested in this documentary by the BBC.... I was very interested to see Dick Cheney was huge part of the propaganda spread about Russia in the 80s.

"This documentary offers a remarkable insight into the reality of our current fear induced climate. Adam Curtis chronicles the rise of neo-conservatism and the resulting change in the world's political agenda orchestrated by those who place their trust in the philosophical ideal of the necessity of evil to unite a country. The filmmaker manages to successfully pluck apart the myth of the reality of there being a logistically organized terror network, let alone one that is managing to orchestrate terror attacks from a cave in the remote mountains of Afghanistan. His arguments are backed up by some eye opening interviews with authorities on the field of Islamic fundamentalism, members of the US government and members of the US judicial system. These insights are parred with concrete, startling facts and the result is a program that manages to shake us awake making us aware of a far more realistic terror threat namely that of psychological warfare carried out by the powers that be, accompanied by a sensationalist media frenzy. I cannot recommend this program highly enough." -imdb.com

And there's also this one:
Dick Cheney speaks out 13 years ago on reasons not to invade Iraq.

http://breningstall.wordpress.com /2007/08/24/dick-cheney-speaks-out-13-years -ago-on-the-reasons-not-to-invade-iraq/
(you need to remove the spaces after .com and years when you paste into the browser - alternet won't allow posting a word over 60 letters long)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bad men in power
Posted by: frank69 on Sep 4, 2007 2:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The veep is just that: numero dos.
GWB is the man in charge. He is not stupid. A rotten person, but not stupid. Don't blame the wrong man. To paraphrase the Clinton campaign slogan: "It's the Prez, stupid!"
Don't blame Dick, blame Lynn - she is the brains of the Cheney family.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]