Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Bratz Dolls: Worse Than Barbie?

By Abby West, Sirens Magazine. Posted August 22, 2007.


How a saucer-eyed, saucy-dressing line of dolls made Barbie the far lesser of two feminist evils.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Abby West

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

How had I let this happen? It was Christmas 2005 and my then 5-year-old daughter had unwrapped yet another Bratz doll, adding it to the pile of scantily clad playthings that well-meaning family and friends had given her. Just the year before, Barbie had ruled the over-commercialized day. But now my little fashionista (with her three or four voluntary outfit changes a day) only had eyes for Bratz. And not only does that continue to this day, but she's also hardly alone: The Bratz are the No. 2 doll in the country (second to you-know-who) and are clearly winning the buzz war, with their very own live-action theatrical release now playing. When's the last time you caught the blond, leggy one at the multiplex? I can't believe I'm saying this, but I wish she'd come out of the Dream House and make a comeback already -- at least with all those different versions of her (remember Astronaut Barbie? Teacher Barbie?), she showed a little aspiration beyond just looking good in a sparkly dress or leather pants.

All of which begs a lot of questions: What is with these incredibly popular little dolls who just so happen to embody that Britney-esque spirit now imploding in a gossip magazine near you? Are they worth worrying over? Could they be destroying the next generation of females with their future-Maxim-cover-girl look? And most of all, how did they manage to turn Barbie into a good girl, a near feminist icon even, in comparison?

For a while there I'd managed to mostly ignore the Bratz, with their absurdly big eyes on their absurdly big heads. They were undeniably cool, this multicultural array of dolls dressed to the nines in funky clothes that would have made any club girl proud. I reasoned that they were meant for older girls who were more likely to dress that way -- not my little one. What I forgot was that while little girls adore their mothers, there comes a time when they really want to be like older girls. In this case, older girls as embodied by these dolls -- never mind that they look like little hookers.

"They don't look trashy to me. I think trashy is in the eyes of the adults," said Isaac Larian, CEO of Bratz's maker, Micro Games of America, on Nightline earlier this month. Then there must be something wrong with a whole lot of us because we all see dolls that look, for lack of a better word, a little slutty. And I know I sound like I'm 1,000-years-old when I say things like that, but as a mother who's pushing 35, the line between prude and rational is getting thinner.

Now don't get me wrong. Through the years I had my own issues with blond Barbie, with her unattainable proportions and a gazillion accessories, from her vapid representation of all things fake to the impossible expectations of female beauty that she helped institute. But when it came down to it, I knew her well. I have fond memories of my own collection as a 4-year-old in Trinidad, and years later, playing with them in my Bronx apartment. I'm sure the attention and exaltation I gave her contributed to my self-esteem issues as a little black girl who would never have hair like that unless I sewed it on. I had a few of the parade of black Barbies that came on the market, but even as little kids we knew that they weren't "the real thing" and that white Barbie was the one we had to have.

So there is a part of me that wants to accept the multi-culti groove that the Bratz have going on. I should be embracing Sasha with her brown skin, even though her hair is just as impeccably straight and long as the rest of them. I should love the "exotic" looking Yasmin and friends. But something in me resists. Maybe it's that I think they've set feminism back 20 years with things like their TV show and video game, in which they run a teen magazine with money they pick up from the ground or make from photographing each other. Despite the fact that they parrot all manner of girl-power phrases along the way, they are still espousing a kind of emptiness that is particularly dangerous coming from relatable-seeming dolls. Or maybe it's just the queasy feeling I get when I look at the Bratz baby dolls who are inexplicably dressed in baby tees or bikini tops with their diapered bottoms. Even at her most Malibu, Barbie wasn't nearly as sexualized as these dolls are, with their overly made-up faces.

Or maybe it's because I see my almost 7-year-old daughter pulling her cute little-girl dresses and shirts tight in the back, trying to create a waistline while she juts out her hip and strikes a pose, and I realize that no matter how much I keep her away from sexual content on TV and in movies, I can't take it out of her world completely.

The knockdown, drag-out fight between the makers of the two dolls will continue, both in toy stores and in the courtroom. Mattel says the Bratz designer came up with the concept while he worked at Mattel, and the makers of Bratz and the makers of Bratz, MGA Entertainment, say that Mattel's My Scene Barbie is a rip-off of the Bratz. As if that very girly fight wasn't embarrassing enough, MGA also alleged that Mattel tried to corner the market on doll hair.

But in my daughter's eyes, the war is pretty much won. "Face it, Mommy. Bratz are just cooler," she told me recently, and I missed Barbie, in all her blond glory, a little more.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bratz, barbie, colls, feminism, womanhood

Abby West is an associate editor at Entertainment Weekly with more than 10 years experience in newspapers and magazines. She's currently working on a compilation of poignant and helpful stories from the loved ones of those with bipolar disorder. She lives in New York with her family.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
vote with our wallets
Posted by: Ames on Aug 22, 2007 12:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These little dolls represent the every increasing sophistication and savvy of the market to influence women from a very young age. I personally don't think they're necessarily comparatively worse than Barbie, all dolls serve to reinforce the notion that women are supposed to take the role of primary care giver and to look good for men. Doll and toy manufacturers will always find ways of preying on young children and become ever more insidious in their quest for more and more money. The only language the market understands is money. Women of intelligence must therefore fight back with money.

Yes, it will only make a samll dent, but refusing to buy toys and dolls which reinforce notion of women as sex/carers goes a long way. Alo make it clear to relatives and friends that you're avoiding such toys and tell them why. Even if they disagree they're likely to respect such a decision.

Articles like this also help raise awareness and consiousness of the potential harm these toys can do. We certainly can't keep sex and commodification of women out of the lives of children, but we can actively minimise it through discussion and consumption discretion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: vote with our wallets Posted by: MartianBachelor
Mike Males
Posted by: mmales on Aug 22, 2007 12:55 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For the millionth time, WHY IS THIS CULTURE WAR stuff important? I'm really sorry that some doll offends some parents, who would be better occupied reevaulating their own values--today's middle-agers are the most consumerist, looks-obsessed, materialistic, fashion-conscious, big-spending generation in history, and if you want to know where your kids get their most troubling values, look in a mirror. But why on earth does the "progressive" "alternative" media continue to waste space on culture-war trivialities when there are 5 million teens suffering abject poverty, hundreds of thousands victimized by household violence every year, and millions of children and teenagers enduring drug-abusing, crime-prone parents and a repressive, youth-hating state worse than any generation before them ever has? Could we please BE SERIOUS about youth issues--no more Britney, no more Lindsay, no more Paris, no more Barbie or doll or video game or beer commercial or other yuppie frettings that have obliterated legitimate, once-progressive concerns for young people's basic socioeconomics, safety, and opportunity under a barrage of pop-culture silliness?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mike Males Posted by: overseas
» RE: Mike Males Posted by: plantsareneat
» RE: Mike Males Posted by: Crazy H
» Why This Matters Posted by: EKSwitaj
» RE: Why This Matters Posted by: kiel
» RE: Mike Males Posted by: goeswithness
» Thanks Mike! Posted by: raven200
sakina
Posted by: sakina on Aug 22, 2007 2:09 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It bothers me that the author refers to the dolls clothing as 'slutty'. This is a derogatory term that is used against women who choose to enjoy many sexual relationships. This kind of name calling usually begins in junior high schooland is used by females to bully others who they envy or feel jealous about. I think judging people using derogatory language for how they chose to express their sexuality or their sexual choices is disrespectful. I wish women could understand how often they harm each other by applying such double standard language to other women. Men are not subject to the same labeling about their promiscuos behavior. If the author is uncomfortable with the way another woman expresses her sexuality, or in this case the way femininity is expressed in doll clothing, perhaps she could find a way to express this preference without resorting to the use of such harmful language.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sakina Posted by: jnelson4765
» RE: multiculturalism Posted by: kiel
» RE: sakina Posted by: ArtemInox
» RE: sakina Posted by: bluebirdella
Unattainable proportions
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Aug 22, 2007 2:39 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of getting boob jobs at 14, now our daughters will be getting their heads enlarged to look like those dolls.

Speaking of unattainable, how about the impossible standards set by He Man and GI Joe dolls? Real men aren't out saving the universe from evil. They're laying in front of the TV watching sports and working on their beer gut. Those steroid-pumped overachievers are making us look bad.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» absolutely Posted by: bluebirdella
» RE: Unattainable proportions Posted by: MartianBachelor
I honestly don't get it
Posted by: rwday@cox.net on Aug 22, 2007 3:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We raised 6 children - the oldest is 25, the youngest 17, and believe me, when my husband and I didn't approve of a toy, it didn't come into our house. Yes, they probably played with whatever it was at friends' houses, but our standards were clear to our kids.

If you don't like Bratz (and I don't - I find them far worse than Barbie, who at least seemed to have career goals) or violent video games or whatever, then don't buy them. If you don't want your six year old to dress like a cheap prostitute, don't buy her low-rider jeans and midriff tops. Marketing to kids only works if parents aren't willing to stand firm and do their jobs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I honestly don't get it Posted by: eve6andahalf
» RE: I honestly don't get it Posted by: kabac55
Not again
Posted by: PJT on Aug 22, 2007 4:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh for heaven's sake. The writer says "they've set feminism back 20 years with things like their TV show and video game". If that's all it takes to set feminism back 20 years maybe it wasn't such an important thing to begin with, huh? I don't exactly get the point here. If you don't want your kid to have these toys, don't allow them. If you think TV is loaded with trash, why not pull the plug on the TV? (Duh.) If you think that would actually change anything, that is. If you want civilization, move to Finland. This is what America is all about. Freedom, by the way, the kind of freedom President Bush wants to export all around the world, when you get right down to is, is the freedom for 11 year olds to dress and act like street whores. The author might try catching her tyke on the way to or from a wardrobe change to talk quietly for a few moments about what SHE (the tyke) thinks about all this and whether it seems good or bad. On the other hand, why not just try convincing the little girl she is a VICTIM? That would be more in line with the program, no?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Agree
Posted by: R.I.P. on Aug 22, 2007 6:03 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a pathetic parent...... I can't add anything to what has already been said. I believe it was Mark Twain who noted: "common sense isn't common ".
As sad as it is to read this tripe first thing in the morning it's sadder yet to see it in action everywhere I go.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh my!
Posted by: Jimbo33 on Aug 22, 2007 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First Iraq and Katrina and now this gigantic problem.
Americans just have no time to rest.;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Is It Any Wonder?
Posted by: fleurette on Aug 22, 2007 6:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've noticed these Bratz dolls; I realize what they politically represent, etc. But something is extraordinarily bizarre, even psychopathological, about a FIVE YEAR OLD idealizing these dolls. How does it get to this point? First of all, you have these magazines that portray Lindsay Lohan, a celebrity and nothing else, with the seriousness and import of Meryl Streep, an trained actress with talent, you have the answer right there. You have these magazines like, hmmmm.....let's sayy-y-y... ENTERTAINMENT WEEKLY.... that pays its editors six-figure salaries for sitting around all day for deciding which ho-in' picture of Angelina Jolie to put in magazine this week. Is it any wonder the kid totally picks up on the hypocrisy and the message is this: Don't idolize the vapid ho's of the world, my daughter; but if you do, I'll put you on next week's cover!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Is It Any Wonder? Posted by: realmuzik
» RE: Is It Any Wonder? Posted by: fleurette
Barbie may be no.1, however.......
Posted by: eosrk on Aug 22, 2007 7:31 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barbie was born out of a dark beginning during WWll from the Nazis.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Bye Bye Barbie": How my girls' obsession with Barbie came to the inevitable conclusion....
Posted by: fearless flower on Aug 22, 2007 7:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prior to a Halloween not long ago, my three young teen girls asked to go to the Salvation Army thrift store to buy some used Barbie dolls. Now, I did allow them to have Barbies when they were littler, although I did set limits on many other things. Sometimes you have to pick your battles and this was one I decided not to fight.

Halloween night they told me their plan: they wanted to strap little firecrackers to the dolls and blow them to bits. Secretly I was delighted with the idea, and I asked them why they wanted to do it. "Gee, Mom!" They said, "Don't you just HATE Barbie? Doesn't she make you feel so inferior?"

Maybe it is a little violent, but isn't this a much healthier response to the pressures of being physically perfect than, say, developing an eating disorder or cutting oneself? If I'm a bad mother for letting them do it this way, then I plead "guilty!" I'm proud of my girls who are not afraid to be themselves and create healthier trends.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lacks interests
Posted by: MDickson on Aug 22, 2007 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author needs to fine some real interests in her life so she won´t have so much time to fret about dolls.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You mean Btanz dolls haven't been recalled yet?
Posted by: g on Aug 22, 2007 7:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I bet they are made in China, like the rest of this trash. And I agree with previous posters: I thought parents had some control with what a 5 years old plays with. I know my brother does, and I know my parents did. I had one Barbie doll and had to make clothes for her myself. I read a lot of stories, so that's what she would re-enact, non someone else's consumerist fable. And I did not have a Ken. My Barbie didn't need one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hyper-barbie
Posted by: Ghoulman on Aug 22, 2007 7:54 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True story... was shopping for a gift at the Mall for my niece. Two little girls were looking at the row of Bratz dolls...

Girl one: They're weird.
Girl two: They're hyper-Barbies!
Girls: giggle, giggle.

I nearly giggled myself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mirror, mirror, on the wall...
Posted by: Sojourner on Aug 22, 2007 8:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...who is the fairest of them all?

Do you suppose it's good for future population trends that our daughters stop playing with baby dolls and instead play with projections of their adult ambitions? After all, they could be playing with exact replicas of AK-47s like their male friends do, preparing for future Abu Ghraibs.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We should ban advertising to children
Posted by: Cruella on Aug 22, 2007 8:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not that is would totally solve the problems you mention but it would go some way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Redress those little dolls in reality: Posted by: thoughtcriminal
To the author
Posted by: jaby on Aug 22, 2007 10:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You can take comfort in the fact, every time you lament these hideous dolls, that you are really just the mother and therefore have no control over what your five year old daughter has, doesn't have, sees in advertising and on tv and doesn't. Control the environment and media consumption of a five year old? I mean, seriously, parenting is hard enough anyway without having to limit the amount of TV your child watches or informing friends and family what toys you consider appropriate for your kindergartener.

You are the mother! If you don't approve of these dolls, you need to take them away! You need to inform others what you consider to be appropriate presents! You need to limit the TV and computer time of your daughter! Give the girl a book, a bracelet making set, a painting book, some clay, enroll her in the brownies, anything! Good god, you act like she is completley beyond your control. She's five! She weighs, what, 40 pounds? 4 feet tall? And you have already lost control of her? She'll be in rehab before she's 16 at this rate. I can here it now...Mommy, you know, cocaine is just so much cooler than calculus.

Please, no more kids for you. You are a bad mother. You along with all the other bad parents in this country need to stop procreating. You are the problem you see. The overly-permissive hand-wringing do-nothing parents who sit silently by and watch their kids being brainwashed while they sit by and lament because their child is the one calling all he shots (she's five!!!!!).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: To the author Posted by: room34
» RE: To the author Posted by: jaby
» RE: To the author Posted by: fleurette
» RE: To the author Posted by: VannaLaRoche
You're the one that bought 'em, Lady!
Posted by: lynmarenjensen on Aug 22, 2007 11:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you don't like the dolls for your five-year-old, then don't buy them. Yeah, you'll have to put up with a tantrum or two, maybe, but next week the kid'll be embracing a new fad. If the market doesn't respond, the manufacturers market something else. Fair enough?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah Bush and co is not the problem-
Posted by: WitchyNy on Aug 22, 2007 1:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IT'S THE BABBIE DOLLS FAULT!

What we need IS a good WITCHY BARBIE! Complete with magic broom-wave it and Bush explodes!

As far as raising kids goes-mine could play with what ever the hell they wanted-toy guns, violent video games, whatever-

As SOON as they had finished reading their Karl Marx and Labor Union History for the day-I an NOT kidding.

What we need-are street-smart tough truly educated children-who can handle whatever they happen to see on TV or corporate brainwashing they come across-

It is not the damn toys-it is what they are NOT learning in the schools-and at home-PARENTS.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

playing with dolls
Posted by: bluebirdella on Aug 22, 2007 1:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Most dolls for girls these days are "trashy," and come with "slutty" clothing. The manufacturers sexualize little girls - these dolls teach kids to focus on body image in an unhealthy way. There are other options, however, like "Get Real Girls," "Groovy Girls," child dolls made by Corolle, Yu Sai Wa Wa Chinese lady dolls, etc. but A) they don't have the marketing behind them - they don't appear in movies, they don't saturate the television advertising environment during cartoon hours, and B) they don't have extensive wardrobes that make playing with dolls fun. The fun part of playing with dolls is getting to experiment with the idea of being someone else. Who among us hasn't fantasized about being rich or famous in some way (being a princess)? These dolls are symptomatic of consumer culture and perpetuate a climate of female objectification. It would be nice if the most popular dolls didn't carry the all-powerful message that you are what you look like, or glitz and glamour are more important than skills, social values, or a personal identity, but I think the point of these dolls it to brainwash today's children into accepting consumerism and fostering the kind of insecurity that will lead them into buying clothes and makeup, hair care products, cosmetic surgery, etc - in the same way that traditional boys' toys brainwash them into wanting to become soldiers. Who does the message serve? I believe there are real gender differences that come with inborn traits - such as, in the case of girls, the desire to groom and dress a doll - there's nothing wrong with that, but with how the expression of that desire is encouraged has an impact. That being said, your values as a parent and human being are more important, as is the way you choose to live your life, the example you set for your child.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rcpi
Posted by: rcpi on Aug 22, 2007 4:25 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I am so relieved a public discourse has started regarding these dolls. When I first saw the adds for these dolls several years ago my first thought was, "rise and fall of the U.S..."
Since "personal opinions" make up the motivations behind following a "trend" or rebuking it, the sucess of these dolls scares me. Their appeal is purely liciveous and their makers KNOW this - hence their business model. Sexual appeal is fine in the proper context; however, selling it using dolls to small children borders on abuse.
The importance of dolls to influence reflections of 'self image' cannot be refuted. Think for a moment on the creation of talismans, and statues, and the tributes civilizations have created for the last 15,000 years. Like the Easter Island sentinels, our civilization may only be remembered by a layer of BRatz in the rubble.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bratz make me sick
Posted by: cryptpyrc on Aug 22, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a man I find these cutesy bratz really ugly and unattractive. If that's how our young ladies turn out to be I'm looking at a long single life.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mike Males
Posted by: mmales on Aug 23, 2007 2:27 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I thank all of you for your comments, but I think it's time to face reality. First, today's girls (and boys) are the healthiest generation ever, with manifestly lower rates of suicide, drug abuse, rape, serious crime, depression, fear, and other ills by the best measures we have. They volunteer more, vote progressive more, succeed in school and college far more--especialy young women--and express more optimism about the future than ever. If these comments strike you as impossible to believe, email me at mmales@earthlink.net and I'll send you the references. The youth who are suffering are not those who see some doll or TV ad or MySpace insult, but those in grinding poverty, with violent homes and messed-up adults around them, issues progressives USED to talk about. Finally, you want to know who is "teaching" our kids to value superficial beauty? Stop blaming "pop culture" and models and dolls and start looking at the 8 million adults ages 35-64 (the moms and dads) who got medically unnecessary cosmetic procedures in 2005 (a number that is skyrocketing), versus just 175,000 teens (a number that is plummeting). Maybe we ought to be panicking over Bratz's and Britney's and Barbie's effects on middle-agers--the kids are fine. We have a forum for yuppie frettings over dolls and pop culture: it's called the corporate media. The "alternative media" should be an alternative, not another shallow echo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Mike Males Posted by: PixelFool
old news
Posted by: carbon paradise on Aug 23, 2007 6:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, old news.

How did this writer gloss over the fact that there has been criticism in this tone about this doll SINCE THEIR RELEASE and that her comments are really nothing new. Fantastic oversight.

And the either/or doll war is absurd. Instead of missing Barbie so much, why can't you hope for a more realistic doll for your daughter? Is that so hard to imagine?

Also, why should you love something that just because it's "exotic", just because it's an alternative to the usual eurocentric standard? As an ethnically ambiguous AMERICAN woman, I really resent the term exotic because it makes me feel like an outsider in my own country, like I'm not really an american beauty because I'm not blond...And I know that's not true.

Bottom line: The pornification of the world is a massive problem, but this article offers no solution and just wallows in the muck of it (like everything else on alternet). It is also a little surprising to me that a woman who seems to think of herself a feminist would throw around terms like "hooker" to demean this doll. Last time I checked, hookers were people too, most of whom have a very hard life and shouldn't be vilified in the manner done here.

Honestly, Alternet, why can't you post any thing that isn't so overwhelmingly trite when it comes to feminism?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

thank you!
Posted by: beelzeblob on Aug 23, 2007 5:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to the author: thank you for this article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's All True
Posted by: voicecoil on Aug 24, 2007 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It used to be that the context changed with each generation. Now they've realized there's no need to wait that long, so the context keeps shifting continuously. All the better to keep consumers, especially 5-year-old consumers, constantly NEEDING the new thing. When we were kids, Barbie struck out in bold relief, with her rocket-tits and blatant materialism. Now we look back on her with fondness (almost) when compared to this Bratz ho-posse. At least Barbie got jobs. Apparently, she got fired a lot, since she had to keep getting new ones. And we could only guess how she got the gigs, with little or no background and competing against a field of highly qualified (and dumpy-looking) applicants. No matter. These Bratz things are something else. I know; my daughters have them. There's no stopping once you get on the slippery slope. They don't merely have accessories, they have bling. Hot tubs. Limos. Diamonds. Ah, excuse me, but exactly how does an adolescent girl acquire these items? Don't hand me that stuff about making money by taking "fashion photographs." Any of you parents want to send your daughters straight into the meat grinder, just send them out after (during) high school and tell them they can make money just like the Bratz. Give me a break, these little dolls are blowing somebody. Somebody with tons of cash, who likes 'em young. Maybe a rapper, maybe a congressman, who cares. They're living the dream, right?

The real deal is that Bratz are an important link in the process of programming our kids to be greedy, unfulfilled consumers. We like to think that we teach them to aim high, to believe that they can have it all. Still, we hate to mention the part about compromising yourself on every level, from your integrity to your orifices. We're Americans! We don't want to see the sausage being made, we don't want to know how the Nikes got here, and we don' t want to compromise our needs. The Bratz dolls are another chapter in the myth of the American Birthright... the idea that God has bestowed (or is about to get around to it any time now) great abundance and comfort upon us... and it isn't up to us to wonder why. Anyone who doesn't enjoy our gifts... well that's between them and God.

To those of us who hate Bratz, relax. They'll be gone soon, replaced by something worse and more crass. Each fresh crop of 5-year-olds and especially their parents are less able to see the irony. Meanwhile, we become cranky old farts, soon to have all we can handle just staying alive.

Cheers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's All True Posted by: jennr11
Prude versus Rational
Posted by: PixelFool on Aug 26, 2007 4:30 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't worry, I'm only 24 and I already feel that way. It's not that we grew up and don't understand any longer. I remember when I was young the kind of music I listened to (Janet Jackson constantly talking about sex) and the way we dressed (attempting to look like R&B idols with our little bellies showing). No, we didn't notice what it all meant. And we turned out fine.

On the other hand, the disturbing part is that with the new materialism today aimed so much at children and teens, those little belly outfits I used to wear are now verging on disturbingly sexy on the young'uns. The situation is that the stakes are getting higher, the quality is getting higher, and frankly the kids today are doing a much better job at looking slutty than my friends and I ever did. They have the resources.

Hence. Bratz. You are not alone! And you are certainly not too old to understand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

New doll promotes indiviuality and kids being kids....
Posted by: jennr11 on Sep 13, 2007 1:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Theres a new doll in town ...check this one out MOMS!!!!

WWW.thisismedolls.com


T.I.M.™ Values

We believe in innocence. That children have the right to be themselves, and not feel pressured to succumb to false images of beauty. To feel comfortable in their own skin and learn to love the person they are and will continue to become. We value self-confidence and dedicate ourselves to creating a world where a little girl or young woman can embrace her individuality.

T.I.M™ is different because she has heart. She’s fashionable and stylish, yes, but she has substance. She’s not shallow or mean spirited. She’s not perfect, but she’s not a brat. She’s her own unique individual free spirit – much like the children who will play with and love her. She has dreams and goals and the motivation to go for it. Its time for kids to get real…and T.I.M.™ answers that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]