Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Toxic Toys, Deadly Dog Food and Other Wonders of "Free Trade"

By Todd Tucker, Eyes on Trade. Posted August 21, 2007.


Mattel says its supply chain just has a few bad apples. Where have we heard that before?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Todd Tucker

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

The Times had this gem this morning:

Separately, laboratory tests have found that some Chinese-made vinyl baby bibs sold at Toys "R" Us stores appear to be contaminated with lead.

Industry analysts said Mattel's woes are part of a much larger problem.

"If I went down the shelves of Wal-Mart and tested everything, I'm going to find serious problems," said Sean McGowan, managing director and the toy analyst at Wedbush Morgan Securities. "The idea that Mattel -- with its high standards -- has a bigger problem than everybody else is laughable. If we don't see an increase of recalls in this industry, then it's a case of denial."

Even Mattel executives said repeatedlyyesterday that the company may have more recalls.

"No system is perfect," Robert A. Eckert, Mattel's chairman and chief executive, said in a conference call. "There's no guarantee that we will not be here again."

Wow. Before yesterday, these mega corporations were saying, oh, it's just a few bad apples caught up in the supply chain. (Kinda like Enron… remember that?) Now, we have the mega-corps admitting that - no, actually it's part of the design of the system.

System?! You mean it's not just a few bad apples? How could such a "system" have ever been devised? Did anyone ever vote on this "system", because I can't imagine it would be popular among anyone that, well, eats or consumes. Oh, that's right - thanks Billy, Joey, Chrissy, Johnny, Sammy, Freddy, and Johnny, also known as the boy band of former and perhaps future presidents. (They unfortunately lack many of the redeeming qualities of those other boyz' bands.)

For an excellent read into what a stupid (in the dictionary definition of the term) SYSTEM we have now, please check out Barry Lynn's piece in Harpers on the madness of mega-corporations' unregulated, global sourcing strategies.

Look closely at today's global production system and you will see shockingly high degrees of specialization, in terms of both geography and ownership. More and more activities take place in only one or a few places on earth, and within one or a few companies. This is especially true in electronics: Taiwan produces more than half of the world's vital customized chips. But it is also ever more true of heavy industries, like automobile manufacturing, even of agriculture and food processing. One of the crowning conceptions of the Enlightenment has been achieved, yet economists appear entirely unwilling to recognize the fact, let alone begin the task of examining how this revolutionary event might alter the purposes and pathways of their work.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: trade, mattel

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
writer
Posted by: writer on Aug 23, 2007 8:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you so much for writing this important article. I think all countries, organizations, corporations and agencies should be accountable for the consequences that their toxic products have on humans and the environment. I think toxic products should be immediately remove from the marketplace – or at least accurately labeled so consumers are notified of their potential for harm. That way each of us can decide if we want to purchase and consume the toxic/unsafe product for ourselves and our family.

Regarding lead in toys from China… Shouldn’t it be critical to immediately remove ALL toxic goods and services used by children from the market? Not just toys? Regardless of their country of origin? Even goods and services that produce billions annually and are produced in the US - such as mercury fillings, mandated vaccines that contain mercury (thimeserol) and other harmful substances?

Did you know that some vaccines being used on American children STILL contain mercury – a known neurotoxin? Do you know how hard it is for the human body to rid itself of mercury – regardless of the persons age? (hence the term ‘heavy metal’)

You may want to review this site for accurate vaccine information - http://www.909shot.com/Default.htm

This one provides a video on how mercury causes brain neuron degeneration - http://movies.commons.ucalgary.ca/mercury/

Did you know that mercury (even at low levels) is much more toxic than lead? The human body does not discriminate – it hates all toxins regardless of their packaging or supplier.

Why do tobacco and alcohol products have to be labeled with their potential for health risks yet many products that contain heavy metals do not?

Can you provide news coverage on where parents can purchase safe and effective diagnostic tools and treatments plans from practioners who know how to help those suffering from toxic exposure - especially kids? Hint- it's not from those who use heavy metals in their goods and services.

Hopefully this information will help parents avoid having their child misdiagnosed as having a behavioral problem when the source of their health problem may be heavy metal toxicity?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]